sourc00

<<ALEXANOR>>

COMPANY FOR SCIENTIFIC IMPLEMENTATION

Information on Literature Sources about Butterflies, etc. in SW Ukraine

1. Abafi, 1897. Entomologiai kirándulás Ungmegyében. / A.L. Abafi // Rovartani lapok. Budapest. 1897. IV kőtet. 3 füzet. 42-45, 52-56 old.

2. Abafi, 1906. Magyarország pillangói. / A. L. Abafi // Rovartani lapok. Budapest. 1906. X. 53-58 old.

3. Abafi, 1906. Magyarország pillangói. / A. L. Abafi // Rovartani lapok. Budapest. 1906. XII. 108-111 old.

4. Abafi, 1906. Magyarország pillangói. / A. L. Abafi // Rovartani lapok. Budapest. 1906. XVI. 179-185 old.

5. Abafi-Aigner, Pavel, Uhryk, 1900. Fauna Regni Hungariae. Ordo. Lepidoptera. / A. L. Abafi-Aigner, J. Pavel, F. Uhryk. // Regia Societas Scientarium Naturalum Hungarica. Budapest. 1900, 82 p.

6. Adamczewski, 1935-1936. Dwie wycieczki motylarskie na podole. / S. Adamczewski // Polskie Pismo Entomoligiczne. Polski Zwiazek Entomologiczny. Lwow. 1935-1936. 14-15. 324-331 s.

7. Artemjeva, 1993. Variability of the wing design features of some Carpathians and Transcarpathians Rhopalocerea species. / E. A. Artemjeva // Proceedings of International Conference: "The East Carpathians Fauna: Its Present State and Prospects of Preservation". September 13-16 1993, Uzhgorod, Transcarpathia, Ukraine. 1993, page 157-158.

   1. A b s t r a c t. The variability of the wing design of 11 common Rhopalocera species of the Carpathians and Transcarpathia were investigated. It enabled us to estimate the range of the microevolutionary processes in the natural populations of these species.

8. Assmann, 1847. Breslau Lepid. / A. Assmann // Ent. Zeitschr. Breslau. 1847. (1) 1., S. 2.

9. Bachinskiy, 1927. The atlas of Butterflies. / L. Bachinskiy // Published by Pedagogical Society House in Uzhgorod. Uzhgorod. 1927, 16 p.p., 20 color plates.

10. Balint, 1985. Plebicula dorylas magna nov. ssp. (Lep.: Lycaenidae) from the Eastern Carpathians, Rumania./ Z. Balint // Neue Entomologische Nachrichten. Keltern. 1990. 14., S. 14-20. Taf. 1-12.

11. Balint, 1990. A karpat-medence boglarkalepkenek revizioja (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae). / Z. Balint // Janus Pannonius Muzeum Evkonynve. Pecs. 1990. 34., old. 47-62.

12. Balogh, 1941. Lepkegyutes a Fekete Tisza forrasvidekein. / I. Balogh // Folia entomologica hungarica. A Magyar rovartani tarsasag tulajdona. Budapest. 1941. 6. 3-4., old. 97-104.

13. Bergstrasser, 1779. Nomenclatur und Beschreibung der Insecten der Grafschaft Hanau-Munzenberg wie auch der Wetterau der angranzenden Nachbarschaft dies und jenseits des Mains. / J. A. B. Bergstrasser. Sturner. Hanau. 1779. 2. Jahrgang., 79 S., Taf. 15-48.

14. Beuret, 1957. Die Lycaeniden der Schweiz: Plebeinae (Blaulinge): Tarucidi, Lampidini, Everidi, Lycaenopsidi, Glaucopsychidi. / H. Beuret // [Entomol. Ges. Basel]. Basel. 1957. Vol. 2., S. 107-271, Taf. 9-14.

15. Borkhausen, 1788. Naturgeschihte der europaischen Schmetterlinge nach systematischer Ordnung: Tagschmetterlinge. / M. B. Borkhausen. Varentrapp u. Venner Bd. 1788. 1. 36+288 S., 1 Taf.

16. Brunicki, 1908. Spis motyli zebranych w powiecie Stryjskim. / J. Brunicki //. Sprawozd. Kom. fizjogr. Akad. Umiej w Krakowie. Karkow. 1908. 42, s. 26-36.

17. Brunicki, 1909. Spis motyli zebranych w powiecie Stryjskim. / J. Brunicki // Sprawozd. Kom. fizjogr. Akad. Umiej w Krakowie. Karkow. 1909. 44, s. 3-5.

18. Brunicki, 1911. Spis motyli zebranych w powiecie Stryjskim. / J. Brunicki // Sprawozd. Kom. fizjogr. Akad. Umiej w Krakowie. Karkow. 1911. 45, s. 66-69.

19. Brunicki, 1912. Spis motyli zebranych w powiecie Stryjskim. / J. Brunicki // Sprawozd. Kom. fizjogr. Akad. Umiej w Krakowie. Karkow. 1912. 46, s. 139-141.

20. Brunicki, 1913. Spis motyli zebranych w powiecie Stryjskim. / J. Brunicki // Sprawozd. Kom. fizjogr. Akad. Umiej w Krakowie. Karkow. 1913. 47., s. 52-55.

21. Bryk, 1935. Lepidoptera Parnassiidae. Pars II (Subfam. Parnassiinae). / F. Bryk // Das Tierreich. Eine Zusammenstellung und Kennzeichnung der rezenten Tierformen. Berlin; Leipzig: de Gruyter. 1935. 65. Lief., 51 + 790 S.

22. Cantener, 1834. Histoire naturelle des Lepidopteres Rhopaloceres, ou Papilllons, Diurnes, des departemens des haut et Bas-Rhin, de la Moselle, de la Meurthe, et des Vosges. / L. P. Cantener. Roret et Levrault. Paris. 1834. Liv. 1., 166 p., 38 pl.

23. Costa, [1836]. Fauna de Regno di Napoli ossia enumerazione di tutti gli animali che abitano le regioni di questo regno e le acque che le bagnano contenente la descrizione de nuovi o pocoesa ttamente conosciuti con figure ricavate da originale viventi e dipinte al naturale. / O. G. Costa. Napoli. 1836., 11+[434] p., 38 pls.

24. Dadd, 1909. [Descriptions of new forms of Rhopalocera]. / E. M. Dadd // Berl. ent. Z. 1909. Berlin. 54., p. (36)- (37).

25. Dannehl, 1927. Neue Formen und geographische Rassen aus meinen Rhopaloceren-Arten der letzten Jahre. / F. Dannehl // Mitt. muench, ent. Ges. 1927. 17., S. 1-8.Eiffinger, 1907-1921. Die palaearctica Tagfalter. Erebia. / G. Eiffinger. In Setz. Grossschmetterlinge der Erde. 1907-1921. 1., S. 94-114.

26. Devjatkin, 1990. About two Siberian species of Skippers genus Pyrgus (Lepidoptera, Hesperiidae)./ A.L. Devjatkin // Zoological magazine. "Science". Moscow. X, page 141-145.

27. Distribution of Insects in the European part of USSR. Atlas. "Science", Leningrad branch. Leningrad. 1981. 56 pages, maps 73-125.

28. Distribution of Insects in the European part of USSR. Atlas. "Science", Leningrad branch. Leningrad. 1982. 56 pages, maps 126-178.

29. Ershov, Fild, 1870. Catalogue of Lepidoptera of Russian empire. / N. Ershov, A. Fild // Works of the Russian Entomological Society IV. (1867-1869). 1870, page 130-204.

30. Esper, 1777. Die Schmetterlinge in Abbildungen nach der Natur mit Beschreibungen. / E. J. C. Esper. Erlangen:Walther. Tagvogel. 1777. 1. Th. 1., 22+388 S., Tab. 1-50.

31. Esper, 1780-[1786]. Die Schmetterlinge in Abbildungen nach der Natur Beschreibungen. Fortsetzung der europaischen Schmetterlinge. 1 Abschn. Zu dem Geschlecht der Tagschmetterlinge, oder Fortsetzung des ersten Theils. / E. J. C. Esper. Erlanger:Walther. 1780-[1786]. 2. Bd. 1 Th., 190 S., Tab. 51- 93.

32. Esper, 1805. Die Schmetterlinge in Abbildungen nach der natur mit Beschreibungen. / E. J. C. Esper. Erlangen:Walther. Supplementband zu Th. 1. Abschnitt 1., 1805. 120 S., Tab. 94-116.

33. Esper, [1805-1830]. Die Schmetterlinge in Abbildungen nach der Natur mit Beschreibungen. Fortsetzung des ersten, zweiten, dritten und virten Theils, als der Tagschmetterlinge, Abendschmetterlinge, Spinner- und Eulenphalenen. 2. Theil. Zu dem Geschlecht der Tagschmetterlinge. / J. J. C. Esper. Erlangen:Walther. [1805- 1830], 48 S., Tab. 117-126.

34. Fabricius, 1787. Mantissa insectorum sistens species nuper detectas, adiectis, synonymis, observationibus, descriptionibus, emendationibus. / I. C. Fabricius. Hafniae:Proft. 1787., T. 1., 20+348 p., T. 2., 382 p.

35. Freyer, 1829. Beitrage zur Geschichte europaischer Schmetterlinge mit Abbildungen nach der Natur. / C. F. Freyer. Rieger. Nurberg., 1829., 166 p., 48 pls.

36. Frivaldsky, 1865. Adatok Máramaros vármegye faunájához. / I. Frivaldsky. // Mathematikai és természettudomŕnyi közlemények.A Magyar Tudományos Akadémia evkönyvei. Budapest. 1865. 11 (1864-1867), 4., old.1-275.

37. Frivaldsky, 1875. Adatok Máramaros vármegye faunájához. / I. Frivaldsky. // Mathematikai és termeszettudományi kozlemenyek. A Magyar Tudomŕnyos Akadémia evkönyvei. 1875. 9 kőtet, 5 szám, old. 183-232.

38. Fruhstorfer, 1922. Der bekannteste mitteleuropaische Tagfalter noch ohne Namen. / H. Fruhstorfer // Entomol. Rdsch. 1922. 39. S. 13.

39. Fruhstorfer, 1923. Neue und seltene Parnassius-Rassen. / H. Fruhstorfer // Ent. Anz. 1923. 3, S. 108-109, 131-133.

40. Fuessly, 1775. Joh. Caspar Fuesslins Verzeichnis der ihm bekannten Schweizerischen insekten mit einet ausgemahlten Kupfertafel nebst der Ankundigung eines neuen Inseckten Werks. / J. C. Fuessly. Zurich. Wintertur: Fuessly und Steiner, 1775, 62 S.

41. Garbowski, 1895. Neue Beitrage zur Osterreichischen Lepidopterenfauna. / T. Garbowski // Entomologische Nachrichten. Berlin. 1895. 21, S. 136-146.

42. Geyer in Hubner (1796-1838), 1837. Sammlung Europaischen Shmetterlinge. / C. M. Geyer. Augsburg. 1837, 194 p.

43. Gieysztor, 1925. Notatki lepidopterologiczne. / M. Gieysztor. // Polskie Pismo Entomoligiczne. Polski Zwiazek Entomologiczny. Lwow. 1925. 4. 1., s. 23-29.

44. Godart, 1821. Histoire naturelle des Lepidopteres ou Papilons de France. / J. Godart. Crevout. Paris. 1821. I, 7+295 p., 39 pl.

45. Gozmány, 1968. Nappali lepkék - Diurna. / L. Gozmŕny. Akademiai kiadó. Magyarország állatvilága. Fauna Hungariae. Budapest. 1968, 1-204 + 1-6 old.

46. Grassl, 1993. P. apollo. Seine Unterarten. / H. Grassl. Helmut Glassl, Mohrendorf, 1993, 214 S.

47. Hemming, 1929. Revision of the baton group of the genus Turanana Bethune-Baker, with an account of an unrecnized species, T. vicrama Moore. / J. Hemming // Entomologist. 1929. 62, p. 27-34, 60-64, 84-89, 2 pl.

