Sources

References

Canadian Education Association. What did you do in school today? infographic. Retrieved on November 25, 2013 from: http://www.cea-ace.ca/publication/what-did-you-do-school-today-infographic

Childers, G. & Weeks, R. 2005. Mixing block and traditional scheduling. Education Digest. Retrieved November 15, 2013 from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ741160

Coalition of Essential Schools. 2013. The CES common principles. Retrieved from http://www.essentialschools.org/items/4

Cobb, R. Abate, S. & Baker, D. 1999. Effects on students of a 4X4 junior high school block scheduling program. Education Policy and Analysis Archives. Retrieved November 18, 2013, http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/538.

Finlay, K., & National Center for School Engagement. 2006. Quantifying school engagement: Research report. Retrieved November 15, 2013 fromhttp://www.schoolengagement.org/TruancypreventionRegistry/Admin/Resources/Resources/111.pdf

GCSE’s, The official student guide to the system. 2013. Retrieved on November 20, 2013 from www.ofqual.gov.uk/files/GCSE_Guide.pdf‎

Hackmann, Donald G; Schmitt, Donna M. 1997. Strategies for teaching in a block-of-time schedule. NASSP Bulletin v81n588.

Hamdy, M., & Urich, T. 1998. Perceptions of teachers in south Florida toward block

scheduling. NASSP Bulletin v82 n596.

Heath, C., & Heath, D. (2010). Switch: How to Change Things When Change is Hard. New York: Broadway Books.

Heuristic. (2007). The Story of the General Certificate of Education. Retrieved from http://web.archive.org/web/20071220003820/http://www.qca.org.uk/qca_6210.aspx

Jones, R. 2008. Strengthening student engagement. International Center for Leadership in Education.

Kienholz, K., Segall, N., & Yellin, D. 2003. The block: implications for secondary teachers. Kappa Delta Pi Record. Retrieved on October 15, 2013 from http://hphs.dist113.org/library/Library/alternative_implications_for_teachers.htm

Klem, A.M. and Connell, J.P. (2004). Relationships matter: linking teacher support to

student engagement and achievement. Journal of School Health. Retrieved on November 2, 2013 from http://www.irre.org/publications/relationships-matter-linking-teacher-support-student-engagement-and-achievement

Maltese, A. Dexter, K. Tai, R. and Sadler, P. 2007. Breaking from tradition: unfulfilled promises of block scheduling in science. Science Educator. Vol. 16, No. 1.

Moon, B. 1994. The national curriculum origins, context, and implementation. In Teaching and Learning in the Secondary School, ed. B Moon and A.S. Mayes. London: Routledge.

Ofqual. Retrieved November 20, 2013, from http://www.ofqual.gov.uk

Perry, K. E., and Weinstein, R. S. 1998. The social context of early schooling and

children’s school adjustment. Educational Psychologist.

Quigly, A. 2013. The OFSTED Stockholm Syndrome. Retrieved on December 2, 2013 from:http://www.theguardian.com/teacher-network/teacher-blog/2013/oct/22/school-ofsted-stockholm-syndrome

Rimm-Kaufman, S. 2013. Improving students' relationships with teachers to provide essential supports for learning. Retrieved on December 9, 2013 from http://www.apa.org/education/k12/relationships.aspx

Robbins, P., Gregory, G., & Herndon, L. E. (2000). Thinking inside the block. Corwin

Press: Thousand Oaks, CA.

Saeed, S. and David Zyngier. 2012. How motivation influences student engagement:

a qualitative case study. Journal of Education and Learning, Vol. 1 No. 2.

Symmons, J. and Hagell, A. 2011. Adolescents and the organization of their school time: a review of changes over recent decades in England.