7.12.20
Following Camden's refusal to respond to Nick Harding's Freedom of Information requests on the grounds that he was vexatious in making them, he took the matter to the Information Commissioners Office. This page contains the main items of correspondence. It originally contained attachments of all the correspondence on the subject of the Freedom of Information Act, between the Information Commissioners Office, Nick Harding and Camden. Later, for technical reasons, the less important documents were not available so are only referred to in the numbered list below and have NA at the start.
The more important documents are shown in bold and underlined. * means on ICO's draft bundle index as correspondence, ** as pleadings. Amounts in square brackets are the number of pages of the larger documents. Immediately below is a description of the documents. At the bottom that are the actual links/attachments.
2*. 20.2.10 Complaint by NJH to ICO with copies to Camden CCU and Head of Legal Services [16]. Pages 4 -10 include the text of the 7 refused FOI requests.
4. 28.5.10 Camden to ICO requesting estension to reply from 3.7.10 to 14.7.10
5*. 11.6.10 (date rec'd by ICO - letter was not dated) [3] + table [10]. Camden to ICO. Sometimes described by NJH as Camden's first response. The table is similar to that in 1a above.
6*. 25.8.10 ICO to Camden requesting further information [4]
6a. 25.8.10. ICO to NJH informing him of current status of complaint
7. 26.8.10 Camden to ICO requesting extension of period to reply
8. 31.8.10 ICO to Camden granting extension to 23.9.10
9*. 23.9.10 (date rec'd by ICO - letter not dated). Camden to ICO [5]. Camden's second response. This contained 3 attachments which are elsewhere on these websites but which are part of the letter:
Attachment 1. Letter of 8.10.08 from Bob West re 31 questions [13]
Attachment 2. Chronology [2] (This document omitted any mention of the sale of Dalby Street and the Travellers Site). This is shown as no 18 below)
Attachment 3. Public Enquiry - (presumably the Inspectors Report) [41])
10*. 10.11.10 ICO to NJH formal letter suggesting rejection of complaint [4]
11*. 23.11.10. NJH to ICO requesting correspondence between ICO and Camden [3]
12*. 21.12.10 ICO to NJH [2] attaching 9 documents (shown in date order on this site)
14* (& 14a* below). 3.1.11. NJH to ICO providing details of past issues with Camden to demonstrate no past vesatiousness and that previous campains were successful incl attachment re Haverstock Hill, PoW Road, MPR junction shared use campaign [2+7]
15*. 4.1.11. ICO to NJH with Camden's 2nd letter (rec'd 23.9.10 - no 9 above)
18. 6.1.11 Encl with 17 being Camden's chronology attached to Camden's 1st letter [2]
19*. 18.1.11 NJH to ICO with 5 Appendices [22 incl appendices]
20*. 24.2.11 ICO to NJH re Decision Notice in next month
21**. 28.3.11 ICO to NJH Decision Notice. Letter [2], DN [21]
22. NA 20.4.11. NJH cover letter to Tribunal with Notice of Appeal incl list of potential documents [5 incl appendix]
22a**. 20.4.11. Notice of Appeal incl list of potential documents [5 incl appendix]
23. NA 26.4.11. Tribunal to NJH acknowledging 22
24. NA None on this number -duplicated
25. NA 24.5.11. ICU (M Thorogood) to Tribunal cc'd to NJH encl Response of ICU
25a**. 24.5.11. Formal Response of ICU (Tom Cross) [16]
26. NA 26.5.11. Tribunal to parties ie NJH and ICU acknowledging ICU's Response and requiring response from NJH in 14 days
27 20.5.11 LBC request to Tribunal to be joined. Forwarded to NJH 31.5.11.
