Ideas what technologies cause neutral job to become good job
Neutral job as manager to good job as manager
AI at work fitbit or iwatch graphs the daily success of manager at getting the managed into a zone of comprehension and AI quantified likelihood of improved action; things like vocal tone and depth of responses support AI output and visualization graph. If the previous day or week chart showed 2/3 functionality of management and new chart shows 4/5 functionality then the personal initiative the manager took to learn to communicate more effectively, or just apply what they already learned is measured as having worked then the manager feels they are doing a good job, promoting goals and being in the graphed effective communications zone, so they feel good.
I read research that said employed people are happier. It is possible an AI work fitbit and more research could find out why. Perhaps it is keeping busy and occupied, perhaps it is polite person-affirming small talk, perhaps it has to do with being normal at broader society. They could find out which, how much, and for what mbti or big 5 type, and have the work fitbit amplify that benefit, with enhanced task mix or even social lunches; this makes the job actually better than the previous version of the job and also produces higher quantified happiness at the global measure where employment is associated with greater happiness, as well as from from a personal individual measured happiness standpoint.
A beneficial drug that causes neutral feeling work to be good; it is possible mbti J feel good and on their preferred organized scheduled motif when they stick to a diet or exercise regimen. These people might then also feel good if they take a longevity pill on time. So, work that provides complimentary longevity pills could leverage J-ness to provide felt satisfaction. This compares to the S or P enjoying the free, spontaneous delicious food some employers provide. I think some Longevity pills, among them metformin, also increase healthspan causing physically greater sustained energy as life progresses without stimulants. That causes a good job to feel good longer to the employee. This also benefits employers. This could be a non-medical drug promotion at work social construct.
.5b year option on employment:option open alternate employers ; person applies for new job while already employed, they are approved for the new job. They could psychologically and materially benefit from being able to switch to the new job anytime that year; the feeling of a ready option could cause greater sense of well being, security and happiness. This would also provide the existing employer with an incentive to promote workplace satisfaction, turning neutral jobs into good jobs. feminism benefits with this as a new thing as equal pay for equal work is bolstered when a ready alternative to current earnings is available a full year at a time. AI human resources software could identify upper half productivity potential employees and give them full year option employment; the numbers work as hiring these upper half people raises the group average productivity above the median.
Also, quite different than a social prescriptive, employers and staffing agencies only provide the year option when they have done a statistical calculation showing that the year option, with guaranteed placement earns money and/or saves money. A staffing agency could guarantee 1099 jobs at the earnings level of the year option if the projected employer took off. They have done the numbers and perhaps know that less than 1℅ will be unprofitable as 1099 persons.
Interestingly China, with its people rating number, could encourage employers to give the year option to sufficient scorers; much better perhaps is to measure the individual freshly. "pre approved" jobs might then exist
.5b Educational software; a teacher writes comments and corrections on a student's paper. Does the student read it and improve? Sometimes, and more students reading the comments would benefit more people. To increase the number of students that read and learn from the comments have educational software that has the student make a note or summary of the comment at a text box online or on the source document this new commenting with phone camera. No human teacher needs to look at the comment on their comment but the software increases the effectiveness of the source comments on learning.
When the comment was "great!" The student could write a sentence about how they found the answer; this could beneficially allow them to bask longer in their praise, generating enthusiasm for the subject and schoolwork. extra credit possible from commenting on the teachers comments.
Survey monkey/grammerly could do a non OCR version perhaps instantly and gather stats on the responses.
Command line educational software, type formulas to know more than mouse
Sharing and teaching reading look up " improve focus while learning to read"
Reading ideas
" I like the way you pay attention" when it occurs I notably like attentive students, the thing is, is there a "catch them doing something right" way to honestly use this. Actually it could benefit the good readers as well. It might heighten their already good concentration as well as feel nice to hear.
How about "I like it when you pay attention like that." After a moment of successful concentration (Clayton)
Enzymatic production of CART peptides from food proteins, or some specialized feedstock protein might be possible; that makes them outside government regulation while still being effective drugs. CART peptides might be better-than-well concentration increasers for children even those without ADD.
Suggest "your child has books! Here are great ways to share reading with them ...and visit the library for more!" minipapers at each give-away book. It might cause more parent child reading and is cheap.
Ethics of first things first or advance on all fronts simultaneously
Notably FTF can specify branched developable fronts early on or even as branches, first! Then, after branch development processing and prioritization it can address other things or even recalibrate based on the effects from addressing the prioritized branch' plurality first or early on.
