Off With THEIR Heads

Abolish The Monarchy & ALL Monarchs

2016

Queens 90th Birthday

King Charles?
Queen Camilla?

Camilla joined the Privy Council this week 11th June 2016

In all the media induced hysteria over the queens birthday, and the speculation over King Charles and Queen Camila.
I ponder their relationship, I have to ask the question just when did their affair begin? She was married and after all he was cuckolding her husband. An subsequent obvious consideration was did this coincide at any stage with his fairytale marriage to Diana? He was 13 years older than her when they married was Camila already his mistress at the time? Or when did that affair start?

There was a great fuss about Mrs Simpson, but apparently the royal firm seem ok with Mrs Parker Bowles and the royal affair.

I suppose the royal closet is scrammed full of such skeletons, and any bodies are doubtless buried too deep for the corgis to dig up.

Royal Jubilee

QUEEN WELCOMES BLOOD BROTHERS IN ROYAL CRIME

Protest at the Pageant

On 3rd June 2012 Republic will hold a major protest against the monarchy at the Thames Diamond Jubilee Pageant. With thousands of republicans expected to attend, this will be the biggest and boldest anti-monarchy protest in modern times.

Throughout the weekend of the 2012 jubilee celebrations republicans will be protesting against inherited power and privilege and calling for the abolition of the monarchy.

Our protests will take place right alongside the major jubilee events, centred around the Thames pageant on Sunday 3rd June as well as at the lighting of the jubilee beacons, the St Pauls thanksgiving service and the planned concert organised by the BBC.

Our aim is to gather thousands of people in opposition to the monarchy, to tell the world that we want change.

Be a part of that demand for change – pledge your support for the protest and sign up to get regular updates or to volunteer as a steward or organiser.

Royal Family

Conspiracy is a concept ridiculed and denigrated principally by those it could expose. Most information about any such Theories are usually to be found in the form of an “expose of The Theory & of those involved in its conception”, these “expose’s” flow freely from media outlets; newspapers; TV; radio; internet. While actual details of the 'Conspiracy' in question are always so scarce as almost to appear non existent.

This wedding was as assiduously promoted as any ‘Royal Event’ the couple providing the cakes icing for this perennial fairy tale.

The Ghost at the banquet was the grooms mother Princes Dianna, his father now able to openly consort with his long time mistress, having done his duty of maintaining the line.

Just what manner of offspring is it that can deal with any degree of equanimity towards their own father whose adulterous relationship continued unabated through their own childhood?

As a youth Dianna Spencer would have needed no encouragement to indulge in Royal Fantasies, these were the veritable mother’s milk of such an upbringing as hers. The consideration of actually being involved in it would be a childhood nirvana.

In previous generations such a thing occurred only in fairy stories, Monarchies existing in their seclusion things of mystery and intrigue. In the present generation the Princess being out of the Royal lineage was relatively able to consort with and marry someone considered beneath her station.

But Diana marrying into The Family would have to live The Fairy Tale which often involved The Princess imbibing toxins from her in-laws poisonous embrace. How many successful Royal Tales involve a Princess with a mind let alone a character all her own? If lucky she may assume tragic proportions from a fate meted out at the handsof her groom’s family.

So should anyone be fairly surprised at the events surrounding Princess Diana’s demise? The Family so used to controlling their own stage settings can certainly manage to control themselves before their own public.

I won’t waste anyone’s time least of all mine in indulging in pointless speculation, I will however ask people to always question everything whether it’s my assertions or what passes for perceived wisdom. Question especially the official line that brands anyone who swallows it as cretins.

Their are numerous offerings purporting to explain the details surrounding these events and a current film Unlawful Killing by the English director Keith Allen gives yet another spin.

The interest for me in such movies as much anything is in the hysterical reaction generated by them. That generated by this film is a case in point, and the reality that its unlikely to be screened this side of the pond due to the convenient 37 points of 'legal objections' should at the very least beg the question "just what are these 37 points? And who the heck requires them?"

If all of the points and arguments made in such films are really so laughable and spurious well why not make the films as publically available as possible so we can all be able to see and judge for ourselves?

In the interest of transparency so people can make up their own minds about this film I am including as many Film Clips etc that I can find.

