Shaival Shah, co-founder and CEO of the homebuying startup Ribbon, called the business model used by larger firms like Zillow and Opendoor an “institutional fix-and-flip.”
All iBuying is doing is moving the buying process online and providing a quicker turn around, but they're still collecting a fee, as a broker would (6-15%).
Even before the pandemic, Zillow was losing money on each house it bought and sold. During the fourth quarter, the company lost $6,407 on each resale after paying interest on a revolving line of credit it uses to purchase homes. (Zillow lost $1,512 per resale before interest payments.)
Skeptics say the strategy of instantly buying and selling homes in bulk is inherently risky.
In the post-pandemic world, another consideration for iBuyers is “what the VC world will look like next time they need to raise funds,” Duranton said. “Limiting the ‘burn’ for now probably makes sense.”
When did Netflix truly become "disruptive?"
While Barton, who serves on Netflix's board, argues that Zillow's iBuying platform is akin to Netflix making the shift to digital streaming, it's probably more in the mold of Netflix's first model - taking something normally done in person, and switching it to an online platform. That is, Zillow isn't generating its own content like Netflix yet. What would it take to make iBuying truly innovative (would it have to be building their own homes, like Netflix developing its own shows)?
Richard Barton's goal - he saw Zillow Offers as becoming akin to trading in your car. You're on the lot, you see the one you want, and voila. Why couldn't home sales work the same way?
The One Stop Shop
Many iBuying companies counter that this is just the beginning, and that the key will be "vertically integrating the category." What if you could get the following from an iBuyer?: