One of my favourite things about a career in arbitration is the opportunity to open the doors to arbitration for new generations of practitioners. ๐ช
With thanks to Olga Boltenko for the invitation, I guest-lectured at the University of HK LLM in ADR programme last week covering a comparative review of arbitration as a dispute resolution method. ๐ฉโ๐ซ
โ๏ธ We discussed the dispute resolution spectrum - from dispute resolution processes which give greater control to the parties to processes which involve binding third-party decisions.
๐ We discussed how important design choice is in drafting a dispute resolution clause and the art of balancing simplicity with flexibility to fit specific circumstances.
๐ก We discussed different forms of "appropriate" dispute resolution including expert determination, mini trials, mock arbitrations, neutral evaluation, baseball or "final offer" arbitration, decentralised justice systems and blockchain arbitration.
๐ We compared domestic and international arbitrations, as well as investment treaty and commercial arbitrations.
๐ค It was also fantastic to hear from Joon-Nie Lau, the Deputy Chief Executive Officer of the Singapore International Mediation Centre, about developments in mediation, including in relation to the Singapore Convention.
๐ Thank you very much to the students who engaged so actively!ย
The highlight of my โTyphoon Dayโ yesterday: participating in an arbitration clause mock negotiation organised by the CIETAC Hong Kong Arbitration Center as part of China Arbitration Week!
โญ๏ธParticipants in the negotiation were:
๐นJohn Crook (Walkers)
๐นOlga Boltenko (Fangda)
๐นAndrew Chin (Gallant)
๐นEdward M Taylor (Shearman & Sterling)
๐นElizabeth Chan (้ณๆๅฝค) (although not sure I fall into the โgreatโ category)
๐กTopics we discussed included:
โญ๏ธDo stipulating deadlines in an arbitration (e.g., for rendering an award) or committing to short timeframes actually reduce costs? Or might it introduce unnecessary complexity and cause the parties to rush when taking more time might reduce costs?
โญ๏ธBeing able to choose your arbitrator is one of the most popular features of arbitration. Would requiring that one of the arbitrators have expertise in crypto be too prescriptive?
โญ๏ธDo multi-tiered clauses help or delay an arbitration? What are the appropriate deadlines to set for a negotiation, mediation and arbitration - and in what order?
โญ๏ธThe choice of substantive law. It is important to consider the implications of the choice of law. For example, in our workshop, applying one law would raise arbitrability and enforcement issues because crypto transactions were banned in that jurisdiction. While the other preferred option for governing law recognised the validity of crypto transactions, crypto assets are categorised differently under different laws and regulations. As a result, the different categorisation may lead to uncertainty and potentially significant differences in valuation.
โญ๏ธ Reasons for choosing Hong Kong as the seat: a robust procedural framework for arbitration and a thriving legal community with relevant legal and linguistic expertise.
โญ๏ธ Reasons to choose CIETAC HK. Check out their impressive statistics for 2022:
- 4000+ new cases accepted
- Parties from 69 countries & regions
- 840 cases involving multiple parties
- 822 cases involving multiple contracts
- 1 case involving 596 contracts!
- 5600+ arbitrator appointments
- 4300 + hearings
Thank you very much to CIETAC HK for the invitation to speak and to Brad Wang, Jintao Ou and Chengyuan Zhang for their organisation.
We had 500+ attendees, which is fantastic!
