Ceasefire, Truce: 

Peace Treaty: 

UN Peacekeepers: 

Other Peacekeeping operations

Soldiers in Azerbaijan meeting with Russian Peacekeeping forces

"Moving on" in this case does not mean simply forgetting a conflict, or just putting it in the past. Moving on means dealing with the leftovers. Think about Galtung's conflict triangle. If a conflict has concluded, then maybe the manifest stuff, like conflict behaviors, are gone. But there are still attitudes that need to be addressed, and the root contradictions of a conflict may not have been settled yet. 

"Forgive and forget" is a recipe for disaster. In some cases, forgiveness may be helpful. Forgetting almost never is.

The reason why forgetting isn't helpful is because a peacebuilding process requires a certain amount of accountability. Dealing with a conflict and moving forward requires being clear about what happened and why, and who was involved (and to what extent.) 

The Rwandan genocide only lasted for a short time in 1994, but its effects can still be felt today. It was one of the most horrific representations of ethnic conflict in the 20th century. In the decades since, the government and other actors have tried a number of strategies to heal the wounds of the past and create a lasting peace.

For one thing, there has been a renewed emphasis on national identity, rather than identification with a specific tribe or ethnic group. The Hutu / Tutsi divide still exists today, but young people are more likely to describe themselves as Rwandan. 

Rwanda has encouraged victims to share their stories, so the memory of the conflict does not fade; they are open about the harm and hurt that happened. Similarly, perpetrators of violence talk plainly and openly about what they did and why, so that people can understand how regular people can be led into committing such horrific acts. 

A lot of Rwanda's process happens at a local level, rather than being carried out through a centralized effort. Part of the peacebuilding process has seen citizens talk about and plan local events and policies together, emphasizing the shared stake that everyone has in the community (victim and perpetrator alike.)

There is some controversy around Rwanda's peacebuilding efforts; former president Paul Kagane, who was the leader of a rebel group at the time of the genocide, had a heavy hand in shaping the reconciliation efforts. He has been criticized as something of an authoritarian at times, so it's sometimes debated whether the emphasis on a Rwandan national identity was more for peacebuilding purposes or his own political goals. Further, the process in Rwanda hasn't always been peaceful. Kagane's rebel group won a military victory in the country, and they killed a lot of the folks who perpetrated the genocide, including in the years after 1994. The real peacebuilding process that we talk about today didn't start until the 1998/1999 and the 2000s, when Kagane's control was undisputed. 

Restorative justice is getting some attention in Taiwan, alongside questions of how to deal with problems of the past, like the White Terror and the treatment of indigenous groups. 

The Tsai administration's apology to indigenous groups represents one step forward, by acknowledging the harm that was done and some acknowledgement of where the fault lies (with the government and its priorities.) It's unclear how more might be done, or if that will happen. 

The White Terror is a bit more tricky; a lot of folks were imprisoned, and we can still see the relics of this period in some aspects of our daily lives. Whether Chiang Kai-Shek Memorial Hall in Taipei should keep its current purpose, what to do with all the other Chiang statues, the public recognition for Chiang Ching-Kuo (who did set Taiwan on the path towards democratization, but who was also the ruthless head of the secret police in the White Terror) are all issues that haven't been resolved. Resolution will be hard due to domestic political differences -- the KMT just tried to sell an NFT of Chiang's sword, so what on earth would need to happen to get them on board with re-purposing his memorial! ?