McDermott (2008) Monoamine oxidase A gene (MAOA) predicts behavioural aggression following provocation.
McDermott et al. aimed to study the underlying causes of aggression and punishment by studying if genetics predispose participants to carry out aggressive behaviour that is costly to the participant when they are environmentally provoked. They specifically aimed to investigate whether the MAOA gene affected aggression when environmentally provoked.
Genetic samples were gained from 78 male participants. The participants were the divided into two groups, one group had high MAOA activity (MAOA-H) and one group had low MOAO activity (MAOA-L).
Aggression was measured by the amount of an unpleasant hot sauce participants would give to an opponent in a ‘power-to-take’ game when they knew the opponent did not like the taste of the hot sauce. The more of the hot sauce that was given, the more aggressive the participant was deemed to be.
Participants played a power-to-take game where they made earnings from a vocabulary task. A portion of these earnings were then taken by an anonymous person (who was in fact not real). Participants could then punish this anonymous person by giving the person some hot sauce.
The participants played four rounds of the game and they were told their opponent was a different person in each round. Participants were told they had a new supply of hot sauce in each of the four rounds, and they could use the hot sauce to punish their opponent or they could trade it in for money.
The amount of earnings that could be taken from the participants by their opponent was manipulated by the experimenters and was either ‘high take’ with 80% of the money being taken or ‘low take’ with 20% of the money being taken.
It was found that high take participants were aggressive to their opponent more often than low take participants, and that they administered more hot sauce than low take participants.
66% of the participants gave some hot sauce to their opponent when 80% of their earnings were taken compared to 39% when only 20% of their earnings were taken.
There was a significant difference between the two groups when 80% of the earnings were taken, but there was no significant difference between the two groups when 20% of the earnings were taken.
There was a significant difference between MAOA-H and MAOA-L participants’ administration of the maximum amount of hot sauce in both high take and low take conditions.
They concluded that the greater the provocation, through monetary loss, the more aggressive people are towards the person they see as responsible for their loss.
It was also concluded that genes interact with the environment when it comes to aggression as participants who had a low MAOA activity were more aggressive when 80% of their earnings were taken compared to participants who had high MAOA activity, showing genes do influence aggression. However there was not as much difference between the two groups when only 20% of the earnings were taken showing that environment also influences aggression.
MAOA plays a role in aggression when there is environmental provocation.
As the sample was large at 78 participants but this is small given the target population so may not be generalisable.
Paying to punish someone is not an everyday form of punishment, therefore the measure of aggression may lack validity.
The data are objective as the participants either would or would not have given the punishment therefore increasing reliability.
There are ethical issues as the participants did not give informed consent, as they thought the person taking away their earning was real.
State one aim from the contemporary study you have chosen. (1) January 2019
Justify one improvement that could be made to the contemporary study you have chosen. (2) January 2019
Describe the results from the contemporary study you have chosen. (3) January 2019
Evaluate one contemporary study from biological psychology. (8) June 2017