Instructional Needs

"The technology we introduce must serve a purpose and that purpose must be to enhance learning through improving pedagogy."

-Dr. Michael Cowling

"Simply using technology for technology’s sake just doesn’t cut it." Dr. Michael Cowling, a Senior Lecturer of Educational Technology.”

A Growing Awareness

Research results show that the U.S. now has one of the worst educated workforces in the industrialized world (Goodman, Sands, and Coley, 2017).

Millennials will be the core of our workforce for years to come, and the U.S. economy will depend on them. The most recent research shows that millennials in the workforce, once the best educated in the world, are now among the least well educated in the industrialized world (Goodman, Sands, and Coley, 2017) .

The ETS survey showed that Americans ages 16-34 in the PIAAC survey were at the bottom in every category: reading, numeracy, and problem solving.

We have to figure out how to enable the students who now leave school with a seventh or eighth grade reading level and a poor command of eighth grade math (NCEE, 2013) to graduate instead with much higher skills, both cognitive and noncognitive, and we have to figure out how to do it for not much more than we are spending now, because there simply is no more money.

Source: Marc Tucker's book, Leading High-Performance School Systems (Watch video overview)

Is Technology a Time-Gobbler?

"Research demonstrates the folly of our current priorities, such as investing heavily in technology when it has had, so far, such limited impact on student learning." (Dylan Wiliams)

Advocates of 21st century education are not urging us to rashly reinvent curriculum around technology or group projects. They are not proposing that students spend less time learning content and more time making movie previews, video skits, wikis, silent movies, or clay animation figures.

We need to say 'No, thank you' to such faddish, time-gobbling activities."

- Mike Schmoker on Pg 26, Focus

  • U.S. fourth-graders who report using tablets in all or nearly all of their classes are a full year behind in reading ability compared with peers who report never using tablets in their classes.
  • Internationally, students who report greater use of technology in their classrooms score worse on the PISA exam
  • High levels of technology use in the classroom tend to correlate with lower student performance.
  • One recent study found that over a third of all technology purchases made by middle schools simply weren’t used. And only 5 percent of purchases met their purchaser’s usage goals.

The Reboot Foundation says, "Our data suggest that technology may not always be used in a way that prompts richer forms of learning." Their findings make these points:

  • Schools and teachers should be more careful about when—and how—education technology is deployed in classrooms.
  • Moderate use of technology is often the most effective for younger students, and
  • Experts recommend limiting the use of devices for young children
  • Technology seems the least helpful for younger students learning to read, and non-digital tools work better for younger students who are mastering the basics of language.
  • Digital tools that provide immediate instructional feedback can show high impact, and technology can be particularly beneficial for promoting richer thinking among older students.

Put simply, ensuring that every child attains a baseline level of proficiency in reading and mathematics seems to do more to create equal opportunities in a digital world than can be achieved by expanding or subsidizing access to high-tech devices and services...students who use computers very frequently at school do a lot worse in most learning outcomes, even after accounting for social background and student demographics.

Source: OECD Publishing - Students, Computers and Learning Making the Connection

Mike Schmoker shares the following points in his book, Results Now:

Research about Reading in the Classroom

    • 38% of all 4th graders in the USA (4 out of 10) read at the "below basic" level on NAEP (2005).
    • "The truth is that many children read for a remarkably small percentage of the school day...children sometimes spend two and a half hours a day in reading instruction and only ten minutes of that time actually reading," says Lucy Calkins (1998) as cited.
    • If 90 minutes per day is devoted to reading or language arts, a 4th grade who read very slowly--at the 2nd grade level--could be reading a novel like Stone Fox every week.
    • 15 extra minutes of reading per day can lead to three months of additional growth.
    • By 8th grade, 43% of poor students are reading at "below basic" level.
    • At the end of 12th grade, the average black or Latino student performs at about the same level as the average white 8th grader (2005).
    • Three to four weeks of effective, full-day literacy instruction would allow the average student to gain an entire year of academic growth (Haycock, 2005).
    • Few teachers are "modeling and demonstrating useful reading strategies" (Allington, 2001).
    • When students were asked to demonstrate their critical reading skills--in writing--they "demonstrated difficulty in providing details and arguments to suport interpretations of what they read" (Allington, 2001).

College Ready?

    • Only 32% of college-bound students are academically prepared for college (2004).
    • 78% of students wishing to attend college will struggle in writing, biology, and algebra (2004).
    • After 12 years of English, a third or more of college students need remedial English. In California State University system, that number is 46 percent (2002).
    • Barzun observes that the typical professor is "still trying in graduate school to get decent writing and intelligent reading out of his bright students" (1991).
    • 75% of students report that they don't do any writing in history or social studies courses (ASCD SmartBrief, 2003).
    • Most U.S. high school students graduate having never written a single extended history paper (2002).

The "information age" places higher-order literacy demands on all of us. These demands include synthesizing and evaluating information from multiple sources. American schools need to enhance the ability of children to search and sort through information, to synthesize and analyze the information they encounter.

Source: Richard Allington (2001), President of IRA, 2005-2006 as cited in Schmoker's Results Now

Are You Prepared?

Today's educational technology planning must be different from yesteryear. Yesterday, the focus was on tools and glitzy silver-bullet solutions.

Today, even though we have access to ample classroom technology, free and paid learning management systems, student blogs, plethora of creativity tools, and more, these are often shown to be ineffective, one-shot solutions whose implementation varies from campus to campus. Too much choice.

How will you answer the question, "Does technology make a difference?"