Managing the Grading Load

One trait of effective teaching is returning student assignments in a timely manner with helpful feedback. As professors, marking papers is often a central task in the many things we do to mentor and advance our students’ learning.

Writing courses are demanding when it comes to feedback and assessment. But there are many ways to lessen the demand significantly. To that end, we have gathered several grading suggestions that may be helpful:

Reframe your motivation for grading

Limit the amount of feedback

Consider giving credit/no credit for writing tasks

Schedule and protect your grading time

Provide your grading criteria or rubric

Develop a feedback system or shorthand

Reframe your motivation for grading

Grading is a time to hear from students and to experience the connections they make about the content you enjoy. Focus on the opportunity grading provides to assess whether students are learning what your course sets out to teach. Consider grading a “data gathering” time to take stock of individuals’ learning and progress and your teaching and clarity.

While you read student work, be on the lookout for small successes and students’ struggles. Keep a positive attitude about students and your grading load—this may motivate you to face the grading stack with purpose and curiosity.

Limit the amount of feedback

Avoid overwhelming students with too much feedback. Instead, focus on only two or three actionable things a student could do to develop as a writer and advance the draft. Focus your comments on only what you want students to learn or improve upon at each stage of an assignment or draft.

Concentrate your energy on engaging students’ ideas more than on editing sentence-level or grammar concerns, especially if the style choices or grammar mistakes don’t interfere with the communication of ideas.

Most importantly, write feedback as suggestions for “next steps for revision” or “ways to strengthen this piece of writing,” even if the paper you’re marking is a final draft.

Students want to know you’re engaging with their ideas as well as helping them meet the purposes of their papers. You don’t have the time to be a copy editor, so focus on the top priorities: what would advance the student’s communication in this given writing task.

Consider giving credit/no credit for writing tasks

If you break an assignment into smaller writing tasks or assign a one-draft reflection piece, consider giving full credit or no credit in order to reduce your grading time.

For smaller reflection pieces or ongoing course reading responses, you don’t have to take the time to deliberate over A, B, or C when you can instead give full credit or no credit. Coach the students specifically on what you expect to read in the assignment and what the purpose is, and if the writing meets the standards, award the assigned points. If the writing seems rushed or ideas are scattered, give no points for the assignment. This is better used on recurring writing tasks where you afford students a first round of “resubmits” for those who earn zero points. This approach saves you time and often results in better reflections because students know what’s expected and that there’s little margin for sloppy or careless reflection writing.

Or, read over assignments such as annotated bibliographies in class during partner or small group workshops and give points for completion. This allows for on-the-spot feedback if a student’s sources are not appropriate to the assignment, and your grading is complete before leaving class that day. At the end of class, you can give whole group feedback about concerns or encouragement you have for students at this stage of the assignment. You save time, get to dialogue with students, and complete grading quickly.

Schedule and protect your grading time

Show up to grade like you show up to class. Block out grading hours on your Google calendar in order to avoid grading outside of work hours.

If you have 20 students in a writing course, consider breaking up the papers into manageable chunks during times when your mind is alert and your energy is high. Read and offer feedback for five papers a day for four weekdays, and you’ll return the papers within a week. Read ten over two days if it’s a shorter assignment. You can pace your grading load to fit the flow of your week, but be sure to create intentional and manageable scheduled time to grade.

If you tell students you’ll return papers in two weeks, stick to that by realistically allowing yourself time to make progress on feedback. You can be timely and productive with feedback when you resource the task with the needed schedule and focused energy.

Provide your grading criteria or a rubric

Distribute an explanation of grading or a rubric at the point when you assign the writing task or very soon after introducing the assignment.

Encourage students to use the rubric for self-evaluation and peer feedback during their stages of writing.

A week after assigning the paper, look at the rubric during class for a quick discussion and “check in” about the guidelines and expectations for the paper. This will reduce the instances of you reading papers that don’t fit the assignment, and it will remind students to start drafting the paper early. More developed papers are less demanding on readers’ time and focus.

Consider using the rubric for draft-one feedback by assigning students to evaluate themselves in class or as a homework task. Ask students to write up a plan for revision and give them points for the plan (instead of you doing careful reading of an early draft). This will encourage students to turn in a more developed draft later that is ready for your feedback. That way you'll avoid wasted time reading (quite as many) drafts that aren't fully developed.

When grading final products, save time by composing very few, if any, comments. Instead, mark the aspects for feedback on your rubric with simple checks or highlighter on the description from the rubric. This is especially appropriate when you’ve already read draft two and provided feedback and comments toward revision.

Develop a feedback system or shorthand

Provide an explanation of your feedback marks in the syllabus or on each rubric for easier access. For example, use check marks to note original or compelling ideas; underline content that interacts with course content; circle things you would suggest the author look at again for proofreading; draw a wavy line under ideas or wording you didn't understand. This saves you the time it takes to write out full comments and sometimes reduces professor-to-student miscommunication.

Be sure to word your shorthand explanations in a way that keeps the power of authorship in the author’s hands. The comment is “I’m confused” instead of “this is confusing.” Or, “How does this relate to your purpose?” instead of “strays from focus.” Posing questions is best for developing writers who write to communicate instead of only to please the professor, so even your shorthand key should promote student authorship. (The chart to the right is an example of the kind of shorthand to avoid...)

Use your shorthand to respond as a curious and informed reader more than a copy editor or evaluator. Invite students to visit office hours to clarify or talk through your feedback marks.

Additional Resources

Tools for Grading Papers

Baker, N. L. (2014). ‘Get it off my stack’: Teachers’ tools for grading papers. Assessing Writing, 19, 36-50.

Integrating Writing, Thinking, and Learning

Bean, J.C. (2011). Engaging ideas: The professor’s guide to integrating writing, critical thinking, and active learning in the classroom. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Handling the Load

Golub, J.N. (Ed.). (2005). More ways to handle the paper load: On paper and online. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.

Maxine Hairston on Teaching Writing

Hairston, M. & Trachsel, M. (2002). On not being a composition slave. In D. Jolliffe, M. Keene, M. Trachsel, & R. Voss (Eds.), Against the grain: A volume in honor of Maxine Hairston. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

Grading Effectively, Fairly, and Efficiently

Jenkins, R. (2015, June 22). Conquering Mountains of Essays: How to effectively and fairly grade a lot of papers without making yourself miserable. The Chronicle of Higher Education.

Commenting Strategies

Straub, R. (2000). The practice of response: Strategies for commenting on student writing. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.