This research focuses on the connection between eco-labels and impacts on sustainable practices and development.

Introduction: The Truth Behind Eco-Labels

Oftentimes when strolling through a grocery store, we tend to search for the healthiest options available. These items are typically marked with at least one eco-friendly sticker. But what does an eco-friendly sticker represent and how healthy and sustainable can it possibly be? For starters, fair trade, forest stewardship council, USDA organic are some of the most popular and notable eco-labels, but there are so many more with different standards associated. Typically, these labels guide consumers into making purchasing decisions that consider sustainable practices and promote overall environmental health. However, while eco-labels are heavily used, their effectiveness in driving sustainable decisions is highly questionable. Do eco-labels help consumers navigate towards more sustainable and healthy choices or do eco-labels simply serve as marketing tools with a limited impact? Do eco-labels truly represent green standards and environmentally friendly choices or are they a result of greenwashing? If eco-labels fail to influence consumers into making greener and healthier choices then we need to reassess the standards to implement sustainable development. 

Research Focus

The primary research question being investigated throughout this paper is ‘are eco-labels effective in influencing consumer behavior towards sustainable purchasing? Additional key areas of inquiry include: 

1. What do different eco-label standards represent and how do they compare?

2. What factors contribute the most to consumer trust in eco-labels?

3. What benefits do eco-labels offer in terms of sustainability and economic impact?

4. How does greenwashing affect consumer perception and trust in eco-labels?

5. How can we improve eco-labeling systems to better serve consumers and the environment?

Key Insights From Literature

Throughout my literature review, I found four connections: the role of eco-labels, consumer behavior patterns relating to eco-labels, greenwashing and media influence on consumers, and the categorization of eco-labels. 

Constructs

I have defined two different constructs that I plan on expanding on with the primary construct being eco-labels and another being consumer trust. Eco-labels represent the certification and labeling mechanisms used for signaling environmentally friendly choices. Consumer trust influences purchasing decisions. For my research, I plan on analyzing three primary measurements: eco-label credibility and effectiveness, consumer trust in green marketing, and consumerism behavior patterns. I will analyze eco-label credibility and effectiveness through third-party verification standards and marketing transparency. I will analyze consumer trust in green marketing through collecting surveys on perceptions of eco-labels and sustainable considered items that assess perceived effectiveness. I will analyze consumerism behavior patterns by collecting data on how consumers decided to shop in a controlled environment and compare purchases made of items containing eco-labels and those not containing eco-labels. 

theoretical Framework

There are two theoretical framework approaches that fit with my research. These two theoretical frameworks include the Value Belief Norm (VBN) and the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB). Both of these frameworks examine consumer behavior and provide a foundation aimed at understanding the effectiveness of eco-labels.

The Value Belief Norm was developed by Stern et al. (1999) according to the study report A Value-Belief-Norm Theory of Support for Social Movements: The Case of Environmentalism (1999), written by Paul C. Stern, Thomas Dietz, Troy D. Abel, Greg Guagnano, and Linda Kalof discuss the idea that an individual's pro-environmentalism behaviors are driven by values, beliefs regarding the environment, and personal and familial norms. This theory is relevant to my research through assessment of how eco-labels influence consumer driven purchasing behavior. If a consumer believes that a product or company aligns more with their own personal values, beliefs, and norms than they are more likely to make a purchase. This framework allows me to analyze to what extent these factors influence purchasing behavior.

The Theory of Planned Behavior (1991) was developed by Icek Ajzen, as addressed in the corresponding study report, addresses the idea an individual's behavior is determined by their intention which is influenced by three factors: attitude of behaviors, subjective norms, and behavioral control. For my research project, I plan on using this theoretical framework to explain how consumer attitudes lean towards labeled/unlabeled products, identify social pressures that influence consumers into purchases, and identify different eco-labels and their verification process. From this framework, I will determine whether consumers' view on eco-labels is positive or negative and evaluate the difference this makes in purchasing behavior. 

sources

Akenji, L., Gilby, S., Mao, C., Koide, R., Watabe, A., & Timmer, V. (2019). Challenges in Conceptualizing Sustainable Lifestyles. In Sustainable Lifestyles Policy and Practice: Challenges and Way Forward (pp. 13–30). Institute for Global Environmental Strategies. http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep21883.7

Castka, P., & Corbett, C. J. (2016). Governance of Eco-Labels: Expert Opinion and Media Coverage. Journal of Business Ethics, 135(2), 309–401. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24736084

Cooper, T., Ludlow, M., & Clift, T. (2007). Examining the Role of Eco-Labels in Changing the Approach to Sustainability in the Commercial Fisheries. Greener Management International, 57, 27–42. http://www.jstor.org/stable/greemanainte.57.27

Guzman, R. S., Hezri, A. A., Anunthavorasakul, A., Ofei-Manu, P., & Didham, R. J. (2015). Education for Sustainable Consumption in the Philippines: Current policy frameworks, implementation and governmental capacity. In S.-Y. LEE (Ed.), The Role of Governments in Education for Sustainable Consumption II: Strengthening Capacity for Effective Implementation in Malaysia, Philippines, and Thailand (pp. 33–64). Institute for Global Environmental Strategies. http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep00889.8 

Lehmann, A. (2020). Regulation of green finance and climate risks. In Private Sector Climate Finance After the Crisis(pp. 16–20). Center for Global Development. http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep29761.7

Loureiro, M. L., McCluskey, J. J., & Mittelhammer, R. C. (2001). Assessing Consumer Preferences for Organic, Eco-labeled, and Regular Apples. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 26(2), 404–416. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40987117

Neamtu, B., & Dragos, D. C. (2015). Sustainable Public Procurement: The Use of Eco-Labels. European Procurement & Public Private Partnership Law Review, 10(2), 92–101. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26639578

Treves, A., & Jones, S. M. (2010). Strategic tradeoffs for wildlife-friendly eco-labels. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 8(9), 491–498. http://www.jstor.org/stable/29546164 

Pancer, E., McShane, L., & Noseworthy, T. J. (2017). Isolated Environmental Cues and Product Efficacy Penalties: The Color Green and Eco-labels. Journal of Business Ethics, 143(1), 159–177. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44253104

Weber, O., & Saravade, V. (2019). Analyzing the Environmental Performance of Green Bonds. In Green Bonds: Current Development and         Their Future (pp. 11–12). Centre for International Governance Innovation. http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep24966.13