*****
ๅจๅ
ญ็โๅฐ้ฃๆฅโ้ๅคดๆ๏ผๅๅ ไบ็ฑไธญๅฝๅฝ้
็ปๆต่ดธๆไปฒ่ฃๅงๅไผ้ฆๆธฏไปฒ่ฃไธญๅฟ็ป็ป็โไปฒ่ฃๆกๆฌพๆจกๆ่ฐๅคโ๏ผ่ฟๆฏโไธญๅฝไปฒ่ฃๅจโ็ไธไธช้่ฆๆดปๅจ๏ผ
โญๅไธ่ฐๅค็ๆ๏ผ
๐นJohn Crook (Walkers)
๐นOlga Boltenko (Fangda)
๐นAndrew Chin (Gallant)
๐นEdward M Taylor (Shearman & Sterling)
๐นElizabeth Chan (้ณๆๅฝค)
๐กๆไปฌ่ฎจ่ฎบ็่ฏ้ขๅ ๆฌ๏ผ
โญๅจไปฒ่ฃ่งๅฎ้่ฎพๅฎๆๅๆ้๏ผไพๅฆ๏ผๅๅบๅคๅณ๏ผๆๆฟ่ฏบ่พ็ญๆถ้ดๅ ๅฎๆไปฒ่ฃ็จๅบไผ้ไฝๆๆฌๅ๏ผๆ่ ๅฎๆฏๅฆไผๅผๅ ฅไธๅฟ ่ฆ็ๅคๆๆง๏ผๅนถๅฏผ่ดๅฝไบไบบๅ่ฑๆดๅค็ๆถ้ดๅค็ไปปๅก๏ผๆ่ ๅฏผ่ดๅฝไบไบบไธบไบ้ไฝๆๆฌ่ๅๅฟๅฐๆท่กไบไบ๏ผ
โญ่ฝๅค้ๆฉไปฒ่ฃๅๆฏไปฒ่ฃๆๅๆฌข่ฟ็็น็นไนไธใไฝๆฏ่ฆๆฑๅ ถไธญไธๅไปฒ่ฃๅๅ ทๆๅ ๅฏไธไธ็ฅ่ฏๆฏๅฆ่ฟไบๆๆกๅ๏ผ
โญๅคๅฑๆฌกๆกๆฌพๆๅฉไบ่ฟๆฏๅปถ่ฟไปฒ่ฃ๏ผไธบ่ฐๅคใ่ฐ่งฃๅไปฒ่ฃ่ฎพๅฎ้ๅฝ็ๆชๆญขๆฅๆ๏ผๅนถๆไฝ็ง้กบๅบ่ฟ่ก๏ผ
โญๅฎไฝๆณ็้ๆฉใ่่ๆณๅพ้ๆฉ็ๅฝฑๅๅพ้่ฆใไพๅฆ๏ผๅจๆไปฌ็็ ่ฎจไผไธญ๏ผ้็จไธ็งๆณๅพไผๅผๅๅฏไปฒ่ฃๆงๅๆง่ก้ฎ้ข๏ผๅ ไธบ่ฏฅๅธๆณ็ฎก่พๅบ็ฆๆญขๅ ๅฏไบคๆใ่ๅฆไธ็ง้ฆ้็็ฎก่พๆณๅๆฟ่ฎคๅ ๅฏไบคๆ็ๆๆๆง๏ผไฝไธๅ็ๆณๅพๅๆณ่งไธ๏ผๅ ๅฏ่ตไบง็ๅ็ฑปไธๅใๅ ๆญค๏ผไธๅ็ๅ็ฑปๅฏผ่ดไธ็กฎๅฎๆงๅๆฝๅจ็ไผฐๅผๅทฎๅผใ
โญ้ๆฉ้ฆๆธฏไฝไธบไปฒ่ฃๅฐ็ๅๅ ๏ผไธไธชๅฅๅ จ็ไปฒ่ฃ็จๅบๆกๆถๅไธไธชๆฅๆ็ธๅ ณๆณๅพๅ่ฏญ่จไธไธ็ฅ่ฏ็็น่ฃๆณๅพ็คพๅบใ
โญ้ๆฉCIETAC HK็ๅๅ ใๆฅ็ไปไปฌ2022ๅนด็ไปคไบบๅฐ่ฑกๆทฑๅป็็ป่ฎกๆฐๆฎ๏ผ
ๆฅๅ็ๆฐๆกไปถ่ถ ่ฟ4000่ตท
ๆฅ่ช69ไธชๅฝๅฎถๅๅฐๅบ็ๅฝไบไบบ
ๆถๅๅคๆน็ๆกไปถ840่ตท
ๆถๅๅคไปฝๅๅ็ๆกไปถ822่ตท
1่ตทๆกไปถๆถๅ596ไปฝๅๅ๏ผ
5600+ๆฌกไปฒ่ฃๅไปปๅฝ
4300+ๆฌก็ๅฌ่ฏไผ็ไธพๅ
้ๅธธๆ่ฐขCIETAC HK็้่ฏท๏ผๅนถๆ่ฐขBrad WangใJintao OuๅChengyuan Zhang็็ป็ปใ
ๆไปฌๆ500ๅคๅ็ไธไผ่ ๅไธ๏ผ่ฟ็ๆฏไปคไบบๅ ดๅฅ็ๆฐๅญ๏ผ
๐๐ ๐๐ซ๐๐ข๐ญ๐ซ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐ ๐ซ๐ข๐๐ง๐๐ฌ: As part of China Arbitration Week, the CIETAC Hong Kong Arbitration Center is hosting a negotiation workshop on a dispute resolution clause relating to a proposed blockchain transaction on Saturday, 2 September 2023.
