I think this is a good paper?

Post date: May 02, 2017 5:34:9 AM

You judge:

https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.00244

I like the way the proof went. I have to thank Cecilia Pagliantini who pretty much listened to my nonsense for a few months, before I managed to crack it.

It all started with realizing that you can remove the (terrible!) inverse in a projection operator definition by introducing a Gram-Schmidt decomposition.

The rest is in the paper, and trying to realize how to slowly massage the equations and arrive at the exponential bounds.

The geometric interpretation on the loop space is neat.