Nowadays, more and more people are moving from the countryside to cities, which are becoming overcrowded. What are the reasons for this movement to cities and what can be done to reduce it?
In many countries, an increasing number of people are leaving rural areas and settling in cities. As a result, urban centres are becoming overcrowded and facing various challenges. This essay will discuss the reasons behind this migration and suggest some possible solutions to address the problem.
Cities have always attracted people because they offer better opportunities for employment, education, and modern facilities. Consequently, large numbers of individuals are moving from the countryside to urban areas, leading to overcrowding. This essay will examine the causes of this trend and propose measures that could reduce it.
While rural areas are often known for their peaceful environment, many people prefer to relocate to cities in search of a better life. This growing movement has contributed significantly to urban overcrowding. This essay will explore the main reasons for this phenomenon and discuss how it can be controlled.
Rapid economic development and urbanisation have changed population patterns across the world. More people are now migrating from villages and small towns to major cities, creating pressure on urban infrastructure and services. This essay will analyse the factors driving this migration and suggest ways to encourage people to remain in rural areas.
The migration of people from rural areas to cities has become a common trend in many parts of the world. Although urban areas provide numerous opportunities, the continuous movement of people has resulted in severe overcrowding. This essay will discuss the primary causes of rural-to-urban migration and recommend solutions to reduce this growing problem.
The migration of people from rural areas to cities has become increasingly common in many countries. As a result, urban areas are becoming overcrowded and facing various social and economic problems. This essay will discuss the main reasons behind this trend and suggest some solutions to reduce it.
One of the primary reasons why people move to cities is the availability of better employment opportunities. Large cities usually have more industries, businesses, and offices, which offer higher salaries and better career prospects than rural areas. Another important factor is access to quality education and healthcare facilities. Many villages lack good schools, universities, and hospitls, forcing people to relocate to cities in order to improve their standard of living. Furthermore, urban areas provide modern infrastructure and entertainment options, making them more attractive, especially to young people.
Several measures can be taken to reduce the movement of people towards cities. Firstly, governments should invest more in rural development by creating employment opportunities in smaller towns and villages. For example, establishing industries and supporting local businesses can encourage people to remain in their hometowns. Secondly, authorities should improve public services in rural areas, including schools, hospitals, and transportation networks. If people can access essential facilities without moving, they may be less likely to migrate. Finally, governments could provide tax incentives and financial support to companies that operate in less developed regions, which would help create balanced economic growth across the country.
In conclusion, people mainly move to cities because of better job opportunities, education, and living standards. However, by improving infrastructure and creating more employment opportunities in rural areas, governments can reduce excessive migration and ease the problem of urban overcrowding.
Being a celebrity – such as a famous film star or sports personality – brings problems as well as benefits. Do you think that being a celebrity brings more benefits or more problems?
Celebrities such as actors and sports personalities are often admired for their fame and success. However, public life can also create several difficulties. Although being famous has certain disadvantages, I believe the benefits outweigh the problems overall.
One major benefit of being a celebrity is financial reward. Famous people usually earn large amounts of money through films, sports, advertisements, and sponsorships, which allows them to enjoy comfortable lifestyles and long-term financial security. Another advantage is the influence celebrities have on society. Many public figures use their popularity to support charities, raise awareness about social issues, and inspire young people through their achievements. Furthermore, celebrities often receive unique career opportunities and worldwide recognition, which can help them expand their professional success beyond their original field.
However, being a celebrity also involves some disadvantages. One serious problem is the loss of privacy. Famous people are constantly followed by the media and public, making it difficult for them to maintain normal personal lives. Another drawback is the mental pressure associated with fame. Celebrities are often criticised on social media and expected to maintain a perfect public image, which may lead to stress, anxiety, or depression.
In conclusion, although celebrities face problems such as lack of privacy and psychological pressure, I believe the advantages are greater overall. The financial benefits, social influence, and career opportunities make fame more beneficial than harmful for most celebrities.