When you think of a computer architecture (quasi metaphorical as I am thinking about actual human ethics) FTF and AFS have the potential to look really different. The 1,1,0 automata is Turing complete; if you think of that 1,1,0 thing running parallel (like an automata then that graphically might look like a bunch of trees at a dendritic polymer) on a AFS while a FTF could possibly be more efficient at high velocities and a near serial architecture; then again an early priority for FTF could be optimizing the ethical landscape for high parallelism of action while still having first things first.
Looking at it like a computer then the kind of actual thing it, the ethics, runs on could be modified. Human body, matter, consciousness, could be adjusted to rapidly solve ethics.
With FTF who or what perceives the priorities? Is AFS being kind of medianish stochastic less efficient than parallel optimized FTF?
So then ethically, what is the optimal architecture or way to run that is metaphorically compute ethics and actual human actions on what kind of mechanism?
Modifying or customizing the mechanism, like serial, parallel, quantum computing, that runs FTF or AFS could cause ultra high ethical well being many orders of magnitude more rapidly.
One approach is genetic engineering of human beings; another might be fiduciary and/or high signal to noise action linkages where people are strongly guided by computers; do that possibly with finding something actually benevolent and person enhancing with greater utility than the ethics of beguilement(advertisingish) or token value systems (although having libertarian tendencies i note token systems, possibly including money, which has recently gotten better, (bitcoin) preclude some harm while providing discernable rewards) at producing with humans behavior near to or the same as the model's response at a computer simulation. Thinking of nice action causers, What might be functional though is artificial love, like measurably good feeling harmonizing around shared behaviors, possibly with girlfriend (robot girlfriend) or biological imprinting-like trust. Voluntary behavioral psychology positive reinforcement environments could also shift behavior towards an algorithmically mathematically valid ethics.
It is likely there are other near fiduciary response to a computed ethics technologies. Self help books about actualizing change exist. A person could think about that though.
Also, what about the lived ethics, or computed ethics of retrocausal modification? (What i think JY said he was doing) when you modify the past with FTF there is a possibility of having a version of FTF from the retrocausalists (only partially globally system aware) proclivities. To the rightmost branch of AFS everything looks like a dove
calculation asymmetry; retrocausal electron computer
Share and reach reading
Cultivate analytical philosophy of the children's book; of the parts you can remember (from different pages) how do they combine together? Might make thinking even more fun near a book
Consider them holding book upright so they focus on it while you read from the back puts their eyes on the text
Do jokes dispell lackadaisical inattentiveness at children
Mirror back the children's gestalt words they say "like" I say what do you like or they say easy I say name three easy things. They say fancy I say what are some things you do that are fancy?
Everytime you get a word right I will put (two dots that get upgraded to happy faces) on this paper; thank you for the strong effort, you can do stuff when you would like to on purpose Perhaps have them draw the faces around the dots so its personalized identification of being happy
Should I practice my eye contact and smile. I think so.
Increase attention to a read aloud but ungazed at book, When reading intersperse a funny word in the read text, ask the student to say Beep every time they hear the word, tally the attentiveness causing stimulus with happy face dots. You got 3 beeps! Might work Zara, Gage and Clayton.
Have Zara teach me something grok her style. Ask about what dolls say to each other. Have Clayton teach me a video game thing.
.5b plays for dolls; eToy speaks like "doll just found out she has long lost sister" then humans improvise and speak new dialog. The software listens to the humans and suggests new and calculated to be fun plot advancements.
Asking for their attention has an effect. Perhaps twice a book would not desensitize.
Be more diligent with sounding out words and a phonics approach
Always leave one thing untouched on your plate BMI normality causing phrase
Are children quantifiably measurable as having fun doing different things; are children on cruise ships near or higher than at home free time fun? mbti: what do the cruise children do? Some might be meet and greet for E,
.5b Children on cruise ship digital face thermography and AI of movement to swoop in with fresh and/or reinforcing stuff and make already good experiences great!
Does green tea have anti distraction pro attentiveness effect on children without ADD; better than well approach deprenyl might longevize children CART peptide as better than well attention increasing drug
.5b coffee CART better than well
Dale Carnegie how to make friends and build charisma for children charisma makes it possible to fluently choose new better social groups.
Zara ups charisma Do you think fancy Nancy has friends? What do they do together->friends are nice, here is how to make friends:carnegie
.5b software looks at social media of school age peers, AI forecasts which ones would date you if you asked, then also software guides you towards members of that list that would actually be good for you. The result is more confidence, less rejection, and absence of toxic relationships.
