sdj-10047

The selection of maxillary anterior teeth width in relation to facial measurements

*Faraidoon Aziz Miran & **Shayda Rasheed Muhamad

*College of Dentistry, University of Sulaimani

**General dental practitioner at Chamchamal medical center, Iraq.

Abstract

Objectives: This clinical study was carried out to determine the relationships between maxillary anterior teeth width [canine arc distance, central incisor width], and certain horizontal facial parameters which include: [(Interzygomatic, inner and outer canthus and interpupillary) distances, and (interalar, mouth and philtrum of upper lip) widths], to be used as a guide to selection of the maxillary anterior teeth width.

Materials and Methods: The facial measurements were taken directly from (60) under-graduate students in age range (19-24) years old by using an electronic digital vernier caliper. While canine arc distance and central incisor width were measured indirectly on the casts made from impressions of the selected subjects using flexible millimeter ruler. The collected data were analyzed and correlated using statistical package SPSS version 20.

Results: The mean value of all the parameters measured were significantly higher in males than female, for male just a significant correlation was found between canine arc distance and mouth width, CARCD =0.994×MW, while for females significant correlation was found between canine arc distance mouth width, inner and outer canthal distance, and interpupillary distance, but the most significance relation was with the mouth width, CARCD=1.036×MW, and central incisor width was significantly correlated with, mouth width, CIW = MW ÷6.15, CIW = MW ×0.16.

Conclusions: This study demonstrated that certain horizontal facial parameters could be used as a guide in maxillary anterior teeth width selection to achieve an optimal esthetic result for each gender.

Keywords: Facial measurement, teeth width, teeth selection, and teeth size.

Full Article - PDF

References:

1. Esan TA, Oziegbe OE, Onapokya HO. Facial approximation: evaluation of dental and facial proportions with height .Afri Heal Scie 2012; 12(1): 63

– 68

2. Ahmad I. Anterior dental aesthetics: dental perspective. Br Dent J2005; 199:135–41.

3. Hoffman W Jr, Bomberg TJ, Hatch RA.Interalar width as a guide in denture tooth selection. J Prosthet Dent 1986;55:219–21.

4. Hassaballa MA. Clinical complete denture prosthodontics. King Saud University, Academic Publishing and Press, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. 2004, pp: 235-256.

5. McArthur DR. Determining approximate size of maxillary anterior artificial teeth when mandibular anterior teeth are present. Part I: size relationship. J Prosthet Dent 1985; 53:216–8.

6. Engelmeier RL. Complete Denture Esthetics. Dent Clin North Am 1996;40:71-84

7. Zarb GA, Bolender CL, CarlssonGE.Boucher’s prosthodontics treatment for edentulous patients.11th ed. St. Louis, MO, Mosby, 1997, pp 231-261

8. NalawadeSS , SagarKS, Renuka L P, Aditi G,

Vishwajeet T K, Kunal A J. Estim-ation of Dental and Facial Proportions Using Height as Criteria. J of InternatOra Health 2014; 6(4):25-28.

9. Galsson GE, Ingerral B, Kocak G. The effect of increasing vertical dimension on the masticatory system in subjects with natural tooth. J Prosthet Dent. 1979; 41: 284-289.

10. Farkas LG, Bryson W, Klotz J. Anthropometry of the face in lateral facial dysplasia. J Cleft Palate. 1979; Jan:41-51.

11. Hatim NA. Relationship between different face forms to tooth form. Iraqi Dent J. 1996; 8: 187-194.

12. Abdul–Hadi L. Relation of facial and tooth measurements. Iraqi Dent J. 1989; 14: 144-155.

13. Mohammed MM. The use of facial measurements in selection of anterior teeth. MSc thesis. College of Dentistry. University of Baghdad. 1990.

14. Rauf FMS. Facial analysis and facial types of the students in Mosul University aged 20–25 years with Class I normal occlusion. Direct method. MSc thesis. College of Dentistry. University of Mosul. 1997.

15. Brodbelt RHW, Walker GF, Nelson N, Seluk LW. Comparison of face shape with tooth form. J Prosthet Dent. 1984; 52(4): 588-592

16. Ricketts RMC. The biologic significance of the divine proportion and Fibonacci series. Am J Orthod. 1982;

81: 351-370

17. Cesario VA, Latta GH Jr. Relationship between the mesiodistal width of the maxillary central incisor and interpupillary distance. J Prosthet Dent 1984; 52: 641-43.

18. Latta GH Jr ., W eaver JR, Conkin JE. The relationship between the width of the mouth , interalar width ,bizygomatic width, an dinterpupillary distance in edentulous patients. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65(2): 250-4.

19. Hatim NA. Selection of maxillary anterior teeth in relation to mandibular natural anterior teeth. Iraqi Dent J. 2000; 26: 241-245.

20. Gillen RJ, Schwartz RS, Hilton TJ, Evans DB. An analysis of selected normative tooth proportions. Int J Prosthodont 1996;7:410-7.

21. Hasanreisoglu U, Berksun S, Aras K, Arslan I. An analysis of maxillary anterior teeth: facial and dental proportions. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 94:530-8.

22. Sterret JD, Oliver T , Robinson F , Fortson W, Knaak B, Russel CM. Width/ length ratios of normal clinical crowns of the maxillary anterior dentition in man. J ClinPeriodontol 1999;26:153-7.

23. Navreed S., Sarabjeet S.S, Bhupinder K. Indian Journal of Dental Sciences. March 2012:1(4);31-34

24. Young HA. Selecting the anterior tooth mold. J Prosthet Dent. 1954;4:748–60

25. HoriehJ J, Orkideh R, Ramin K, Naser V. The analysis of correlation between the facial width and mesio-distal width of the maxillary anterior teeth. J Res Dent Sci Spring 2014;11(1):49-53.

26. Muhammad W H, Khezran Q, Sajid N. Significance of intercommissural width and anterior teeth selection. Pakistan Ora&Denta J. August 2013, 33(2): 393-396

27. Gomes VL, Gonçalves LC, do Prado CJ, Junior IL, de Lima Lucas B. Correlation between facial measurements and the mesiodistal width of the maxillary anterior teeth. J EsthetRestor Dent. 2006; 18(4):196-205.

28. Silverman SI. Physiologic factors in complete denture esthetics. Dent Clin North Am. 1976:115–22.

29. Bhaskar A, Mohit K, H A Alvi, Varun A, Srishti A. Relating Central Incisor to Inner Canthal Distance - AFlexible Approach Adaptable to Different Population Groups International Journal of Contemporary Medicine. January-June., 2013, Vol.1, No. 1; 8-11

30. Abdullah M A: Inner canthal distance and geometric progression as a predictor of central incisor width. J.Prosthet.Dent.2002; 88(1):16-20.

31. Lee John H.: The appearance of Artificial Dentures. Aust. Dent. J. 1964: 304, 196.

32. Edward G Owens, Charles J.Goodacre, Poey Ling Loh. A muticenter interracial study of facial appearance. IntJProsthodont; 15(3):283-8,2010.

33. Avinash S Bindra, Flavio Uribe, Thomas D Taylor. The relationship of facial anatomic landmarks with midlines of the face and mouth. J Am Dent Assoc,

138(3):331-7,2007

34. Garn SM, Lewis AB, Swindler DR, KerewskyRS.Genetic control of sexual dimorphism in toothsize. J Dent Res 1967; 46:963-72.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.