᾿Εμπεδοκλῆς

Empedocles - Empedocle - Empédocle - Empedokles - Empedoklés - Empédocles - Эмпедокл - Empedoklész - エンペドクレス-  Empedoklo  -  Empedioklis  - אמפדוקלס  - إمبيدوكليس

Bibliographie présentée par Tomáš Vítek et J.-C. Picot

You are on the page presenting an extensive bibliography relating to Empedocles. This page can be found online at the following address:

https://sites.google.com/site/empedoclesacragas/bibliography-assembled

"Bibliography assembled" means that this page brings together three pages of bibliography from the empedocles.acragas website: an AZ page, an AZ Supplement page and a page of bibliographical references prior to 1805.

On this website dedicated to the promotion of Empedoclean studies (https://sites.google.com/site/empedoclesacragas/), the page entitled "AZ Supplement" is regularly updated to include new titles. By consulting this page with the following link from time to time – https://sites.google.com/site/empedoclesacragas/bibliography-a-z-supplement –, you can keep abreast of new works concerning Empedocles.

Out of respect for the work of T. Vítek, who uses B for fragment (as does Diels from 1906 onwards), I extend this writing here, although I see a possibility of confusion between the context(s) of the quotation(s) and the single fragment edited by Diels.

In right square brackets, after the bibliographical references, are mentioned the testimonies A and fragments B that I was able to find in the said reference.

Some books systematically report a large number of fragments and/or testimonies. This is the case with editions or collections of translations. In this case, I write [ + ]. Some of these books also include commentaries or notes on all or part of the fragments and/or testimonies. In this case I write: [+ +].

   Updated on 6 October 2023.

AAA

Abt, Adam, Die Apologie des Apuleius von Madaura und die Antike Zauberai, Giessen: Töpelmann 1908.

[P. 112-115; B 111.1: φάρμακα.]

Acevedo, Angel Eduardo Juan, The idea of Στοιχεῖον in grammar and cosmology: From Antique roots to medieval systems, Diss. The Warburg Institute, University of London, 2018.

– Alphanumeric cosmology from Greek into Arabic: The idea of stoicheia through the Medieval Mediterranean, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 2020.

Acri, F[rancesco?] “Dei sistemi di Empedocle e Democrito,” Rivista sicula di scienze, letteratura ed arti, 2, 4, 1870, p. 408-421.

[P. 408-411. General outline of the principal theses of Emp. doctrine; a detailed idea of the author is the roots being composed of small divisible parts, which are able to penetrate the pores of each element during the maximal dominance of Strife.]

Adam, James, The religious teachers of Greece: Gifford lectures delivered at Aberdeen University, 1904-1906, Aberdeen 1908.

[P. 244-253; B 17, B 21, B 26, B 29, B 30, B 31, B 35, B 59, B 105, B 109, B 110, B 133, B 134.]

Adamson, Peter, S., The Arabic Plotinus: a study of the "Theology of Aristotle" and related texts, diss., University of Notre Dame, 2000.

[B 115.]

– The Arabic Plotinus: a philosophical study of the "Theology of Aristotle", London: Duckworth 2002.

[A dissertation in 2000. Review of G. Stamatellos in Ancient Philosophy, 26, 2006, p. 472-475. B 115.]

Adluri, Vishwa, Parmenides, Plato, and mortal philosophy: Return from transcendence, London-New York: Continuum 2011.

[Two-soul theory: Thumos versus Psukhe, Gomperz.]

Afonasina, Anna S. [АФОНАСИНА, Анна, Сергеевна], (2012) “The birth of harmony out of the spirit of tekhe,” ΣΧΟΛΗ, 6, 1, 2012, p. 68-75.

https://nsu.ru/classics/schole/6/6-1-af-tekh-en.pdf

[Empedocles connects harmonia with Aphrodite – one of the creative powers. It was important for him to represent the multifaceted character of harmonia by means of different crafts. In his philosophical views we can clearly see the process of development of the term of harmonia from its technical to abstract meaning.]

– (2015) “Эмпедокл о дыхании,” ΣΧΟΛΗ, 9, 2, 2015, p. 353-362.

https://nsu.ru/classics/schole/9/9-2-afonasina.pdf

[In Fr. B 100 DK Empedocles famously compares the principle of breathing with this of clepsydra. This simile provoked a scholarly controversy. This article is the first part of the future analysis of Empedocles’ views on physical mechanisms of living beings and their sense perceptions.]

– (2016) “Страсбургский папирус Эмпедокла. О реконструкции текста и задачах на будущее,” ΣΧΟΛΗ, 10, 1, 2016, p. 214-226. (The Strasbourg papyrus of Empedocles. A note on its reconstruction and future tasks for studies). 

http://www.nsu.ru/classics/schole/10/schole-10-1.pdf

– (2018) “Эмпедокл в диалогах платона. свидетельства и преемственность идей,” Intellectual traditions in past and present, 4, 2018, p. 197-208. 