Including media coverage The Good Bad and The Ugly

Unlawful Killing

Diana film scrapped

Controversial documentary is shelved indefinitely

By Ben Arnold | Yahoo UK Movies News – Thu, Jul 5, 2012 09:33 BST

Am I the only one with the nous to ask this question why is this film able to be released unhindered everywhere else in the globe but her in the UK and France? A coincidence? Why all these cuts in the films content to get round the ‘Problems’ for a UK release? The hassle from that delayed the chances of its UK release. And now there is ‘Insurance Problems that don’t affect any other countries but the UK and France, coincidence? This latest ‘Problem’ has suspended the film’s UK release indefinitely, is anyone really surprised by this? Whatever the reality of Princess Diana’s death is no one even curious about the hassle over this film’s release? Is it all just a storm in a tea cup? If there really is no Royal Agenda behind it then why not just to it on general release so we can all make up our own minds about its contents? Or do people just prefer to have their minds up for them? Now we can’t rock the Royal boat can we?

Barry Thomas Cross; Friday 6th July 2012

{Documentary Film: Director; Keith Allen}

Gangster Liz In Tiara

The term Unlawful Killing has a specific legal meaning in England, referring to a verdict that can be returned by an inquest in England and Wales. The verdict means that a death was caused by another person, without lawful excuse and in breach of the criminal law, in other words homicide. This includes murder, manslaughter, infanticide, and causing death by dangerous driving. A verdict of unlawful killing generally leads to a police investigation, with the aim of gathering sufficient evidence to identify, charge and prosecute the culprit(s)

Royal Wedding

The Royal Wedding just who in ALL honesty gives a monkies about it especially ALL the hype and sycophancy surrounding ever nauseating second of what passes for media News & Reporting? Just what media outlet is NOT promoting the event assiduously? From the apparently statutory requirement of the media Royal Correspondent, through the piously irreverent ‘Alternative’ slant on the proceedings, which in reality is simply another excruciating chance to revel in it this time from a ‘Plebs’ perspective. Councils especially those privatised by the local ConDem Intelligentsia, who are unable or unwilling to provide proper re-cycling facilities for ALL its local residents. Are miraculously by Government Decree, allowed to dispense with council byelaws waiving planning regulations and parking restrictions to encourage the populace to celebrate the festivities. While Republic, England’s only specific campaigning alternative to the Monarchy had its Main London Street Party Event blocked by Camden Council bureaucracy forcing them to make 11^th hour alternative arrangements. BUT republicans will NOT be deterred by Monarchist Apologists & Republic’s London Street Party is NOW still on, from 11am to 3.30pm Friday 29^th April in Red Lion Square. With an evening Party Event Love Republic from 7.30pm in the Borough Bar, in 10-18 London Bridge Street, London, SE1. Nb Tickets going FAST. With further Parties and Events arround England; Scotland & Wales arranged by Republic volunteers.

CONVENTION of the Alliance of European Republican Movements Saturday 30th April 2-3.30pm Directory of Social Change, 24 Stephenson Way, London NW1 2DP.

There is really no need to ask in advance just how much media coverage will be given to any alternative to the Royal Fantasy assiduously cultivated in this petite bourgeois autocracy. While the State has already shown its preparedness for its Rulers protection weighing threats to her legitimacy, from religious opponents with support from her natural allies the Fascist EDL.

Off With

Monarchs Heads

Lord Mountbatten’s Assassination by the IRA at Mullaghmore is the nearest incident of the 20^th century of a successful coup de grace against a prime member of the British Royal Establishment.

Poetic Justice

There is a serious consideration that Revolutions and Revolts happen elsewhere and don’t exactly fit into the psyche of the English working class or otherwise. This is clearly bunk as the English Revolution brought about not only the end of the Monarchy and the introduction of a pseudo Republic but the judicial assassination of the Head of State the Monarch Charles I.
So it should never be said that for example the French Revolution is totally unparalleled and could never happen here, indeed the parallels are very striking down to the Republics decay and the Absolute Monarchs replacement by dictatorial figureheads Cromwell and Napoleon.

The apparent differences are merely those of the settings in which they occur, learned tomes are written about these Revolutions precisely to prove their ‘differences’ based on nothing more than that they occurred in different locations, eg the logic being that the English are not French and could not possibly behave in the same manner ie possess any desire to replace its non elected ruler.