Evolution of a D1 Claim
I have been given permission to use a colleague's claim for Associate Fellowship to illustrate the development and evolution of a D1 submission. For each stage in the drafting process I have provided my written feedback and the supporting video feedback.
Use the feedback form provided here to assess for yourself whether you think the applicant aligns to the D1 criterion.
D1 - ASSOCIATE FELLOW GRID [D1] [FEEDBACK].docxDraft 1
Have a look through the 1st draft and think about the feedback you would provide to this applicant. Compare your notes to my own written feedback I have provided.
EXEMPLAR (CH) - 1ST DRAFT.pdf1st Draft
EXEMPLAR (CH) - 1ST DRAFT FEEDBACK.pdf1st Draft Feedback
On this occasion I only provided written feedback as we did not have Panopto in place.
Draft 2
So the applicant is getting very close now! Look at this second draft and think about what feedback you would be providing. Would you let the applicant submit this draft to be considered by an awards panel?
EXEMPLAR (CH) - 2ND DRAFT.pdf2nd Draft
EXEMPLAR (CH) - 2ND DRAFT FEEDBACK.pdf2nd Draft Feedback
2nd Draft Video Feedback
Final Submission
5. EXEMPLAR (CH) - SUBMISSION.pdfSo finally we have the applicant's final submission that was presented for consideration. Look at this draft and assess it against the criterion for D1.
Do you think this applicant's claim has met the required standard allowing you to confer Associate Fellowship? Once you have an answer - email me with your final decision (andy.clegg@port.ac.uk) and I will send you back details of the result.