In some countries, governments provide payments for unemployed people.
How does this impact people?
Is this a positive or negative development?
In some nations, governments provide financial assistance to people who are unemployed. This policy can affect individuals in various ways. Although it may create certain disadvantages, I believe it is generally a positive development because it provides essential support during difficult times.
One significant impact of unemployment benefits is that they offer financial security to people who have lost their jobs. These payments help individuals cover basic expenses such as food, housing, and healthcare while they search for new employment. As a result, families are less likely to experience severe financial hardship or fall into poverty. Another benefit is that unemployed people can spend more time looking for suitable jobs instead of accepting the first opportunity available simply to survive. Furthermore, financial support may allow individuals to participate in training programmes and develop new skills, increasing their chances of securing better employment in the future.
However, this policy can also have some negative consequences. One drawback is that a small number of people may become dependent on government assistance and lose motivation to find work. If benefits are too generous or continue for long periods, some individuals may delay returning to employment. Another issue is the financial burden on governments. Funding unemployment payments requires substantial public expenditure, which may increase pressure on taxpayers and reduce resources available for other public services.
In conclusion, government payments for unemployed people can reduce poverty, provide financial stability, and help individuals improve their employment prospects. Although there is a risk of dependency and increased public spending, I believe the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. Therefore, this policy is a positive development when supported by appropriate regulations and employment programmes.
People often think about creating an ideal society, but most of the time fail in making this happen.
What is your opinion about an ideal society?
How can we create an ideal society?
People have long dreamed of creating a perfect society where everyone can live happily and peacefully. Although achieving such a society is extremely difficult, I believe an ideal society is one that provides equal opportunities, justice, and a high quality of life for all citizens. Several measures can help us move closer to this goal.
In my opinion, an ideal society is one in which people have access to basic necessities and equal opportunities for success. Quality education and healthcare should be available to everyone regardless of their economic background. Furthermore, citizens should feel safe and protected by a fair legal system that treats all individuals equally. Another important feature of an ideal society is mutual respect among people from different cultures, religions, and social groups. When individuals respect one another, social harmony becomes easier to achieve.
Creating such a society requires both government action and individual responsibility. Firstly, governments should invest heavily in education because educated citizens are more likely to make responsible decisions and contribute positively to society. Secondly, efforts should be made to reduce inequality by improving access to employment opportunities and essential public services. In addition, strong laws must be enforced fairly to maintain order and ensure justice. Finally, individuals should actively participate in their communities through volunteering and social activities. Such involvement can strengthen relationships between people and encourage cooperation.
In conclusion, an ideal society is one that offers equality, security, and mutual respect. Although perfection may never be fully achieved, governments and citizens can work together through education, fairness, and community involvement to create a society that is closer to this ideal.
As most people spend a major part of their adult life at work, job satisfaction is an important element of individual well-being. What factors contribute to job satisfaction? How realistic is the expectation of job satisfaction for all workers?
Since most adults spend a significant proportion of their lives at work, job satisfaction plays an important role in their overall well-being. Several factors contribute to satisfaction in the workplace, although expecting every worker to be completely satisfied may not be realistic.
One of the most important factors influencing job satisfaction is fair pay and job security. Employees who earn a sufficient income and feel secure in their positions are generally less stressed and more motivated. Another factor is the working environment. Supportive colleagues, respectful managers, and a positive workplace culture can greatly improve an employee's experience. Opportunities for career advancement are also important because workers are more likely to feel motivated when they can develop new skills and achieve promotions. In addition, maintaining a healthy work-life balance allows employees to spend time with their families and pursue personal interests, which contributes to overall happiness.
However, it is unrealistic to expect all workers to be fully satisfied with their jobs. People have different personalities, goals, and expectations. For example, some individuals value a high salary, whereas others prioritise meaningful work or flexible schedules. Furthermore, certain occupations are inherently stressful or physically demanding, making complete satisfaction difficult to achieve. Another issue is that employers often face financial and operational limitations, which means they cannot always provide ideal working conditions for every employee. Therefore, while many workers can achieve a reasonable level of satisfaction, complete satisfaction for everyone is unlikely.
In conclusion, job satisfaction depends on factors such as salary, workplace environment, career growth, and work-life balance. Although these elements can improve employee well-being, expecting all workers to be entirely satisfied with their jobs is not a realistic goal.
In many countries insufficient respect is shown to older people. What do you think may be the reason for this? What problems might this cause in society?
In many parts of the world, older people do not receive the level of respect they once enjoyed. This change can be attributed to several social developments, and it may create a number of negative consequences for individuals and society.
One reason for this trend is the changing structure of families. In the past, several generations often lived together, allowing children to develop close relationships with their grandparents. However, nuclear families have become more common, and young people now spend less time with elderly relatives. Another reason is the influence of modern culture. Today's society places great importance on youth, technology, and economic productivity. As a result, older people are sometimes viewed as being less capable of contributing to society. In addition, busy lifestyles leave many people with little time to interact with or care for elderly family members.
