Dr. Melissa Jeanne Moore (born 1962)

Dr. Melissa Moore ; image from 2011 University of Massachusetts article,"Melissa Moore wins Gates Foundation grant"[HE0080][GDrive]

Wikipedia 🌐 Melissa J. Moore


ASSOCIATIONS - People

ASSOCIATIONS - Companies and Institutions

Saved Wikipedia (Aug 1, 2022) - "Melissa J. Moore"

Source : [HK00AK][GDrive]

Melissa J. Moore is an American biochemist who focuses on RNA. She is the Chief Scientific Officer of [Moderna, Inc.], where her team contributed to development of the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine.

Early life and education

Moore was born and raised in New Market, Virginia,[1] the youngest of four children.[2] After graduating from the College of William and Mary with a Bachelor of Science degree in Chemistry and Biology, she earned her PhD in Biological Chemistry from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1989.[1] She wrote her thesis on "Mercuric ion reductase: mutagenesis of n- and c-terminal paired cysteines and initial crystallization studies".[3] As a Helen Hay Whitney postdoctoral fellow under the supervision of [Dr. Phillip Allen Sharp (born 1944)], she invented technology to join long RNA molecules,[4] and published a seminal paper establishing the chemical mechanism of pre-mRNA splicing.[5]

Career

Brandeis University

Following her postdoctoral fellowship, Moore joined the faculty at Brandeis University in 1994, despite being recruited by Harvard University, Yale University, and Northwestern University.[6] Soon after, she was named a Searle Scholar and Packard Fellow.[7][8] At Brandeis, Moore established her own laboratory in the Biochemistry Department to research pre-mRNA splicing and its connections to intracellular mRNA localization, translation, and degradation. In 1997, she became a Howard Hughes Medical Institute Investigator, a position she retained for the following 19 years.

UMass Medical School

In 2007, Moore moved her research group to the Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology Department at the University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (UMass Med).[9][10] In 2011, Moore was the recipient of the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology's William C. Rose Award[11] for excellence in mentoring. That year, Moore and her collaborator Ananth Karumanchi, also received a Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation Grand Challenges grant for their project "siRNA-based Therapeutics for Preeclampsia."[12] They received a second grant in 2013 to refine the therapy and test it in baboons.[13] That work stemmed from Moore's own experience as a preeclampsia survivor in 2003.[14]

Moderna

In October 2016, Moore was appointed Chief Scientific Officer, Platform Research, at [Moderna, Inc.] Therapeutics [15][16] While serving in this role, she was elected to the National Academy of Sciences,[17] named a fellow in the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, and recognized with the 2021 RNA Society Lifetime Achievement in Science Award.[18] During the COVID-19 pandemic, the work of Moore's team was instrumental in the development of the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine.[19] In December 2020, she and other Moderna leaders addressed the Food and Drug Administration advisory panel to consider recommending emergency use authorization of the mRNA-1273 vaccine.[2]

Personal life

Moore is married to Janet Kosloff, a retired CEO and entrepreneur in the life science market research sector. They have three children together.[2]

References

External links


2020 (Dec) - W&M Alumni Magazine website : "Alumna leads groundbreaking research platform at Moderna"

A strong weapon against COVID-19: "Ten years of hard work led to us having all the resources in the right place at the right time to create this vaccine in short order," says Melissa J. Moore '84, chief scientific officer of platform research at Moderna Inc. Courtesy photo

by Tina Eshleman, University Advancement | December 17, 2020 / Saved PDF : [HE0081][GDrive]

When people ask what Melissa J. Moore ’84 does for a living, she often says, “I work for you.”

That was literally true when the biochemist and molecular biologist received federal funding for her academic research. And in an important way, it still is. As the chief scientific officer of platform research at Massachusetts-based Moderna Inc., Moore is a key part of the biotech company’s effort to produce 200 million COVID-19 vaccines for the U.S. government to distribute to Americans across the country.

“It’s a way to draw people in,” Moore says of her response to the question. “It’s so important for scientists to be out there communicating with the public. We are in it for the public good.”

She’ll have a chance to speak to a global audience during a livestreamed Dec. 17 hearing, when she addresses a Food and Drug Administration advisory panel considering whether to recommend emergency use authorization for the vaccine known as mRNA-1273. Produced by Moderna in partnership with the National Institutes of Health, it would be the second vaccine to receive such authorization, following one produced by Pfizer and BioNTech that began arriving at destinations nationwide on Dec. 14. Moderna officials say that about 20 million doses could be delivered by the end of December.