Some argue that parents should have a strong influence on their children’s choice of friends and life partners. Others believe that young people should make these decisions independently. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
View 1
· More exp
· Immature
· Same communityàto ensure adaptability
· Financial security, character
View 2
· Better emotional understanding
o Partners already know each other deeply before committing
o Parents cannot judge compatibility
· Responsibility and learning
o If they choose them themselves, they will learn if they had chosen poorly
· Personal freedom
o Right to choose friends and partners
· Changing social scenario
In many societies, there is ongoing debate about whether parents should play a major role in choosing their children’s friends and life partners. While some people believe parental influence is essential, others argue that young people should make these decisions independently. This essay will discuss both views before presenting an opinion.
On the one hand, parents are often seen as better decision-makers due to their experience and maturity. They are more likely to recognise potential risks in relationships and can guide their children away from harmful influences. In addition, parents tend to consider long-term factors such as financial stability, character, and compatibility, especially when it comes to choosing a life partner. In many cultures, family values and traditions also play an important role, and parental involvement helps ensure these values are preserved.
On the other hand, many people believe that young individuals should have the freedom to make their own choices. Friendships and romantic relationships are deeply personal, and individuals are best placed to understand their own emotions and preferences. Making independent decisions also helps young people develop responsibility and confidence. Furthermore, modern societies increasingly value personal choice over traditional expectations, making independent decision-making more acceptable.
In my opinion, although parents can provide valuable advice and guidance, young people should ultimately make their own decisions. Since these choices directly affect their lives and happiness, independence is essential, while parental support should remain a guiding influence rather than a controlling force.
Some people say cultural traditions are destroyed when they are used as money-making attractions aimed at tourists. Others say this is the only way to save such traditions. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In many parts of the world, cultural traditions are promoted as attractions for tourists. While some people believe this practice damages the authenticity of traditions, others argue that it is necessary to preserve them. This essay will discuss both views before presenting an opinion.
On the one hand, turning cultural traditions into tourist attractions can lead to their decline. In many cases, traditions are modified to suit visitors’ expectations, which may result in a loss of their original meaning. For example, traditional dances or festivals may be shortened or exaggerated to entertain tourists rather than reflect true cultural values. As a result, these practices may become commercial performances instead of genuine expressions of heritage. Furthermore, excessive tourism can put pressure on local communities and lead to the exploitation of cultural resources.
On the other hand, tourism can play an important role in preserving cultural traditions. Financial support from tourism helps maintain festivals, costumes, and traditional practices that might otherwise disappear. In addition, exposure to international audiences can increase awareness and appreciation of local culture. This may encourage younger generations to learn and continue traditional customs. Without such economic benefits, many traditions could gradually fade away in modern societies.
In my opinion, although tourism can sometimes affect the authenticity of cultural traditions, it is often a practical way to ensure their survival. With proper management and respect for local values, tourism can support both cultural preservation and economic development.
Some countries invest in specialized sports facilities for top athletes but not for the average people. Is this a positive or negative development?
Better international performance
Specialized facilities allow elite athletes to train with advanced equipment and professional coaching. This can improve a country’s performance in international competitions such as the Olympics and raise national prestige.
Efficient use of resources
High-level training centres require significant investment and technical expertise. Concentrating resources on talented athletes may produce better results than distributing limited funds widely.
Inspiration for the public
Successful athletes can motivate young people to participate in sports. Their achievements may encourage wider interest in physical activity and national pride.
Economic benefits
Elite sports success can attract sponsorship, tourism, and international sporting events, which may benefit the economy.
Neglect of public health
If governments focus mainly on elite athletes, ordinary citizens may lack access to affordable sports facilities. This can reduce physical activity and increase health problems such as obesity.
Social inequality
Public money is used to benefit a small group of professional athletes while the majority of people cannot access quality facilities.
