Language/Communication
Second Language Needs
Results of TELPAS evaluations
LPAC Committee reports
Instructional supports provided to address second language acquisition
Fluency/voice Evaluation Review
Language Evaluation Review
Articulation Evaluation Review
Mode of Communication
Example Verbiage:
After reviewing the data the committee is requesting: Formal Speech assessment; Updated parent teacher information
Health/Medical
Address medical Issues changes
Current medications
Summary of previous medical evaluations
Previous and current vision and hearing screenings
Fine and Gross Motor
Related Services (if appropriate)
Example Verbiage:
After reviewing the data the committee is requesting: Vision/Hearing Screening; Updated OHI information provided by physician, Updated medical records, Informal data provided by the parent
Sociological Information
Any significant changes in the student’s environment or attendance over previous three years.
Example Verbiage:
After reviewing the data the committee is requesting: Informal data provided by the parent and teachers
Intelligence/Cognitive
Review results of last assessment
Review areas of concern
Review progress
Example Verbiage:
After reviewing the data the committee is requesting: Formal cognitive assessment; Updated informal data provided by the parent and teachers; Full dyslexia profile
Adaptive Behavior
Previous results
Previous areas of concern
Progress
Example Verbiage:
After reviewing the data the committee is requesting: Formal adaptive behavior rating; Updated parent/teacher information
Academic Achievement
Previous achievement assessment results
Curriculum based assessments
Progress monitoring data on goals
Example Verbiage:
After reviewing the data the committee is requesting: Formal achievement data; Full dyslexia profile, Updated parent/teacher data
Assistive Technology
Related service evaluation reports
Learning Media Assessment
Functional Vision Evaluation
Progress reports
Example Verbiage:
After reviewing the data the committee is requesting: Updated parent/teacher data; Formal AT evaluation
Emotional/Behavioral
Behavior (adequate or problematic)
Describe targeted behaviors in previous FBAs (if applicable)
Describe progress on BIP (if applicable)
Indicate whether or not the student’s current behavior warrants further evaluation (FBA or Comprehensive Evaluation)
Example Verbiage:
After reviewing the data the committee is requesting: Functional Behavior Assessment; Formal evaluation for suspicion of Emotional Disturbance/ADHD; Updated informal parent/teacher data
The verbiage shall include:
Further Evaluation Needed: Yes.
Specify: All areas of suspected disability will be assessed including any need for related services.
Why?
If, throughout the course of the evaluation, the data determines and additional evaluator is needed (LSSP, SLP, etc), we are able to do so. However, the initial evaluator must contact the parent to let them know further testing is being conducted. This parental contact must be documented.
At least 2 FIEs have been completed in which the student has consistent results.
Eligibility of the student is not in question.
Additional disabilities or areas of need are not suspected.
Sufficient data exists to develop an appropriate IEP.
For elementary students. Exceptions may be more significantly/profoundly impaired students who have been identified ta very early age. Contact all of the evaluation personnel involved to discuss these cases.
If ANY formal evaluation is requested. If additional disabilities are suspected or additional data in any area is needed, then an evaluation needs to be completed.
If dismissal from special education is being considered.
*If there is an extenuating circumstance, contact the SpEd Department for review.*
You are building a case to continue a student's eligibility. Use all available information for the student. Sources include, but are not limited to the following:
PLAAFP data
Previous evaluations
Progress on goals
STAAR results
District assessments
Report card grades
Teacher information
Parent information
Student information
Attendance records
Discipline records
Vision/Hearing screening
The REED must be completed in the ARD on or before the FIE due date. When scheduling the ARD, keep in mind that the parent/adult student may not agree to have the REED stand as the FIE. The ARD should be scheduled on a date far enough in advance of the FIE due date that would allow you to complete testing if the parent requests formal assessment.
No new Disability report is required with a REED as FIE.
The REED is not intended to include formal names of specific tests.
The REED should consider if formal assessment is needed in all areas.
In many cases, if two formal evaluations have been completed concerning a student, additional formal evaluation is not deemed necessary.