Both vaccines use genetic material called “messenger RNA” to instruct special immune cells to create the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, which is found on the surface of the virus that causes COVID-19. This imitates a viral infection, prompting an immune response in the complete absence of any other viral components. Like Pfizer’s vaccine, Moderna’s has proven in clinical trials to be highly effective against COVID-19. It also has the significant advantage of being able to be stored at less cold temperatures, making it easier to transport and store.

“I never could have imagined when I was in school that we’d be using messenger RNA to make therapeutics and vaccines,” says Moore, who received a bachelor of science in chemistry and biology from William & Mary and a doctorate in biological chemistry from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. “It’s amazing that we’re able to do this and humbling that it will have such an impact on humanity. Ten years of hard work led to us having all the resources in the right place at the right time to create this vaccine in short order.”

Moore’s work over more than three decades underpins why Moderna was in a position to develop the coronavirus vaccine. As she describes it, she has spent most of her career researching how cells in humans and other mammals use information in their DNA and transcribe or copy it to RNA as a code for blueprints to make proteins.

“RNA is the temporary blueprint that your cell’s synthesis machinery uses to know what protein to make,” Moore says. “If we know which protein we want to make, we can back-translate to make the sequence into RNA. It’s the perfect technology for a pandemic or for making vaccines very quickly.”

For most of her career, though, Moore’s focus wasn’t on producing vaccines or drug therapies.

“It was expanding our fundamental knowledge of how our biological systems work,” she says. “We were not put here on earth with an owner’s manual.”

As a post-doctoral fellow at MIT in the early 1990s, Moore invented technology to join long RNA molecules together. Her advisor, biology professor Phillip Sharp, suggested that she patent her discovery, but Moore declined because she didn’t see how anyone would be able to produce a drug using such long RNA sequences. Sharp earned a Nobel Prize in medicine for his discoveries related to gene splicing in 1993, while Moore was working in his lab.

“It’s amazing to me to see the progression of the field,” she says. “RNA is considered an unstable molecule. The fact that we solved the problems to make a lot of it and make it more stable is a huge leap forward.”

A Virginia native who grew up in the Shenandoah Valley, Moore attended a high school where, at the time, only 20% of the students went on to college. She and her three siblings were in the minority, all earning advanced degrees.

“My brother Jay has doctorate in American history and teaches in Vermont,” says Moore, who lives in the Boston suburb of Newton, Massachusetts, with her wife, Janet Kosloff; three children ages 17, 19 and 22; a Bernedoodle and a Maltipoo — both puppies being new additions during the pandemic. “My sister, Mimi, recently retired from her veterinary practice in Maine. My brother Chris works for NASA as an aerospace engineer.”

When Moore’s late father became disabled after a farming accident, her mother, Sylvia Moore, attended night classes to earn a master’s degree and resumed her career as a teacher and administrator. Setting an example of service for Melissa and her siblings, Sylvia Moore, who died this past September, also taught children of migrant fruit pickers through an outreach program and served as a consultant with the Virginia Department of Education for developing and assessing the Standards of Learning for Social Studies.

Melissa Moore chose William & Mary “sight unseen,” partly because she didn’t want to the same school as her brother Chris, who attended the University of Virginia. Contrasting their experiences, she says she benefited from a smaller environment where she got to know her professors well. Her advisor, chemistry professor Randy Coleman, was especially influential.

“It was a much more intimate learning experience, and I especially appreciated the ability to do research as an undergraduate,” she says. “When I got to MIT, I learned that the courses were no harder than at William & Mary. In fact, William & Mary had much tougher grading. My education was top notch.”

Moore served as a scientific advisory board member before taking on her current role with Moderna in 2016. Prior to that, she had a long career in academia, and she still holds a position as a part-time faculty member at the University of Massachusetts Medical School, where she was a professor and co-director of the RNA Therapeutics Institute. At Moderna, she saw “a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to be part of an entirely new way of making medicines.”

A lightbulb moment occurred in early 2013, when one of Moore’s UMass colleagues returned from a conference and told her about a poster demonstrating that researchers were injecting mRNA into mice and producing proteins.

“The most common type of viruses that infect us are RNA viruses,” she says. “If viruses can get their RNA into cells, then we should be able to engineer the delivery of our own RNA into cells.”