Reduced grassroots participation
Without community sports infrastructure, fewer children and adults will engage in sports. This can weaken the long-term development of sports talent.
Missed opportunity for wider benefits
Sports facilities for the general population improve well-being, social interaction, and community cohesion.
Some people warn that the era of silver screen is coming to an end and that people will eventually lose interest in going to the cinema. Do you agree or disagree with this view?
Some people argue that the golden age to cinema is coming to a close, which might cause cinemas to shut down eventually. I fully support this idea and the reasons shall be elaborated in the paragraphs ahead.
To begin with, the biggest reason why cinemas are failing to attract audiences is the rise in digital streaming platforms. OTT platforms like Amazon Prime, Netflix and JioHotstar provide a vast collection for binging movies and series, which can be seen anywhere anytime. Not only does it provide comfort and convenience, it is pretty reasonable as well. For instance, a typical movie trip costs around Rs. 500 per person including food and drinks, while a monthly subscription of Netflix costs Rs. 499 for a 4K plan with multiple profiles.
Agree
• Rise in streaming platforms
o More affordable
o Flexibility (anywhere, anytime)
o Saves time (travel)
• Increase in home theatre
o Cheaper to buy large-screen TVs
• Comfort and convenience
o Pause, rewind, replay, fast forward
o Breaks
• COVID impact changed habits
• Faster digital releases
Disagree
• Immersive experience
o Surround Sound effects
o Large screen
o Good visuals
o 3D/4D, IMAX, Dolby Atmos
• Shared experience creates more enjoyment
• Cultural tradition
• A day out (picnic)
o Dining
o Shopping
In conclusion, it is more probable that cinemas might completely lose audiences because of the rise in OTT platforms, the comfort and convenience they provide, as well as due to the rising trend of home theatres.
To conclude, although theatres provide an immersive experience and gives more enjoyment as it is a shared activity, I believe the rise in digital streaming platforms and the trend of building home theatres will eventually cause cinemas to lose their audiences over time.
Essay 1
INTRODUCTION
Version A – Simple
Public libraries have existed for many years. Some people believe governments should provide free libraries in every town. Others think this is unnecessary because information is easily available online. This essay will discuss both views.
Version B – Complex / Rich
Public libraries have long played an important role in society. While some people argue that governments should continue to fund free public libraries in every town, others believe this money is wasted because most information can now be accessed online. This essay will examine both perspectives before presenting a final opinion.
BODY PARAGRAPH 1 – Libraries should be free
Version A – Simple
Supporters of public libraries say they are important for education. Many people cannot afford books or internet services. Libraries give free access to knowledge for students, job seekers, and elderly people. They also provide a quiet place to study.
Version B – Complex / Rich
Those who support free public libraries argue that they play a crucial role in promoting equal access to education. Since not everyone can afford books, digital devices, or reliable internet connections, libraries ensure that students, job seekers, and disadvantaged groups are not excluded from learning opportunities. Moreover, libraries offer quiet and supportive environments that encourage reading, research, and academic development.
BODY PARAGRAPH 2 – Libraries are a waste of money
Version A – Simple
Others believe libraries are no longer necessary. Today, people can find information easily on the internet. Governments spend a lot of money on buildings, staff, and maintenance. This money could be used for healthcare or transport instead.
Version B – Complex / Rich
On the other hand, critics argue that public libraries are becoming less relevant in the digital age. Since vast amounts of information are freely available online, maintaining physical libraries requires significant spending on infrastructure, staff, and resources. From this perspective, government funds could be better invested in essential public services such as healthcare, housing, or transportation.
CONCLUSION (Opinion included)
Version A – Simple
In my opinion, public libraries are still important. Not everyone has access to the internet. Libraries help people learn and improve their lives. Governments should continue to support them.