๐๐๐๐ฌ๐จ๐ง๐ฌ ๐ฐ๐ก๐ฒ ๐ฒ๐จ๐ฎ ๐ฌ๐ก๐จ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ ๐๐จ๐ฆ๐:
โ It will be a fun format: a negotiation rather than a panel.
โ Great speakers:
๐นJohn Crook (Walkers)
๐นOlga Boltenko (Fangda)
๐นAndrew Chin (Gallant)
๐นEdward M Taylor (Shearman & Sterling)
๐นBrad Wang (CIETAC HK)
๐นHorace Cheung Kwok-Kwan (Deputy Secretary for Justice of the HKSAR Government)
๐นElizabeth Chan (้ณๆๅฝค) (although not sure I fall into the โgreatโ category)
โ Networking opportunity with those working/having an interest in the Greater Bay Area
โ The issues covered will be very interesting, including:ย
๐นSeat of the arbitration
๐นSubstantive lawย
๐นMulti-tiered dispute resolution
๐นEmergency arbitration
โ The case will involve a proposed Bitcoin transaction, which raises all kinds of interesting nuances.
โ Spend your Saturday morning with me!
๐๐ข๐ ๐ง ๐ฎ๐ฉ ๐ง๐จ๐ฐ:
๐ Saturday, 2 September 2023
๐ง10:00-12:00 HKTย
๐In-person only
๐Function Hall, 1/F, Main Wing, Justice Place, 18 Lower Albert Road, Central, Hong Kong
๐RSVP: https://lnkd.in/gKnq6uR7 ย
*****
้่ฆๆดปๅจ้็ฅ๏ผไฝไธบไธญๅฝไปฒ่ฃๅจ็ไธ้จๅ๏ผCIETAC HONG KONG ๅฐไบ2023 ๅนด 9 ๆ 2 ๆฅ-ๅจๅ ญไธพๅไธๅบ่ฎจ่ฎบๅบๅ้พไบคๆไบ่ฎฎ่งฃๅณๆกๆฌพ็่ฐๅค็ ่ฎจไผใย
ๆฌๆฌกไผ่ฎฎ็็น่ฒ:ย
โ ๅฐ้ๅไธ็งๆฐ้ขๆ่ถฃ็ๅฝขๅผโโ่ฐๅค๏ผ่้ไผ ็ป็ๅฐ็ป่ฎจ่ฎบใย
โ ๆฐๅบ็ๅๅฎพ๏ผย ย
๐นJohn Crook (Walkers)ย
๐นOlga Boltenko (Fangda)ย
๐นAndrew Chin (Gallant)ย
๐นEdward M Taylor (Shearman & Sterling)ย
๐นBrad Wang (CIETAC HK)ย
๐นHorace Cheung Kwok-Kwan (Deputy Secretary for Justice of the HKSAR Government)
๐นElizabeth Chan (้ณๆๅฝค)
็ณ่ฏทๅๅ ่ฟๆฌกไผ่ฎฎไฝ ็ๆถ่ทๆฏ๏ผ
โ ไธๅจๅคงๆนพๅบๅทฅไฝ/ๆๅ ด่ถฃ็ไบบๅปบ็ซ่็ณป็ๆบไผ๏ผๆฉๅฑไฝ ็ไบบ่ใ
ย
โ ๆดๆทฑๅ ฅ็ไบ่งฃๅไปฒ่ฃๆๅ ณ็็ฅ่ฏ๏ผย
๐นไปฒ่ฃๅฐย
๐นๅฎไฝๆณย
๐นๅคๅฑๆฌกไบ่ฎฎ่งฃๅณย
๐น็ดงๆฅไปฒ่ฃย
โ ็น่ฒไนไธๆฏ๏ผๆญคๆกๅฐๆถๅๆ่ฎฎ็ๆฏ็นๅธไบคๆ๏ผ่ฟไผๅผๅๅ็งๆ่ถฃ็่ฎจ่ฎบใย
โ ๅๆไธ่ตทๅบฆ่ฟๅจๅ ญๆฉไธๅง๏ผย
ๆฌข่ฟๅคงๅฎถ็งฏๆๅไธๅๆณจๅๆฅๅ
ย
๐ 2023 ๅนด 9 ๆ 2 ๆฅๆๆๅ ญย
๐ง10:00-12:00 ้ฆๆธฏๆถ้ดย
๐็บฟไธๆดปๅจ๏ผไป ้้ขๅฏน้ข๏ผย
๐้ฆๆธฏไธญ็ฏไธไบๅๆฏ้18ๅทๅพๆฟไธญๅฟไธป็ฟผไธๆฅผๅคๅ่ฝๅ ย
๐ๅๅค๏ผhttps://lnkd.in/gKnq6uR7ย
๐ Back in Beijing after four years, and what an amazing experience it's been! ๐
I had the privilege of participating in the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) Beijing Academy on 10-11 May.