This lack of respect can lead to several problems. Firstly, many older people may suffer from loneliness and emotional stress because they feel ignored or unappreciated. This can negatively affect their mental and physical health. Secondly, society may lose valuable knowledge and experience that older generations can offer. Elderly people often provide practical advice and important life lessons, but younger people may miss these benefits if they do not value their elders. Finally, weaker relationships between generations can reduce family unity and create a less caring society overall.
In conclusion, insufficient respect for older people is mainly caused by changing family structures, modern values, and busy lifestyles. This trend can result in loneliness among the elderly, loss of valuable experience, and weaker social relationships, making it a concern that deserves attention.
Some believe that pets should stay at home at all times, while others feel they should be allowed outside the home. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Bahut log pets ko apni family ka hissa maante hain. However, is baat par alag-alag opinions hain ki animals ko hamesha ghar ke andar rehna chahiye ya unhe bahar jaane ki permission milni chahiye. Yeh essay dono views discuss karega aur phir meri opinion dega.
Ek taraf, pets ko ghar ke andar rakhna unki safety ko ensure karta hai. Jo animals ghar ke andar rehte hain, unke road accidents ka shikaar hone ya kho jaane ke chances kaafi kam hote hain. Saath hi, unhe dusre animals se phailne wali diseases ka bhi risk kam rehta hai. Iske alawa, indoor pets neighbours ke liye bhi kam problems create karte hain. For instance, kuch dogs bahar jaakar zyada bhonk sakte hain ya logon ke gardens ko damage kar sakte hain. Isliye, pets ko ghar ke andar rakhna animals aur aas-paas ke logon dono ke liye beneficial ho sakta hai.
Dusri taraf, pets ko bahar jaane dena unki physical aur mental health ke liye kaafi zaroori hai. Sabse pehle, animals ko fit aur healthy rehne ke liye regular exercise chahiye hoti hai, aur outdoor environment unhe daudne aur active rehne ka mauka deta hai. Isse obesity jaise health issues ka risk kam ho jata hai. Iske saath hi, bahar rehkar pets naye places explore karte hain aur alag-alag cheezon ko experience karte hain, jo unhe mentally stimulated rakhta hai. Aur jab woh dusre animals ke saath interact karte hain, toh unki social skills bhi improve hoti hain aur boredom bhi kam hota hai. Isi wajah se, mere hisaab se pets ko owners ki supervision mein bahar jaane ki permission milni chahiye.
Conclusion mein, ghar ke andar rehna pets ko protection deta hai aur dusron ke liye inconvenience ko kam karta hai, jabki bahar jaana unki overall well-being ke liye faydemand hai. Mere opinion mein, controlled way mein pets ko bahar jaane dena better option hai kyunki iske benefits risks se zyada hain.
Scientists agree that excessive consumption of junk food is harming people’s health. Some people believe that educating the public is the best way to solve this problem, while others argue that education alone will not be effective. This essay will discuss both views before presenting my opinion.
On the one hand, education can play an important role in improving eating habits. When people understand the health risks associated with junk food, such as obesity, diabetes, and heart disease, they may become more careful about their diet. Schools can also teach children the importance of balanced nutrition from an early age, helping them develop healthier habits in the long term. In addition, public awareness campaigns through television and social media can encourage society to make more responsible food choices.
On the other hand, many people believe that education alone is insufficient to solve the problem. One reason is that junk food is highly convenient, affordable, and appealing, especially for busy individuals who do not have time to prepare healthy meals. Furthermore, fast food companies invest heavily in advertising, which strongly influences consumer behaviour, particularly among children and teenagers. Even when people are aware of the dangers, they may continue consuming unhealthy food because of taste, habit, or lifestyle pressures.
In conclusion, while education can increase awareness and promote healthier habits, it is unlikely to solve the problem completely by itself. A broader approach involving both education and government action is necessary to reduce the harmful effects of junk food.
Page 238 Q24
In modern society, celebrities often receive attention for their luxurious lifestyles and physical appearance rather than their actual achievements. Some people believe this creates a negative influence on young people. I agree with this view to a large extent, although some celebrities can still serve as positive role models. My perspective shall be justified in the following paragraphs.
One reason for this problem is the increasing focus of media and social platforms on glamour and wealth. Celebrities frequently display expensive clothes, luxury holidays, and lavish lifestyles online, which attracts public attention. As a result, many young people begin to associate success with money and appearance rather than hard work or talent. This can create unrealistic expectations and encourage teenagers to value fame and material possessions above education or personal growth.
Another concern is that celebrity culture may promote unhealthy social values. Many young people attempt to imitate the lifestyles of famous personalities without understanding the effort behind their success. In some cases, this may lead to excessive spending, low self-esteem, or unhealthy pressure to appear attractive. Consequently, young people may develop a distorted understanding of achievement and happiness.
However, it is important to recognise that not all celebrities have a negative influence. Many successful athletes, actors, and public figures use their popularity to support charitable causes and inspire young people through discipline and determination. In addition, family and educational institutions continue to play a more significant role in shaping children’s values and behaviour.
In conclusion, although some celebrities provide positive inspiration, I agree that modern celebrity culture often places too much emphasis on glamour and wealth. This can encourage unhealthy attitudes among young people and create misleading ideas about success.
News editor decide what to to broadcast on television and what to print in newspaper. What factors do you think influence these decisions? Do we bacame used to bad news? Would it be better if more good news was reported?
