What are the specific contributions of Italian food retailers, restaurants, and consumers to food waste in Perugia, and how can these sectors collaborate through sustainable practices (e.g., policy, education, technology) to reduce their collective waste footprint?
Food waste is an increasingly pressing issue worldwide and Italy is no exception. Italian food retailers, with their emphasis on product variety and abundance, often contribute to waste through overstocking and unsold goods (Busetti, 2019). Restaurants, known for their portion sizes and high-quality ingredients, regularly discard edible food due to preparation excess, aesthetic standards, or customer preferences. Consumers, influenced by cultural habits and growing convenience-driven mindset, also contribute by over-purchasing, lack of awareness about food preservation, and improper disposal practices. Perugia, a charming city in central Italy, renowned for its rich culinary heritage, still has a significant problem of food waste across its food retailers, restaurants, and among consumers (Busetti, 2019). In response to this challenge, there are opportunities for collaboration between these sectors, integrating sustainable practices such as policy reforms, consumer education, and innovative technology solutions. This proposal will explore how food retailers, restaurants, and consumers in Perugia can reduce their collective food waste footprint by adopting more sustainable, efficient practices through a combination of policy implementation, educational campaigns, and technological innovations.
One critical theme in understanding food waste is the identification of systemic drivers. Thyberg and Tonjes (2016) argue that food waste is not solely the result of individual consumer choices, but is also shaped by broader systemic factors such as inefficiencies in the food system, inadequate food management practices, and consumer attitudes. These drivers, they suggest, need to be addressed through policies that target specific stages of the food supply chain, from production to consumption. This perspective is supported by Szulecka et al. (2024) and Busetti (2019), who call for comprehensive policies that consider the complexities of consumer behavior and systemic inefficiencies. Their work emphasizes the importance of addressing the root causes of food waste, which often lie beyond individual actions and require systemic solutions. Social drivers, like consumer unawareness and poor food management skills, are key contributors to food waste (Canali et al., 2017). Factors such as mishandling food, inadequate storage, and misunderstanding labels lead to significant waste. Social attitudes can be shifted through targeted awareness and education campaigns, sustainable marketing practices, and policies that promote responsible consumer behavior (Canali et al., 2017). Most food waste in the EU occurs in primary production and households, suggesting these sectors should be prioritized. While technology availability in Europe is less of an issue, the human factor—such as labelling errors or poor production planning—plays a significant role (Canali et al., 2017).
At the household level, consumer behavior and management practices play a crucial role in food waste. Agovino., et al (2024) explore how household size, shopping habits, and management routines influence food waste in Italian households. Their study suggests that larger households tend to waste less food due to their ability to buy in bulk and manage resources more efficiently. Additionally, the study highlights the potential for reducing waste through improved household practices such as better food storage and portion control. This focus on consumer-level interventions aligns with broader research on consumption-stage strategies. Reynolds et al. (2019) also identify key interventions that can reduce food waste at the consumption stage, including portion control, food preservation techniques, and raising awareness. They stress the importance of understanding the psychological and behavioral factors that influence consumer decisions, pointing to the need for more targeted interventions that cater to specific consumer behaviors and motivations. Household food waste is influenced by various factors, including income and food behaviors. Higher income correlates with increased food waste for certain products, like unpackaged fruits, but not for food with low income elasticity or cultural significance, such as bread (Setti et al., 2016). Waste behavior is more common among both high and low-income groups for these products, showing a polarized relationship. For high-value foods (e.g., dairy and pre-packed vegetables), waste is more frequent in mid-to-low income brackets, suggesting that consumers’ risk-averse behaviors and purchasing choices contribute to waste (Setti et al., 2016). The finding suggests that reduced income affects food purchasing and eating behaviors: consumers buy cheaper, larger quantities of lower-quality foods, which can lead to more waste due to spoilage or dissatisfaction.
Szulecka., et al (2024) examine food waste governance in Europe, highlighting the importance of coordinated governance frameworks involving both public and private sectors. They stress that successful food waste management requires collaboration among stakeholders at the local, national and international levels. These findings are supported by Busetti (2019), who evaluates the effectiveness of food waste policies in Italy. Busetti’s study identifies key challenges in policy implementation, particularly the fragmentation of efforts, and calls for a more integrated approach to food waste management that considers local contexts. Both studies align in advocating for a unified approach to food waste governance, underlining that fragmented and inconsistent policies limit the success of food waste reduction efforts. In a Building Responsibility & Developing Innovative Strategies for Tackling Food Waste (BREAD) Report, written by Dr. Ludovica Principato, writes, “On the basis of the research, we can state that, considering the National legislative framework, Italy has been the first country in the world to adopt a law that presents a strategic approach to the problem of food waste, thus becoming a reference model for the European Union” (Principato, 2021). Law No. 166, or The Gadda Law, aims to combat food waste by reorganizing the regulations surrounding food donation. The law clarifies the distinction between “use by” and “best before” dates, allowing food to be donated even after the "best before" date has passed (FAO, 2025). Additionally, it introduces measures like allowing the donation of confiscated food, creating "family bags" for distribution, and offering businesses a waste tax reduction to incentivize them to donate excess food.