The Academy is a rigorous, hands-on, in-person course that dives deep into improving written advocacy through panel discussions and workshops.
From drafting notices of arbitration to emailing prospective arbitrators, drafting procedural requests, and witness outlines, it was a comprehensive learning experience.
It was an absolute pleasure to facilitate several workshops on the first day of the conference alongside the fantastic Arthur Dong.
Sharing our insights and learning from the participants was an enriching experience.
Moreover, I had the fantastic opportunity to connect with members of the Chinese arbitration community.
Overall, the SIAC Beijing Academy was both fun and informative. It's always great to see the global arbitration community come together to share knowledge and experience.
Thank you very much to Cunyuan Zhang for the invitation to participate in this year's Academy!
I'm excited about facilitating at the Singapore International Arbitration Academy in Beijing on 10 May!
Last time I was in Beijing for two weeks, I enjoy five Peking duck meals, with each meal more delicious than the last.
On a more serious note, please join us for what will be a fantastic academy on "A Typical Arbitration Proceeding: Written Advocacy | 10 - 11 May 2023".
I am lucky enough to be a facilitator alongside some of the most thoughtful and creative thinkers in the arbitration world. (Check out the list of faculty!)
Thank you very much to Cunyuan Zhang for the invitation.
More details, including registration, are below.
***********************
SIAC Beijing Academy โ A Typical Arbitration Proceeding: Written Advocacy | 10 - 11 May 2023
Join us as participants of this intensive two-day course will be provided with the fact scenario of a hypothetical case and will be guided through the stages of a typical arbitration proceeding, as they craft a case theory, draft the Notice of Arbitration, Response to the Notice of Arbitration, select and interview their arbitrators, prepare for their first Preliminary Meeting and Mock Application for Consolidation, prepare a request to produce documents, responses to their opposing counsel's request to produce, as well as draft the outline of a witness statement.
Register here now to secure a spot as spaces are limited:
https://lnkd.in/gNQwmybR
What fun to be part of today's teaching crew for the Hong Kong Institute of Arbitrators (HKIArb)'s international commercial arbitration entry course.
While costs may be the last thing to address in an arbitration, it is not the least important.
That's why I co-authored a chapter on the recovery of in-house legal costs last year and co-authored the Mondaq HK Guide on litigation funding.
Costs can raise many interesting issues, as we discussed today.
Thank you to Louise Barrington, JD, LLM, FCIArb, for the opportunity to teach, and a shout-out to my fellow teaching crew, including Kate LI, FCIArb and Prakritee Yonzon.
Thanks to Zoe for her superb organisational skills.ย
Joshua Folkard and Elizabeth Chan (้ณๆๅฝค) presented a thought-provoking and practical session on "Conflict of Laws in International Arbitration" on 16 January 2023.
They considered issues of applicable law and jurisdiction from a comparative law perspective and concluded with drafting tips to draft valid arbitration clauses.
Thank you to:
- the close-to 100 attendees who joined us;
- the Hong Kong Institute of Arbitrators (HKIArb), Lara Quie and Yon for the opportunity to present, as well as
- Jimmy Ma, our moderator.ย
What's the Queen's Gambit of arbitration? Like chess, arbitration is an exercise in strategy. Many moves are possible. But you have to get your timing right and anticipate your opponent's countermoves.