If they read nonfiction ask them to summarize it (builds organize, know, act skills) it also practices how to study; Say, name three facts about topic
Genetically engineering all people to have more charisma than any previously measured person is the way to go; mutually charismatic people have beneficial interactions with each other. Both win. Or if at a group there is more plural engaged win, less numb mere attendance.
Ask about bringing in stickers
Noting "triple bottom line" or any multi good summary, could complex numbers be a bigger part of business and ethics; graph of 3i+3 intersection with y^3+I
That makes it so an ethicist or regular person can graphically compare a benevolent emoter with a productive beneficial scientist
vaguely, is it better to advance on all fronts simultaneously or to do first things first? (Rescue a child first or file a vaccine patent) Computer science might suggest multifoliate leaves of simultaneity on some branches sorted on preeminence, so if the utility is positive (create, feel) or negative utilitarianism (rescue, ensure) then CS seems to suggest particularized combination of advance on fronts with first things first. CS upgrades though; quantum computers, as I perceive them, advance on all fronts.
Possible FEA voxels: is FEA of sets with verbs, more or less ethical? Whatever size chunks that you have the mind or computer to calculate affects their ethical depth; FEA: Having your sunscreen rejuvenate your skin while rescuing a child and simultaneously getting a vaccine patent seems sunscreenish trivial but noting math, FEA, and the effect of 3% growth compounded suggest that aggregations of micro benefit could have large volumes of value. This suggests that good things can happen even without a sentience being aware; a decisionless benefit.
Noting FEA Voxels produce a geometry of ethical chunks sortalike user-adjustable directional stress tests also can produce emergent godelescherbach cube simultaneous objects with 3 projections
Share and reach reading
Cultivate analytical philosophy of the children's book; of the parts you can remember (from different pages) how do they combine together? Might make thinking even more fun near a book
Consider them holding book upright so they focus on it while you read from the back puts their eyes on the text
Do jokes dispell lackadaisical inattentiveness at children
Mirror back the children's gestalt words they say "like" I say what do you like or they say easy I say name three easy things. They say fancy I say what are some things you do that are fancy?
Everytime you get a word right I will put (two dots that get upgraded to happy faces) on this paper; thank you for the strong effort, you can do stuff when you would like to on purpose Perhaps have them draw the faces around the dots so its personalized identification of being happy
Should I practice my eye contact and smile. I think so.
Increase attention to a read aloud but ungazed at book, When reading intersperse a funny word in the read text, ask the student to say Beep every time they hear the word, tally the attentiveness causing stimulus with happy face dots. You got 3 beeps! Might work Zara, Gage and Clayton.
Have Zara teach me something grok her style. Ask about what dolls say to each other. Have Clayton teach me a video game thing.
.5b plays for dolls; eToy speaks like "doll just found out she has long lost sister" then humans improvise and speak new dialog. The software listens to the humans and suggests new and calculated to be fun plot advancements.
Asking for their attention has an effect. Perhaps twice a book would not desensitize.
Be more diligent with sounding out words and a phonics approach
Always leave one thing untouched on your plate BMI normality causing phrase
Are children quantifiably measurable as having fun doing different things; are children on cruise ships near or higher than at home free time fun? mbti: what do the cruise children do? Some might be meet and greet for E,
.5b Children on cruise ship digital face thermography and AI of movement to swoop in with fresh and/or reinforcing stuff and make already good experiences great!
Does green tea have anti distraction pro attentiveness effect on children without ADD; better than well approach deprenyl might longevize children CART peptide as better than well attention increasing drug
.5b coffee CART better than well
Dale Carnegie how to make friends and build charisma for children charisma makes it possible to fluently choose new better social groups.
Zara ups charisma Do you think fancy Nancy has friends? What do they do together->friends are nice, here is how to make friends:carnegie
.5b software looks at social media of school age peers, AI forecasts which ones would date you if you asked, then also software guides you towards members of that list that would actually be good for you. The result is more confidence, less rejection, and absence of toxic relationships.
If they read nonfiction ask them to summarize it (builds organize, know, act skills) it also practices how to study; Say, name three facts about topic
Genetically engineering all people to have more charisma than any previously measured person is the way to go; mutually charismatic people have beneficial interactions with each other. Both win. Or if at a group there is more plural engaged win, less numb mere attendance.
