sdj-10157

The Effect of an Audiovisual Distraction Method on 6-10-Years Old Children’s Behavior During Dental Treatment: A Clinical Trial

Przha K. Muhammed* , Arass J. Noori*

* Pedodontics, Orthodontics and Preventive Dentistry Department, College of Dentistry, Sulaimani University, Sulaimani, Iraq.

Submitted: July 4, 2022, Accepted: September 20, 2022, Published: December 1, 2022.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17656/sdj.10157

Objective: Management of uncooperative and anxious children during dental treatment is a major problem in pediatric dentistry. This study was designed to assess the effect of an audiovisual distraction method in minimizing the fear and anxiety of the child patient during dental treatment. 

Methods: A randomized clinical trial with a parallel design was carried out on 40 children aged between 6 and 10 years to ascertain the efficacy of the audiovisual (virtual reality eyeglasses) distraction method in reducing children's dental anxiety during local anesthetic administration. Forty children were randomly divided into two groups; the control group (conventional local anesthesia injection alone) and the study group (conventional local anesthesia injection combined with audio-visual virtual reality eyeglasses). The pain experience and anxiety were assessed using a combination of measures: visual analog scale (child self-report) & visual analog scale (parent report), pulse rate and oxygen saturation SpO2 (physiological), and behavior assessment performed using (Frankl’s behavior rating scale and Houpt’s scale).     

Results: All 40 children completed the study. A highly significant reduction in the child’s anxiety and pain experienced in the audiovisual distraction group was seen as reported by the visual analog scale (p < 0.001) and Houpt scale (p < 0.003). In contrast, pulse rate and spo2 showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups.   

Conclusions: Audiovisual distraction method offers an effective distraction tool for alleviating the pain and unpleasantness that arises while administering local anesthesia in dental treatment.                                                                                     

Keywords: Audiovisual distraction, Children’s anxiety, Behavior guidance.         

Full Article - PDF

References:

1. Klingberg G, Broberg AG. Dental fear/anxiety and dental behavior management problems in children and adolescents: a review of prevalence and concomitant psychological factors. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2007;17(6):391-406.

2. Felemban OM, Alshamrani RM, Aljeddawi DH, Bagher SM. Effect of virtual reality distraction on pain and anxiety during infiltration anesthesia in pediatric patients: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Oral Health. 2021;21(1):1-10.

3. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Behavior guidance for the pediatric dental patient. The Reference Manual of Pediatric Dentistry. Chicago, Ill.: American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. 2021:306-24.

4. Lambert SA. Distraction, imagery, and hypnosis. Techniques for management of children’s pain. J Child Fam Nurs. 1999;2(1):5-15.

5. Klieber C, McCarthy AM. Evaluating instruments for a study on children’s responses to a painful procedure when parents are distraction coaches. J Pediatr Nurs. 2006;21(2):99-107.

6. Peretz B, Gluck GM. Assessing an active distracting technique for local anesthetic injection in pediatric dental patients: repeated deep breathing and blowing out air. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 1999;24(1):5-8.

7. Patel A, Schieble T, Davidson M, Tran MCJ, Schoenberg C, Delphin E, et al. Distraction with a hand-held video game reduces pediatric pre- operative anxiety. Paediatr Anaesth. 2006;16(10):1019-27.

8. Weydert JA, Shapiro DE, Acra SA, Monheim CJ, Chambers AS, Ball TM. Evaluation of guided imagery as treatment for recurrent abdominal pain in children: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Pediatr. 2006;6(1):1-10.

9. Nilsson S, Finnström B, Kokinsky E, Enskär K. The use of Virtual Reality for needle-related procedural pain and distress in children and adolescents in a paediatric oncology unit. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2009;13(2):102-9.

10. Aitken JC, Wilson S, Coury D, Moursi AM. The effect of music distraction on pain, anxiety and behavior in pediatric dental patients. Pediatr Dent. 2002;24(2):114-8.