Version B – Complex / Rich
In my opinion, despite the growth of digital technology, public libraries remain essential institutions. Because access to the internet is not equal for everyone, libraries continue to support education, social inclusion, and lifelong learning. Therefore, governments should continue to invest in public libraries while also adapting them to modern needs.
Essay 2
INTRODUCTION (Opinion included)
Version A – Simple
Today, the world faces many serious problems. Some people think countries must work together to solve them. I agree that international cooperation is necessary to deal with most urgent global issues.
Version B – Complex / Rich
In the modern world, societies face a range of urgent challenges that extend beyond national borders. I strongly agree that most of these problems can only be effectively addressed through international cooperation rather than individual national efforts.
BODY PARAGRAPH 1 – Reason 1 (Global nature of problems)
Version A – Simple
Many major problems affect many countries at the same time. Climate change and pandemics do not stop at borders. One country cannot solve these problems alone. Countries must share information and solutions.
Version B – Complex / Rich
Many of today’s most serious problems are global in nature, which makes international cooperation essential. Issues such as climate change and global pandemics do not respect national borders, meaning that action taken by one country alone is often ineffective. Only by sharing information, resources, and strategies can nations reduce the impact of such challenges.
BODY PARAGRAPH 2 – Reason 2 (Shared resources and expertise)
Version A – Simple
Countries have different strengths and resources. Some have technology, while others have natural resources. When countries work together, they can help each other. This makes problem-solving faster and more effective.
Version B – Complex / Rich
Another reason international cooperation is necessary is that countries possess different resources and areas of expertise. While some nations have advanced technology and scientific knowledge, others may have natural resources or strategic locations. By working together, countries can combine their strengths, which leads to more efficient and sustainable solutions to urgent global problems.
BODY PARAGRAPH 3 – Opposing view (national solutions) + response
Version A – Simple
Some people believe countries should solve problems on their own. They think national governments understand local issues better. However, this approach is not enough for global problems that affect many nations.
Version B – Complex / Rich
Some argue that governments should focus on solving problems independently because they understand their own national situations best. While this may be true for local issues, it is unrealistic when dealing with global crises that require coordinated action. Without cooperation, national efforts often remain limited and ineffective on a global scale.
CONCLUSION
Version A – Simple
In conclusion, I believe international cooperation is very important. Most urgent problems affect many countries. Working together is the best way to solve them.
Version B – Complex / Rich
In conclusion, I firmly believe that international cooperation is essential for addressing most urgent global challenges. Since these problems cross national boundaries and require shared responsibility, collective action remains the most effective and practical solution.
Essay 3
Remote work has become increasingly common in recent years. Some argue this impairs work habits generally. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this modern time, work-from-home has become quite widespread. Some believe it negatively impacts work habits. I strongly agree with this viewpoint and the reasons shall be given ahead.
In this hyper-digitalized era, working remotely has been gaining immense popularity due to its flexibility and convenience. Thus, there are many who are concerned that over time it causes a detrimental impact on work routines. I firmly advocate that this statement is correct due to the reasons elaborated further.
Agree:
· Time management
o Work and family overlap
· Decrease in productivity and efficiency
· Work-life imbalance
· Insincerity in work
· On the one hand, the biggest concern is decreased productivity and efficiency. At home, there are multiple disruptions like family members barging in, noise from the neighborhood, people playing music and so on. This results into loss of focus and delayed completion of tasks.
Disagree:
· Some are more productive at home
o Comfortable env
o Introverted
o Personal space
· Flexibility
o Working at night
On the other hand, remote work offers great flexibility and convenience. To illustrate, some people find it much easier to work productively in their private space, and can choose when they work. For example, night time may be a preferred option for some due to their circadian rhythms.
Some people think that it is a waste of time for high school students to study literature, such as novels and poems. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
POINTS AGREEING (Literature is a waste of time)
1. Limited practical value
Literature does not directly prepare students for the job market.
Subjects like science, maths, and technology are seen as more useful.
2. Academic pressure and time constraints
Students already face heavy workloads and exam pressure.
