Remote Consulting for Anxiety and Depression

CPMS code:  54212

Lead Network: West of England

Study Summary

Primary care appointments that take place over the telephone or by videocall are called remote consultations. During the COVID-19 pandemic, most appointments moved from face-to-face to remote consulting. It is likely that many appointments will continue to be delivered this way. GPs and nurses report that telephone consultations can be useful for long-term conditions, or where physical examinations are not required. However, some patients may not have a private space to discuss sensitive issues, or prefer to do so in-person. Some may also struggle with the technology that is needed for remote consultations. Whilst there is research on the use of remote consulting across primary care generally, we do not know what the benefits and challenges are for the management of individuals with anxiety and depression. This is particularly important because 40% of primary care consultations focus on mental health, and this figure has increased since the pandemic. During these consultations, distressing issues may be discussed. Patients may find it difficult to have these conversations over the telephone. Additionally, GPs and nurses are unable to notice important physical cues. Alternatively, anxiety and depression can make it more difficult to attend appointments or discuss problems in-person. Therefore, these patients may find remote care easier than in-person appointments. Understanding the benefits and challenges of remote consultations for mental health will inform how best, and when, this method of consulting is used within primary care. To understand GPs’, nurses’ and patients’ views and experiences of remote consultations for the management of anxiety and depression, to identify what elements are beneficial, what are the challenges, and how these consultations can be best used and delivered in the future. We will interview up to 40 practitioners and patients on a one-to-one basis. Interviews will be analysed to identify common themes, to better understand people’s experiences. 

The search files hosted on this website are based on the inclusion/exclusion criteria as described in the study protocol and have been built and tested with input from our GP Champion teams. Every effort is made to keep the search files  hosted here maintained and up-to-date. 

However, it is the responsibility of the Principal Investigator to review the search and make any practice specific amendments as deemed necessary*. 

Please DO NOT mail out to patients until you have confirmation and sign off ('green light') from the study team.

*You should advise the study team of any amendments you make to the search.

Disclaimer:

Please note the resources provided are designed to assist with the identification of potentially suitable patients and to appropriately code these patients if required.

These resources have been developed based on the criteria provided by the relevant study team and whilst every effort has been made to make them universally implementable they rely on read codes and the data stored in the individual practice's clinical system. These resources are intended to assist with identification but should be used in conjunction with clinical oversight and a clear understanding of the study parameters.

While we endeavor to keep the information, tools and resources provided up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the tools provided for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

In no event will we be liable for any loss or damage including without limitation, indirect or consequential loss or damage, or any loss or damage whatsoever arising from loss of data or profits arising out of, or in connection with, the use of the tools provided.