Evaluations

1. Process Evaluation




1. The importance of having visible, very senior backing at the outset.

2. Establish a broad base of senior involvement that will be actively involved in the working group.

3. Guidance on how to engage the community, and how to adapt the methodology to a non-academic audience, would be helpful.

4. sufficient time should be devoted to workshop activities and causal mapping activities.

5. A blended approach to the process could be considered (COVID related, all online).

6. A more concentrated process, with workshop activities being closer to one another, could make it easier for stakeholders to stay fully engaged (links with 2).

7. mechanisms for more stakeholder voices in the causal mapping and action development.



2. Developmental Evaluation 




1. Does the approach taken in Dundee support key stakeholders to recognise what they can do in relation to actions at different levels within the system? (stakeholder interviews and survey)


2. How do/ can co-produced activities (e.g. with children, vulnerable communities) shape this approach?


3.What adaptations to the approach taken in Dundee would be required over time to connect this approach to other 'systems’ (e.g. Mental Health) and implement this approach in other Local Authorities in Tayside? 




Below is a timeline of key activities that were undertaken as part of the developmental evaluation .

Draft Recommendations from 2. Developmental Evaluation



        * The final evaluation report is in the final write-up stage, due to be published by  Summer 2023 *