Time spent on literature could be used for core or vocational subjects.
3. Lack of student interest
Many teenagers find classic novels and poems outdated or difficult.
Forced study can reduce motivation and enjoyment of learning.
4. Irrelevance to modern life
Older literary texts may not reflect current social realities.
Students struggle to relate themes to their own experiences.
5. Exam-oriented education systems
Literature analysis often focuses on memorisation rather than skills.
Assessment methods may limit creativity and understanding.
POINTS DISAGREEING (Literature is valuable and important)
6. Development of language and communication skills
Reading literature improves vocabulary, grammar, and writing ability.
Helps students express ideas clearly and creatively.
7. Critical thinking and interpretation
Literature encourages analysis, evaluation, and independent thinking.
Students learn to understand different viewpoints and themes.
8. Emotional and moral development
Stories and poems explore human emotions, values, and ethics.
Builds empathy and social awareness.
9. Cultural and historical understanding
Literature reflects society, history, and cultural identity.
Students gain insight into different cultures and time periods.
10. Lifelong reading habits
Early exposure can encourage a love of reading.
Supports lifelong learning beyond academic subjects.
Studies show that crime rates are lower among those with educational degrees. Therefore, the best way to reduce the crime rate is to educate criminals while they are still in prison. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Agree:
· Job opportunities, more independent
o Skills
· Positive Mindset change, awareness
· Help others to change or stop committing crime
Disagree:
· No direct relation
· More focus should be on root issues
· No desire to learn/study
· Resource limitations
· Some use education to commit crimes more notoriously
o Don’t get caught as they know the system
Some people believe that educating criminals while they are in prison is the most effective way to reduce crime rates, as studies suggest that people with educational qualifications are less likely to commit offences. While I agree that prison education plays an important role, I do not believe it is the best solution on its own.
One strong argument in favour of prison education is that it helps rehabilitate offenders. By gaining basic education or vocational skills, prisoners can improve their chances of finding legal employment after release. This reduces the likelihood of returning to crime due to unemployment or lack of skills. In addition, education can change attitudes by giving inmates confidence, discipline, and a sense of purpose, which are essential for successful reintegration into society.
Another benefit is that education addresses long-term crime prevention. Teaching literacy, numeracy, or job-related skills helps offenders become more independent and responsible. When former prisoners are able to support themselves legally, the temptation to engage in criminal activity decreases. For this reason, prison education can be an effective investment in public safety.
However, it is unrealistic to claim that education is the best or only way to reduce crime. Criminal behaviour is often influenced by factors such as poverty, drug addiction, and mental health problems. Without proper treatment, counselling, and support after release, educated prisoners may still struggle to adapt. Furthermore, not all inmates are willing or able to participate in educational programs, which limits their overall impact.
In conclusion, although educating prisoners can significantly reduce reoffending and support rehabilitation, I believe it should be part of a broader strategy. Education must be combined with social support, employment opportunities, and rehabilitation services to effectively lower crime rates.
In numerous nations, there is a growing trend for individuals to frequently discuss financial matters, such as their earnings or expenditures, in everyday conversation. What are the reasons behind this phenomenon? Is it advantageous or detrimental?
In today’s world, money is considered one of the most fundamental topics of discussion. As a result, there is a rising trend in many countries that people increasingly talk about their finances like investments or income in their daily interactions. I believe that it is largely a positive development, and the causes, along with the pros and cons shall be elaborated ahead.
Some people feel that the private lives of celebrities should not be openly shared by the media. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In today’s technologically advanced era, the media plays a crucial role in providing information about the world. Some argue that the sharing of personal lives of famous personalities via the media should be discouraged. According to me, I completely support this standpoint, and the relevant reasons and arguments shall be presented ahead.
The world has many towns and cities constructed in previous centuries that were more suitable and livable for people in those times than they are now. What problems will this cause? What can be done to solve these problems?