In media broadcast and print, the news editors give the final approval for what kind of stories to run on TV and what to publish in the newspapers. Multiple factors can affect these decisions, and I absolutely believe that majority of the people do become habituated to negative news and it would be much better if more positive news was reported.
To begin with, the most prominent factor is public awareness and safety. News channels and newspapers have the main purpose to serve public interest and make people informed about what is happening in their country and the world overall. Additionally, they also have a significant duty during natural and man-made disaster situations. Apart from that, a significant driving factor is profit and competition as well. News stories are primarily selected to get maximum revenue and viewership, so as to generate more relevance in the market among competitors.
Due to the constant exposure to negative stories, many people have become accustomed to bad news. Reports about violence, war, and disasters appear so frequently that audiences may become emotionally less sensitive over time. This can create fear, stress, and a negative perception of society. Some individuals even begin to expect negative events as a normal part of daily life.
In my opinion, reporting more positive news would be beneficial for society. Stories about scientific progress, acts of kindness, or personal achievement can inspire people and improve public morale. However, the media should not ignore serious issues completely. A balanced approach that includes both positive and negative news would inform the public while also encouraging a more hopeful and constructive outlook.
In conclusion, news editors are mainly influenced by audience demand, competition, and social importance when selecting stories. Although people have become used to negative news, I believe greater coverage of positive events would have a healthier effect on society.
Certain laws have little effect now because it is difficult for the police to enforce them.
Why is this the case?
How can this problem be solved?
In many countries, some laws are no longer as effective as they once were because they are difficult for the police to enforce. This issue can be explained by several factors, and there are also practical solutions that governments can adopt to address it.
One major reason for this problem is the rapid growth of technology and modern lifestyles. Many crimes now take place online, such as cybercrime and digital fraud, which are harder for traditional police forces to monitor and control. In addition, limited resources and manpower make it difficult for law enforcement agencies to effectively enforce all laws. In large cities with high population density, police officers may be overwhelmed, leading to weak enforcement of minor laws such as traffic violations or public behaviour regulations. Another factor is the lack of public awareness or willingness to follow rules, which reduces the overall effectiveness of laws.
To solve this issue, governments should invest in modern technology and improve law enforcement systems. For example, using surveillance cameras, digital tracking systems, and artificial intelligence can help police monitor activities more efficiently. Increasing funding for police departments can also ensure that there are enough officers to enforce laws properly. Furthermore, public education campaigns can encourage citizens to follow laws voluntarily, reducing the burden on law enforcement. Stricter penalties for violations may also act as a deterrent and improve compliance.
In conclusion, the reduced effectiveness of certain laws is mainly due to technological changes, limited resources, and public behaviour. By adopting modern tools and promoting awareness, governments can improve law enforcement and ensure that laws remain effective.
Introduction Format
General St. (opt)
Paraphrasing
Thesis (opinion) (as req.)
Outline (opt)
Advantage-Disadvantage Essay
Nowadays, a lot of offices employ open-space designs instead of separate rooms for work. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
In these modern times, workplace environments play a crucial role in productivity and efficiency of employees. A large number of offices today utilize open space cubicles rather than individual cabins for their workers. I believe the benefits far outweigh the drawbacks, and the reasons shall be elaborated ahead.
Discussion Essay
Some people think that children should begin their formal education at a very early age. Others think they should begin after 7 years of age. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
In these times, children usually start their formal education quite early. A group of individuals believes that formal schooling for children should start early, while others claim that it need not commence until after 7 years. Both the perspectives shall be analysed in the following paragraphs, including my own opinion.
I shall elaborate both the claims in the ensuing paragraphs, followed by my own perspective.
Sides, standpoints, viewpoints, perspectives, arguments, claims
Argumentative Essay
Many claim that the fast food industry has a negative effect on the environment, eating habits, and families. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is irrefutable that the fast food industry has grown tremendously in the recent years. The nature, climate, food consumption and the society in general is getting severely affected by this industry, which is claimed by many. I majorly support this argument, and the justifications shall be presented ahead.
I believe this argument is correct to a large extent.
Support, advocate, stand
Cause-Solution Essay
Many young people today know more about international pop or movie stars than about famous people in the history of their own country. Why is this? What can be done to increase young people’s interest in famous people in the history of their country?
It is undeniable that today the young generation is highly influenced by the pop culture. However, it is concerning that they are usually unaware about the famous personalities of their native history. Some major reasons and some effective steps that can be implemented shall be elaborated ahead.
Solutions, measures, steps
Fight, tackle, combat
Two-Part Q Essay
There are different methods businesses use to increase their sales. What are the different ways companies use to increase sales? Which one is the most effective?
In this ever-changing technological era, various markting strategies are employed by companies to drive sales and generate profits. Some effective advertsing and promotional methods shall be analysed ahead.
Two-Part Q Essay
In many countries, people now wear western-style dress such as suits and jeans rather than traditional clothing. Why is this? Is this a positive or negative development?
I believe this is actually an advantageous development, and the justifications including the reasons for this shall be examined ahead.