48. Hemming, 1967. The generic names of the butterflies and their type-species (Lepidoptera: Rhopalocera). / F. Hemming. // Bulletin of the British museum (Natural History) entomology. London. 1967, suppl. 9., 509 p.

49. Henriksen, Kreutzer, 1982. The butterflies of Scandinavia in nature. / H. J. Henriksen, I. Kreutzer. Scandinavisk bogforlag. Odense. 1982, 215 p., col. ill.

50. Herbst, 1796. Natursyst. in Ausland. Ins. Schmett. / J. F. W. Herbst. 1796, (?) p.

51. Higgins, Hargreaves, 1983. The Butterflies of Britain and Europe. / L. G. Higgins, Br.Hargreaves. Collins, London, 1983, 256 pp., col. ill.

52. Higgins, Riley, 1970. A Field Guide to the Butterflies of Britain and Europe. / L. G. Higgns., N. D. Riley. London., 1970. 380 p., col. pl.

53. Higgins, Riley, 1978. Die Tagfalter Europas und Nordwestafrikas. (2. Aufl.). (Transl. W. Forster). / L. G. Higgins, N. D. Riley. Verlag. Paul Parey. Hamburg und Berlin. 1978, 377 p., 60 col. pls.

54. Hoffmansegg, 1804. Alphabetisches Verzeichniss zu J. Hubner's Abbildungen der Papilionen mit den beigefungen vorzuglichsten Synonymen. / J. C. Hoffmansegg. / Mag. Insectenk. (Illiger). 1804. 3., S. 181-206.

55. Hormuzaki, 1894. Lepidoptera der Bukowina. / C. Hormuzaki. Czernowitz., 1894, 183 S.

56. Hormuzaki, 1903. Karpatokban honos Erebiakrol. / C. Hormuzki. // Rovartani lapok. Budapest. 1903. 10, Old. 144-148, 166-171.

57. Horvath, Pável, 1876. Magyarország nagypikkelyröpüinek rendszeres névjegyzéke. / G. Horvath, J. Pável // Mathematikai és természettudomanyi kozlemenyek. A.M.T. Akadémia könyvkiadó hivatalában. Budapest. 1876, XII. kötet, old. 25-74.

58. Hübner, 1796-[1838]. Sammlung europaischer Schmetterlinge. / J. Hübner. Papiliones. Augsburg, 1796-[1838]. 10+194 S., Tab. 1-207.

59. Hufnagel, 1766. Tabelle von den Tagevolgeln der hiessigen Gegend, worauf denen Liebhabern der Insecten Beschaffenheit, Zeit, Ort, und andere Umstande der Raupen und der daraus entstehenden Sc hmetterlinge bestimmt werden. / [without initials] Hufnagel. // Berlin. Mag. Berlin. 1766. 2, S. 54-90.

60. Issekutz, 1952. Parnassius apollo (L.) in the Carpathians. / L. Issekutz. // Annales historico-naturales musei Nationalis Hungarici. Kozoktatasudyi kiadovallalat. Budapest. 1952. 2, old. 133-140.

61. Jarosiewicz, 1935-1936. Leucochloe chloridice Hb. / J. Jarosiewicz // Polskie Pismo Entomoligiczne. Polski Zwiazek Entomologiczny. Lwow. 1935-1936. 14-15, s. 368, 369, fig. 1-3.

62. de Jong , 1972. Systematics and geographic history of the genus Pyrgus in the Palaearctic region (Lepidoptera, Hesperiidae). / R. de Jong // Tijdschr. entomol. 1972. 115., 1-120 p.

63. Jutzeler, 1983. Beobachtungen über Neptis rivularis Scop. im Tessin. / D. Jutzeler // Mitt. Entomol. Ges. Basel. 1983. 33. 1., S. 10-14.

64. Kardos, 1877. Máramarosmegye állatrajzi ismertetése. / K. Kardos. A Részvénytársulat Nyomdájában. Máramaros-Sziget. Negyedik ev., 1877, 19 old.

65. Kaucki, 1924. Motyle t. zv. rzadsze lub nowe dla Malopolski. / T. F. Kaucki // Polskie Pismo Entomoligiczne. Polski Zwiazek Entomologiczny. Lwow. 1924. 3. 3, s. 89-91.

66. Kaucki, 1925. Motyle t. zv. wieksze, rzadkie lub nowe dla Malopolski. / T. F. Kaucki // Polskie Pismo Entomoligiczne. Polski Zwiazek Entomologiczny. Lwow. 1925. 5. 1-2., s. 59-61.

67. Kaucki, 1928. Motyle t. zv. Wieksze, rzadsze lub nowe dla Malopolski. III. / T. F. Kaucki // Polskie Pismo Entomoligiczne. Polski Zwiazek Entomologiczny. Lwow. 1928. 7. 1-4., s. 180-188.

68. Kertész, 1922. A magyar Kárpátok Apollo-pilljének eddig ismeretes helyi alakjal és repülési helyei. / A. Kertész // Rovartani lapok. Budapest. 1922. 26. 1-3., old. 23-33.

69. Kirby, 1871. A synonymic catalogue of Diurnal Lepidoptera./ W. F. Kirby. John van Voorst & R. Friedlander & Son. London & Berlin. 1871, 690 p.

70. Klausnitzer, 1990. Ecology of urban fauna. / B. Klausnitzer. Translation with german by I.V. Orlova and I.M. Marova. Moscow. "Mir" .1990, 246 pages, ill.

71. Klemensiewicz, 1894. Beitrage zur Lepidopterenfauna Galiziens. / S. Klemensiewicz // Spraw. Komis. fizjogr. Akad. Umiej. w Krakowie. Krakow. 1894. XLIV, s. 167-190.

72. Klemensiewicz, 1898. O nowych i malo znanych gatunkach motyli fauny galicyjskiej. / S. Klemensiewicz // Spraw. Komis. fizjogr. Akad. Umiej. w Krakowie. Krakow. 1898. 33, s. 113-190.

73. Klemensiewicz, 1899. O nowych i malo znanych gatunkach motyli fauny galicyjskiej. / S. Klemensiewicz // Spraw. Komis. fizjogr. Akad. Umiej. w Krakowie. Krakow. 1899. 34, s. 176-202.

74. Klemensiewicz, 1901. O nowych i malo znanych gatunkach motyli fauny galicyjskiej. / S. Klemensiewicz // Spraw. Komis. fizjogr. Akad. Umiej. w Krakowie. Krakow. 1901. 35, s. 78-101.

75. Klemensiewicz, 1902. O nowych i malo znanych gatunkach motyli fauny galicyjskiej. / S. Klemensiewicz // Spraw. Komis. fizjogr. Akad. Umiej. w Krakowie. Krakow. 1902. 36, s. 40-76.

76. Klemensiewicz, 1905. O nowych i malo znanych gatunkach motyli fauny galicyjskiej. / S. Klemensiewicz // Spraw. Komis. fizjogr. Akad. Umiej. w Krakowie. Krakow. 1905. 38, s. 4-7.

77. Klemensiewicz, 1906. Lepidopterologische Beitrage aus Galizien. / S. Klemensiewicz // Verch. Zool.-Bot. Ges. Wien. Wien. 1906. 46, S. 160-163.Klemensiewicz, 1906. Lepidopterologische Beitrage aus Galizien. / S. Klemensiewicz // Verch. Zool.-Bot. Ges. Wien. Wien. 1906. 46, S. 160-163.

78. Klemensiewicz, 1909. O nowych i malo znanych gatunkach motyli fauny galicyjskiej. / S. Klemensiewicz // Spraw. Komis. fizjogr. Akad. Umiej. w Krakowie. Krakow. 1909. 43, s. 53-62.Klemensiewicz, 1909. O nowych i malo znanych gatunkach motyli fauny galicyjskiej. / S. Klemensiewicz // Spraw. Komis fizjogr. Akad. Umiej. w Krakowie. Krakow. 1909. 43, s. 53-62.

79. Klemensiewicz, 1911. O Nowych i malo znanych gatunkach motyli fauny galicyjskiej. / S. Klemensiewicz // Sprawozd. Kom. fizjogr. Akad. Umiej w Krakowie. Krakow. 1911. 45, s. 1-8.

80. Knoch, 1782. Beitrage zur Insektengeschihte. / A. W. Knoch. Schwickertschen Vlge. Leipzig. 1782. 2. Stuck., 85 S.

81. Koch, 1984. Wir bestimmen Schmetterlinge. / M. Koch. Neumann Verlag. Leipzig u. Radebeul. 1984. 792 S.

82. Korshunov, 1972. The catalogue of butterflies (Lepidoptera, Rhopalocera) of fauna USSR. / Y. P. Korshunov // Entomological Review. Acad. Sci. of USSR, All Y. E. S., Leningrad. 1972. LI. Issue 1, p. 136-154.

83. Korshunov, 1972. The catalogue of butterflies (Lepidoptera, Rhopalocera) of fauna USSR. / Y. P. Korshunov // Entomological Review. Acad. Sci. of USSR, All Y. E. S., Leningrad. 1972. LI. Issue 2, p. 352-368.

84. Kozakevich, 1970. A presence of Erebia pronoe Esp. (Lepidoptera, Satyridae) in Gorgany (Ukrainian Carpathians). / Z. M. Kozakevich // "Vestnik Zoologii". Kiev. 1970. 2, p. 77-78.

85. Kremky, 1925. Przyczynek do fauny motyli Podlasia. / J. Kremky. // Polskie Pismo Entomologiczne. 1925. 4. 1., s. 35-62.

86. Kricsfalusy, Ivaneha, Lugovoj, Budnikov, Mezo-Kricsfalusy, Mateleshko, Popov, Syvokhop, Pavlej, Lesjo. Uzhansky National Nature Park. / V.Kricsfalusy, I. Ivaneha, A. Lugovoj, G. Budnikov, G. Mezo-Kricsfalusy, A. Mateleshko, S. Popov, Ja. Syvokhop, Ju. Pavlej, I. Lesjo. - Uzhgorod, 2001.- 120 p. (Biodiversity Conservation Series / Ed. V. Kricsfalusy.- Issue 5).

• 1. Abstract: The book describes the nature peculiarities of the Uzhansky Park, it familiarizes the readers with the natural conditions, diversity of the plant and animal kingdoms, gives information on rare flora and fauna species, which need protection, elucidates the nature and historical heritage. A list of 75 butterfly species is presented. Amongst of Red Data Book of Ukraine such species as Iphiclides podalirius, Papilio machaon, Parnassius mnemosyne, Hamearis lucina, Apatura iris and Limenitis populi were registered. From European Red Data book such species as Maculinea arion was noted. The book is addressed to students, teachers, nature conservationalists, members of environmental NGO's and wide public circles.

  2.  

87. Kricsfalusi, Lugowoj, Kitschura, Popow, 2001. DURCH DIE NATUR VON TRANSJARPATIEN. Für ökologische Excursionen. /V. Kricsfalusi, A. Lugowoj, V. Kitschura, S. Popow. - Uschgorod, 2001. 76 S.

• 1. Abstract: Vorwort. Die ukrainische Provinz Transkarpatien liegt - aus dem Blick-winkel der Landeshauptstadt Kyiw (Kiew) -jenseits, nämlich an der Südabdachung der Karpaten, angrenzend an Rumänien, Ungarn, Slowakei und Polen. Transkarpatien liegt genau im geografischen Mittelpunkt Europas und nur rund 1500 km östlich der Schweiz. Hier ist der weltweit grösste Urwald der europäischen Buche (Rotbuche; Fagus sylvatica) verblieben. Und da erhebt sich der höchste Berg der Ukraine - Howerla (2061 m ü. M.), an deren Abhänge der grösste Donau-Zufluss, die Theiss (Tisza, Tysa), entspringt, die in der Pannonischen Ebene auf 100 m ü.M. nach Ungarn fliesst. Auf unterschiedlichen Grundgesteinen sind in grosser Dichte endemische Arten zu finden; fast auf Schritt und Tritt können die in Westeuropa selten gewordenen Vögel der natumahen Kulturlandschaft beobachtet werden. Abwechslungsreiche Routen füh-ren durch harmonische Landschaften.

