Since returning to Hong Kong to practise arbitration three years ago, I've observed that the public domain of insolvency and the private realm of arbitration regularly collide.
The question of which issue should take priority - a winding-up petition or an arbitration/exclusive jurisdiction clause - remains in a state of flux.
But perhaps we can describe the most recent evolution in relevant jurisprudence as being a "stay of play".
While the courts have taken (somewhat) different approaches, the prevailing view, for now, seems to be that winding-up petitions should be be stayed subject to an arbitration/exclusive jurisdiction clause (and other relevant factors).
There's a lot more nuance to that position of course, and you'll find the details in our article, co-authored with Ian De Witt and Tim Au.
We discuss the recent HK Court of First Instance decision in Re Shandong Chenming Paper Holdings Limited, in the context of recent HK case law.
Read the full article at
https://www.tannerdewitt.com/stay-of-play-winding-up-v-arbitration-again/
๐ถ "๐๐๐ฒ ๐ ๐ก๐๐ฏ๐ ๐ฒ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ ๐๐ญ๐ญ๐๐ง๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง, ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐๐๐ฌ๐? ๐๐ข๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ซ๐๐๐ฅ ๐๐จ๐ง๐๐ก๐จ๐ฅ๐๐๐ซ ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐๐๐ฌ๐ ๐ฌ๐ญ๐๐ง๐ ๐ฎ๐ฉ?" ๐ถ Channeling a bit of Eminem today to talk about a buzzing insolvency topic - the standing of bondholders under global notes! ๐
๐๐ก๐ฒ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ข๐ฆ๐ฉ๐จ๐ซ๐ญ๐๐ง๐ญ?
Lack of standing (to bring a winding up petition) is one of those powerful defences that, if proven, can halt a petition in its tracks. ๐ But there's no universal rule here. It all boils down to the fine print of the indenture. (Of course...!) ๐ง
In my latest insolvency article (linked below), co-authored with Ian De Witt and Tim Au, we delve into what fine print you should watch out for. ๐ฆ
๐ ๐๐๐ฒ ๐๐๐ค๐๐๐ฐ๐๐ฒ๐ฌ:
๐ก ๐๐๐ง๐๐ฆ๐๐ซ๐ค ๐๐๐๐ข๐ฌ๐ข๐จ๐ง: In Re Leading Holdings Group Limited [2023] HKCFI 1770, the Hong Kong courts addressed for the first time, the rights of global note investors.
๐ก ๐๐ฅ๐จ๐๐๐ฅ ๐๐จ๐ญ๐ ๐๐ญ๐ซ๐ฎ๐๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐: A prevalent debt security in international finance, often designed to ensure that all bondholders act collectively through the trustee. ๐ค
๐ก ๐๐ข๐ ๐ก๐ญ๐ฌ & ๐๐๐ฅ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐ก๐ข๐ฉ๐ฌ: In determining the bondholder's standing, the Court differentiated between trust property beneficiaries and equitable assignees.
๐ก ๐๐ซ๐๐๐๐๐๐ง๐ญ๐ฌ ๐๐ซ๐จ๐ฆ ๐จ๐๐๐ฌ๐ก๐จ๐ซ๐ ๐ฃ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ข๐ฌ๐๐ข๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐ฌ: The article discusses significant recent cases from the Cayman Islands and the BVI, including Re Shinsun Holdings (Group) Co., Ltd and Cithara Global Multi-Strategy SPC v Haimen Zhongnna Investment Development (International) Co. Ltd, on key relevant principles.
๐ก๐๐ก๐ ๐๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ฉ๐ซ๐ข๐ง๐ญ: The terms of the indenture will be essential in determining the standing of bondholders in individual cases.
๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐ข๐จ๐ฎ๐ฌ ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐ข๐ฏ๐ ๐๐๐๐ฉ๐๐ซ?
Read the full article at https://lnkd.in/gSKyyaTd
Three years ago, I returned to my home city, Hong Kong, after practising in the legal hubs of London and New York, focusing on international arbitration.๐๐
One striking difference I observed in the HK arbitration market was how often insolvency issues dovetailed with arbitration.
For instance, a debt default might lead to a statutory demand (with subsequent proceedings in the HK courts), but the process could be complicated by a defensive arbitration claiming an underlying dispute. ๐ค
Providing clients with practical remedies using all the tools in the dispute resolution toolbox is why I'm excited to be part of Tanner De Witt's outstanding cross-border restructuring and insolvency team in Hong Kong, while still diving deep into my core practice in international arbitration. ๐
So, alongside my arbitration insights, I'll be sharing my learnings and insights on cross-border insolvency/restructuring matters too. ๐
Speaking of which, I'm delighted to share my first insolvency/restructuring article at TDW, co-authored with Ian De Witt.๐๏ธ
*****
๐ข ๐๐จ๐ง๐ ๐๐จ๐ง๐ '๐ฌ ๐๐ข๐ ๐ข๐ญ๐๐ฅ ๐๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ก ๐ข๐ง ๐๐๐ง๐ค๐ซ๐ฎ๐ฉ๐ญ๐๐ฒ ๐๐๐ฐ๐ฌ ๐ข
The Hong Kong Government is moving towards digitisation, leaving hard copy documents (well, not entirely) in the past. The latest amendments to our bankruptcy laws now allow:
1๏ธโฃ Electronic service of statutory demands
2๏ธโฃ Use of electronic bundles & skeletons for winding-up & bankruptcy applications
3๏ธโฃ Electronic submissions to the Official Receiver
๐๐๐ฒ ๐๐ข๐ ๐ก๐ฅ๐ข๐ ๐ก๐ญ๐ฌ:
๐ง๐ฒ Electronic service of statutory demands is a game-changer. Creditors can now serve demands via email, WhatsApp, WeChat, and other platforms. But there are conditions and implications for both creditors and debtors.
๐ฑ๐ผ Say goodbye to paper waste! Electronic bundles for applications are not just eco-friendly but also cost-effective.
๐ฅ๏ธ๐ The Official Receiver's new electronic submission system is set to revolutionise the way it handles documents, making processes smoother and more efficient.
๐Embracing these changes is crucial in the digital age.
๐๐๐๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐๐ซ๐ญ๐ข๐๐ฅ๐ ๐๐ญ https://lnkd.in/gx85eKtGย