Advantage, disadvantage
Positive, negative
Benefit, drawback
Pros, cons
Bright side, dark side
Merit, demerit
Upside, downside
It is sometimes possible to pay somebody to do things you don't want to do, or don't have time to do, for example, household chores or looking after children. Is this a good way of providing work for others? Should people do these things themselves?
Nowadays, due to busy lifestyle, many people choose to employ someone for their house chores or menial work, like cleaners or babysitters. Whether this is a good way of providing jobs to people or people should do these tasks on their own shall be discussed in the following paragraphs.
On the one hand, paying others to do such tasks can be an effective way of providing work. Domestic services create jobs for many people, particularly those with limited education or employment options. In addition, outsourcing chores allows professionals to concentrate on their careers, which can increase overall productivity in society. For working parents, hiring childcare support may also make it possible to maintain stable employment and financial security.
However, relying entirely on others for personal responsibilities can create problems. When parents spend less time caring for their children, emotional bonds may weaken. Similarly, avoiding basic household tasks can prevent individuals from developing essential life skills and independence. There is also the risk of overdependence, where people become unable to manage daily activities without assistance.
In conclusion, hiring people for chores or domestic labor can generate employment for unskilled people, increase productivity for working people and free time for personal growth. However, if possible, it is always advisable to do such work by own to develop essential life skills and maintain healthy bonds with family members.
In education and employment, some people work harder than others.
Why do some people work harder?
Is it always good to work hard?
In this competitive world, in the academics and workplace, some individuals tend to put in more efforts compared to others. There are many factors that play a role, and I believe that hard work is not always beneficial.
Reasons:
· Achieve goals
· Lack of skill in the work
· Societal expectations
· Competitive env
· More passion about work/field
· Financial pressure
· Rewards
o Promotions/position
o Perks
o Scholarships
Negative Development
· Burnout and stress
o Not able to enjoy/live fully
· Poor work-life balance
· Health problems
o Sleep deprivation
· Less productivity in the long term
Apart from that, societal expectations can also play a significant role. Some cultures expect individuals to work hard, be disciplined, punctual, have integrity and other such qualities. Japan is a clear example of this, where work is considered as worship, and not putting in efforts is believed to be bad for reputation.
The biggest reason can be passion about work or studies. For example, I completely enjoy reading history, and I can do it for hours without getting tired or frustrated. To me, it does not feel like work.
Nowadays everywhere in the world there are multicultural societies, in which there is a mixture of different ethnic people. What are the advantages and disadvantages?
ADVANTAGES of multicultural societies
1. Cultural diversity and enrichment
• Exposure to different traditions, festivals, food, and customs
• Broader cultural experiences
• More vibrant and interesting communities
2. Greater tolerance and open-mindedness
• People learn to respect different beliefs and lifestyles
• Reduces prejudice and discrimination
• Encourages acceptance and social harmony
3. Exchange of ideas and innovation
• Different perspectives lead to creative solutions
• Innovation increases in business, education, and arts
• Diverse thinking improves problem-solving
4. Economic growth
• Immigrants fill labour shortages
• Skilled workers contribute to productivity
• More entrepreneurship and small businesses
5. Language and global skills
• People learn multiple languages
• Improves communication in international trade and tourism
• Makes countries more globally competitive
6. Culinary and lifestyle variety
• Access to international food, fashion, music, and art
• Improves quality of life and social experiences
7. Stronger global connections
• Links between countries through migrant communities
• Better international relations and cooperation
DISADVANTAGES of multicultural societies
8. Communication barriers
• Language differences create misunderstandings
• Difficulty accessing jobs or services
• Slower integration
9. Cultural conflicts
• Differences in values, religion, or traditions may cause tension
• Disagreements over social norms and behaviour
10. Social segregation
• Ethnic groups may live separately
• Lack of interaction reduces unity
• Creation of ghettos or isolated communities
11. Pressure on public services
• Increased demand for housing, healthcare, and education
• Overcrowding in cities
12. Job competition
• Locals may feel immigrants take jobs
• Can lead to resentment and unemployment concerns
13. Loss of national identity
• Traditional culture may weaken
• Fear that local customs disappear over time
14. Discrimination and racism
• Prejudice between groups
• Social tension and inequality
Some people warn that the era of silver screen is coming to an end and that people will eventually lose interest in going to the cinema. Do you agree or disagree with this view?
Today, it is increasingly seen that people are losing interest in going to the cinemas, and it is possible in the near future that cinemas may shut down. From my perspective, this seems to absolutely true.
Agree
• Expensive
o Food, drinks
o Tickets
o Parking
o Travel
The biggest reason of reducing popularity of theatres is the expense associated with it. Along with the ticket prices, food and drinks in cinemas cost almost three times more; also, the parking and fuel cost cannot be ignored.
• Rise of streaming platforms
o Cheaper
o Accessible anywhere/anytime
o Pause and resume/rewind
• Comfort
o Home env—more comfortable
• Faster digital releases
o 1-2 months
o One less reason to go to the theatres
Disagree
• Immersive viewing experience
o Large screen
o Surround Sound
o 3D
o IMAX, 4DX
• Social activity/ emotional group experience
In recent years, the popularity of online streaming services has led some people to believe that cinemas will gradually disappear and that audiences will lose interest in going to the theatre. Although home entertainment has become more convenient, I disagree with this view because cinemas still offer unique experiences that cannot be replaced.