Ostrom’s Social-Ecological Systems (SES) Framework is a comprehensive approach to understanding how human and environmental systems interact, particularly in the context of managing common-pool resources (Nagel & Partelow, 2022). The framework is especially relevant when studying complex environmental and social dynamics, such as the issue of food waste in restaurants and retail food stores. In this research, Ostrom’s SES Framework will be applied to understand the various components of the food waste system in Italy, specifically focusing on governance systems, resource units, and users. The framework is composed of multiple constructs that help break down and operationalize the factors influencing resource use, governance, and outcomes (Nagel & Partelow, 2022). The framework will help us examine how food waste in Italy is influenced by natural resources, human actions, institutional rules, and policies.
The first key construct in the SES Framework is Resource Units (RU). In the context of food waste, the "resource units" are the different types of food that are being wasted. This includes all food products discarded in the waste stream from restaurants and food retailers. The types of food can be categorized by perishability (e.g., dairy, fruits, vegetables, packaged foods) and the reasons for waste (e.g., overproduction, spoilage, consumer behaviors). The second construct is Resource Systems (RS). The “resource systems” in this research refer to the systems that manage food within restaurants and retail stores. This includes the internal procedures and practices that shape how food is procured, stored, handled, and eventually discarded.
The third construct is Governance systems (GS), which refer to policies at the national, regional, and organizational levels that regulate food waste. This includes Italy's legislation on food waste and how it is enforced, along with how restaurants and food retail stores manage food waste internally through staff training, waste audits, and waste diversion strategies. The fourth and final key construct in the SES Framework is Users (U). Users are the customers who consume food at restaurants and food retail stores. Their behaviors and actions—such as portion sizes, willingness to pay for surplus food, or engagement with food waste awareness programs—are important in understanding food waste dynamics (Marshall G, 2015). Additionally, staff members at food outlets (chefs, kitchen staff, and servers) play a role in how food is handled and disposed of.
This framework illustrates how the food waste system in Italy is influenced by the governance systems (food waste policy), the resource systems (food management practices in restaurants and food retailers), the resource units (types and amounts of food wasted), and the users (consumers and food handlers). By applying this framework, we can analyze how institutional rules, food management systems, and consumer behavior come together to affect the outcomes in food waste reduction, and how policies (such as Italy’s national food waste laws) shape the governance systems of individual food service outlets.
Agovino et al., (2024). The role of economies of scale and efficiency in food shopping and management routines in reducing household food waste: the Italian case. Applied Economics, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2024.2315096
Busetti, S. (2019). A theory-based evaluation of food waste policy: Evidence from Italy. Food Policy, 88, 101749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2019.101749
Canali et al., (2017). Food Waste Drivers in Europe, from Identification to Possible Interventions. Sustainability, 9(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9010037
Fao.org. FAOLEX. (2025). https://www.fao.org/faolex/results/details/en/c/LEX-FAOC160906/
Marshall, G. R. (2015, September 18). A social-ecological systems framework for Food Systems Research: Accommodating transformation systems and their products. International Journal of the Commons. https://thecommonsjournal.org/articles/10.18352/ijc.587#abstract
Nagel, B., & Partelow, S. (2023, October 24). Ecology & Society: A methodological guide for applying the social-ecological system (SES) framework: A Review of Quantitative Approaches. Ecology & Society - A journal of integrative science for resilience and sustainability. https://ecologyandsociety.org/vol27/iss4/art39/
Principato, L. (2023). Bread Report on Italian food waste governance and Practice. TIK Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture. https://www.sv.uio.no/tik/english/research/projects/bread/publications/bread-report-on-italian-food-waste-governance-and-.html
Reynolds et al., (2019). Review: Consumption-stage food waste reduction interventions – What works and how to design better interventions. Food Policy, 83, 7-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2019.01.009
Setti, M et al., (2016) Italian consumers’ income and food waste behavior. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305370459_Italian_consumers’_income_and_food_waste_behavior
Szulecka et al., (2024). Food waste governance architectures in europe: actors, steering modes, and harmonization trends. Global Challenges, 8(11), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/gch2.202300265
Thyberg et al., (2016). Drivers of food waste and their implications for sustainable policy development. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 106, 110-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.11.016