DP1 Students: IA Engagements!
According to IB: Legitimacy refers to an actor or an action being commonly considered acceptable and provides the basis for all forms of governing and exercising power over others. The most accepted source of legitimacy in a state is some form of democracy or constitution which gives the citizens an opportunity to choose who they wish to exercise power over them. Non-democratic states offer other explanations of their legitimacy. Furthermore, individual actions by a state can be considered more or less legitimate. Other actors of global politics and their actions can also be evaluated from the perspective of legitimacy.
Legitimacy (合法性)
Actor: Here, actor refers to "political actors." A political actor is not a performer, but a participant: anyone involved in a political issue. Countries, organizations, companies, and even something like a terrorist group are all political actors.
Constitution (憲法): A written document that sets up how a country's government operates. Taiwan and the U.S. are both constitutional republics (立憲共和國)
Other actors: Again, anyone or anything involved in a political issue (local, national, or global) is a political actor. YOU can be a political actor.
Keep in mind: a lot of Legitimacy is about perception. How you are seen or perceived can be more significant than the reality of a situation. (e.g. when a person is considered "smart," it is easy to overlook when they do stupid things.)
Consider the following...
What made American actions in Afghanistan illegitimate?
Internationally, why was the U.S. criticized for its involvement in Afghanistan?
This is a BBC news report from August 31st, 2021 - the final day of American military presence in Afghanistan.
What does this tell you about how some people within Afghanistan saw the U.S. military? Did they view their presence as legitimate?
The above is an opinion or commentary article. It does not reflect a reporter's work and does not represent the point of view of the newspaper it is printed in. This is not an easy read, but it has some important ideas.
Consider...
What made people in Afghanistan less trustful of the U.S.?
What kind of mistakes did U.S. soldiers and other Americans make when interacting with people in the country?
The Global Times is a Chinese state-run news source. It represents the Chinese government view of events (there are versions published in Chinese and English. This is an English-languge cartoon.)
What message is the Chinese government sending through this cartoon?
Cartoon from a California Newspaper.
I think you can figure this one out.
From some Americans' point of view, was spending 20 years in Afghanistan worth it?
Last one... this is a bit "on the nose."
It is critical of President Biden's decision to leave Afghanistan, but uses his own explanation to help make the point. (Biden, in real life, did not say "corrupt and unaccountable regime.")
What does this say about both American and Afghan perceptions of the Afghan government (pre-Taliban takeover)?