One reason people think cinemas are declining is the rapid growth of streaming platforms. Services such as Netflix and other online providers allow viewers to watch films at home at a lower cost and at any convenient time. This flexibility means people can pause, rewind, or choose from thousands of movies without leaving their houses. In addition, cinema tickets and snacks are often expensive, which discourages many families from visiting theatres regularly.
However, despite these advantages of home viewing, cinemas continue to provide an experience that cannot be recreated in a living room. Watching a movie on a large screen with high-quality sound systems creates a stronger emotional and visual impact. Action scenes, special effects, and dramatic moments feel more exciting in theatres, which makes cinema-going a special form of entertainment rather than just another way to watch a film.
Furthermore, cinemas are important social spaces where people can enjoy films together. Going to the movies with friends or family is often seen as a shared activity and a way to relax outside the home. Modern technologies such as IMAX and 3D screenings also make cinema visits more attractive and enjoyable.
In conclusion, although streaming services have reduced cinema attendance to some extent, I believe the silver screen will not disappear. The unique atmosphere and social experience of cinemas ensure that they will remain popular in the future.
Shopping habits depend more on your age group than anything else. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
POINTS AGREEING (Age group is the strongest influence)
1. Different needs at different life stages
Children, young adults, parents, and elderly people buy different products.
Needs change with education, work, family responsibilities, and health.
2. Technology usage varies by age
Younger people prefer online shopping, apps, and digital payments.
Older generations often prefer physical stores and face-to-face service.
3. Income and spending priorities change with age
Younger people spend more on fashion, entertainment, and gadgets.
Older consumers focus on savings, quality, and long-term value.
4. Brand loyalty differs across age groups
Older shoppers are more loyal to familiar brands.
Younger shoppers enjoy experimenting with trends and new brands.
5. Influence of social media on younger generations
Teenagers and young adults are influenced by influencers and online trends.
Advertising platforms target age-specific audiences.
POINTS DISAGREEING (Other factors matter more than age)
6. Income level and financial situation
High-income individuals shop differently from low-income ones, regardless of age.
Budget constraints shape purchasing decisions strongly.
7. Cultural background
Traditions, religion, and social norms influence buying habits.
Age may be less important than cultural expectations.
8. Education and awareness
Educated consumers may prioritize sustainability and ethics.
Awareness affects buying choices more than age.
9. Lifestyle and personality
Minimalists, environmentalists, or luxury-oriented consumers exist across ages.
Personal values override age-based patterns.
10. Location and access
Urban vs rural environments affect shopping habits.
Availability of malls, markets, and delivery services plays a role.
Studies show that crime rates are lower among those with educational degrees. Therefore, the best way to reduce the crime rate is to educate criminals while they are still in prison. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people believe that reading is always a good habit. Others feel it depends on which books a person is reading. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.
________________________________________
POINTS SUPPORTING THE VIEW THAT READING IS ALWAYS GOOD
1. Improves language and communication skills
• Reading regularly increases vocabulary and grammar awareness.
• Helps people express ideas more clearly in speaking and writing.
2. Enhances knowledge and awareness
• Books expose readers to new ideas, cultures, and perspectives.
• Even fictional stories can improve understanding of human behavior and society.
3. Develops imagination and creativity
• Reading stimulates imagination more actively than visual media.
• Helps readers think creatively and form independent interpretations.
4. Improves concentration and mental discipline
• Reading requires focus and patience.
• Regular readers often have better attention spans.
5. Supports mental health
• Reading can reduce stress and provide relaxation.
• It is often used as a healthy escape from daily pressures.
6. Encourages lifelong learning
• Reading habits formed early often continue into adulthood.
• Promotes curiosity and intellectual growth.
________________________________________
POINTS SUPPORTING THE VIEW THAT IT DEPENDS ON WHAT IS READ
7. Poor-quality content offers little value
• Some books may promote misinformation, stereotypes, or harmful ideas.
• Reading such material may negatively influence beliefs or attitudes.
8. Excessive entertainment reading
• Constantly reading only light fiction or gossip content may limit learning.
• Does not always contribute to intellectual or personal development.
9. Age-inappropriate or harmful material
• Children exposed to violent or disturbing content may be affected emotionally.
• Guidance is necessary to ensure healthy reading habits.
10. Time opportunity cost
• Time spent reading low-value material could be used more productively.
• Reading should add value, not replace essential activities like exercise or social interaction.
11. Reading without critical thinking
• Simply reading does not guarantee understanding or growth.
• Readers must reflect and think critically about content.
Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals, and that this money could be better spent on the human population. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Arguments supporting the view (agree)
(Money should be redirected toward human population)
1. Urgent human needs
• Millions lack access to clean water, healthcare, education, and housing.
• Governments should prioritise saving human lives over animals.
2. Limited public resources
• National budgets are finite.
• Spending heavily on wildlife reduces funds for poverty reduction and infrastructure.
3. Human welfare has direct economic impact
• Investing in education and healthcare improves productivity and economic growth.