Using RNA technology, Moderna was able to finalize the sequence for its mRNA-1273 vaccine on Jan. 13, just two days after Chinese authorities shared the SARS-CoV-2 genetic sequence. On Feb. 24, the company shipped the first batch of its vaccine to the NIH for study, and the first clinical trial participants received doses on March 16. A development process that previously might have taken years had been whittled down to two months.

As Moderna’s vaccine heads to distribution, Moore and her team are focused on improving mRNA technology for other applications.

“My group works on how to design the messenger RNA and how to get it to the right place in the body,” she says. “We’re working on the technologies that will be in drugs two or three years from now.”

One therapy on the horizon is a drug that could be used to treat cystic fibrosis. “We’re working on the technology for how to get RNA into a form that can be inhaled and go into cells in the lung instead of being injected,” Moore says.

A vaccine for cytomegalovirus, the leading cause of congenital deafness in newborns, is in Phase 2 clinical trials. Messenger RNA could also be used to treat genetic deficiencies that cause hemophilia and other conditions. The ability to develop vaccines quickly using mRNA could lead to more effective flu immunizations, she says. In addition, Moderna is applying its mRNA technology to cancer treatment by using a personalized vaccine to marshal the body’s immune system against cancer cells.

“We can make vaccines, and we can also provide protein replacement therapies for kids lacking a particular gene — say a metabolic enzyme,” she says. “The applications are manifold. One of our problems is that we have so many possible things that we can do, that we really have to prioritize.”

At the moment, though, Moore is thankful she was in the right place at the right time to be of service during this hour of urgent need worldwide.

“I feel so privileged that we were able to step in and do something about this COVID-19 crisis,” she says. “It’s amazing to be able do something like this for public health.”

2011 (April 29) - Univ. of Massachusetts : "Melissa Moore wins Gates Foundation grant"

UMass Medical School is a Grand Challenges Explorations (GCE) winner, an initiative funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Melissa J. Moore, PhD, Howard Hughes Medical Institute Investigator and professor of biochemistry & molecular pharmacology, will pursue an innovative global health and development research project, titled “siRNA-based Therapeutics for Preeclampsia.”

Grand Challenges Explorations grants fund scientists and researchers worldwide to explore ideas that can break the mold in how we solve persistent global health and development challenges. Dr. Moore’s project is one of more than 85 Grand Challenges Explorations Round 6 grants announced on April 27 by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

“GCE winners are expanding the pipeline of ideas for serious global health and development challenges where creative thinking is most urgently needed. These grants are meant to spur on new discoveries that could ultimately save millions of lives,” said Chris Wilson, director of Global Health Discovery at the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

To receive funding, Moore and other Grand Challenges Explorations Round 6 winners demonstrated in a two-page online application a bold idea in one of five critical global heath and development topic areas: polio eradication, HIV, sanitation and family health technologies, and mobile health.

Preeclampsia is a leading cause of premature birth, complicating up to 10 percent of all pregnancies worldwide. The problem is especially pronounced in developing nations where access to advanced pre- and post-natal care is lacking. As a result, preeclampsia is a major contributor to maternal, fetal and neonatal mortality in underdeveloped countries and is estimated to cause more than 75,000 maternal and 500,000 infant deaths globally each year. Characteristics of preeclampsia include high blood pressure, abnormal accumulation of fluid beneath the skin and excess protein in the urine after the 20th week of pregnancy.

Preeclampsia is caused by excess levels of circulating anti-angiogenic proteins secreted into the mother’s bloodstream by the placenta. Moore, a leading figure in RNA processing and metabolism, and her collaborator Ananth Karumanchi, MD, associate professor of medicine at Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital and Harvard Medical School, will explore the potential for a small interfering RNA (siRNA)-based therapy to inhibit production of the proteins responsible for causing preeclampsia. Because siRNAs are inexpensive to produce, stable and have long shelf lives, development of an siRNA-based therapeutic to neutralize the protein responsible for preeclampsia could be cost-effectively and easily administered throughout the world.

  • About Grand Challenges Explorations : Grand Challenges Explorations is a $100 million initiative funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Launched in 2008, Grand Challenge Explorations grants have already been awarded to nearly 500 researchers from more than 40 countries. The grant program is open to anyone from any discipline and from any organization. The initiative uses an agile, accelerated grant-making process with short two-page online applications and no preliminary data required. Initial grants of $100,000 are awarded two times a year. Successful projects have the opportunity to receive a follow-up grant of up to $1 million.