     1. Die sich seit der Unabhängigkeit der Ukraine verschärfende ökonomische Krise nötigt die Bevölkerung, täglich um ihre Existenz zu ringen. Unter solch widrigen Umständen wurde uns das Glück von Bekanntschaften mit qualifizierten Naturwissenschaften! zu Teil. So konnte vorliegendes Büch-lein als ein Schlüssel zum „andern" Transkarpatien entstehen: einer Provinz voller Schönheit und Gastfreundschaft. Dieses Transkarpatien ist für an Zentral- und Osteuropa interessierte Naturfreunde ein lohnendes Reise- und Ferienziel. Nach zwei begeisternden Studienreisen durch die Natur von Transkarpatien, organisiert durch den Unterzeichnenden und unter kundiger Leitung von Dr. Wladimir Kricsfalusi, Geobotaniker, Uschgorod; Dr. Wladimir Kitschlira, technischer Chef der transkarpatischen Forstadministration in Uschgorod und Dr. Alexej Lugowoj, Zoologe, Uschgorod, war 1999 der Entschluss gereift: Eine übersichtliche Schrift, abgefasst in einer westlichen Sprache, soll es interessierten Personen aus dem Ausland erleichtern, die Naturreichtümer von Transkarpatien kennenzulernen. Eine Vorläuferversion wurde im Jahr 2000 anlässlich einer dritten Studienreise erprobt.  

     2. Die Publikation wurde dank der Unterstützung durch Teilnehmer der ökologischen Führungen 1998-2000 möglich. Der Übersetzerin Natalja Tschemowa und dem mit der Bild- und Kartenbearbeitung betrauten Sergej Popow und anderem Mitthelfem, sei für ihre grosse Arbeit unter schwierigsten Bedingungen herzlich gedankt. Ebenfalls wird das Lektorat durch Hansheinrich Bachofen, Adrian Borgula, Brigitte Commarmot und Beate Hasspacher verdankt. Mit der Herausgabe der Schrift ist der Wunsch verbunden, dass sich über den sich zusehends vertiefenden Graben zwischen Ost- und Westeuropa hinweg ein Austausch zum Wohl der Menschen und der Natur hier und dort entwickelt. Die Schrift ist ein erster Versuch, die merkwürdige Welt des natürlich-wilden Transkarpatien dem Blick westeuropäischer Gäste zu öffnen. Gemeinsam mit unseren transkarpatischen Freunden laden wir Sie in diese faszinierende Gegend ein. Sie werden den Besuch nicht bereuen! Es würde uns freuen, von Ihren Eindrücken zu erfahren und Ihre Vorschläge für den zukünftigen Austausch mit Transkarpatien zu verwilklichen!

     3.  

  2. Kricsfalusi, Popov, 2002. Restoration of wetland biotopes on the Tisza plain, Ukraine. / V.V. Kricsfalusi, S.G. Popov / 3rd European conference on restoration ecology. “Challenges of the New Millennium our joint responsibility”. Conference abstracts. Budapest. Hungary, 25-31 August 2002. Budapest, 2002, p. 132.

• • 1. The conservation of refugee wetland biotopes on the Tisza Plain (Transcarpathian region) is fairly actual, because many endangered communities, plant and animal species are concentrated here. The patches of wood, marsh and meadow complexes are relict habitats from the middle-end Holocene and specify possible ways of migration mountain and boreal species with Carpathians on Alfőld. Study area on the Maramarosh Depression formally has a status of the  Protected Landscape with regional significance. The investigation of natural condition, soils and mezoclimate of this area was carried out. The main factors limiting restoration of relict communities was determined as pasturing of cattle, cutting down of forest cover and continuing draining of marsh and meadow lands. For nature conservation purpose the management-plan which includes such activities as regulation of a hydrological regime, restoration of a native forest cover, periodic moving and clearing open land for prevention of process them silvatization, repatriation of populations of the missed plant and animal species was designed. Restoration of wetland biotopes with unique vegetation, flora and fauna by the use of permanent plots and searching for appropriate management were done for the first time in Ukraine. Laying out of permanent monitoring plots and data collection recording are necessary for the elaboration of effective future management of study area.

    2.  

88. Ksienzopolski, 1912. Rhopalocera of South - Western Russia. / A.V. Ksienzopolski // Works of the Volynj verifiers of nature. Zitomir, 1912 (1911). 8, p. 1-76, tab. 1-2.

89. Kuhn, 1774. Herrn Doctor Kuhns Anecdoten zur Insecten-Geschichte. / [without initials] Kuhn. Naturforscher. Halle. 1774. 3, S. 1-27, 2 Tab.

90. Kuntze, 1937-1938. Charakterystyka entomofaunistyczna scianki wolczynieskiej pod Stanislawowem. / R. Kuntze // Polskie Pismo Entomoligiczne. Polski Zwiazek Entomologiczny. Lwow. 1937-1938. XVI-XVII, s. 1-15.

91. Kuzyakin, Mazin, 1984. Quantitative Calculation of Butterflies for Biogeografical Purposes. / A.P. Kuzyakin, L.N. Mazin // IX Congress of All Union Entomology Society. Kiev, "Naukova Dumka", 1984, p. 268.

92. Kuzyakin, Mazin, 1993. Route Method of Butterfly Imago Calculation by Method of Catching For a Unit of Time. / A.P. Kuzyakin, L. N. Mazin // A. P. Kuzyakin Memoramble Reading. "Influence of Anthropogenic Factors on Structure and Function of Ecosystems and Their Particular Components". N.K. Krupskaya Moscow Pedagogical Institute, Moscow, 1993, p. 61-66.

93. Lang, 1789. Verz. Schmett. / H. Lang. Gegend. Augsburg. 1789. (?) S.

94. Linnaeus, 1758. Systema Naturae per Regna Tria Naturae, secundum classis, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentis, synonymis, locis. Etudes de Lepidopterologie comparee. / C. Linnaeus. Holmiae: Laurentii Salvii. 1758. 1. Ed. 10, reformata, 4+824 p.

95. Linnaeus, 1761. Fauna Svecia, sistens animalia Sveciae Regni: Quadrupedia, Aves, Amphibia, Pisces, Insecta, Vermes, distributa per classes et ordines, genera et species. Cum differentiis spec ierum, synpnymis auterum, nominibus, incolarum, locis habitationum, descriptionibus insectorum. Edition altera. / C. Linnaeus. Laurentii Salvii. Stokholmiae., 1761. 26+411 p.

96. Linné, 1764. Museum S: ae R: ae M: tis Ludovicae Ulricae Reginae Svecorum, Gothorum, Vandalorumque etc. etc. In quo animalia rariora, exotica, imprimis Insecta et Conchilia describuntur et de terminatur, prodromi instar editium. / C. v. Linné. Laurentii Salvii. Holmiae., 1764, 8+720 p.

97. Linné, 1767. Systema Naturae per regna tria Naturae, secundum classis, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis, T. 1, ps. 2. Editio duodecima, reformata. / C. v. Linné. Laurentii Salvii. Holmiae. 1767. 1, p. 533-1327.

98. Linné, 1771. Mantissa Plantarus (Ed. 2). / C. v. Linné. Laurentii Salvii. Appendix. Animalia. Stockholm. 1771, p. 521-552.

99. Maslowscy, 1923. Z biologii motyla: Lycaena eumedon Esp. / L. M. Maslowscy // Polskie Pismo entomol. 1923. 2. 1., S. 24-30.24-30.

100. Meigen, 1827-1832. Systematische Beschreibung der Europaischen Schmetterlinge; mit Abbildungen auf Steintafeln. / J. W. Meigen. Jacob Anton Mayer. Aachen and Leipzig. 1767. 2. IV+212 p., pls 43-80.

101. Mocsáry, 1877. Adatok Zempln és Ung Megyék Faunájához. / S. Moscáry // Mathematikai és természettudományi Közlemenyek. A M. T. Akadémia könvkiadó-hivatalában. Budapest. 1877, XIII. kötet, old. 131-185.

102. Moucha, 1956. Belasek horsky (Pieris bryoniae O.) v Karpatech. / J. Moucha // Cas. Slez. mus. Opava. 1956. 5, s. 119-122.

103. Nickerl, 1850. Synopsis der Lepidopteren-Fauna Bohmens. / F. A. Nickerl. Prag. 1850, 77 S.

104. Nekrutenko, 1985. The Rhopalocera of the Crimea. / Nekrutenko Y.P. Kiev. Naukova dumka. 1985; 123 figs., 24 col. pl., 152 p

105. Niesiolowski, 1935. Przycynek do znajomosti fauny Czarnohory. / W. Niesiolowski // Rozpravy i sprawodzania. Institut badawczy lasow Ponstwowych. Warszawa. 1935. Seria A., s. 72-79.

106. Niesiolowski, 1936. Pieris napi L. subsp. bryoniae Ochs. ze szczegolnem uwzglenieniem form karpatckich. / W. Niesiolowski // Annales musei zoologici polonici. Warszawa. 1936. 11, s. 213-236.

107. Niesiolowski, Wojtusiak, 1937. Rozprestrzenienie geofraficznych form gatunku Erebia manto Esp. zeszczegolnym uwzglednieniem Karpat wschodnich. / W. Niesiolowski, R. J. Wojtusiak // Bull. Acad. Polon Sci. Cracov., 1937, ser. B., s. 111-126.

108. Nowicki, 1860. Enumeratio Lepidopterorum Galiciae Orientalis. / M. Nowicki. Simtibus auctoris. Tupis Instituti Stauropigiani. Leopoli. 1860, XXX+269+XVI, 1 tabl.

109. Nowicki, 1865. Beitrag zur Lepidopterenfauna Galiziens. / M. Nowicki // Verch. Zool.-Bot. Ges. Wien. Wien. 1865, XV, S. 175-192.

110. Nowicki, 1865. Motyle Galycii. / M. Nowicki. W drukarni instytutu tauropiglanskiego. Lwow. 1865a, s. 70- 152.

111. Oberthur, 1910. Notes pour servir a etablir la faune francaise et algerienne de Lepidopteres (Suite). Rhopalocera. / Ch. Oberthur. Etudes de Lepidopterologie comparee. Rennes. 1910. 4, p. 15-417.

112. Obraztsov, 1935. Lycaena (Aricia) allous Hb. und ihre ostlichen Rassen. / N.S. Obraztsov // Folia Zool. et Hydrobiol. 1935, 8, S. 141-150.

113. Ochsenheimer, 1807-1808. Die Schmetterlinge von Europa. 1 Bd., 1 Th.: Falter oder Tagschmetterlinge. / F. Ochsenheimer. Fleischer. Leipzig. 1807-1808. 1. Abt. 2+323 S., 2. Abt., 30+241 S.

114. Pallas, 1771. Reisen durch verschieden Provinzen der Russischen Reichs in den Jahren 1768-1774. / P. S. Pallas. Druck. Akad. Wiss. St.-Petersburg. Buch. 1771. 1, 504 S. 23 Taf.

115. Patryn, 1935-1936. Wzmianki motylnicze. / W. Patryn // Polskie Pismo Entomoligiczne. Polski Zwiazek Entomologiczny. Lwow. 1935-1936. 14-15, s. 367.

116. Pawlitschek, 1901. Einige Eigenthumlichkeiten der bukowiner Insectenfauna, mit besonderer Rucksichtnahme auf Schmetterlinge und Kafer. / A. Pawlitschek // Janresb. Gymn. Czernowitz. Czernowitz. 1901. S. 3-21.

117. Pekarsky, 1954. Parnassius apollo L. in den Karpaten; seine Geschichte und Formenbilding. / P. Pekarsky // Zetschrift der Wiener entomologischen Gesellschaft. Wien. 1954. 39. 7, S. 257-264.