28. NA 31.5.11 Tribunal to NJH forwarding 27
29. NA 31.5.11. NJH to Tribunal. Request for extension (no length stated)
30. NA 31.5.11. NJH to ICU (M Thorogood requesting missing document
31. NA 31.5.11. Tribunal to NJH with LBC request to be joined
32. NA 31.5.11. ICU out of office message received by NJH
33.NA 31.5.11. ICU out of office message forwarded to Information Tribunal
34. NA 31.5.11. Tribunal to NJH asking how long extension requested
35. 2.6.11. NJH to Tribunal requesting extension of a month
36. 10.6.11 Tribunal to parties with Initial and possible directions
38. NA 12.6.11 NJH to Tribunal requesting an extension for two or three months in the light of delay in receiving document from ICO and the current situation on the project that gives rise to the FOA requests
39. NA 13.6.11 Tribunal to NJH saying 38 has been forwarded to the judge
40. NA 13.6.11. ICU (Mark Thorogood) to NJH re list of FOIs on Talacrefacts
41. 13.6.11 Attachment to 40 giving FOI non vex page on Talacrefacts
42. 13.6.11. Attachment to 40 giving FOI vex page on Talacrefacts
43. NA 28.6.11. From Tribunal saying NJH must respond by 4pm 1.7.11
44. 28.6.11. From ICO Direction Proposals
45**. 30.6.11. Council's response [15]
46. NA 30.6.11. Camden to Tribunal re procedures
47**. 1.7.11. NJH being his Response [6]
48. NA 1.7.11. NJH being his agreement to 44
49. NA 1.7.11. Camden to Tribunal conditionally agreeing to directions
50. NA 4.7.11. NJH to ICO re size of bundle
51.NA 4.7.11. ICO to NJH re size of bundle
52.NA 7.7.11. ICO to Tribunal re issuance of Judges directions
53. NA 8.7.11. NJH to ICO re size of bundle
54. 13.7.11. Judge to 3 parties Directions
55.NA 14.7.11. ICO to NJH cover to draft bundle list
55a. 14.7.11. Draft bundle list with 55
56. NA 21.7.11. NJH to ICO re Bundle index
57. NA 21.7.11. LBC to ICO re bundle
57a. 21.7.11. LBC to ICO bundle table attached to 57
58. NA 22.7.11. NJH to Tribunal re bundle
59. NA 22.7.11. Tribunal to NJH acknowledgement of 58. Judge asked for instruction
60. NA 25.7.11. Tribunal giving 25.7.11.25.7.11. Judges decision re 59.
61. NA 25.7.11. NJH to Tribunal, withdrawing 59
62. NA 25.7.11. Tribunal referring 61 to judge.
63.NA 25.7.11. Camden to Tribunal
64. NA 25.7.11. Tribunal to pass on 63 to judge.
65. NA 1.8.11. Tribunal to parties from Judge
66. NA 1.8.11. NJH to ICO asking if anything more required from him and requesting reply to 3 questions in 56.
67.NA 3.8.11. ICO to parties
68. NA 3.8.11. ICO to parties
69. NA 3.8.11. Camden to parties
71. NA 8.11.08. Camden to Parties requesting ext for witness statements
72. NA 8.8.11. ICO to Parties saying no problem with Camden's requested extension
73. NA 11.8.11. Tribunal to parties saying Judge allows extension but asking about rest of programme
74. NA 11.8.11. NH to Parties saying he has no problem with rest of programme
75. 24.8.11. NH and FoTTG Witness Statements, cover and acknowledgement
76. 24.8.11. Camden (Dave Jenkins) Witness Statement and cover
77. 1.9.11. ICO to Parties cover email for updated bundle index
78. 1.9.11. From ICO - Updated bundle index
79. 2.9.11. NH to Parties cover email for written representation
80. 2.9.11. NH written representation
81. 16.9.11. Camden final submission
82. NA 16.9.11. ICO confirmation they would not be submitting a Final submission
83. 23.9.11. NH Reply submission
84. NA 17.10.11. ICO Cover letter to Decision
86. NA 13.11.11. NJH to IT Informal request to appeal
87.NA 14.11.11. IT to NJH confirming request sent to Judge
88. NA 16.11.11. IT to NJH requiring formal request using form
89. NA17.11.11. NJH to IT cover email to formal request
90. 17.11.11. NJH formal request to appeal
91. NA 17.11.11. IT to parties notifiying that request for appeal had been made
92. 18.11.11. Judge's decision on request for appeal
93. NA 21.11.11. IT notifying parties of Judge's decision
94. NA 21.11.11. IT to NJH re right of direct appeal.