2016 (September 13) - Endpoints News : "Captured in a harsh spotlight, biotech unicorn Moderna names Melissa Moore as its new CSO"

by John Carroll / Saved as PDF : [HM007M][GDrive]

As [Moderna, Inc.] drew a harsh review from Stat, portrayed as a company in turmoil with an often embittered staff, the biotech unicorn named Howard Hughes investigator and University of Massachusetts Medical School Professor [Dr. Melissa Jeanne Moore (born 1962)] as its new CSO, now in command of its full mRNA development platform.

Moore was plucked from the company’s scientific advisory group at a crucial stage in Moderna’s development. The biotech has raised $1.9 billion so far — a huge amount by biotech standards — establishing a broad ranging preclinical effort to use patient cells as drug factories. That effort has now led to 11 development programs and a slate of new therapies waiting to enter the clinic.

“Melissa is an exceptional scientist whose knowledge and expertise in this area will have an enormous impact on Moderna,” said CEO [Stéphane J. Bancel (born 1972)]. “And, importantly, she shares our vision and commitment to help patients and improve lives. We could not be more thrilled.”

Thrilled is probably the last word you would hear Bancel use to describe the newly posted investigation at Stat, which claims that Moderna’s “caustic work environment” has driven away top staff at a time where “signs” have appeared that the company’s top projects are running into trouble. Bancel himself, reports Stat, is over-controlling, obsessed with secrecy and impatient with setbacks.

The story is heavy with criticism and anonymous finger pointing, but light on details. Moderna’s former CSO, Joseph Bolen, left last fall after two years at the company, which Stat used to illustrate its claims of a toxic work environment at Moderna. Bolen was pushed out, according to unnamed “insiders,” after being relegated to a small role. Bolen himself, though, declined comment. And Bancel says he tried to get him to stay on, unsuccessfully.

[Dr. Melissa Jeanne Moore (born 1962)] now gets a shot at either proving or disproving Stat’s claims at a time the company is nearing the rapids of mid-stage development, when it will have to start outlining specific proof-of-concept data on what its drugs can do. If the company can accomplish that with several programs, Bancel tells me he plans to file for an IPO.

At this stage, it’s fair to say that everyone is watching to see whether Moderna succeeds or fails. A failure would prove highly embarrassing for a lineup of top industry collaborators. Success would be groundbreaking.

[Dr. Melissa Jeanne Moore (born 1962)] herself had this to say in a prepared statement:

  • “As a member of Moderna’s Scientific Advisory Board, I’ve had a front row seat to experience their groundbreaking progress first-hand. And through my work at the RTI and with MassTERi, I’ve come to appreciate the power of academic-industry collaboration and entrepreneurship. My new role at Moderna is a natural next step in my own progression as a basic researcher passionate about translating our ever-increasing knowledge of RNA biology into products that improve the human condition. I look forward to working with the incredibly talented Moderna team and building stronger connections and collaborations between Moderna and academia, as we work to advance the promise of mRNA therapeutics as a completely new modality for creating the medicines of the future.”

https://www.whitepages.com/name/Melissa-Jeanne-Moore/Chestnut-Hill-MA/P4y0eKp0Ye3

2022-08-01-whitepages-com-melissa-jeanne-moore-ma.pdf

Melissa Jeanne Moore

60

• 1/24/1962

Chestnut Hill, MA


2007 (Sep 10) - The Boston Globe :

https://www.newspapers.com/image/444297744/?terms=%22melissa%20j.%20moore%22&match=1

2007-09-10-the-boston-globe-pg-c2

2007-09-10-the-boston-globe-pg-c2-clip-top-talent

University of Massachusetts : Profile for Melissa J Moore PhD

Saved PDF : [HE0083][GDrive]

  • Title : Professor

  • Institution : UMass Chan Medical School

  • Department : RNA Therapeutics Institute

  • Address : UMass Chan Medical School / 364 Plantation Street LRB-825 / Worcester MA 01605


  • Other Positions


  • Institution : T.H. Chan School of Medicine

  • Department : RNA Therapeutics Institute


  • Institution : Morningside Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences

  • Department : Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology


  • Institution : Morningside Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences

  • Department : Bioinformatics and Computational Biology


  • Institution : Morningside Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences

  • Department : Interdisciplinary Graduate Program


  • Institution : Morningside Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences

  • Department : Neuroscience


  • Institution : Morningside Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences

  • Department : Translational Science


  • Institution : UMass Chan Programs, Centers and Institutes

  • Department` : Bioinformatics and Integrative Biology


  • Institution : UMass Chan Programs, Centers and Institutes

  • Department : Chemical Biology



Biography

education and training

College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, VA, United States

BS


Chemistry/ Biology

Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States

PHD


Biological Chemistry


Overview

overview

Eleanor Eustis Farrington Chair of Cancer Research

Professor, RNA Therapeutics Institutes (RTI)


Eukaryotic RNA Processing and Metabolism



Melissa Moore’s work encompasses a broad array of topics involved in post-transcriptional gene regulation in eukaryotes via mechanisms involving RNA.