118. Poda, 1761. Insecta musei Graecensis, quae in ordines, genera et species juxta Systema Naturae Caroli Linnaei digessit Nicolaus Poda, e Societate Jesu, Philosophiae Doctor et Mathesos Professor. / N. Poda. Etudes de Lepidopterologie comparee. Graecii: Widmanstadii. 1761, 18+127 p., 2 tab.

119. Popov, 1987. The matherials on Lepidoptera fauna of Ukrainian Carpathians. I. Catalogue Rhopalocera of Prikarpattya. The family of Hesperiidae, Papilionidae, Pieridae./S.G. Popov// "The materials of Scientific conference of young scientists of biological faculty, Uzhgorod university, Uzhgorod, 22-24, May, 1986 "Uzhgorod, 1987, 75-86. (The manuscript is deposited in UkrSRI 03.11.1987. * 3045-Uk87).

• 1. Abstract: On the basis for the 125 years concerning the fauna of Prikarpatye a list of 30 species and one subspecies which appertain to 20 genera from the families Hesperidae, Papilionidae, and Pieridae was made. Some species were chosen , which under the influence of biotic and abiotic factors have reduced their numbers and need protection. A table of species common for contiguous territories is given.

     1.  

120. Popov, 1987. On the fauna of Lepidoptera, Rhopalocera in "Chorna Gora" reserve (Transcarpathia). /S.G. Popov// III congress of UES thesis of the report, Kiev, Ukrainian Entomologic Society, September, 1987:158-159.

• 1. Abstract: As a result of entomofaunistic investigations on the territory of fauna-floristic reserve "Chornaya Gora" (Transcarpathian, area 823 ha) 62 species Rhopalocera from the families Hesperidae (5 species), Papilionidae (3), Pieridae (9), Lycaenidae (19), Nymphalidae (16) and Satyridae (10) were found. It constitutes more than half of butterfly's fauna of Transcarpathian. 6 specific species are picked out. From founded species four have been entered in Red Book of U.S.S.R. Wealth and uniqueness of the reserve's one can explain by peculiarity of the territory, which is inaccessible for economic activity of man, by unique flora an favourable warm microclimate.

     1.  

121. Popov, 1987. On the fauna of Lepidoptera, Rhopalocera in "Dobrony" reserve. /S.G. Popov// In collected articles systematics, faunistics, ecology, Lepidoptera, Rhopalocera protection. 2-5-October 1987. Novosibirsk, 1987:96, 97.

• 1. Abstract: Results of investigations of Rhopalocera fauna plain reserve "Dobrony" (area 4459 ha), which have been carried in Summer of 1986, are given. In all 35 species from various families have been fixed: Hesperidae (3 species), Papilionidae (2), Pieridae (8), Lycaenidae (5), Riodinidae (1), Satyridae (6), which accounts for 36% of the butterflies' fauna of Transcarpathians. A specific group typical for glades and secondary woods of Latoritza river flood-lands is picked out. Close links of bluetailed Quercusia quercus L. with oaks is established. The role of rare species of butterflies as state indicators of protected territories surroundings is discussed.

     1.  

122. Popov, 1988. Lepidoptera, Rhopalocera of geobotanic districts of Transcarpathia. In collected articles The Problems of protection and rational utilization of flora and fauna of Ukrainian Carpathian. /S.G. Popov// MOIP, Uzhgorod department. Uzhgorod, 1988:40-45.

• 1. Abstract: On the grounds of entomological field investigations in period 1973-1985 years and of literary data six basic geobotanical regions of transcarpathian specific complexes of butterflies are picked out. The most numerous and representative group - 98 species on Vyhorlat-Huta mountain ridge and individual hills of Chop-Mukachevo lowland is noted. From total number of founded 32 species were listed for the first time for Transcarpathian. 8 "Red Book" species were stated. The list of 8 species, including 2 protected ones, which were indicated for Transcarpathian in early reports, but not noted at present, is given. The principal directions of investigations of Rhopalocera founa of Transcarpathian in connection with economic activity of men, which disturbs an ecological balance in natural habitats of rare insects is laid out.

     1.  

123. Popov, 1988. Summaries and outlooks of reseach of Lepidoptera, Rhopalocera populations of Ukrainian Carpathians. /S.G. Popov// Report thesis of Scientific Practical conference of young scientists devoted to 70 Anniversary of YCL "Scientific elaborations and achivements of young scientists to agricultural production. 24-26 of October 1988. V. Bakta, 1988:40, 41.

• 1. Abstract: Results of visual registrations in 1987 of Rhopalocera's seminatural and natural habitats of the Ukrainian Carpathians are given. In spring-autum period during 168 total hours of account 5155 individuals imago have been registered. In summary table background, ordinary and rare species are produced, which classified according to dominating index. In perspective, on the ground of used scientific method it is planned to carry out yearly accounts of butterflies. It shall allow to determine the dynamics of fauna in time of intensive mastering by man the nature of the Carpathians.

     1.  

124. Popov, 1989. On reseach of Lepidoptera, Rhopalocera population of Carpathian State Reserve. /S.G. Popov// Information Report of thesis, IV Conference of young scientists. 1-3 of June 1989 devoted to 70 Anniversary of YCL. Uzhgorod, 1989:138.

• 1. Abstract: In July-August, 1988, on territories of Ugolsko-Shyrokoluzhansky and Chernogora mountain massifs of the Carpathian State Reserve in result of visual quantitative accounts (43 hours of account) 1349 individuals imago of 37 butterfly species have been registered. Among them there are two "Red Book" Apatura ilia and Iphiclides podalirius. The influence of vertical zone (or altitude) on the dominant species composition is registered. So, background population Rhopalocera of the first massiv was represented such species as Artogeia napi, Heodes virgaureae and Inachis io, and of the second one (Alpine) - Aglais urticae, Artogeia rapae and Erebia euryale.

     1.  

125. Popov, 1990. Lepidoptera, Rhopalocera population of "Rostochye" reserve in 1988. (West Ukraine). /S.G. Popov// AS USSR. Zoological Institute. All Union Enthomologic Society, "The successes of entomology in USSR: Hymenoptera and Lepidoptera insects. "The Materials of X Congress of All Union Entomologic Society. September, 11-15, 1989, Leningrad, 1990:195-197.

• 1. Abstract: By means of catching and visual observations, carried out in reserve "Rostochye" in spring-summer period on forest roads, edges of forests, dry and wet meadows, bogs, 42 species Rhopalocera were registered. In all during 22 hours of account 1269 individual imago have been registered. According to abundance index (evaluating in one hour of account), butterflies, which are investigated, are divided into two groups: background species (17) and rare species (25). The reserve's Rhopalocera fauna list has been made with distribution every species according to dominating index and with indicating of abundance in spring and in summer.

     1.  

126. Popov, 1992. Rhopalocera (Lepidoptera) fauna of Volcanic Carpathians (Transcarpathia). /S.G. Popov// In Collection of articles "The problems of general and molecular biology. Kiev, "Libidy", 1992, 10:13-17.

• 1. Abstract: The results of investigations of butterflies of Transcarpathian (Volcanic Carpathians) of many-years are represented. 96 species of this group, from which 21 species are in detail examined, have been detected. Typical biotops, habitats of populations and summer periods of imago described.

     1.  

127. Popov, 1992. To the history of Rhopalocera Lepidoptera fauna study of Ukrainian Carpathians and adjoining area. /S.G. Popov// IV Congress of Ukrainian Entomology Society 8-10 IX 1992, thesis to report Kharkiv, 1992:132-133.

• 1. Abstract: A brief historical survey of study of butterflies of the Ukrainian Carpathians and contiguous territories of the Ukraina is presented. Total period of investigations is devided on pre-war and post-war parts (before and after 1945) the first one noting as most fruitful in respect of publication by Austrian-Hungarian authors the articles on fauna and ecology of Rhopalocera. It is informed about beginning of preparing of annotated catalogue of butterflies explored region on the grounds of data of literature and new original materials.

     1.  

128. Popov, 1993. Rhopalocera, Lepidoptera population of Dnestrovsky Canyon in 1986-1992 (West Ukraine). /S.G. Popov// AS Ukraine. Entomological reseaches in the steppe zone reserves. Report thesis of international symposium May, 25-28, 1993, Rozovka. Kharkov, 1993:56-59.

• 1. Abstract: Some results of accounts of butterflies in period 1986-1992, which were carried out on individual parts of meadowal steppes of Dniester Canyon of Podolye, are shown. During 54 hours of account 8038 individuals imago (593 out of them - in spring and 7445 - in summer), which belong to 69 species from families Hesperidae, Papilionidae, Pieridae, Lycaenidae, Nymphalidae and Satyridae, were registered. According to abundance indexes numerous, usual and rare species have been chosen. Every species domination index was given. The role of autochthon species as bioindicators of ecological state of territory is noted.

     1.  

129. Popov, 1993. On the organization of the Rhopalocera (Lepidoptera) monitoring in the Ukrainian Carpathians and in neighbouring areas. /S.G. Popov// Proceedings of the International conference "The East Carpathians Fauna: its Present State and Prospects of Preservation". Uzhgorod, 13-16 september. Uzhorod, 1993, p. 227, 228.

• 1. Abstract: The importance of biological monitoring in organizing of environment quality management in the Ukrainian Carpathians is in the process of study. The day time butterflies (Rhopalocera: Hesperioidea & Papilionoidea, further R) are being selected as the object of investigations. The R autochtonic and anthropogenic species significance as the biological indicators is being discussed. The R observation was made in 150 geographical points, where about 120 species have been registered. The goal of the investigations is also the proof of R 140 species that had been indicated for the region in the literature data published during last 130 years. Since 1991 the works are being conducted by small seized enterprise "ALEXANOR", it officially is organize the expeditions in the region.

     1.  

130. Popov, 1995. Biological monitoring of Rhopalocera (Insecta: Lepidoptera) populations on Ukrainian Carpatian mountains and its computer processing. /S.G. Popov// 7th European Ecological Congress: "Ecological Processes: Current Status and Perspectives". Abstracts. Edited by A. Demeter & L. Peregovits. Hungarian Biologocal Society, Budapest, 1995, p. 134.

• 1. Abstract: There are some results of biomonitoring of butterflies carried out in more than 150 geographical sites of Ukrainian Carpathian mountains. In 1973-1994 about 130 Rhopalocera (Papilionoidea, Hesperioidea) species were registered. It was established that in natural landscape many species of Rhopalocera occur in approximately equal number, and in the landscapes influenced by anthropogenic transformation, as a rule few, so-callied anthropogenic species are present. Therefore the ecological state of region is being studied by creating two database: all bibliographic information is unified and entered in CARPBIBL.DBF database, and new faunistic, geographical, climatic and habitat information is standardized and placed in CARPECO.DBF database.

     1.  

131. Popov, 1996. To the monitoring of wildlife of Western Ukraine. Bulletin of Carpathian ecological club Ruthenia. 4, 1996, p. 8-9.

• 1. Abstract: The paper has deal to condition of creating of private Company of Science Implementation “Alexanor” in 1991. It was no any possibilities to get collaboration with state natural departments, which is responsible for studying of wildlife of South West Ukraine. Failure of Soviet system drove to disintegration of local science units and insufficient financing. Initiative to continue long-term monitoring of butterflies as unique nature components in the frames of the private company was explained. It is intended to get contacts with monitoring centers in West Europe for future collaboration. Elaboration and adoption of compatible approaches, mapping of butterfly distribution patterns are some of the priorities for next working decades.

     1.  

132. Popov, 1997. Long - Term Monitoring of Papilionoidea & Hesperioidea (Lepidoptera, Insecta) Populations of West Ukraine: Objectives, Methods and Discussion of Results . /S.G. Popov// Proceedings of the international regional seminar "Environment protection: modern studies in ecology and microbiology". May 13-16, 1997 Ukraine Volume 1 Uzhgorod, 1997 pages 252-257.

• 1. Abstract: The preconditions and importance of biological monitoring in Ukraine are specified as vital tool for butterfly conservation. Scientific researches by route method of visual calculation is used. The meaning of the correlation of anthropogenic abundance (species which accompany man) and natural species (originally evolving in a certain area or native species) is discussed.