At yesterday's Chartered Institute of Arbitrators (CIArb)'s webinar on Procedural Possibilities, we discussed some early procedural strategies for parties in arbitration:
๐ต ๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐ข๐ฌ๐๐ข๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐๐ฅ ๐๐ก๐๐ฅ๐ฅ๐๐ง๐ ๐๐ฌ: from a respondent's perspective, successful jurisdictional challenges can knock out a claim entirely or dramatically limit the scope of the issues in dispute.
๐ต ๐๐ง๐ญ๐๐ซ๐ข๐ฆ ๐ฆ๐๐๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ซ๐๐ฌ: where should you seek them? (e.g., from the arbitral tribunal, from an emergency arbitrator and/or from the local courts).
๐ต ๐๐๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ ๐๐จ๐ซ ๐๐จ๐ฌ๐ญ๐ฌ: security for costs are known for being difficult to get, so what can a respondent do to improve its chances of success? (Tip: a strong evidentiary case against the claimant is key.)
I learnt a lot from my co-panellists, Frederico Singarajah, FCIArb, Ann Ryan Robertson, and Marcus Cato FCIArb FRSA, and our moderator, Mercy McBrayer, FCIArb.ย
We all know the importance of first impressions, and the opening statement is the advocate's golden opportunity to make their impression on the Tribunal. It was pleasure to moderate the second-ever American Bar Association International Law Section International Arbitration Skills Masterclass with a fantastic panel featuring Alexis Mourre, Meriam Nazih Alrashid and Christian Leathley, who shared their best tips on opening statements.
Wishing all the participants in the Masterclass all the best for the rest of workshop.
Huge thanks to Bart Wasiak, Betsy Hellmann, Sherman Humphrey, Dianne Lake and all members of the organising committee for the opportunity to participate.
In pursuing global Hong Kong thought leadership and practice-oriented approach in teaching, on 28 March 2022, our programme will have the pleasure of hosting a lecture by Elizabeth Chan (้ณๆๅฝค), a registered foreign lawyer with Allen & Overy in Hong Kong who has practised commercial and investment arbitration with leading arbitration teams in London and New York before she has chosen to continue building her career in Hong Kong.
Moderated by Professor Shahla Ali, Ms Chan's lecture will focus on "Investment Arbitration Basics, from a Hong Kong Perspective".
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/hku-llm-adr-program-5140261bb_investment-arbitration-in-hong-kong-activity-6896660076052955136-M_At?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop
You might not immediately associate Hong Kong with Investor-State Dispute Settlement. Right? But did you know that the:
โ๏ธFirst known investment treaty case was brought by a HK investor.
โ๏ธFirst known ICSID annulment proceedings involved a HK investor.
โ๏ธFirst known investment treaty arbitration against Australia was brought under a HK bilateral investment treaty.
โ๏ธFirst known investment treaty arbitration against Japan was brought this year by a HK energy fund.
โ๏ธFirst (one of) States party to include mandatory conciliation in a BIT (HK-UAE BIT).
Intrigued? Tune into my webinar for the The Chinese University of Hong Kong Faculty of Law Online Alumni Series on "Investment Treaty Basics, from a Hong Kong Perspective" today, Wed 24 Nov at 6pm HKT.ย
Three trends in three minutes on trends in conciliation and mediation in ISDS relating to Hong Kong--shared at the Swiss Chinese Law Association's 21st Global Forum on Conciliation tonight:
1. Some recent HK BITs specifically provide for conciliation or mediation in the beginning of the dispute process (e.g., HK-Australia BIT, (2019) Art 23.1; Chile-HK BIT (2016), Art 20.1).
2. Mainland China's investment agreement with HK (2017) includes a Mediation Mechanism for Investment Disputes (no arbitration).
3. The HK-UAE BIT (2019) includes mandatory conciliation (if requested by the State) (Art. 8.3).
My co-panellists were Antonio Parra, the first Deputy Secretary-General of ICSID, and Xiaobing Tang, former World Trade Organization counsellor, moderated by Tianze Z., Co-Founder of the Swiss Chinese Law Association. Thank you for the opportunity to speak!ย
In advance of the of 2019 London International Disputes Week, BIICL, in cooperation with the China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC), is delighted to co-organise 'The Belt and Road Initiative and Global Dispute Resolution' London Forum.
The speakers will focus on the following three topics:ย
Projects Dispute Resolution and BRI: Practice in China and the UK;ย
Finance, Dispute Resolution and BRI: Practice in China, and the UK; andย
Global Dispute Resolution Update.
For more information, see: https://tinyurl.com/2yvmz4w6