Ask about bringing in stickers
Noting "triple bottom line" or any multi good summary, could complex numbers be a bigger part of business and ethics; graph of 3i+3 intersection with y^3+I
That makes it so an ethicist or regular person can graphically compare a benevolent emoter with a productive beneficial scientist
vaguely, is it better to advance on all fronts simultaneously or to do first things first? (Rescue a child first or file a vaccine patent) Computer science might suggest multifoliate leaves of simultaneity on some branches sorted on preeminence, so if the utility is positive (create, feel) or negative utilitarianism (rescue, ensure) then CS seems to suggest particularized combination of advance on fronts with first things first. CS upgrades though; quantum computers, as I perceive them, advance on all fronts.
Possible FEA voxels: is FEA of sets with verbs, more or less ethical? Whatever size chunks that you have the mind or computer to calculate affects their ethical depth; FEA: Having your sunscreen rejuvenate your skin while rescuing a child and simultaneously getting a vaccine patent seems sunscreenish trivial but noting math, FEA, and the effect of 3% growth compounded suggest that aggregations of micro benefit could have large volumes of value. This suggests that good things can happen even without a sentience being aware; a decisionless benefit.
Noting FEA Voxels produce a geometry of ethical chunks sortalike user-adjustable directional stress tests also can produce emergent godelescherbach cube simultaneous objects with 3 projections
CS approaches to ethics; advance on all fronts simultaneously(AFS) or first things first(FTF); different effects on hope and optimism; genetically engineered to be optimistic an FTF mileau person might not care optimizing their teen romance could not happen before age14. An AFS person has the benefit of a different improvement front making teen tinder. Without optimism or cheer FTF could produce a subtype of nonoptimality: (long waitlist emotion effects) unless the person was biologically always feeling good; the optimality of course is that the most important thing gets accomplished.
possible efficiency: a two or more pass math CS function that scans the list (or math space) of things to do then finds new substitutes for what would otherwise be redressive actions: Then the new list is shorter and more rapidly effectively doable. It is very possible that more than two passes of the substitutor/agglomerator would optimize a first things first list.
AFS causes longevity pills and robots while the living conditions among humans vary, rather than a durable nicely furnished precivilization hut with lots of food and a loving mate for every person; noting one effect of AFS is billions of people that are very happy and live millennia or longer.
From an advance on all fronts perspective FEA at a resolution more minute than human awareness could model all the benefits at once, then big-voxel or parsimoniousize some of the FEA ethics spaces to create more efficient attainment of benefit computations even while doing everything at once
Genetically engineering all people to be good at math they would then be able to talk, act upon, and compare their actual living ethics with math; this is beneficial
Sharing and teaching reading
Cultivate informed directional choice so as to practice "news you can use" filtering. Have Zara and other students pick out a book for "looks like most fun", reminds me of me, prettiest images; then have them pick from their new list. Supposedly this practices discernment, purpose, and knowing they can seek a kind of benefit on purpose; then postschool they can interrupt their social media to read consumer reports
Ask Zara, " would you like to babysit? What would you do?"
Study if people who babysit make better happier parents or is no effect; if beneficial promote voluntary babysitting by 20somethings for the experience rather than the money; this benefits moms and the 20something babysitters might be extra enriching to children.
Look up babysitting on pub med
It might cultivate liking books and reading from asking Clayton, Zara and other students "what would make this book more fun?" Would it be more fun on an airplane? Possibly improvise the new preferred version.
I could start saying hello to people on the street. They will usually like it.
Greeting women recognizes them.
Measure psychological well being of children with 1,2 or 3 friendship based play dates a week; find out if there is an optimal amount of friendship parents can purposefully cultivate for their children; they could measure stuff like empathy, beneficial speaking up/boldness, happiness (even on the non-playdate days)
This research supports the children's well being directly but also practices their good person social skills for when they are older and have children of their own.
Is there an ethical way to teach children to be nicer to their parents; that would then non consciously cause the parents to be even nicer to the children; scheduled non-goodnight hugs and teaching the child to say the parent's name rather than "mom" goes well with Dale Carnegie. Kids taking Fish oil modifies their behavior and then parents were measurably better at being harmless to their children and each other.
A beneficial new drug the child could take that has a benevolence and utility increasing effect on the parents; Possibly the amino acid taurine which removes tiredness (one study) could be beneficially given to children (and parents).
It is possible that mbti sorted parents might, as groups, benefit from similar actual doables. It could work, even if it was on purpose, to have three sentences written on an index card that the child says to her parents; a little like fill in the blank, "I love you even more than ______", " thanks for looking at my schoolwork tonight", "what's the best thing that happened to you today?" Although these are staged conversations the minds of the parents might absorb the affectionate and beneficial messages along with frequent actual good discussions
Perhaps 9-11am weekends is peak alertness for parents and children simultaneously, sort of; more research; then schedule learning and togetherness activities then. Higher willingness and responsiveness from children meet peak productivity office hours. Parents that schedule this way might get single or double digit gains in their kids perceived interest and friendliness thus making the parents feel good(so they treat their children even better).
