Definition: The process of developing arguments and discovering the means of persuasion for a given topic.
Invention is one of the five canons of classical rhetoric, alongside arrangement, style, memory, and delivery.
The goal of invention is to find the best ways to convince or inform an audience, focusing on generating ideas and strategies for effective communication.
Discovery of Arguments
Invention involves finding and generating arguments that can support your position. This includes identifying the most compelling evidence, examples, and reasons to persuade your audience.
Use of Common and Special Topics
Common Topics: These are general categories or lines of argument that can be applied to any subject. Aristotle identified several common topics, such as past and future fact (conjecture), greater or lesser (degree), and possible or impossible (possibility).
Special Topics: These are specific to particular fields or disciplines, such as law, politics, or ethics. They provide more focused arguments related to the subject matter.
Questioning and Exploration
Invention often involves asking a series of questions to explore the topic thoroughly. These questions help in examining different aspects and perspectives, ensuring a comprehensive understanding and argumentation.
Creativity and Critical Thinking: Invention encourages creativity and critical thinking, helping rhetoricians to develop innovative and effective arguments.
Foundation for Persuasion: It provides the foundation for building persuasive and compelling messages.
Comprehensive Understanding: Thorough exploration of a topic ensures a well-rounded understanding, making the argument more robust and convincing.
Stasis Theory
Stasis theory involves identifying the main points of contention in a debate. It asks four key questions:
Fact: What happened?
Definition: What is the nature of the issue?
Quality: What is the seriousness or significance of the issue?
Policy: What should be done about it?
Common & Special Topics
The early Greeks, including Sophists and Aristotle, developed a series of questions known as "common topics" and "special topics" to help students and rhetors explore a subject and find all available means of persuasion.
Past/Future Fact (Conjecture):
Examining what has occurred or what will occur.
Note that the word fact is misleading. The Greeks meant "educated guesses" about something that probably took place or might take place in the future.
Example: "Based on past data, we predict the market will grow next year."
Greater/Lesser (Degree):
Comparing the significance or magnitude of different things.
Example: "Recycling has a greater environmental impact than reducing energy consumption."
Possible/Impossible (Possibility):
Determining what is possible or impossible.
Example: "It is possible to reduce emissions with current technology."
Contemporary rhetoricians use these topics as a model and often divide subjects into four categories: objects, events, abstract concepts, and propositions. This approach helps explore material by asking specific questions about each aspect, preventing loss of details. One may thoroughly explore and develop a topic by systematically addressing the questions below.
Physical Object
What are its physical characteristics?
What sort of structure does it have?
What other objects is it similar to?
How does it differ from things that resemble it?
Who uses it, and for what?
Abstract Concept
How has the term been defined by others?
How do you define the term?
What other concepts have been associated with it?
In what ways has this concept affected the lives of people?
How might this concept be changed to work better?
How might it be applied to be more useful?
Event
What happened (who, what, when, where, why, how)?
What were the causes of the event?
What were the consequences of the event?
How was this event like or unlike similar events?
To what other events was it connected?
How might the event have been altered or avoided?
Proposition
What must be established before readers will believe the proposition?
What are the meanings of the keywords in the proposition?
By what kinds of evidence can the proposition be proved or disproved?
What counter-arguments must be confronted and refuted?
What are the practical consequences of the proposition?
Special topics in rhetoric refer to categories of arguments that are specific to particular fields or disciplines. These topics help rhetoricians generate arguments that are tailored to the unique aspects of those fields. Here are examples of special topics in various areas:
Special Topics in Politics
Justice
What actions or policies are just or unjust?
Example: Debating whether a new law is fair to all citizens.
Legality
What actions or policies are legal or illegal?
Example: Arguing about the constitutionality of a proposed bill.
Public Good
What actions or policies benefit the public?
Example: Advocating for a public healthcare system based on its benefits to society.
Rights
What are the rights of individuals or groups?
Example: Discussing the protection of free speech in new legislation.
Special Topics in Ethics
Moral Goodness
What actions are morally good or bad?
Example: Debating the morality of euthanasia.
Virtue
What constitutes a virtuous character?
Example: Arguing that honesty is a fundamental virtue in leadership.
Duty
What are the moral duties and obligations?
Example: Discussing whether there is a duty to help those in poverty.
Consequences
What are the ethical consequences of actions?
Example: Considering the long-term environmental impact of industrial practices.
Special Topics in Law
Precedent
What has been decided in previous legal cases?
Example: Using previous rulings to argue a current case.
Interpretation
How should laws and statutes be interpreted?
Example: Debating the interpretation of the Second Amendment.
Intent
What was the intent behind a law or legal document?
Example: Arguing about the framers' intent in the Constitution.
Equity
How should fairness be applied in legal contexts?
Example: Discussing equitable remedies in civil cases.
Special Topics in Science
Causation
What are the causes of phenomena?
Example: Presenting evidence on the causes of climate change.
Methodology
What are the appropriate methods for scientific inquiry?
Example: Debating the validity of a new research methodology.
Evidence
What constitutes valid scientific evidence?
Example: Arguing the reliability of data from a recent study.
Theoretical Frameworks
What theories explain the phenomena?
Example: Discussing the merits of different theories of evolution.