In many nations worldwide, people are suffering from housing problems on a large scale. One of the causes of this situation is that the architecture of the earlier centuries was more adapted to the requirements and lifestyles of the people of those times as compared to today. Both the challenges that arise from this and some effective measures shall be articulated in the forthcoming paragraphs.
Innovation is often driven by the pursuit of profit and economic growth. However, some argue that it should prioritize addressing social and environmental issues. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.
It is undeniable that innovation is the foundation of development. Some argue that it stems from pursuing overall development and earning more, while others opine that it should come from tackling social welfare issues and environmental conservation. Both perspectives shall be analyzed ahead with my own view at the end.
Some people believe that in the future, most cities will become unliveable due to pollution and overcrowding. Others think technological innovation will solve these problems. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.
View 1
· Pollution: industrialization—air, water, vehicles—noise, soil degradation—agriculture—food shortage
· Shortage of resources
o Land—deforestation, air quality
o Less space for accommodation
o Water, energy,
· Higher prices for basic resources, lower quality of life
· Climate change
o Increased infrastructure—increased heat
o Rising sea levels (coastal cities)
View 2
· Renewable energy
o Green roofs, terrace farming
o Solar, nuclear, wind, geothermal
o E vehicles reduce pollution
· Smart city design
Agree:
• Advanced features (higher MP camera, editing tools, light adjustment, color grading, cinematic mode, slo-mo mode, etc); skill gap close
• Easy to share (takes time to get to the client, within seconds post on social media/share w/ friends)
• Oversaturation of images (millions of pics uploaded daily, ph. Become ordinary, people nor longer see it as worth paying for)
• Quantity over quality (can easily grow followers, reinforces the belief that skills not needed)
Disagree
• Large events need pro. Photographers (weddings, conferences, seminars)
• Larger projects like product photoshoot, real estate listings, social media marketing needs prof.
• Technical expertise cannot compare with layman’s knowledge
o studio quality—smartphone cannot copy, detail, depth, motion
o Poses, lighting conditions, backgrounds, angles
Agree:
Improvement in public health
Reduction in health issues like obesity, heart disease, diabetes, high BP
Reduced expenditure on healthcare (govt), reduced mortality rate
Healthier items might become affordable (less processed items)
Disagree:
Job loss
Large industry—employs millions of people, economic impact
Restaurants, fast food joints, local businesses
Personal choice
Limitations on unhealthy ingredients, regular inspections, awareness, nutritional labels (easier to read), star rating
Film stars and celebrities often share their views on public matters that have little to do with their profession. Is this a positive or negative development?
Positive:
1. Raising awareness about imp issues
2. Encourage people towards adopting positive habits
3. Support for charity or volunteer participation (humanitarian aims/purposes)
Adding on to it, celebrities’ actions can mobilise support for charities, NGOs and even gather participation for volunteer work. For example, donations for improving the war-torn areas of Ukraine during the ongoing war came when certain Hollywood celebrities tweeted on X about it.
4. Influencing youngsters positively
Moreover, usually youngsters get more influenced by film stars than the government, so in many cases like climate change, wildlife conservation and social media overuse, they are more effective to spread awareness.
Negative:
1. Endorse or promote products that they themselves don’t use
2. Use public matters just to gain fame, leading to misinformation and following wrong things
3. Provoking public into attacking beneficial govt policies
Another problem is some celebrities may post negative comments on certain government policies, that are actually beneficial to the public, which may cause outrage among their followers and cause disruption for the government.
4. Creating conflict (sensitive issues)
People today get less sleep than in the past.
What is the cause of this?
What are the possible effects of this development?
In recent years, many people around the world have been sleeping less than previous generations. There are several reasons for this trend, and it can lead to a number of negative effects on both health and daily life. This essay will discuss the main causes and the possible consequences of reduced sleep.