     1.  

133. Popov in van Swaay, et al., 1997. Threatened butterflies in Ukraine and Moldova. Provisional report. Part 3. Checklist of butterflies: present distribution (%) category of butterflies in the Ukraine and the Moldova. /S.G. Popov in van Swaay, et al. // Dutch Butterfly conservation (De Vlinderstichting), Wageningen. VS97.25, November, 1997, pp. 18-64.

• 1. Abstract: For species restricted to Ukraine and Moldova (208(83) species for Ukraine, 36%(14%) of the European total) the new IUCN-criteria were followed as closely as possible (Moldova data in brackets). Present abundance and trend used for determination new ones. Overall, 68 species (33%) are considered to be threatened in Ukraine. A total of 143 species are considered to be of concern or relatively secure, although 57 of these are classed as Lower Risk (near threatened). So, overall, 28 species (33%) are considered to be threatened in Moldova. A total of 56 species are considered to be concern or relatively secure, although 18 of these are classed as Lower Risk (near threatened).

     1.  

134. Popov, 1998. Long-Term monitoring European butterflies with purpose of their ecology and conservation: preconditions and methodical instructions. /S.G. Popov// Uzhgorod, 1998, 16 p. (In Russian)

• 1. Abstract: The experience of butterfly monitoring in Ukraine accordingly to the national scheme is described. The schemes, datasheets and maps of real monitoringdata which has been carried out in Transcarpathia (SW Ukraine) are shown. Method accepted in Great Britain ("Butterfly monitoring scheme", Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, 1981) was taken as base.

     1.  

135. Popov, 1998. New and little known for the fauna of Transcarpathia butterfly species (Lepidoptera, Papilionoidea). /S.G. Popov// Issues of sustainable development in the Carpathian region. Proceedings of the International Scientific-Practical Conference, Dedicated to the 30th Anniversary of the Carpathian Biosphere Reserve. October 13-15, 1998 Vol. 2 Rakhiv, Ukraine, 1998, pp. 266-270.

• 1. Abstract: From 1992 up to 1998 years on the territory of Transcarpathia there were carried out quantititative species calculation of butterflies imago (Lepidoptera, Papilionoidea) according to the scientific project "Long - Term Monitoring of Ukrainian Butterflies with Purpose of Their Ecology and Conservation.". The natural investigation was made on the neigbouring territories near motor roads, railway, country roads and other paths across different butterflies biotops. The new and not enough known species for Transcarpathian territory are Colias erate Esp. (Pieridae); Vacciniina optilete Knoch, Lycaena helle D. & S., Thersamonia thersamon Esp., Everes decoloratus Stgr., Plebicula amanda Schn. (Lycaenidae); Euphydryas maturna L., Boloria eunomia Esp. (Nymphalidae); Brintesia circe F. (Satyridae).

     1.  

136. Popov, 1999. Maculinea populations in Transcarpathian Ukraine: monitoringdata 98'. /S.G. Popov// Maculinea Newsletter. February 1999. Issued by Dutch Butterfly Conservation. 1999, Nr. 3, p. 5.

• 1. Abstract: A second year of butterfly monitoring according to the British Scheme has been carried out in the Transcarpathian region of Ukraine. Since March 1998, 47 butterfly sites were monitored. We used to ride a bike for this purpose. The monitoring sites are situated on a line of at least 320 km from NW to SE. From 13 of 47 sites, 64 individuals of Maculinea arion were registered. From 4 sites 243 individuals of M. teleius were registered too. We have plans to visit the populations of M. alcon & M. nausithous in Prikarpatie in the following years. It will be possible with addition money for a wide Maculinea project in Ukraine.

     1.  

137. Popov, 1999. Rhopalocera fauna of "Chorna Gora" reserve (Transcarpathia): modern state and some ways for solving of conservation problems. In materials of international scientific-practical conference devoted to the 10th anniversary of the Sinevir national park. "Problems of Ecological Stability in the East Carpathians". June 24-27, 1999, Sinevir NP, Ukraine, pp. 148-149.

• 1. Abstract: Accordingly to our scientific project "Long - Term Monitoring of SW Ukrainian Butterflies with Purpose of Their Ecology and Conservation" quantitative accounts of imago butterflies species carried out at "Chorna Gora" reserve in spring-summer seasons of 1988-1999 years. It enable us to determine modern state of butterflies diversity. The similar research work was carried out at this place early (Popov, 1987). Altogether 9901 butterfly samples were counted for 1518,5 registration hours for the past 15 years (1984-1999) by Ukrainian monitoring scheme. In the reserve Maniola jurtina L. was by far the most numerous butterfly. Such species as Pieris napi L., Leptidea sinapis L., Melitaea cinxia L., Everes argiades Pall., Pieis rapae L., Gonepteryx rhamni L., Hipparchia fagi Scop., Thymelicus sylvestris Poda and Celastrina argiolus L. were very common. The old systematic list of butterflies includes 65 butterflies species. Now, the faunistic list is complemented by 14 new species for investigated territory. Among this are Thymelicus sylvestris Poda, Pyrgus armoricanus Ob., Carcharodus flocciferus Zell. (Hesperiidae); Leptidea morsei Fent., Colias crocea Geofr. (Pieridae); Strymonidia ilicis Esp., Aricia agestis D. & S., Plebejs idas L., Pl. argyrognomon Brgstr. (Lycaenidae); Melitaea phoebe D. & S., Euphydryas maturna L., Apatura iris L., A. ilia D. & S. (Nymphalidae), Brintesia circe F. (Satyridae). Such species as Scolitandies orion Pall., Glaucopsyche alexis Poda, Maculinea arion L, Euphydryas maturna L, Melitaea aurelia Nick. and Leptidea morsei Fent. was noticed by visual monitoring. At present time they have threat status in Europe as vulnerable species (Popov, S.G. in Chris van Swaay et al., 1997). Populations of this species are small and continue decline by changing of open meadows with bushes of Prunus and Rubus species. The concrete management for surviving of noticed threatened butterflies is needed. In consideration of important role of reserve area for preservation of relict parts of landscape and biological diversity not only in the Volcanic mountains, but also Transcarpathia in general, a complex of organizational and scientific measures must be realized.

     1.  

138. Popov in van Swaay, et al., 1999. Red Data Book of European Butterflies (Rhopalocera). Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats (Bern Convention). Part II. Datasheets for threatened butterflies in the Ukraine and the Moldova. /S.G. Popov in van Swaay, et al. // Nature and environment, No 99. Concil of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg, 1997, pp. 77, 86, 89, 99, 101, 104, 110, 112, 114, 116, 118, 121, 124, 128, 131, 135, 143, 146, 150, 152, 158, 160, 164, 167, 173, 175, 177, 180, 183, 185, 187, 193.

• 1. Abstract: Part II of this comprises datasheets for at least 70 Ukrainian and Moldova butterfly species assessed as threatened, based on the new IUCN criteria. Datasheets concentrate the distribution and status, habitat and conservation measures required.

     1.  

139. Popov in van Swaay, et al., 1999. Red Data Book of European Butterflies (Rhopalocera). Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats (Bern Convention). Part II. Appendix 4. Present distribution (%) category of butterflies in the Ukraine and the Moldova. /S.G. Popov in van Swaay, et al. // Nature and environment, No 99. Concil of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg, 1997, pp. 210-255.

• 1. Abstract: Present distribution categories of butterflies from genus Hespriidae (27 species - Ukraine (UA), 8 - Moldova (MD)), Papilionidae (5-UA, 4-MD), Pieridae (21-UA, 12-MD) , Riodinidae (1-UA, 1-MD), Lycaenidae (59-UA, 26-MD), Libytheidae (1-UA), Nymphalidae (44-UA, 19-MD) and Satyridae (46-UA, 7-MD) in the Ukraine and the Moldova are given.

     1.  

140. Popov, 1999. Present state of butterfly populations of European threatened species in Transcarpathia (SW Ukraine). /S.G. Popov// VIII European Ecological Congress: "The European Dimension in Ecology. Perspectives & Challenges for the 21st Century". Abstracts. September 18-23, 1999, Halkidiki, Greece. Thessaloniki, 1999, p. 138.

• 1. Abstract. The main aim of the research project "Monitoring butterflies with purpose of their Conservation in West Ukraine" is conservation and restoration of marsh, wetlands and species rich grassland habitats as medium of inhabitance of threatened species of butterflies and their host plants. A second year of butterfly monitoring according to the British Scheme has been carried out in Transcarpathian region of Ukraine. 60670 butterflies of 110 species were calculated for 358 registration hours in anthropogenic, seminatural and natural sites (altogether about 47 sites). Among Rhopalocera here the large interest represent populations of rare species. To such species belong marsh butterflies Boloria eunomia Esp., Lycaena helle D. & S., Maculinea teleius Brgstr. and such meadow species as Maculinea arion L., Erebia medusa D. & S., E. aethiops Esp., Glaucopsyche alexis Poda. The first three species trophically connected with unique area of vegetation and their preservation is depending from well-being of biotopes. In particular territory the repatriation of such species protected in Europe is possible: Parnassius apollo L., Colias palaeno L., Coenonympha tullia Mull., Boloria aquilonaris Stich., Maculinea alcon L., Maculinea nausithous Brgstr. The populations of two noticed Maculinea species already nearly have disappeared from territory of Transcarpathia, and other meet in unit localities. Therefore repatriation of these species represents significant scientific and nature protective interest. As a whole in the investigated territory inhabits 15 butterfly species, which have threatened status in Europe.

     1.  

141. Popov, 2000. Present State of Butterfly Populations of European Threatened Species in Transcarpathia, Ukraine. /S.G. Popov// Journal of Balkan Ecology. Scientific Surveys, Projects, Ecological Problems. 2000, vol. 3, No 1, pp. 44-56.

• 1. Abstract. The biological monitoring of the chosen group of Invertebrate (butterflies) has been made for the Ukrainian South West since 1973. Up to 1998 year 197547 butterflies of 127 species were calculated for 2068 registration hours in anthropogenic, seminatural and natural sites (at least 500 transects). 15 species carry threatened status. Amongst them here the large interest represent populations of such rare marsh butterflies as Boloria eunomia Esp., Lycaena helle D. & S., Maculinea teleius Brgstr. and such meadow species as Maculinea arion L., Erebia medusa D. & S., E. aethiops Esp. and Glaucopsyche alexis Poda. Checklist of Transcarpathian butterflies is given. Comparative analysis of faunas in general and threatened species of Europe, Ukraine and Transcarpathia is presented (the paper was reported to the 8th European Ecological Congress held in Porto Carras, Halkidiki, Greece, 18-23 September, 1999). 9 references.

     1.  

142. Popov, 2000. Threatened European butterflies in Transcarpathia (Ukraine): genus Maculinea van Ecke 1915. /S.G. Popov// A Magyar Tud. Akad. Szabolcs-Szatmar-Bereg Megyi Tud. Test. 9. kozg. egy. Tud. Ules. Eload.-Osszefoglaloi. Nyiregyhaza, 2000, old. 27. [In English].

• 1. Abstract. Most populations of sedentary Maculinea species Transcarpathia are threatened by the fragmentation of their in combination with the isolation of small habitat patches. The monitoring works which started by Alexanor Center in 1997 year (Popov, 1999) are shown that from 47 monitoring sites in 1998 now we have 13 sites inhabited by Maculinea arion, 4 by M. teleius, 7 by M. alcon. Last one was found for the first time in Transcarpathia, 10 males and 10 females next to Bushtino settlement in August 2000. Such isolated populations are very susceptible to chance extinction and as there is no exchange possible with other habitat patches, recolonisation will not occur. Butterflies are generally not able to cross a distance of more than a few kilometers. Furthermore, dispersal only occurs under favourable circumstances, such as good weather and high population densities. The lowering of of the water table has restricted many populations of larva food plant Gentiana pneumonanthe (and M. alcon) to the lowest areas of south part of Transcarpathia.

     1.  

