Salary Management Process

Improvements to Salary Management Process Reduce Complexity, Improve Transparency

By Walter Garcia, TM-II for Patrol 24 at Woodland Park, Pueblo Maintenance Section 4, Region 2, cross-training program participant with the CDOT Office of Communications

September 26, 2014

Overview

Salary Cap and Position Change Management are two subjects that are hard to write and read about; however, after the challenges that came about after boundary shifts over this past year, those two subjects took center stage.  When the employees were absorbed from Region 6 into the new Region 1, their salaries did not follow.  To say that the situation pointed to a challenge would be an understatement.

“Historically, [the Colorado Department of Transportation] (CDOT) has transferred budget with all positions, vacant or full,” noted Scott Richrath, CDOT Chief Financial Officer who is also the primary sponsor for this Lean process.  “In an environment of restricted salary cap growth for the entire department matched with significant changes to the structure of the organization, moving positions requires a more thoughtful process and approach.”

The goals for this new process were as follows:

Maintenance workshop

Maintenance workshop

What did CDOT do?

As of September 1, 2014, CDOT had 3,315 Full Time Equivalent (FTE) positions.  Each appointing authority receives an allotted amount of money annually to fund employee salaries, as well as a reserve amount for overtime and incentive pay.  However, a cap or limit is placed on each FTE salary.

CDOT conceived and instituted a salary cap as a way to ensure proper financial management of employee’s salaries and positions; however, during the boundary changes, in fiscal year 2014, it was found that there were no documented or efficient processes established for creating, transferring, reclassifying, and reallocating positions. The regions that absorbednew positions did not receive any increase in their budgets for the newly acquired personnel; therefore, the regions had to exceed their caps to pay those employees and in doing so those regions exceeded their yearly budgets for personnel and operations.

“This has been an evolving process that has presented challenges, as well as learning opportunities,” noted Leah Ware, Salary Cap project lead.  “As a result of the challenges that the boundary changes presented, the Lean team was tasked with creating and communicating standardized directives, and policies on cap budgeting, as well as for FTE changes, transfers and creations.”

In order to find a solution, Richrath organized a Lean team and tasked them with creating and implementing guideline policies and step-by-step procedures for a new Salary Cap Management and Position Change Process.

The purposes that dictate how and why CDOT has moved toward this new management process includes adhering to the commitment of not expanding the size of state government.  Other major considerations include:

In conjunction with outlining a process for improving efficiency, step-by-step procedures were created in order to streamline these communications and apply the Lean team’s recommended procedures. This four step procedure is as follows:

Testing Phase and Anticipated Induction

The Lean team is currently testing their new processes on different scenarios. “The Lean team’s recommendations are currently being implemented,” said Ware, “We are running through scenarios to determine how best to implement these new processes. Draft policies have also been created and are in place as a guideline and will be updated once the most effective and efficient scenario is selected.”

The Lean team’s time and effort identified the areas in need of improvement, developed recommendations and solutions, and are currently in the implementation testing process.  “We anticipate having something in place, and approved by the Appointing Authorities, this fall,” said Gary Vansuch, CDOT Director of Process Improvement and the Project Mentor.  “We are rolling information out by Division, so as of August 27, 2014, the Division of Accounting & Finance (DAF) has given their approval, and now we are having the Division of Administrative Services (DAS) review the information.”

Key Players