Our research currently focuses on three distinct but interconnected areas involving the basic mechanisms of eukaryotic gene expression: (1) the structure and mechanism of the spliceosome, (2) the effects of nuclear-acquired proteins on cytoplasmic messenger RNA (mRNA) metabolism, and (3) the fate of functionally defective ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs) and mRNAs.


Introns are incoherent strings of nucleotides that interrupt the coding regions of genes. They are removed from nascent RNA transcripts by the process of precursor mRNA (pre- mRNA) splicing.


Since the majority of genes in multicellular organisms contain introns, their timely and precise removal is essential for proper gene expression. Most introns are excised by the major spliceosome, a complex macromolecular machine containing five stable, small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs) and a multitude of proteins. The spliceosome must be at once precise (e.g., a 1-nucleotide shift in a splice site will throw the protein-coding region completely out of frame) and adaptable (in humans it must recognize >10^5 different splice site pairs in diverse sequence contexts). In metazoans, the recognition problem is compounded by poor conservation of the sequences defining splice sites and the presence of multiple introns per pre-mRNA. Also, a remarkably high percentage of metazoan pre-mRNAs are subject to alternative splicing, which greatly expands the repertoire of proteins that can be expressed from relatively small genomes.

A major goal of our research is to elucidate the basic mechanisms by which mammalian spliceosomes accurately identify splice sites in pre-mRNAs and then catalyze intron excision. For some time, our primary focus has been the second step of splicing, wherein the intron is excised and the expressed regions (or exons) are ligated together. Recently we succeeded in purifying, in their native state, spliceosomes poised to perform this reaction. Mass spectrometry revealed more than 100 polypeptides associated with this structure. Using techniques for single-particle image reconstruction from electron micrographs, we obtained an initial three-dimensional structural map to ~30-Å resolution. The structure, with dimensions ~240 x 270 Å, exhibits three major domains connected via a series of bridges and tunnels. Further structural analysis is under way. (This work has been carried out in collaboration with Nikolaus Grigorieff [HHMI, Brandeis University].)




On the mechanistic front, we have recently developed methodologies for following pre- mRNA splicing at the single-molecule level. All previous in vitro mechanistic studies of splicing have utilized ensemble assays that report only the average behavior of a population. Although such bulk assays have provided a wealth of mechanistic insight, they are ultimately limited in their ability to tease out finer mechanistic details. Over the past two decades, single-molecule techniques that complement ensemble measurements have emerged as powerful tools to elucidate the enzyme mechanism. These approaches permit observation of the stochastic behavior of individual binding and catalytic events. They also allow observation of many individual events that would otherwise go undetected.


Using a pre-mRNA attached to a glass surface via end and containing fluorescent labels in the 5' exon and intron, we are now able to observe individual splicing events in Saccharomyces cerevisiae extracts, using a multiwavelength total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) microscope system developed by Jeff Gelles (Brandeis University) and his colleagues. Chemical biology tools are being used to fluorescently label core spliceosomal proteins and snRNAs, as well as a number of transiently associating splicing factors. This system allows us to analyze the dynamic characteristics of individual spliceosomes in real time. It should provide a new window into previously unaddressable questions regarding spliceosome assembly and internal structural transitions, as well as the comings and goings of key splicing factors. (All of the spliceosome structure and mechanism work is supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health.)


Structure and Assembly of the Exon Junction Complex


In addition to removing introns, the process of pre-mRNA splicing has significant consequences for the subsequent metabolism of the product mRNA. That is, mRNAs produced by splicing are subject to different subcellular localization, different


efficiencies of translation into proteins, and different decay rates than otherwise identical mRNAs produced from intronless genes. Splicing affects downstream mRNA metabolism by altering the complement of proteins that associate with the mRNA to form an mRNP (mRNA ribonucleoprotein particle). Several years ago, in collaboration with Lynne Maquat (University of Rochester) and Elisa Izaurralde (European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg), we showed that spliceosomes stably deposit a complex of proteins (the EJC) on mRNAs at a conserved position 20–24 nucleotides upstream of exon-exon junctions. Such EJCs accompany spliced mRNAs to the cytoplasm, where they are ultimately displaced by the process of translation.