• Healthy populations strengthen national development more visibly.
4. Wildlife protection sometimes benefits tourism elites
• Conservation funds may support tourism rather than local communities.
• Local people near reserves may remain poor while animals are protected.
5. Human–wildlife conflict
• Protected animals can destroy crops or endanger villagers.
• People suffer losses while governments spend money protecting animals.
________________________________________
Arguments opposing the view (disagree)
(Wildlife protection is essential and should continue)
6. Ecosystem balance
• Wild animals are crucial for biodiversity and food chains.
• Loss of species damages ecosystems that humans depend on.
7. Long-term human benefit
• Conservation supports clean air, water, climate stability, and agriculture.
• Protecting animals indirectly protects humans.
8. Ethical responsibility
• Humans caused most wildlife destruction through deforestation and pollution.
• Moral duty to repair the damage.
9. Economic benefits through eco-tourism
• Wildlife protection creates jobs and tourism revenue.
• Funds can support local communities if managed well.
10. Prevention is cheaper than repair
• Restoring damaged ecosystems is far more expensive than protecting them early.
________________________________________
Balanced / nuanced ideas
11. False comparison
• Human welfare and wildlife protection are interconnected, not opposing goals.
• Protecting nature supports long-term human survival.
12. Problem lies in inefficient spending
• Issue is not wildlife funding but corruption or poor policy.
• Funds should be managed better rather than reduced.
13. Priority-based approach
• Emergency human crises may need immediate funding.
• Long-term budgets should still protect wildlife.
Nowadays, it is easier for young people to have a credit card compared to the past. Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages?
In these contemporary times, the usage of credit card has been increasing by a huge rate, as it makes purchases easier than ever. It is also true that the accessibility of a credit card for young adults has become more convenient. According to me, this phenomenon has more demerits, which shall be justified ahead.
In many countries, primary and secondary schools close for two months or more in the summer holidays. What is the value of long school holidays? What are the arguments in favour of shorter school holidays?
Vacations are the times for which students eagerly wait, so they can relax and can get a break from their studies. Primary and secondary school holidays usually last for two months or more when learning institutes remain closed. This essay shall elaborate the benefits of both longer and shorter vacations.
Countries should try to produce all the food for the population and import as little food as possible. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is undeniable that food is one of the most essential fundamental requirements for humans. Some individuals argue that nations should try to grow all the food for their inhabitants and import less frequently. I partially support this standpoint, and the relevant reasons shall be discussed ahead.
Many people feel that media coverage has become increasingly biased today. Why is this? What can be done to fix this problem?
Today, media can be considered as the fourth pillar of a healthy economy. It has been observed that media sources like media houses, newspapers and journalists have become one-sided when broadcasting news. The responsible factors and some effective measures to address this situation shall be presented ahead.
In many countries, coffee chains are expanding rapidly, which some claim threatens the survival of small local cafés. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Format:
2:1 ratio (largely support/oppose)
One idea for agreement and two for disagreement
OR
One idea for disagreement and two for agreement
IDEAS FOR AGREEMENT
(Coffee chains DO threaten small local cafés)
1. Economic pressure and unfair competition
• Large chains can offer lower prices due to bulk buying and strong supply networks.
• Small cafés struggle to compete with discounts, loyalty programs, and promotions.
2. Dominance of prime locations
• Coffee chains secure high-traffic areas such as malls, business districts, and transport hubs.
• Local cafés are pushed to less visible locations, reducing customer flow.
3. Consumer preference for consistency and speed
• Many customers value predictable taste and fast service.
• Chains appeal to busy lifestyles, reducing demand for independent cafés.
4. Marketing and brand power
• Global brands invest heavily in advertising and social media.
• Small cafés lack visibility and brand recognition.
5. Higher survival capacity
• Chains can survive temporary losses; local cafés often close after short downturns.
________________________________________
IDEAS FOR DISAGREEMENT
(Coffee chains do NOT necessarily threaten local cafés)
1. Uniqueness and personal experience
• Local cafés offer personalised service, unique interiors, and custom menus.
• Customers seeking atmosphere prefer independents over standardised chains.
2. Community connection
• Local cafés act as social hubs for neighbourhoods.
• Strong customer loyalty helps them survive competition.
3. Growing demand for authenticity and ethics
• Consumers increasingly support local, sustainable, and ethically sourced businesses.
• Independent cafés can attract niche markets.
4. Different target audiences
• Chains focus on mass convenience; local cafés serve customers seeking quality and experience.
• Both can coexist without replacing each other.
5. Ability to adapt and specialise
• Local cafés can innovate with specialty coffee, local flavours, or cultural themes.
• Flexibility allows them to survive alongside chains.
Some people choose to have their first child at an older age. What are the reasons? Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
In many societies today, people are choosing to have their first child at a later stage in life. This trend is mainly influenced by career priorities and financial concerns. Although there are some disadvantages to delaying parenthood, I believe the advantages are greater overall.
One major reason people postpone having children is the desire to establish a stable career. Many young adults spend their early years pursuing higher education and professional growth, which leaves little time for raising a family. Another reason is financial pressure. The rising cost of housing, childcare, and education encourages couples to wait until they are financially secure. In addition, some people prefer to enjoy personal freedom, such as travelling or developing hobbies, before taking on the responsibilities of parenthood.