143. Popov, 2000. Transcarpathia butterfly report for 1997. /S.G. Popov// Alexanor CFSI, Uzhgorod, 2000. 13 p.

• 1. Abstract. The report has deal with investigation of butterfly populations in SW Ukraine in 1997. A first year of butterfly monitoring according to the British Scheme (Pollard, Yates, 1993) has been carried out in Transcarpathian region of Ukraine. 29418 butterflies of 104 species from genuses Hesperidae, Papilionidae, Pieridae, Lycaenidae, Riodinidae, Nymphalidae and Satyridae were calculated for 193 registration hours in anthropogenic, seminatural and natural sites (altogether 45). The most numerous butterflies were Maniola jurtina (6501 samples), Pieris napi (4749) and Plebejus argus (1924). Among Rhopalocera here large interest represent populations of local and rare species. To such species belong marsh butterflies Lycaena helle D. & S., Maculinea teleius Brgstr. and such meadow species as Maculinea arion L., Erebia medusa D. & S., Glaucopsyche alexis Poda. The first two marsh species trophically connected with unique area of bog vegetation. Were noticed 8 species from Ukrainian Red Data Book (Red Data Book of Ukraine. Animal Kingdom, 1994) and 8 species from European Red Data Book (Red Data Book of European Butterflies (Rhopalocera), 1999).

     1.  

144. Popov, 2000. Transcarpathia butterfly report for 1998. /S.G. Popov// Alexanor CFSI, Uzhgorod, 2000. 12 p.

• 1. Abstract. The report has deal with investigation of butterfly populations in SW Ukraine in 1998. A second year of butterfly monitoring according to the British Scheme (Pollard, Yates, 1993) has been carried out in Transcarpathian region of Ukraine. 31190 butterflies of 103 species from genuses Hesperidae, Papilionidae, Pieridae, Lycaenidae, Riodinidae, Nymphalidae and Satyridae were calculated for 167 registration hours in anthropogenic, seminatural and natural sites (altogether 47 sites). The most numerous butterflies were Maniola jurtina (7053 samples), Pieris napi (6222) and Plebejus argus (1924). Among Rhopalocera here large interest represent populations of local and rare species. To such species belong marsh butterflies Lycaena helle D. & S., Maculinea teleius Brgstr. and such meadow species as Maculinea arion L., Erebia medusa D. & S., Glaucopsyche alexis Poda. The first two marsh species trophically connected with unique area of bog vegetation. Were noticed 8 species from Ukrainian Red Data Book (Red Data Book of Ukraine. Animal Kingdom, 1994) and 8 species from European Red Data Book (Red Data Book of European Butterflies (Rhopalocera), 1999).

     1.  

145. Popov, 2000. Transcarpathia butterfly report for 1999. /S.G. Popov// Alexanor CFSI, Uzhgorod, 2000. 12 p.

• 1. Abstract. The report has deal with investigation of butterfly populations in SW Ukraine in 1999. A third year of butterfly monitoring according to the British Scheme (Pollard, Yates, 1993) has been carried out in Transcarpathian region of Ukraine. 34549 butterflies of 99 species from genuses Hesperidae, Papilionidae, Pieridae, Lycaenidae, Riodinidae, Nymphalidae and Satyridae were calculated for 171 registration hours in anthropogenic, seminatural and natural sites (altogether 53 sites). The most numerous butterflies were Pieris napi (7041 samples), Maniola jurtina (6092) and Plebejus argus (2109). Among Rhopalocera here large interest represent populations of local and rare species. To such species belong marsh butterflies Lycaena helle D. & S., Maculinea teleius Brgstr. and such meadow species as Maculinea arion L., Erebia medusa D. & S., Glaucopsyche alexis Poda. The first two marsh species trophically connected with unique area of bog vegetation. There were noticed 7 species from Ukrainian Red Data Book (Red Data Book of Ukraine. Animal Kingdom, 1994) and 8 species from European Red Data Book (Red Data Book of European Butterflies (Rhopalocera), 1999).

     1.  

146. Popov, 2001. Transcarpathia butterfly report for 2000. /S.G. Popov// Alexanor CFSI, Uzhgorod, 2001. 14 p.

• 1. Abstract. The report has deal with investigation of butterfly population in SW Ukraine in 2000. A fourth year of butterfly monitoring according to the British Scheme (Pollard, Yates, 1993) has been carried out in Transcarpathian region of Ukraine. 28582 butterflies of 107 species from genuses Hesperidae, Papilionidae, Pieridae, Lycaenidae, Riodinidae, Nymphalidae and Satyridae were calculated for 154 registration hours in anthropogenic, seminatural and natural sites (altogether 60 sites). The most numerous butterflies were Hyponephele jurtina (3447 samples), Plebejus argus (2990) and Coenonympha pamphilus (1883). Among Rhopalocera here large interest represent populations of local and rare species. To such species belong marsh butterflies Boloria eunomia L., Lycaena helle D. & S., Maculinea teleius Brgstr., M.alcon D. & S. and such meadow species as Maculinea arion L., Erebia medusa D. & S., Glaucopsyche alexis Poda. The first three marsh species trophically connected with unique area of bog vegetation. There was noticed 7 species from Ukrainian Red Data Book (Red Data Book of Ukraine. Animal Kingdom, 1994) and 11 species from European Red Data Book (Red Data Book of European Butterflies (Rhopalocera), 1999).

     1.  

147. Popov, 2001. The Rhopalocera (Lepidoptera, Papilionoidea, Hesperioidea) populatiuon of West Ukraine (Pravobereznoe and Zapadnoe Polesie) in 1995-96. /S.G. Popov// Descrierea CIP a Camerei Naţionale a Cărţii. Academician Leo Berg -125 years: Collection of Scientific Articles = Akademiku L.S. Bergu -125 let: Sb. nauc. statej./ Ékologiceskoe ob-vo “BIOTICA”. Gorodskoj ecologiceskij klub Bender “Ekopolis”.- Bendery: BIOTICA, 2001 (F.E.-P. “Tipogr. Centrală”), p. 127-131.

• 1. Abstract. This collection ofscientific articles is published to commemorate the 125"' anniversary of the eminent scientist, Academician L.S. (Leo) Berg, borm in the City of Bendery in 1876. It includes research and other papers from Moldavian, Trans-dniestrian, Ukrainian, Russian, Romanian, Dutch, and American scientists, with the aim ofhonouring the memory ofthis outstanding Moldavian personality. Publication (as well as the Conference of Commemoration, held in Bendery, 14 March 2001) has been made possible thanks to financial support from the OSCE Mission to Moldova. Within the framework of performance of the scientific project "Pearls of Nature. Long-term monitoring wildlife of Ukraine for ecology and protection" a species and quantitative accounts of Rhopalocera (further – R) for definition of structure of population, and also establishment of a modern fauna condition of investigated group in the territory of the state are carried out in the seasons 1995-96. For two seasons of field works in total amount 48 hours are taken into account 9078 R adults of 63 species from 6 generas (Hesperiidae - 4 species, Papilionidae -1, Pieridae -11, Lycaenidae -15, Nymphalidae- 21, Satyridae - 11). The common abundance was 189 R adults for one hour. The most numerous species became Artogeia napi L. (1427 adults). Amongst of species brought to the Red Book of Ukraine, are noted Papilio machaon L., Colias palaeno europome Esp., Apatura ilia Schiff. and Meleageria daphnis Schiff. The greatest interest in faunistical attitude was presented by such species as Colias myrmidone Esp., Heteropterus morpheus Pall., Coenonympha tullia Mull., Maculinea arion L. and Colias chrysotheme Esp.

     1.  

148. Popov, Kricsfalusy, 2002 Using of Geographical information system (GIS) for studying of upper forests in the Ukrainian Carpathians. / S.G. Popov, VV. Kricsfalusy // International workshop: Carpathian upper mountain forests: management and conservation for promotion of sustainable regional development. Kostryno, Ukraine, 26-29 April 2002, p. 37.

• 1. Abstract. Using of integrated GIS on base ARC / INFO is one of the way for creation of compatible data base of objective information not only about mountain forests but all vegetation, water regime, state of soils etc. The inventory of virgin forests will serve as a base for biodiversity conservation. There live strong population of rare and endemic species and it will serve as kernel for future reserves. In frame of investigation of current station of the upper mountain forest in the Ukrainian Carpathians the examination of ARC / View software with purpose of determination of upper tree line will carried out. It enables us to fix of different historical tree lines in such upper forests as East Beskidy, Borzhava, Svydovets, Maramorosh Mountains and Chomohora. The topographical and satellite maps of different scales will serve as base for future comparisons. The significance of using of GIS technology is difficult to overestimate. Monitoring of dynamic changes in model areas of upper forests under different factors is important stage for future estimations. The main tasks of using of GIS technology on model areas in the Ukrainian Carpathians are: - to establish and create map of historical tree lines of XIX-XX centuries; - to determine of dynamic tendencies of treelike in period of last 130 years; - to study of space distribution of biodiversity in upper mountain forests; - to designate of model forest mountain areas for carrying out of tree line monitoring with purpose of modeling of future forestry management; - to promote processing of common plan or policy of management upper forest in accordance to criteria of sustainable development; - to support of elaboration of multidisciplinary tools of investigation in up-per forests, including floating systems of modeling for integration of social, economic and ecological data.

  2.  

149. Popov, 2002 Threatened butterfly species as indicators of stability of restored wetland habitats on the Tisza plain, Ukraine. / S.G. Popov / 3rd European conference on restoration ecology. “Challenges of the New Millennium our joint responsibility”. Conference abstracts. Budapest. Hungary, 25-31 August 2002. Budapest, 2002, p. 145.

• 1. Abstract. The Tisza Plain in Transcarpathia was historically completely covered with forest, mainly by damp oak woodland. Today, more than 90% of its area has been converted to human use. In this connection, the preservation of remnants of natural biotopes is important, because rare and disappearing plants and butterflies still survive here today. Place Chere is one of the most natural and unique protected areas remaining on the Tisza Plain. Since 1985 66 butterfly species have been recorded. Amongst these Proclossiana eunomia Esp., Lycaena helle D. & S., Maculinea teleius Brgstr., M. arion L., M. alcon D. & S., Erebia medusa D. & S., Glaucopsyche alexis Poda are indicators marshes and wet meadows. At the present time their European threat status in is Vulnerable. Their populations are small and continue to decline through draining of forest meadows and marshes and their subsequent change to scrub dominated by bushes of Salix, Spiraea and Rubus. A concrete management programme for the surviving butterflies is still needed here.

  2.  

150. Popov, 2003. SW Ukraine butterfly report for 2001. /S.G. Popov// Alexanor CFSI, Uzhgorod, 2003. 14 p.

• 1. Abstract. The report has deal with investigation of butterfly population in SW Ukraine in 2001. A fifth year of butterfly monitoring according to the British Scheme (Pollard, Yates, 1993) has been carried out in Transcarpathia, Lvov, Ivano-Frankovsk and Chernovtsy regions of SW Ukraine. 22989 butterflies of 117 species from genuses Hesperidae, Papilionidae, Pieridae, Lycaenidae, Riodinidae, Nymphalidae and Satyridae were calculated for 215 registration hours in anthropogenic, seminatural and natural sites (altogether 95 sites). In addition, 35 new sites were started and counted. The most numerous butterflies were Peris rapae (3037 samples, noted in 81 sites), Hyponephele jurtina (2899, 75 sites) and Pieris napi (2423, 71 sites). Amongst Rhopalocera here large interest represent populations of local and rare species. To such species belong marsh butterflies Melitaea diamina Lang., Lycaena helle D. & S., Maculinea alcon D. & S., M. nausithous Brgstr., Euphydryas aurinia Rott., Cenonympha tullia Mull., C. hero L., deciduous forest species – Euphydryas maturna L., Limenitis camilla D. & S., mixed forests – Lopinga achine and such meadow species as Vacciniina optilete Knoch, Pseudophilotes vicrama Mr., Glaucopsyche alexis Poda. There was noticed 22 species from new Regional Red List, 8 species from Ukrainian Red Data Book (Red Data Book of Ukraine. Animal Kingdom, 1994) and 15 species from European Red Data Book (Red Data Book of European Butterflies (Rhopalocera), 1999). Was noticed 104 species of flowering plants whish was visited by butterflies. Amongst of them Cirsium sp. and Lotus corniculatus attract 25 butterfly species and Centaurea cyanus – 20 butterfly species.

