SUMMER ASSIGNMENT
LINK- https://docs.google.com/document/d/17-VDYhsusq4BL-NvCFQ_hW3RKCRJXzaqWjDDmv6CMC4/edit?tab=t.0
GRADE- 100%
Due Sep 13
What I did well on- In the summer assignment that determined the beginning of my grade, I tried to answer each question as accurately as possible to the correct answer. Although I struggle with many of these questions, I am glad to have received a good overall grade. The objective was to understand the materials [Such as friction, static, and direction of force], And answering questions has provided me with further guidance and confidence in my work. At the end of the assignment, We were required to write a cover sheet summarizing one question we found most challenging and one we found easy.
1 Dimensional Motion Lab Report Due
GRADE- 81%
Oct 29, 4:00 PM
In this one-dimensional motion lab report, our team investigated the motion of an object with constant acceleration. The purpose was to deepen our understanding of the mathematical equations related to this motion and analyze the graphical representations of displacement and velocity changes over time. We also aimed to learn how to determine the values of velocity and acceleration from the displacement and time measurements obtained during the experiment. When reporting on our calculations, we focused on subtraction, possible errors, and an overall summary of our activities during the lab. I noticed that I repeated many points while answering the questions and did not clearly explain the calculations I performed or the rationale behind them. Additionally, I did not adequately discuss the concepts we learned or how well I understood them. Although I received a decent grade, I could have performed better by providing more detailed explanations.
MARKING PERIOD 2
GRADE- 93
LINK-https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_47tp7pLPggleAu15gErLJhRm493uVWmJZ7Y4m6wIvU/edit?tab=t.0
In this experiment, we investigated how different materials and the angle of inclination affect static and kinetic friction. Our objective was to measure frictional forces and determine friction coefficients between surfaces. We aimed to understand how the angle of the inclined plane influences the normal force and friction, connecting our findings to real-world applications in transportation and construction. Before starting, our instructor, Ms. Atbany, explained the procedures for accurate results and emphasized the importance of using high-quality materials for reliable data and to measure the mass on the random object we choose for this experiment. During the first phase, we attached a string to the objects (Key chains accessory, and a mouse) to pull them along a surface and record measurements. However, we ran out of time and could not measure the kinetic friction. In the second phase, we set up an inclined plane, gradually lifting one end until the object slides down. We timed their descent, noting the height of the ramp and the time taken to reach the end. This hands-on experience aimed to test our hypotheses about static and kinetic friction and reinforce our understanding of related concepts. In hindsight, we recognized the need to minimize measurement errors related to distance for future experiments. Overall, I was satisfied with my performance, as I received a good grade and learned where to focus my efforts for future lab reports and assignments.
GRADE- 68
In our physics class, we recently had a test covering Statics and Dynamics. Statistics deals with forces on objects at rest or moving at a constant velocity, while Dynamics focuses on the forces that cause changes in motion, leading to acceleration. Unfortunately, my performance on the test was not great, primarily due to my lack of commitment to the preparation activities. I struggled particularly with recalling the necessary formulas, ultimately contributing to my poor results. However, I've realized that consistency in my studies can help me improve my memory of essential formulas in the future.
MARKING PERIOD 3
(front Side of the assignment)
On Question 2, we needed to write an equation for the velocity in the x-direction. I used the formula ( Vx = vcos(78) ) to calculate the velocity in the x-direction, which resulted in
( Vx = 15.5{m/s}cos(78°) = 3.22 {m/s}
Moving to Part 3, Question 1, I found the velocity in the y-direction using the equation (Vy = v \sin(78°) ). This gave me ( Vy = 15.5{m/s}sin(78°)= 15.16{m/s} ).
Next for Part 3 Question 2, we were required to find the total energy of the bar in both the horizontal and vertical directions using the kinetic energy formula ( Ek = ½ mv² ) (where (m) is mass and (v) is velocity).
- The total kinetic energy of the bar was calculated as:
Ek(final) = ½ 5.8kg (15.5m/s)^2 = 696.725 J
- The kinetic energy in the x-direction (horizontal) was:
Ekx = ½ 5.8kg (3.22m/s)^2= 30.068J
- The kinetic energy in the y-direction (vertical) was:
Eky = ½ 5.8kg (15.16m/s)^2= 666.494J
In Part 3, Question 3, we had to find the maximum height the bar reached using the formula (-vi^2/2g}=Δr):
-(15.5m/s)^2/2 (-9.81m/s²)= 12.24m
Finally, we were asked how far away from the launch site the bar would land, assuming It was in the air for 3.12 seconds. We used the formula (Δrx = Vix\Δt):
Δrx = 3.33 m/s(3.12s)= 10.39m
Overall I did well on this assignment despite a few mistakes but I am mostly glad that I was able to get a pretty good grade and that all.
Authentic Assesment
95%
What I did well on-
This panel question is something I did well on. The assignment was about determining the kinematics based on the given data. We started with a scenario involving a railroad worker who was injured by an iron bar that penetrated his skull. The bar is about 110 cm long, has a diameter of 3.2 cm, and a mass of 5.8 kg. It was launched at an angle of 78 degrees with an initial velocity of 15.5 m/s when it left the worker's skull. Additionally, we are given the gravitational acceleration on Earth, which is -9.8 m/s². While reading this we must also answer all the questions that are asked for based on what we were given or make of it:
In question 1 identified all the given information, but I made an error: instead of writing ∅= -9.8 m/s², I mistakenly wrote Degrees = -9.8 m/s², which, in my opinion, doesn't make a huge difference but i progressed.
backside of the assignment
I don't have the picture of what it was but I'll show a picture to how some of the concepts looked like. Saru's law or rule is what I tried to use in the Quiz to find the third vector, but failed since I didn't know where to make the lines at, nor was I confident in my subtracting and adding when combining some of the numbers together.
When I saw this similar concept on the board I was absolutely confused about what I was looking at since it was in 3d. But I just realize its just the same concept that i explained but in a draw out version.
50%
What I need to work on-
In our recent physics class, we focused on the cross-product, an essential concept in both physics and mathematics. The cross product of two vectors, A and B, generates a third vector, C, which is perpendicular to the plane formed by A and B. The magnitude of this vector is calculated using the formula |C| = |A| |B| sin(θ), where θ is the angle between the two vectors. When A and B are parallel or antiparallel (at angles of 0 or 180 degrees), the sine becomes zero, resulting in a zero magnitude for the cross product, indicating no area is formed between them. Determining the direction of the cross product involves using the right-hand rule, which I struggled to understand initially. However, after watching some videos, I learned that if you point the fingers of your right hand in the direction of vector A and curl them towards vector B, your thumb points in the direction of the cross product. This clarifies the distinction between A × B and B × A; while they share the same magnitude, they have opposite directions. During the quiz, I faced difficulties applying these concepts under pressure, particularly in differentiating between (A × B) and (B × A), which led to mistakes with the vector directions and component signs. Additionally, I found the component form of vectors confusing, especially in calculating the cross product using a determinant or the Saru law. I often hesitated with the order of subtraction and addition, resulting in errors for the overall outcome of vector C. Reflecting on this experience, I've realized that I need more practice to fully grasp these computations and their geometric meanings. It's clear that thorough preparation and seeking clarification on challenging topics are crucial. Moving forward, I plan to enhance my understanding through additional study and practice to navigate similar topics more effectively since while looking the concept up I could have definitely reviewed by watching a few videos and taking notes.