Additional evaluation should be considered for all 10th, 11th, and 12th grade students to develop a current Summary of Performance prior to graduation.
A REED must be conducted if additional evaluation such as related services is deemed appropriate.
A review of existing evaluation data (REED) is the process of looking at a student’s existing data to determine if additional data are needed as part of an initial evaluation (if appropriate) or as part of a reevaluation. Specifically, the group conducting the REED must determine whether further assessments are required to determine:
Whether the student has or continues to have a disability;
Whether the student's present levels of academic achievement needs and related developmental needs have changed;
Whether the student needs or continues to need special education and related services; and
Whether the student needs any additions or modification to the special education and related services to meet the measurable annual goals set out in the individualized education program (IEP) and to participate, as appropriate, in the general education curriculum.
The local education agency (LEA) must ensure that a reevaluation of each student with a disability is conducted when:
The LEA determines the student’s educational or related services needs, including improved academic achievement and functional performance, warrant a reevaluation;
The student’s parent or teacher requests a reevaluation; or
The admission, review and dismissal (ARD) committee is determining that the student is no longer a student with a disability.
A reevaluation may not occur more than once a year unless the parent and the LEA agree otherwise and must occur at least once every three years unless the parent and the LEA agree that a reevaluation is unnecessary.
A REED is conducted by an ARD committee (which must include the parent or the adult student, an administrator, a general education teacher of the student, a special education teacher of the student, assessment personnel) and other members with knowledge of the student, as appropriate.
No. A REED may be conducted without holding an ARD committee meeting. It is common practice, however, for REEDs to be conducted as part of an ARD committee meeting. This enables the group to review the information together and to document the determinations made by the participants. Note- when completing a REED as an FIE, it must be reviewed by the ARDC.
No. The LEA is not required to obtain parental consent before reviewing existing data as part of an initial evaluation or a reevaluation.
A review of the student's existing evaluation data must include the following information:
The student's evaluations, including independent evaluation conducted by outside agencies, and information provided by the student’s parents or the adult student;
The student's current classroom-based, local, or state assessments, classroom-based observations, curriculum-based measurements (CBMs), criterion-referenced assessments, State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness (STAAR), report cards, discipline reports, attendance records, medical and health records, the most recent full and individual evaluation (FIE), and any other pertinent information; and
The teacher's and related service provider's observations of the student.
No additional data are needed.
If the group conducting a REED determines that no additional data are needed, the LEA must notify the student’s parent or the adult student of:
The groups determination and the reasons for the determination and
The right to request an evaluation to determine whether the student continues to have a disability and to determine the student’s educational needs.
If the parent or the adult student does not request additional evaluation, the LEA is not required to conduct further evaluation, and the REED may constitute the student’s three-year reevaluation. The date of the REED establishes the new three-year reevaluation date.
If the group conducting a REED determines that additional data are needed, the LEA must:
Provide the parent or the adult student with prior written notice that describes any assessments that it proposes to conduct;
Obtain consent from the parent or the adult student before conducting any additional assessments (except that an LEA need not obtain consent to conduct a reevaluation if it can demonstrate that it made reasonable efforts to obtain consent); and
Administer the assessments and evaluation measures needed to produce the necessary data on or before the three-year reevaluation due date. The date the reevaluation is completed establishes the new three-year reevaluation due date.
No. Nothing in statute, rule, or regulations allows a district and parent to agree to extend the three-year deadline for a reevaluation. A student must be reevaluated at least once every three years unless the parent and district agree that a reevaluation is not needed. As noted in question 7, when no additional data is needed the Reed constitutes the reevaluation.
No. There is not a specified timeline in state or federal regulation when it comes to reviewing the reevaluation. Therefore, the decision as to when an ARD committee comes together to review the reevaluation and make any updates or changes to the IEP is a local one. The LEA needs to consider the reason(s) for the reevaluation and the impact and relevance of the information obtained to the student's IEP to schedule a timely review.
Based on information from Jyutika Mehta, R10 SLP, short answer is yes!