     1.  

  2. Popov, et all, 2003. Russia.  /S.G. Popov, et all// Pp. 451-476. In C.A.M. van Swaay & M.S. Warren, eds. Prime Butterfly Areas in Europe: priority sites for conservation. Nation Reference Centre of Agriculture, Nature and Fisheries, Ministry of Agriculture, Nature Management and Fisheries, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

• • 1. Abstract. There are 241 butterfly  species reported from the European part of Russia, forty of them considered threatened in Europe. The eleven target species are listed in table. Russia still holds string populations of many on these, which in the rest of Europe are rare and threatened species. Since the country is by far the largest in Europe, it is not surprising that for almost all of the target species, Russia has more than 15% of the European population on its territory. Coenonympha hero is found on humid meadows, mostly in sparse coniferous woodland. In the southern part of the country, the butterfly can be seen in meadows in the forest and forest-steppe zone. C. oedippus occurs locally on swampy meadows, floodlands, river valleys, damp grassy clearings in forest and forest-steppe. The species is reported to be common in Siberia (Asia). Euiphydryas aurinia can be found in mixed forests, grassy banks and steppe slopes. Euphydryas maturna can be seen locally in openings and clearings in mixed forests and scrubs. Lopinga achine occurs in shadowy, humid places in mixed and broad-leaved forests. Maculinea arion is found in dry grassland habitats in light woodland, meadows and steppe habitats, sometimes on limestone. M. teleius and M. nausithous occur locally on damp meadows and forest clearings. Parnassius apollo can be found in dry pine and mixed woodlands on plains, and on stony slopes in mountainous areas.

    2.  

• 3. Popov, et all, 2003. Ukraine.  /S.G. Popov, et all// Pp. 611-642. In C.A.M. van Swaay & M.S. Warren, eds. Prime Butterfly Areas in Europe: priority sites for conservation. Nation Reference Centre of Agriculture, Nature and Fisheries, Ministry of Agriculture, Nature Management and Fisheries, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

• • 1. Abstract. There are 208 native butterfly species in Ukraine, 34 of them being considered threatened in Europe. The ten target species are listed in table. The global distribution of Pseudochazara euxina (global threat status: vulnerable) is restricted to this country. In the Ukraine Coenonympha hero and Euphydruas maturna occur in wet meadows in natural forests and peat bogs, mainly in the northern part of the country. C. oedippus has a very restricted range and occurs in wet, open forest meadows and peat bogs, in the Kiev and the Zitomir regions in northern Ukraine. In western Ukraine, Euphydryas aurinia can be found in open forest peat bogs and wetlands, while in eastern Ukraine the species occurs in ravines along streams. Maculinea nausithous and M. teleius are characteristic of wet meadows and are still widespread in the western and northern parts of Ukraine. M. arion is the most common target species in this country, and is found on dry, steppe grassland, chalk  grasslands and within the Carpathian Mountains. The present status of Parnassius apollo is not clear, and there have been no recent observations in its former habitats in Hora Bila and Potashnia. The global range of Pseudochazara euxina is restricted to parts of the Crimean Peninsula.

    2.  

• 4. Popov, 2004. Butterfly Species (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea, Papilionoidea) Need Protection in the Zakarpatska province.  /S.G. Popov// Scientific Bulletin of the Uzhgorod University. Series Biology. 2004, vol. 15, p. 98-101.

• • 1. Abstract. The paper has deal to creation of Red List of Transcarpathian butterflies with purpose to optimize of their conservation on regional level. All together 23 species from families Nympalidae, Satyridae and Lycaenidae were selected. From them 9 belong to Red Data Book of European Butterflies. Accordingly to ecological threats factors endangered species were established. For the most vulnerable species (Boloria aquilonaris, Euphydryas aurinia, Coenonympha tullia, Lycaena helle and Maculinea alcon) places of localization are listed. Ukrainian and European Red List species Parnassius apollo in last scientific publications is not listed and in nature of Transcarpathia for last 40 years not found.

    2.  

• 5. Popov, 2005. Buterflies (Rhopaloera)  of Tisza floodplain, Transcarpathia.  /S.G. Popov// Butterfly Conservation  - 5th International Symposium. Lepidoptera as indicators of biodiversity conservation. 8-10 April 2005, Southampton University (UK). Abstracts. Southampton 2005, p. 47.

• • 1. Abstract. In frames of TACIS project Flood Risk Assessment and Management in Transcarpathian Region, Ukraine from Tiachev to Badalovo some field data collection was carried out. From main task are Compile lists of key species groups, historic data and information/maps on natural habitats in (or to be expected) in the project area; identify which of these species or habitats are rare, unique or endangered (both nationally and using the IUCN Red Data list criteria); identify species that may be used as possible indicator species in the floodplain; analyse past changes in species and habitats and assess present trends, based on historic data; evaluate the effects of various flooding and flood management intervention scenarios on key flora, fauna and habitats. Also very important output is to identify ways in which impacts of flood management interventions can be mitigated, and ways in which interventions can add to floodplain butterfly diversity. This may include modifying dike design, planting of certain preferred species and changing the timing of construction activities. It may also include recommendations for optimising flood management (including water regime management) for the protection of key butterflies. Altogether 30 monitoring sites in the investigated area were visited in July-September 2004. As a result, butterfly database includes 240 records on 41 species from genus Hesperidae (3 species), Papilionidae (2), Pieridae  (10), Lycaenidae (9), Nymphalidae (13) and Satyridae (4). More numerous species are Artogeia napi (occurs in 28 sites), Artogeia rapae (23 sites) and Maniola jurtina (21 sites). From European Red Data Book (1999) and IUCN Red Data in the project area such species as Leptidea morsei on 1 site founded. It inhabits foliage forests and has status critically endangered species. Neptis sappho [1] (it occurs on 1 site) has lower risk status and belongs to IUCN Red Data Book. Lycaena dispar [4] included to Bern Convention list (Invertebrate animals.., 1999) can be found on two sites in the project area.

    2.  

• 6. Popov, 2008. Butterflies of the Transcarpathian Floodplain Ecosystem : Monitoring, Ecology and Conservation. – Uzhhorod: Art Line, 2008.–124 p.

  7. Abstract. The data on butterflies (Lepidoptera, Rhopalocera) of the Transcarpathian Floodplain Ecosystems is presented. The monitoring scheme, diversity and population dynamics of the butterflies for selected areas are described. The data on ecology and conservation of the butterflies is elucidated as well. For enthomologists, ecologists, nature conservationists and as support material for their study and research trainings.

• 8. Popoff in van Swaay et al., 2015. The European Butterfly Indicator for Grassland species 1990-2013.(2015). in Van Swaay, C.A.M., Van Strien, A.J., Aghababyan, K., Åström, S., Botham, M., Brereton, T., Chambers, P., Collins, S., Domènech Ferrés, M., Escobés, R., Feldmann, R., Fernández-García, J.M., Fontaine, B., Goloshchapova, S., Gracianteparaluceta, A., Harpke, A., Heliölä, J., Khanamirian, G., Julliard, R., Kühn, E., Lang, A., Leopold, P., Loos, J., Maes, D., Mestdagh, X., Monasterio, Y., Munguira, M.L., Murray, T., Musche, M., Õunap, E., Pettersson, L.B., Popoff, S., Prokofev, I., Roth, T., Roy, D., Settele, J., Stefanescu, C., Švitra, G., Teixeira, S.M., Tiitsaar, A., Verovnik, R., Warren, M.S. (2015).  Report VS2015.009, De Vlinderstichting, Wageningen

• • 1. Abstract. This report presents the fifth version of the European Grassland Butterfly Indicator, one of the EU biodiversity indicators of the European Environment Agency. The indicator is based on national Butterfly Monitoring Schemes in 22 countries across Europe, most of them active in the European Union. Fluctuations in numbers between years are typical features of butterfly populations. The assessment of change is therefore made on an analysis of the underlying trend. The underlying analysis of the indicator shows that since 1990, grassland butterfly abundance has declined by 30%. The rate of loss has slowed in the last 5-10 years and the priority now is to halt further losses and support recovery. Such a slowing in declines is good news if it can be sustained and losses begin to be reversed. This can only come about with greater protection and more sustainable management of semi-natural grassland. Of the seventeen widely occurring and characteristic grassland species included in the indicator, ten have declined in the EU, three have remained stable and three increased. For one species the trend is uncertain. The overall abundance of these grassland species is low and unacceptable losses are still occurring in many species.

• 9. Popoff in van Swaay et al., 2016. The European Butterfly Indicator for Grassland species 1990-2015. (2016). in Van Swaay, C.A.M., Van Strien, A.J., Aghababyan, K., Åström, S., Botham, M., Brereton, T. Carlisle, B., Chambers, P., Collins, S., Dopagne, C., Escobés, R., Feldmann, R., Fernández-García, J.M., Fontaine, B., Goloshchapova, S., Gracianteparaluceta, A., Harpke, A., Heliölä, J., Khanamirian, G., Komac, B., Kühn, E., Lang, A., Leopold, P., Maes, D.,  Mestdagh, X., Monasterio, Y., Munguira, M.L., Murray, T., Musche, M., Õunap, E., Pettersson, L.B., Piqueray, J., Popoff, S.,  Prokofev, I., Roth, T., Roy, D.B., Schmucki, R., Settele, J., Stefanescu, C., Švitra, G., Teixeira, S.M., Tiitsaar, A., Verovnik, R., Warren, M.S. (2016). The European Butterfly Indicator for Grassland species 1990-2015.  Report VS2016.019, De Vlinderstichting, Wageningen

  10. Abstract. This indicator is based on data from nineteen national Butterfly Monitoring Schemes. The European Grassland Butterfly Indicator shows the population trend of butterflies which are characteristic of grasslands. Since 1990 the European Grassland Butterfly Indicator shows a strong negative trend and has declined by almost 35%.

  11.  

151. Prunner, 1798. Lepidoptera Pedomontana illustrata. / Prunner L. von. Turin. 1798., 52+124 p.

152. Rambur, 1839-1842. Fauna entommologique de l'Andalousie. / P. Rambur. Paris: Bertrand. 1838-1842. Liv. 2., 336 p., 18 pls.

153. Rebel, Rogenhofer, 1892. Pap. Eur. / H. Rebel, A. Rogenhofer. Ernst & Engramelle. 1892. 2. Suppl., S. 22.

154. Reiprich, Okáli, 1989. Dodatky k Prodromu Lepidopter Slovenska. 3. zväzok. / A. Reiprich, I. Okáli // Biologické Práce. SAV, VEDA, Bratislava, 1989, 1-144 s.

155. Romaniszyn, 1923. Fauna owadow okolic Lwowa. / J. Romaniszyn // Polskie Pismo Entomoligiczne. Polski Zwiazek Entomologiczny. Lwow. 1923. 2. 1., s. 35-37.

156. Romaniszyn, 1924. Dwie ciekawe odmiany motyli. / J. Romaniszyn // Polskie Pismo Entomoligiczne. Polski Zwiazek Entomologiczny. Lwow. 1924. 3. 3, s. 87, 88.

157. Romaniszyn, 1925. Kilkanascie form motyli nowych lub b. rzadkich dla fauny Polski. / J. Romaniszyn // Polskie Pismo Entomoligiczne. Polski Zwiazek Entomologiczny. Lwow. 1925. 4. 3, s. 196-198.

158. Romaniszyn, 1929. Fauna motyli polski. / J. Romaniszyn. Nakladem polskiej akadeniji umiejetnosci. Krakow. 1929. 1., 552 s.

159. Rottemburg, 1775. Anmerkungen zu den Hufnaglischen Tabellen der Schmetterlinge. / S. A. Rottemburg. 1 Abt. Tagevogel. Naturforscher. Halle. 1775. 6, S. 1-34, Tab. 1.