A major unresolved question regarding the EJC had been how this complex manages to bind so tightly to a specific position on mRNA in what seems to be an entirely RNA structure- and sequence-independent fashion. We solved this mystery by identifying eIF4AIII as the EJC anchor. A member of the DEAD-box family of RNA helicases, eIF4AIII represents a new functional class of such proteins that act as RNA "placeholders" or "clothespins" rather than RNA translocases. Such place-holding DEAD-box proteins could serve as a general means for attaching factors that add functionality to an RNP without requiring any special consensus sequences in the RNA.


Functional Consequences of EJC Deposition


As stated above, spliced mRNAs exhibit metabolic fates different from the metabolic fates of mRNAs not produced by splicing. We have been investigating to what extent and by what mechanism(s) EJC deposition contributes to these differences. One area of investigation is the efficiency by which mRNAs are utilized as templates for making proteins. Quantitative analysis revealed that two to three times as many protein molecules are made per spliced mRNA molecule than per identical mRNA molecules not made by splicing. Polysome analysis revealed that spliced mRNAs interact more efficiently with ribosomes, the macromolecular machines that use mRNAs as the blueprints to synthesize proteins, than do unspliced mRNAs. This effect may facilitate the rapid expression of newly made mRNAs by enabling them to outcompete translationally experienced mRNAs (that no longer carry EJCs) for limiting translation initiation factors.


Recently, in collaboration with Gina Turrigiano (Brandeis University) and Christopher Burge (Massachusetts Institute of Technology), we found that eIF4AIII remains associated with dendritically localized mRNAs in mammalian neurons. eIF4AIII knockdown up-regulates at least two proteins involved in postsynaptic function and markedly increases synaptic strength. Thus eIF4AIII appears to act as a key brake on expression of proteins required for synaptic function. One mechanism for this braking action is via the translation-dependent decay of Arc mRNA, the gene for which contains two conserved introns in its 3'-untranslated region (3'-UTR). This is a highly unusual gene structure in mammals, as EJCs downstream of stop codons trigger nonsense- mediated mRNA decay (NMD). A bioinformatics approach revealed 148 other mammalian genes with this same feature, suggesting that translation-dependent mRNA decay mechanisms such as NMD might be widely employed in mammalian cells as a means to limit the amount of protein produced from certain mRNAs. Curiously, a large number of these genes are expressed in hematopoietic cells, suggesting that some feature of blood cells may particularly favor their evolution there. Future experiments will probe the role of the EJC in modulating expression from some of these new 3'-UTR intron- containing genes.


Clearance of Nonfunctional Ribosomes


The ribosome is the most abundant macromolecular machine in the cell. Its highly complex structure, composed of both ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs) and proteins, necessitates an intricate assembly mechanism in which pre-rRNA processing and nucleotide modification are coupled with chaperone-assisted rRNA folding and protein association.


Although the mechanics of this assembly process are becoming increasingly understood, surprisingly little is known about the mechanisms assuring its overall fidelity. Furthermore, given their inordinately long half-lives in eukaryotic cells, it is to be expected that some ribosomes will become nonfunctional over time as they accumulate oxidative damage due to normal cellular metabolism. We therefore wondered whether eukaryotes might possess any mechanisms for eliminating ribosomes that are fully assembled but functionally defective, akin to their abilities to eliminate mRNAs that are fully processed but defective. To test this, we introduced point mutations into the peptidyltransferase center of 25S rRNA and the decoding center of 18S rRNA in S. cerevisiae. These mutant rRNAs are assembled into ribosomes, but they display markedly decreased steady-state levels compared to wild-type rRNAs.


Preliminary analyses of knockout strains have revealed several candidate genes important for decreased expression of the translationally defective mutant rRNAs. Our results therefore indicate that budding yeast do contain a quality control system capable of recognizing and eliminating translationally deficient ribosomes so as to prevent their interference with normal cellular function. We continue to study the trans-acting factors and molecular mechanisms involved in this process.



Rotation Projects

Our laboratory combines biochemical, biophysical, molecular and cell biological approaches to investigate various aspects of pre-mRNA processing, mRNA metabolism and RNA quality control in eukaryotic cells. Potential rotation projects are available in all areas of the laboratory's interests (see Research section).