One major cause of this problem is the increasing pressure of modern work and study. Many jobs today demand long hours, and people often continue working on their phones or laptops late into the night. Because of this, they find it difficult to maintain a regular sleep routine. Another important reason is the rise of digital technology. Many individuals spend too much time on social media, watching videos or browsing the internet before going to bed. The bright screens keep the brain active, making it harder to fall asleep at the right time.
The effects of getting less sleep are quite serious. Firstly, lack of sleep can harm a person’s physical health. It can lead to problems such as fatigue, a weak immune system, and a higher risk of illnesses like heart disease. Secondly, insufficient sleep affects mental well-being. People may become more stressed, irritable, and unable to concentrate, which reduces their performance at work or school. Finally, sleeping less can also increase the chance of accidents, especially on the road, as tired drivers cannot react quickly.
In conclusion, modern lifestyles, technology use, and work pressure are the main causes of reduced sleep. If this trend continues, it will lead to significant health problems, lower productivity, and greater safety risks. Therefore, it is important for individuals and societies to promote healthier sleep habits.
Media coverage of violent crime frightens people and encourages criminals. Some people say it should be banned from newspapers and TV programmes.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Constant exposure to violent crime news can make people feel unsafe, even in generally peaceful areas.
Sensationalized reporting exaggerates the frequency and brutality of crimes, creating public panic and mistrust in law enforcement.
Example: Repeated broadcasting of murders or terrorist attacks can lead people to believe such crimes are happening everywhere.
Detailed descriptions or dramatizations of crimes may unintentionally give criminals fame or new ideas for committing offenses.
Especially for impressionable viewers (e.g., teenagers), such portrayals may normalize or even glamorize violence.
Example: Some copycat crimes have been reported after violent acts received heavy media attention.
The media’s role should be to inform, not to cause harm or fear.
Focusing on violent stories for higher ratings shows a lack of moral responsibility.
People need to know about crime trends in their communities to stay alert and take precautions.
Media transparency holds authorities accountable and ensures justice is not hidden.
Example: Investigative journalism has uncovered police negligence and corruption.
Banning coverage of violent crimes can lead to government control over information, reducing media independence.
Once restrictions begin, they may spread to other areas, threatening democracy and free speech.
Instead of completely prohibiting coverage, media can focus on balanced reporting—avoiding sensational language and unnecessary visuals.
Example: Reporting causes and prevention of crime rather than only violence itself.
Agree that excessive or sensational coverage is harmful and should be restricted.
However, a complete ban is impractical and threatens press freedom.
The best approach is media regulation and ethical journalism standards, not censorship.
People living in the 21st century have a better life quality than people who lived in previous times. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
After graduation many students take a year to travel. Some think that it would be more useful to work for a year. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
After completing their studies, many young people take a break before starting their professional lives. While some believe that travelling during this period is a waste of time and that working would be more beneficial, I believe both options can be valuable depending on how the time is used.
Travelling after graduation can be an enriching experience for many young people. Visiting new countries allows them to understand diverse cultures and perspectives, which can broaden their worldview and help them become more open-minded. Moreover, living in unfamiliar places teaches independence and adaptability, qualities that are highly valuable in both personal and professional life. For instance, students who manage their own budgets and schedules while travelling often develop problem-solving and organisational skills that serve them well later on.
However, spending a year working after graduation can also bring significant advantages. A year of employment offers graduates a chance to gain practical skills that are rarely taught in university. They can also earn money to support themselves or save for further education. Additionally, early work experience gives them an understanding of the job market and helps them decide on a suitable career path. This can prevent frustration or regret that some students feel after entering a field they later discover they do not enjoy.
In my opinion, both travel and work have their benefits, but the key factor is how effectively the year is spent. Travelling can be just as productive as working if it involves volunteering or skill-building activities rather than leisure alone. Ultimately, the choice should depend on a graduate’s goals, financial situation, and readiness to take responsibility for their future.
10/10 Essay Conclusions