Timeliness of Analogy

Schedule: Saturday 9, Morning

9h30-9h45 Introduction

9h45-10h30 Keynote Talk: Juan ManuelCampos Benítez, Meritorious Autonomous University of Puebla, Mexico, "Analogy and Metaphor"

10h30-11h00 Sylvie Herrouet

11h00-11h30 Coffee break

11h30-12h00 Zofia Wójciak, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland, "Analogies within Honorifics Systems in English, Korean and Polish"

12h00-12h30 Przemysław Krzywoszyński, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland, "Analogical Model of Referendum: Dialogical and Anti-Dialogical Applications"

12h30-13h General Discussion

ORGANIZERS

After two World Congresses on Analogy (Puebla, Mexico 2015, Poznań, Poland 2017), the results of which were published in the special issue of Methodological Studies (37/2016) and in Philosophies : Philosophies on Analogy , we invite you to submit abstracts to the workshop “Timeliness of Analogy”.

KEYNOTE SPEAKER

Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Mexico

"Analogy and Metaphor"


Analogy suggests several things: similarities, proportions, attributions, even identity and difference. There are hexagons of opposition to express the relationships among these components. Metaphor is more difficult to characterize, although it is relatively easy to detect a metaphor when we pay attention to the language of everyday life and language in other areas, especially in fiction and poetry. Metaphor has been characterized as a trope, a shift in the meaning of an expression, and in this sense, it is considered one among several figures of speech, such as synecdoche or metonymy. Many times we use the same word to signify different things due to a certain similarity that we find in the named things. That is why we can speak of the foot of the bed or the foot of the mountain, and utter metaphorical sentences with these types of expressions: in this sense, metaphor is related to analogy. The similarities can be taken for granted, as in the sayings or proverbs, which try to draw a moral.


George Lakoff and Mark Johnson, in their work Metaphors we live by, argue that metaphor consists in understanding one thing in terms of another thing, and that that it is not just a matter of rhetorical issue, but that thought itself is a metaphorical process. In fact, metaphor encompasses at once three dimensions: language, thought, and action. In this talk, we will pay attention to this book’ view of metaphor trying to understand its links to analogy.


TOPIC



"Good mathematicians see analogies between theorems or theories, the very best ones see analogies between analogies" is Banach’s famous phrase, which we know thanks to Stanisław Ulam. This maxim indicates a certain way of developing investigations, and not only mathematical ones. With the development of knowledge, the domains in which analogical reasoning occur naturally expand and relevant theories of such a reasoning are created.

But Feyerabend warned: ‘Progress of knowledge’ meant in many places killing of minds. We do not want the humanities to be a scene of further murders, maybe even serial killings.


We are interested in the application of analogy in the humanities. The Polish psychiatrist Antoni Kępiński (1918-1972) juxtaposed the traditional pair “civilization” and “culture”. He assumed that civilization is power over the world, while culture is love for the world. Since knowledge is power, we are inclined to consider such a concept of analogy which is part of culture (in Kępiński’s sense). We closely associate the concept of analogy with Franz Rosenzweig’s dialogical turn in philosophy and going beyond the three paradigms of philosophic research as defined by Herbert Schnädelbach, i.e. outside the ontological, mentalistic and linguistic paradigms. The constitution of a dialogical relationship (i.e. the relationship between “I” and “Thou”) requires the development of the ability to focus attention, at the same time, on similarities among differences and on differences among similarities. This is our formula for a creative approach to the dialogical relationship. According to Martin Buber, relationships are created in three spheres: in our life with nature, with people, and with intelligible forms. Therefore, we are interested in all the testimonies and examples of the use of analogies: from ancient mythology, through all the history of literature and philosophy, to utopian thinking and visions of the future. Hence, it can be said that we are following the path within a theoretical framework for the humanities related to the procedures of the so-called “analogizing” in the very sense that Edith Stein indicated in this passage from her On the Problem of Empathy: “The interpretation of foreign living bodies as of my type helps make sense out of the discussion of »analogizing« in comprehending another. Of course, this analogizing has very little to do with inferences by analogy”.

CALL FOR PAPERS

Those interested in analogy are invited to submit their proposals on any aspect related to this subject. Topics may include, but are not restricted to:

  • concepts of analogy

  • theories of analogy

  • analectics

  • analogical hermeneutics

  • analogy vs. univocity and equivocity

  • applications of analogies

  • examples of analogies

  • creativity of analogies

  • analogies in dialogue

To submit a contribution, please send a one-page abstract to Katarzyna Gan-Krzywoszyńska: kgank@wp.pl

Accepted submissions will be invited to submit a paper to a book or a special issue that will be edited by the organizers after the workshop.

For any query, please contact the organizers of the workshop.

IMPORTANT DATES

Submission: November 30, 2021

Notification: December 7, 2021

Worskhop: 6-11 April , 2022 (the workshop will take place at some point during the UNILOG congress).