160. Ruhl, 1892. Die Palaearktischen Grossschmetterlinge und ihre Naturgeschichte. / F. Ruhl. Ernst Heyne. Leipzig. 1892., 857 S.

161. Ruzicka, 1931. Prispevok k sustavnemu vuzkumu fauny lepidopter na Slovensku. / A. Ruzicka // Sborn. prir. odb. Slov. vlast. muz. v. Bratislave. Nakl. vlastn. s podpr. min. skol. a nar. osv. v Prahe a kr. vyb. v. Bratislave. 1924-1931. Bratislava. 1931., s. 69-86.

162. Schille, 1924. Rzadkie i aberatywne motyle mego zbioru. / Fr. Schille // Polskie Pismo Entomoligiczne. Polski Zwiazek Entomolo-giczny. Lwow. 1924. 3. 1-2., s. 2-6.

163. Schneider, 1792. Neuestes Magazin fur Liebhaber der Entomologie. / D. H. Schneider / Struk. Stralsund & Leipzig. 1792. IV. 1(2)., S. 128-256.

164. Schnur-Peplowski, 1929. Notatki motylnicze. / L. Schnur-peplowsky // Polskie Pismo Entomoligiczne. Polski Zwiazek Entomologiczny. Lwow. 1929. 8. 1-4, s. 200-202.

165. Schwarz, 1948. Motyli. 1. / R. Schwars. Vesmir. Praha. 1948, 14 + 42 pp., 291 figs.

166. Schwarz, 1949. Motyli. 2. / R. Schwars. Vesmir. Praha. 1949, 10 + 69 pp., 505 figs.

167. Schweitzer, 1897. P. a. / A. Schweitzer. Czekelius in Verh. Siebenburg. Ver. 1897. V. 47., Sep. 9.

168. Scopoli, 1763. Entomologia carniolica exhibens Insecta Carnioliae indigena et distributa in ordines, genera, species, varietates. Methodo Linnaeana. / I. A. Scopoli. Trattner. Vindobonae. 1763, 30+420 p.

169. Seitz, (1906-1910). Die Grosschmetterlinge der Erde. / A. Seitz. Stuttgart. (1906-1910), 379 S., 89 taf.

170. Shushman, 1993. Yellow-Spottet Ringled (Erebia manto Den. Et Schiff., 1775, Lepidoptera: Satyridae) in Ukrainian Carpathians. / V. Shushman // Proceedings of the International conference "The East Carpathians Fauna: its Present State and Prospects of Preservation". Uzhgorod, 13-16 September. Uzhorod, 1993, p. 250-252.

• 1. Abstract. The information about history of study and distribution of Erebia manto in the Ukrainian Carpathians is given in the work. As a result of researches from 1987 till 1992 new locations of this species are discovered. For the first time for Transcarpathians subspecies of Erebia manto trajanus has been found in the massif of Marmarosh. Data on some aspects of biology, taxonomic status and modern distribution are reported. The protection measures of this species are discussed.

171. Shushman, 1997. Fauna of butterflies (Lepidoptera Rhopalocera) in Transcarpathia with special attention to species which need protection. / V. Shushman // Proceedings of the International scientific-practical conference dedicated to the "550th anniversary of the town of Rakhiv". Rakhiv, 25-27 September. Rakviv, 1997, p. 250-254.

• 1. Abstract. The paper has deal to show current station of butterfly's fauna in area with strong economical development. As a result of 15 years of field work 118 species are noted for Transcarpathia without locality and time of collection. List of butterflies contains 9 species from Red Data List of Ukraine - Animals (1994), 7 species from European Red List (1991), 32 species selected as critically endangered on regional level.

172. Soffner, 1932. Reise in den Waldkarpathen. (Lep.). / von J. Soffner // Entom. Zeitschr. 1932. XLV, S. 306-310.

173. Soltys, 1938. Motyle wieksze (Macrolepidoptera) okolic Skla. / E. Soltys // Fragmenta faunistica musei zoologici polonici. Warszawa. 1938. 3. 16, s. 251-295.

174. Soltys, 1939-1948. Uzupelnienia do fauny wiekszych (Macrolepidoptera) okolic Skla. / E. Soltys // Pol. Pismo Entomol. Lwow. 1939-1948. 18. 48., s. 60-68.

175. Starczewski, 1935-1936. Przczynek do fauny Macrolepidoptera okolic Buczacza. / A. Starczewski // Pol. Pismo Entomol. Lwow. 1935-1936. 14-15, s. 370-373.

176. Staudinger, 1886. Centralasiatische Lepidopteren. / O. Staudinger // Stettin entomol. Ztg. 1886. 47, S. 193-215.

177. Staudinger, 1901-1903. Aufl. Macrolepidoptera / O. Staudinger, H. Rebel. Catalog Lepidopteren des palaearctischen Faunengebietes. Friedlander. Berlin. 1901-1903. 1. Theil, S. I-XXXII, 1-411.

178. Stichel, 1908. Ein Beitrag, zur nordischen Schmetterlingfauna und anknupfende Bemerkungen. / H. Stichel // Berlin. ent. Zeit. Berlin. 1908. T. 3, S. 61-24.

179. Stockl, 1922. Motyle rzadsze i nowe zebrane, w latach 1911 do 1921 w okolicach Lwowa, Janowa, Mikuliczyna i Worochty. Czesc III. / A. Stockl // Polskie Pismo Entomologiczne. Lwow. 1922. T. 2, zeszyt 2, s. 48-53.

180. Stockl, 1923. Dwie rzadkie aberacje matyli z rodzaju Argynnis F. / A. Stockl // Polskie Pismo Entomoligiczne. Polski Zwiazek Entomologiczny. Lwow. 1923. 2. 2., s. 35-37.

181. Stockl, 1928. Motyle (Lepidoptera) rzadsze i nowe zebrane w latach 1922 do 1925 w okolicach Lwowa, Janowa i Worochty. - Czesc IV. / A. Stockl // Polskie Pismo Entomoligiczne. Polski Zwiazek Entomologiczny. Lwow. 1928. 7. 1-4, s. 4-75.

182. Stockl, 1936. Motyle rzadsze i nowe zebrane, w latach 1926 -1934 w okolicach Lwowa, Janowa i Worochty. - Czesc VI. / A. Stockl // Spraw. Kom. fizjogr. Krakow. 1936. 70, s. (?).

183. Swiatkiewicz, 1924. Motyle rzadze i nowe dla Polski zebrane w ostatnich latach. / M. Swiatkiewicz // Pol. pismo entomol. 1924. III., s. 94-100.

184. Swiatkiewicz, 1928. Motyle rzadze i nowe dla Polski zebrane w ostatnich latach. / M. Swiatkiewicz // Polskie Pismo Entomoligiczne. Polski Zwiazek Entomologiczny. Lwow. 1928. 7. 1-4., s. 44-46.

185. The directory of the foreman-gardener, 1988. Edition by A.G. Guljaev. Kiev. "Urozaj". 1988, 241 pages

186. Toll, 1937-1938. Uzupelnienia do fauny Motyli Polski. / S. Toll. // Pol. Pismo Ent. Lwow. 1937-1938. 16-17., s. 50-53.

187. Turati, 1905. Alcune nuove forme di Lepidotteri. / E. Turati // Naturalista sicil. 1905. 18, p. 1-26, pl. 1-9.

188. Tuzov, 1993. The synonimic list of butterflies from the ex-USSR. / V. K. Tuzov. Rosagroservis. Moscow. 1993. p. 1-73.

189. Varga, 1971. Die Erebien (Lep.: Satyridae) der Balkanhalbinsel und der Karpaten III. Die Verbreitung und subspezifische Gliederung von Erebia pandrose (Bkh., 1788) nebst Beschreibung einer neuen Unterart: E. pandrose ambicolorata ssp. nova./ Z. Varga // Acta biologica debrecina. Debrecen. 1971. IX, S. 227-235.

190. Verity, 1905-1911. Rhopalocera Palaearctica: Iconographie et description des pappillons diurnes de la region Palearctique. Papilionidae et Pieridae./ R. Verity. Verity et Landi. Florence. 1905-1911, 368 p., 72 pl.

191. Verity, 1913. Revision of the Linnean types of Palaearctic Rhopalocera. / R. Verity // J. Linn. Soc. London. 1913, p. 173-191.

192. Viertl, 1872. Przyczynek do fauny Galicyi. / A. Viertl // Sprav. Kom. fizjogr. 1872. VI., s. 57-59.

193. Viertl, 1897. Beitrage zur Lepidopteren-Fauna der oesterreichisch-ungarishen Monarchie. / A. Viertl // Entomologische Zeitschrift. 1897. XI. 9, S. 69-71.

194. Viertl, 1897. Beitrage zur Lepidopteren-Fauna der oesterreichisch-ungarishen Monarchie. / A. Viertl // Entomologische Zeitschrift. 1897. XI. 10, S. 77, 78.

• 1. Vorontsov D., Kanarskyi, Yu., Geryak, Yu. 2011  The habitat of the rare butterfy species Boloria aquilonaris (Stichel, 1908) within Upper Tisa river basin. – D. Vorontsov1, Yu. Kanarskyi2, Yu. Geryak2. Uzhhorod university Scientific bulletin, series biology, 2011, part 31, pp. 53-58

     1. Summary:  The vegetation cover and preservation status of the habitat of rare arctic-boreal butterfly species Boloria aquilonaris (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae) characterized. The habitat is the oligotrophic raised bog situated at Chorna Tysa village (Rakhiv district, Transcarpathian region), which is known as botanical nature monument “Andromeda”. Vegetation communities of the bog belong to association Eriophoro vaginati - Sphagnetum recurvi Hueck 1925 (class Oxycocco-Sphagnetea Br.-Bl. et Tx. 1943). The area decrease, draining melioration and trash throwing have a threat for B. aquilonaris population as well as for the unique bog vegetation of the habitat.  Key words: butterflies, oligotrophic raised bog, habitat, vegetation, Tisa river basin. Addresses: 1 Institute of Ecology of the Carpathians NAS of Ukraine, 4 Kozelnytska str., Lviv, 79026 Ukraine; e-mai: voronzoff@ukr.net; ykanarsky@gmail.com. 2 State Museum of Natural History NAS of Ukraine, 18 Teatralna str., Lviv, 79005 Ukraine; е-mail: entomobelka@ukr.net.

195. Werneburg, 1864. Beitrage zur Schmetterlingeskunde. / A. Werneburg. Neumann. Erfurt. 1864. I, 599 S.

196. Wojtusiak, 1931. Z notatek motylniczych. / R. Wojtuziak // Pol. Pismo Ent. Lwow. 1931. 10 zeszyt. 1, s. 74-76.

197. Zeller, 1847. Bemerkungen über die auf einer Reise nach Italien und Sicilien gesammelten Schmetterlingsarten. / P. C. Zeller. Isis. (Oken; Leipzig) 1847. H. 4, S. 284-307.

198. Ziharev, 1928. Harmful and other Lepidoptera of Darnica's forest research summer residence. / I. Ziharev // Reports on forest research work in Ukraine. Issue. IX. 1928, page 231-330.

199. Zukowski, 1959. Rozwazania nad pochodzeniem odmian Parnassius apollo L. (Lepidoptera, Papilionidae) w Polsce. / R. Zukowski // Polskie pismo entomologiczne. Wroclaw. 1959. XXIX. 25, s. 491-505.

*ALEXANOR'S office information in Ukraine is available.

*Information on butterfly monitoring project in SW Ukraine territory is available.

*A list of butterflies with more than a hundred species for SW Ukraine with their scientific, English, German, Dutch, Hungarian, Russian and Ukrainian names is available.

© 1991-2021 ALEXANOR CFSI

This page was created for "ALEXANOR" (Company for Scientific Implementation )

by S.G. Popov (Last update October 12, 2021)

These pages are best read with Netscape 3.0 or WebDesigner 1.3 andmonitor resolution 1024x768x64K