methods of gleaning the meaning
Hebrew book: not "Themes" but patterns, for people who are
a. intrinsically-interested in the chumash and
b. getting a deeper understanding not just of the story but of the interconeciotn of kabbalah, torah shebischsav, halacha, etc,
c. and the interconneciotn of historical unfolding, how what is done in one generaiotn is influenced by what happned earleir and influences what happens later, or that certian patterns play themselves out over time in different ways (like gilgul of groups rather than of individuals).
So instead of "themes" as in the English version, can do sections:
1. Applying kabbalistic notions to the chumash in order to learn from the text new translaiton/inteprretaitons, ie k'c ideas shedding light on the pshat of chumash... like 4 worlds idea helps us to better understand the word "tzelem", and also "bara". And we can read the stories as contianing remazim to the things taught by chazal, eg vort "Remazim bapsukim harishonim le EY, hagalut ve hageulah"
2. Applying halachik ideas to the chumash, eg seeing the mlachot in the creaiotn account helps us better understand breishis, and also maybe better understand what 'shviso' means and helps see all the creative acts in a unified maner? and connect it to the description of the building of th mishkan perhaps.
3. perush hachumash lachumash etc, helps us understand the chumash by seeing how it is cas later, or understood by M"R, and then by the nevi'im etc
4. via parallels, seeing one story in the light of another, perhaps as a pattern playing itself out over different generations (like sibling rivalry as the story of chumash breishis, the yosef and mordechai stories, and list others)
5. Chazal differ in their interpretaitons, but they must all come from the oringinal understnading, andperhaps there was one deeper level that eventually split into many different ones, and given these pieces we can try to sew them back into the original one, eg by finding the unifying underlying feature in various conflicting interpretations we can arrive at a deeper understanding: by finding the unifying underlying feature in various conflicting interpretations we arrive at a deeper understanding: eg: rashi brings several different seemingly unrelated explanations of what breishis means it ties in to tov me'od, and so this tying of the vairous interpretaiotns to their essential similarity shed slight on the meaning of 'breishis' - 'avur oneg', feelings of gratitude, which is what underlies the vairous explanations brought by Rashi] .
6. try to deduce what would be the essence, ie if we are told there is kabalah, and we know there are basic priciples and philosophical notions missingfrom the pshat of chumash, and we try to learn it ourselves, and then see what kabbalah says, and then in the light of how that is different than what you would have thought, and what that teaches you about how to interpret chumash, re-look at the chumash.
learn a halacha from the chumash(as I tried to do re eved ivri), ie using context etc, and then use the 'midos she hatorah idreshes bahem', and then learn mishna, then gemara, and see how these various results differ and what we can learn from this, and then re-look at the chumash.
Rambam talks of contradiciotns as pointing to secrets, and I point to non-sequitars eg shabbos as a pointer to finding a new layer in the creation account's details (Perhaps the reason for the detail in breishis is to help betzelel in constructing the mishkan?!).
Use an amira of chazal to shed light further, like the new verison of vort re shabbos shmita and E"Y
Use an insight from one story to apply to another: eg recognizing that the exile from gan eden was NOT because of eating of the etz ha;da;at but rather to prevent eating from the etz ha'chayim can maye teach us how to better interpret other galut episodes? or other stories in general?