Sharing and teaching reading;
written previously: possibly making word lists of words new from last week could be beneficial, also pick out three new words to learn like "Monday" or "these" and bring them up again next session. Bring paper to the classroom.
Suggest the children have what is likely fun reading words that spontaneously occur from a car view. If they don't know the word they can recognize the letters and say first or all letters at "yield" or "mall".
Look up math analysis online
Customize honest praise more than saying good or right; John might then hear, " I like the way you repeat the word right after I read it"
While they are reading most of the text, suggest Gage say the word after I supplementally read it, also Zara
It might work and thus double practice, "have your parent read this to you again tonight!" "You'll be extra good reading this to your parent because we already practiced!" Gage might do well with this, he likes his family a lot.
Find lively books for Clayton Dr Seuss rhyming poems might be lively enough to maintain attention while making books and reading actively fun. Practice saying the letters of words so he knows all the letter shapes. dbp etc.
Mention most beneficial child parent ideas to Shay Stacer like teaching/positioning/medicating (taurine)/staging child produced content that makes the parent feel good and emotionally connected to their children, even though it is prompted, thus they become even nicer to their children
How big would the detector have to be to measure the entire universal wave function? Is it littler than a universe? Could it be one durable particle responding to gravity? Which brings up how high a resolution is necessary to make an observation "gravity, from all directions, yep. That one particle tells it like it is" Might be less than sufficient. So what is a shannon information theory minimum to make an UWF observation; if it were a p value it would be eight things.
The detector that can measure the entire universal wave function, regardless of size might be easier to construct or more math and logic parsimonious than unitary MWI; to some people, but not others, that looks better. Could building a detector capable of observing the entire universal wave function obviate future multiverses? No need for branching when you've got it observed. The thing is JY was able to describe alternate versions of Earth's history (he said there are some without the internet), so JY data might align with the multiverse.
Just for amusement, what about the parts of the universe that are beyond the light cone of the alleged big bang; are they a boundary between entirely different MWI universe sized wave functions? Hint: quantum entangled photons communicate at least 10,000 times faster than light travels so that portion of overlapping space with .000001% naturally occurring quantum entangled photons would have a huge volume overlap or expansion of the MWI area.
If there is a buildable detector for the entire universal wave function? could the MWI come up with varied universes where it was either working or turned off? That might cause a growth MWI branch and a branchless determined universe. Which is better to live in? Have nonhuman observers already observed and made the universe that humans live at as wave function specific branch determined?
Could people tell if the entire universal wave function has been previously observed; some approach to verifying or refuting that preobservation could verify or refute or verify the MWI What would act different in a preobserved universe; its remotely possible that the crust of Newtonian deterministic physics comes from some universal resolution of some possibly big quantum thing. So building a universal wave function (UWF). detector, then detecting the UWF, could be measured as to whether it extended newtonianism to some previously unnewtownian area; building the detector would change physics.
Just for fun, noting there are different sizes of infinities (aleph numbers) could a quantum event detector/MWI branchmaker be constructed that operated at a different higher aleph number of infinities? I may have read that something squared is aleph two compared with all the integers which might be aleph one; so can you use a photon or radiation detector squared some way to hypermultiply the MWI infinity? Although the MWI might address time sequence, do pulsed lasers or standing waves alephtwoize even though they are chrono effects
Does using that detector cause variation (wobble) at things, among them the casimir effect from some kind of physics thing? Is there a new geometry packing effect, because the technologist made an aleph two detector squared that causes multiverse to pack together differently? is there some way to measure or mathematically predict some anisotropy that could be measured differently from both before and after the aleph two branch apparatus; this way produces three observations to detect the MWI?
Lunch might be about a tenth of the workday. Things that improve the moments known as lunchtime could have value.
Do people feel good when they share food? More the sharer or the consumer? Does it work better or the same with volume? Like a cookie from a package compared with an entire slice of pizza. Also could be mapped with myers Briggs or big five. Esf might like the talking, the flavor, and the possible emotionally inclusive gesture. In Australia this is the most frequent myers Briggs type for women
Study the effects of music at lunch also the cashier greeting lift effect
Could robots provide even more of an emotional lift than a human cashier better eye contact and hand touch
perhaps a quantitatively measured as having greater lift greeting than how are you