The task of the assignment was to create an essay revolving around the identity and status of the analysis of the Richard Crafts Case. Richard Craft’s urge to assassinate his wife was led by motives of severance and morbidness. Richard Crafts was described as someone whose actions vividly signify how much of a deranged, dishonest husband he might've been. Dr. Henry Lee, also known as the Director of Connecticut’s Forensic Science Laboratory, was summoned from a case of a Danish-born flight stewardess’s unexplained disappearance which was commonly thought of from the actions of her spouse.

They were able to find physical substantiations that corresponded to a scene, a place where an incident occurred in real life. This murder case could have been considered both unusual and significant due to its composition.

Glow: I did well on trying my best and being honest as much as possible. I addressed the prompt the best I can, explain how it contributes to what I resonated. I am proud of my work because of the effort I put into this essay.

The task of the assignment was to (in a few sentences) give an overall goal of this lab. This meant that I was asked to explain what I was trying to synthesize or test. This came along with experimental considerations, results, and a conclusion.

Grow: I could work on my comprehension skills. My findings indicated that I'll probably suck as a detective. I judged a book by its cover (Tim Burr) and I made a mistake. But it's ok in this case, that's the point of trying I guess. If I could do anything differently it would be to spend more time analyzing and comprehending what each suspect/witness says. That way, I will have a better understanding of what goes on in another’s story.