There are several advantages to having children at an older age. Firstly, older parents are usually more financially stable, which allows them to provide better living conditions and education for their children. Secondly, they tend to be emotionally mature and patient, which helps them handle parenting challenges more effectively. Finally, having clear life goals and experience often makes older parents more committed and responsible in raising their children.
However, there are also some disadvantages to this trend. One concern is the increased health risks associated with pregnancy at an older age. Another issue is that older parents may have less physical energy, making it harder to manage active young children.
In conclusion, although delaying childbirth can lead to health and energy-related challenges, the benefits of financial security and emotional readiness outweigh the disadvantages. Overall, having children later in life can provide a more stable and supportive environment for families.
Some people think that charity organizations should only offer help to people of their own country. But others believe that these organizations should give aid to people in great need wherever they live.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
View 1
· Limited resources
o Avoids logistical difficulties (transport, storage, legal permissions, language barrier)
· Local responsibility first
· Better understanding of local issues (laws, culture, community needs)
View 2
· International relationships improve
· Richer nations have greater capacity
· Humanitarian duty
o Famines, wars, disasters require foreign help when local governments collapse
· Some problems require global solutions
o Climate change, pandemics, hunger cannot be solved by national efforts alone
Some people believe that in the future, most cities will become unlivable due to pollution and overcrowding. Others think technological innovation will solve these problems. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.
As urban populations continue to grow around the world, there is ongoing debate about the future livability of major cities. Some people believe that cities will become increasingly difficult places to live due to pollution and overcrowding, while others argue that technological progress will help prevent such outcomes. Both perspectives will be discussed in this essay.
Those who expect cities to become unlivable point to rapid population growth and the pressure it places on infrastructure. Many cities are already struggling with traffic congestion, limited housing, and overcrowded public transport. As more people move from rural areas to urban centres, these problems may intensify. In addition, pollution from factories, vehicles, and waste disposal could worsen air and water quality, making daily life uncomfortable and unhealthy. Climate change is likely to add further challenges, with extreme heat and flooding affecting many large cities. For these reasons, some people believe that future urban environments will be extremely difficult to manage.
On the other hand, supporters of technological innovation argue that new solutions will help cities overcome these challenges. Smart city systems, for example, can reduce traffic by using sensors and artificial intelligence to control roads more efficiently. Cleaner energy sources, such as solar and wind power, can lower pollution levels, while electric vehicles can further reduce emissions. Advances in construction technology may also allow cities to build taller, more efficient housing, helping to manage overcrowding. Furthermore, innovations like vertical farming can improve food supply without taking up large amounts of land.
In conclusion, although cities are likely to face serious problems in the future, I believe that technological development can play a major role in solving them. With careful planning and investment, cities can become more sustainable and comfortable places to live.
Film stars and celebrities often share their views on public matters that have little to do with their profession. Is this a positive or negative development?
Film stars and other celebrities often express opinions about political, environmental, and social issues that are unrelated to their professions. While some see this as helpful for society, others believe it can be harmful. In my view, this development is more positive than negative because celebrities can raise awareness and encourage public action.
One benefit of celebrities speaking about public matters is their ability to reach a wide audience. Millions of people follow actors, musicians, and influencers online, and a single social media post can bring attention to causes that many would normally ignore. For example, when well-known entertainers publicly support environmental campaigns, young people are more likely to pay attention and learn about climate change, animal rights, or sustainable living. This level of influence can drive meaningful social awareness.
Another positive aspect is the ability of celebrities to mobilise support. Their fame can attract donations and volunteers far more effectively than government statements or news articles. During natural disasters or humanitarian crises, public figures often encourage fundraising efforts that provide food, medical care, and housing to affected communities. In this way, celebrity involvement can translate directly into real-world benefits for those in need.
However, there are cases in which celebrity commentary can be harmful. Some entertainers share opinions on complex issues such as economics or public health without sufficient knowledge. Their followers may then adopt misinformation simply because they admire the person speaking, rather than because the statement is accurate. This can distort public debate and lead to poor decision-making.
In conclusion, while celebrity involvement in public matters carries risks when ideas are uninformed, the overall impact is positive. Their ability to raise awareness and support meaningful causes makes their participation valuable to society.
People today get less sleep than in the past.
What is the cause of this?
What are the possible effects of this development?
In recent years, many people around the world have been sleeping less than previous generations. There are several reasons for this trend, and it can lead to a number of negative effects on both health and daily life. This essay will discuss the main causes and the possible consequences of reduced sleep.
One major cause of this problem is the increasing pressure of modern work and study. Many jobs today demand long hours, and people often continue working on their phones or laptops late into the night. Because of this, they find it difficult to maintain a regular sleep routine. Another important reason is the rise of digital technology. Many individuals spend too much time on social media, watching videos or browsing the internet before going to bed. The bright screens keep the brain active, making it harder to fall asleep at the right time.
