Ko ia kāhore nei i rapu, tē kitea
He who does not seek will not find
This is a justification where you explain how and why your proposal addresses the chosen topic, area, issue, or problem and the big/key question, that you have explored and researched.
To Achieve you need to:
report on the findings of the research in relation to the inquiry question(s) and proposed digital technologies outcome.
For Merit you need to:
discuss the possible future opportunities relating to the inquiry focus and explaining the possible impacts of these opportunities .
evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of the proposed digital technologies outcome.
For Excellence you need to:
consider possible issues relating to the proposed outcome and suggesting areas for improvement, extension, and/or follow-up
critique the accuracy, relevance, reliability, and/or significance of the findings.
The final step is evaluating your findings and making deeper connections between research, impact, and proposed DT outcome.
~ INTRO ~
Part 1: Restate your inquiry focus and question(s) in a simple and clear way.
What topic/area are you looking into?
What was your big / key question?
Is there an issue or problem are you trying to solve?
Why are the above important?
What were the main questions that informed your research direction?
~ BODY ~
Where relevant use specific evidence from your research to back up your points, and in brackets state your source by naming the website, article, person etc
Part 2: Summarise the findings - key insights from your research.
What did you learn about the topic, area, issue, or problem you are addressing? Why is it significant?
What were the three main areas of importance you identified in your analysis? How do you know they are important (e.g. research data, expert opinions, user feedback)?
Who are the end users? What are their specific needs? Consider both majority users (the typical audience) and extreme users (those with unique needs who may still influence design decisions)
Are there similar digital solutions already available? What their strengths and weaknesses?
Part 3: Discuss the future opportunities (Merit)
Identifying advancements in technology that could enhance the proposed DT outcome (e.g., emerging AI models, new programming languages, or hardware improvements).
Exploring potential industry applications or how businesses/organisations could adopt and scale the solution.
Discussing ethical, societal, or economic impacts - both positive and negative.
Considering future iterations or add-ons that could make the outcome more robust.
Part 4: Evaluating strengths & weaknesses - (Merit)
Highlighting strengths, such as efficiency, user-friendliness, innovation, or how well the proposed DT outcome meets the original problem.
Identifying weaknesses, such as technical limitations, scalability issues, cost, or user accessibility.
Comparing the solution to existing alternatives, explaining where it excels or falls short.
Talking to an expert about the proposed DT outcome and using feedback to support the evaluation.
Part 5: Possible issues & areas for improvement - (Excellence)
Discuss security, ethical, or privacy concerns.
Consider legal or compliance requirements.
Identify usability concerns.
Suggest enhancements such as new features, improved UI/UX, or optimization for different platforms
Propose follow-up actions, such as further research, prototype testing, or user feedback cycles.
Part 6: Critiquing the Findings - (Excellence)
Evaluate sources—Are they credible? Is the data up-to-date?
Identify any biases in the research overall and discuss how that may affect conclusions.
Did you have multiple perspectives to ensure a balanced approach?
Assess whether the research findings are generalisable or only relevant to a specific case study.
Reflect on whether the findings align with real-world applications.
~ CONCLUSION ~
A strong conclusion should summarise key points, reinforce your argument, and leave a final impression on the reader.
Here are some key pointers to help you structure an effective conclusion:
1. Restate the Main Purpose
Briefly restate your inquiry focus, your big/key question and the issue/problem you addressed.
Remind the reader why your proposed digital technologies outcome is important and should be created.
2. Summarise Key Justifications
Highlight the most important research findings that influenced your decisions.
Reinforce how your proposed DT outcome directly responds to these findings.
Avoid introducing new information - stick to the core takeaways from your justification.
3. Reflect on the Effectiveness of Your Proposed DT Outcome
Briefly evaluate how well your proposed DT outcome meets the needs identified in your research.
Mention any limitations or areas for improvement if relevant.
4. End with a Strong Final Statement
Finish with a confident closing statement that reinforces the value of your proposed outcome.
This could be a future impact statement, a call to action, or a reflection on its potential success.