11. Marwah N, Prabhakar AR, Raju OS. Music distraction - its efficacy in management of anxious pediatric dental patients. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev De. 2005;23(4):168-70.

12. Prabhakar AR, Marwah N, Raju OS. A comparison between audio and audiovisual distraction techniques in managing anxious pediatric dental patients. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2007;25(4):177-82.

13. Lier EJ, Harder J, Oosterman JM, Vries M de, Goor H van. Modulation of tactile perception by Virtual Reality distraction: The role of individual and VR-related factors. PLOS ONE. Public Library of Science. 2018;13(12):1-10.

14. Wismeijer AAJ, Vingerhoets AJJM. The use of virtual reality and audiovisual eyeglass systems as adjunct analgesic techniques: a review of the literature. Ann Behav Med. 2005;30(3):268-78.

15. Alinejhad D, Bahrololoomi Z, Navabazam A, Asayesh MA. Comparison of visual analog scale scores in pain assessment during pulpotomy using different injection materials in children aged 6 to 8 and 8 to 10 years. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018;19(3):313-7.

16. Klimek L, Bergmann K-C, Biedermann T, Bousquet J, Hellings P, Jung K, et al. Visual analogue scales (VAS): Measuring instruments for the documentation of symptoms and therapy monitoring in cases of allergic rhinitis in everyday health care. Allergo J Int. 2017;26(1):16-24.

17. Riba H, Al-Zahrani S, Al-Buqmi N, Al-Jundi A. EC dental science review article a review of behavior evaluation scales in pediatric dentistry and suggested modification to the frankl scale. 2018;18:1-7.

18. Hosey MT, Blinkhorn AS. An evaluation of four methods of assessing the behaviour of anxious child dental patients. Int J Paediatr Dent. 1995;5(2):87-95.

19. Reed KL, Malamed SF, Fonner AM. Local anesthesia part 2: technical considerations. Anesth Prog. 2012;59(3):127-36.

20. McGrath PA. Evaluating a child's pain. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1989;4(4):198-214.

21. Luyk NH, Beck FM, Weaver JM. A visual analogue scale in the assessment of dental anxiety. Anesth Prog. 1988;35(3):121-3.

22. Alshatrat SM, Sabarini JM, Hammouri HM, Al- Bakri IA, Al-Omari WM. Effect of immersive virtual reality on pain in different dental procedures in children: A pilot study. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2022;32(2):264-272.

23. Shim Y-S, Kim A-H, Jeon E-Y, An S-Y. Dental fear & anxiety and dental pain in children and adolescents; a systemic review. J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2015;15(2):53-61.

24. Nuvvula S, Alahari S, Kamatham R, Challa RR. Effect of audiovisual distraction with 3D video glasses on dental anxiety of children experiencing administration of local analgesia: a randomised clinical trial. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2015;16(1):43-50.

25. Ram D, Shapira J, Holan G, Magora F, Cohen S, Davidovich E. Audiovisual video eyeglass distraction during dental treatment in children. Quintessence Int. 2010;41(8):673-9.

26. El-Sharkawi HFA, El-Housseiny AA, Aly AM. Effectiveness of new distraction technique on pain associated with injection of local anesthesia for children. Pediatr Dent. 2012;34(2):e35-38.

27. Liau FL, Kok S-H, Lee J-J, Kuo R-C, Hwang C-R, Yang P-J, et al. Cardiovascular influence of dental anxiety during local anesthesia for tooth extraction. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008;105(1):16-26.

28. Simpson WJ, Ruzicka RL, Thomas NR. Physiologic responses of children to initial dental experience. ASDC J Dent Child. 1974;41(6):465- 70.

29. West GA, Reid KH, Bastawi AE. Autonomic responses to dental procedures in pedodontic patients during a standard restoration session. J Dent Res. 1983;62(6):728-32.

Abstract