The effects of getting less sleep are quite serious. Firstly, lack of sleep can harm a person’s physical health. It can lead to problems such as fatigue, a weak immune system, and a higher risk of illnesses like heart disease. Secondly, insufficient sleep affects mental well-being. People may become more stressed, irritable, and unable to concentrate, which reduces their performance at work or school. Finally, sleeping less can also increase the chance of accidents, especially on the road, as tired drivers cannot react quickly.
In conclusion, modern lifestyles, technology use, and work pressure are the main causes of reduced sleep. If this trend continues, it will lead to significant health problems, lower productivity, and greater safety risks. Therefore, it is important for individuals and societies to promote healthier sleep habits.
In many cities, planners tend to arrange shops, schools, offices and homes in specific areas and separate them from each other. Do you think the advantages of this policy outweigh the disadvantages?
Urban planners in many cities design areas for specific purposes, such as residential, commercial, and educational zones. While this system helps to organize city spaces more effectively, it also creates certain drawbacks related to daily life and the environment.
One clear advantage of separating different functions within a city is improved order and management. When schools, offices, and shopping centres are grouped in specific areas, it becomes easier for local authorities to provide essential services such as transport links, waste collection, and infrastructure maintenance. This kind of structured layout can also make residential areas quieter and safer, as they are kept away from heavy traffic and business activity. Furthermore, concentrating commercial spaces together can boost the economy by promoting business networking and efficiency.
However, the disadvantages of this approach are becoming increasingly apparent in modern urban life. The most significant issue is long commuting distances, as people often live far from their workplaces or schools. This not only wastes time and energy but also contributes to higher levels of air pollution and stress. Moreover, separating spaces by function can make cities feel less vibrant and connected. When people spend most of their time in specialized zones, there are fewer opportunities for social interaction among residents, workers, and students. Additionally, expanding cities to maintain these divisions can destroy green areas and increase housing costs.
In conclusion, although dividing cities into zones offers better organization and control, its disadvantages — such as pollution, urban sprawl, and reduced community life — outweigh the benefits. A more mixed-use urban design would create healthier, more inclusive, and environmentally friendly cities.
10/10 Essay Conclusions
Argumentative
It is better for children if the whole family including aunts, uncles and so on are involved in a child’s upbringing, rather than just their parents.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
A family plays a crucial role in a child’s upbringing. Some people opine that when a child is growing up, not only the parents, but also the whole kith and kin needs to be engaged. I majorly oppose this suggestion, and the relevant reasons shall be illustrated ahead.
Argumentative
If a product is good and meets customer needs, then people will buy it and advertising is unnecessary.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Argumentative
It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. dinosaurs, dodos, etc.). There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening.
Do you agree or disagree?
As many animal species are disappearing nowadays, many people argue that it is a waste of time trying to preserve these species as it is a natural phenomenon. I strongly disagree with this statement, and the relevant reasons shall be elaborated in the following paragraphs.
Two Part Q
Many researchers believe that we can now study the behaviour of children to see if they will grow up to be criminals, while others disagree.
To what extent do you think crime is determined by genetics?
Is it possible to stop children from growing up to be criminals?
Due to the advancement in medical technology, genetics has progressed a lot. I believe that genes and upbringing are equally responsible for children becoming criminals, so blaming it just on one of them is not right. Along with that, by the right guidance and care, it is absolutely possible to make them good citizens of the society.
Two Part Q
Getting promotions are one of the biggest motivators for hard work in the modern workplace.
Why are people so driven to
receive promotions?
What other factors motivate people to work hard?
Advantage-Disadvantage
In many countries, plastic containers have become more common than ever and are used by many food and drink companies.
Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
As plastic is one of the most durable materials, its use has become the most frequent it has ever been, especially by food and drink companies, who use plastic for packaging. According to me, the drawbacks far outnumber the benefits, which shall be elaborated in the forthcoming paragraphs.
Advantage Disadvantage
In the past, knowledge was contained in books. Nowadays, knowledge is uploaded to the internet.
Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
Positive-Negative
Many people put their personal information online (address, telephone number, and so on) for purposes such as signing up for social networks or online banking.
Is this a positive or negative development?
Due to rapid expansion of technology, a lot of people now put their personal data like addresses, contact information, and others on websites or apps, to facilitate signing up. I claim this to be an advantageous development, though there are definitely some demerits associated with it.
Discussion
Some people believe that the experiences children have before they go to school will have the greatest effect on their future life. Others argue that experiences gained when they are teenagers have a bigger influence.
Discuss both views and give your own opinions.
There is an ongoing debate between two distinct opinions, where some people argue that the experiences that a child has in childhood before schooling, have a more lasting effect on his/her future, while others tend to side with the experiences during the teenage to have a more profound influence. Both the standpoints shall be analysed ahead before reaching a conclusion.
Discussion
Some think that climate change reforms will negatively affect business. Others feel they are an opportunity for businesses.
Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.
Cause-Solution
Many students find it difficult to pay attention at school.
What are the reasons for this?
What could be done to solve this problem?
Nowadays, there is a growing concern for attention at school among students. More and more students these days are finding it difficult to focus in school. I shall elaborate some responsible factors for this, along with some effective measures to deal with this situation.
Cause-Solution
Childhood obesity has become a serious problem in recent years.
What are the primary causes of this?
What measures should be taken to reduce childhood obesity?