[Intellectual traditions in past and present = Интеллектуальные традиции в прошлом и настоящем (исследо- вания и переводы). Empedocles in Plato’s dialogs. Evidences and the continuity of ideas; B 29, B 73, B 84, B 86, B 87, B 96.]

https://www.plato.spbu.ru/CONFERENCES/2018/ther164.html

http://roii.ru/intellectual-tradition/intellectual-tradition-4.pdf

– (2019) “Фрагмент В 17 Эмпедокла (перевод и комментарий),” ΣΧΟΛΗ, 13, 1, 2019, p. 375-381.

https://nsu.ru/classics/schole/13/schole-13-1.pdf https://nsu.ru/classics/schole/13/13-1-afonasina.pdf

[A new commented translation into Russian of Empedocles’ fragment B17 with the addition of several new lines available in the Strasbourg papyrus.]

– (2019) “Фрагмент В 17 Эмпедокла (продолжение) + собрание с страсбургского папируса (= В 20) (перевод и комментарий),” ΣΧΟΛΗ, 13, 2, 2019, p. 755-763.

https://nsu.ru/classics/schole/13/13-2-afonasina.pdf

– (2020) “Источники для образа Афродиты у Эмпедокла [Sources of the image of Aphrodite in Empedocles],” ΣΧΟΛΗ, 14, 1, 2020, p. 293-308

https://nsu.ru/classics/schole/14/schole-14-1.pdf

– (2020) “Страсбургский папирус Эмпедокла (окончание) перевод и комментарий,” ΣΧΟΛΗ,14, 2, 2020, p. 812-825.

https://nsu.ru/classics/schole/14/14-2-afonasina.pdf

– (2021) Страсбургский папирус Эмпедокла. The Strasbourg papyrus of Empedocles: A translation into Russian and commentary by A. A., ΣΧΟΛΗ Supplements, III, Novosibirsk 2021.

– (2022) “The image of Empedocles in the Hippocratic treatises and the interpretation of some biographical evidences.” Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 38, 3, 2022, p. 293-306. (In Russian. “Образ Эмпедокла в трактатах гиппократовского корпуса и интерпретация некоторых биографических сведений,” Вестник СПбГУ. Философия и конфликтология. 2022. Т. 38. Вып. 3, p. 293-306.)

https://philosophyjournal.spbu.ru/issue/view/755

https://philosophyjournal.spbu.ru/article/view/12911/9878

https://philosophyjournal.spbu.ru/article/download/12911/9878

[B 17, B 111, B 112, B 115, B 128, B 136, B 137.]

– (2023) “Загадочные тонкие полотна: Эмпедокл о зрении,” ΣΧΟΛΗ, 17, 2, 2023, p. 1098-1108.

[“Mysterious filmy veils: Empedocles on vision”. B 84, B 87. The author does not take into account O. Primavesi, Empedokles’ Theorie der Augenfunktion und der Text des Laternengleichnisses, 2022]

Agnello, Nino, Empedocles: Frammenti, traduzione et commento, Cosenza: L. Pellegrini, 2008, (Filosofia teoretica, 6).

[Agnello follows B. Inwood’s edition. [+  +].]

Albinus, Lars, “The Greek δαίμων between Mythos and Logos,” in: Die Dämonen – Demons. Die Dämonologie der israelitisch-jüdischen und frühchristlichen Literatur im Kontext ihrer Umwelt, ed. A. Lange, H. Lichtenberger & K. F. D. Römheld, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 2003, p. 425-446.

[Empedocles: p. 431-433, B 115, B112.]

Alearius, G. Ph. [perhaps Aleandro, Girolamo], Programma de morte Empedocles, Leipzig 1733.

[non vidi; adopted from a suspect source.]

Alesse, Francesca, “L’Empedocle di Renato Laurenti,” in: Studi sul pensiero e sulla lingua di Empedocle, ed. L. Rossetti & C. Santaniello, Bari: Levante editori 2004, (‘Le Rane’, Collana di studi e testi, 37), p. 291-304.

Alessio, Felice., “Empedocle,” La Rassegna Nazionale, 9, 35 (16. maggio, Firenze), 1887, p. 308-355.

[A popular sketch of Emp. teaching.]

Alexander, Thomas M., Aristotle’s dialectical criticism of Empedocles’ concept of animate being, Master Thesis, Emory University, 1976.

– “The Sphairos God in Empedocles’ Two Poems,” Southwest Philosophical Studies, X, 1, 1985, p. 84-95.

[B 27, B 29, B 98, B 105, B 112, B 115, B 117, B 134, B 146, in favor of daimôn = piece of Love, discussion of Cornford and Kahn's views about the daimôn.]

Algra, Keimpe - Mansfeld, Jaap, “Three thêtas in the ‘Empédocle de Strasbourg’,” Mnemosyne, 54, 2001, p. 78-84.

[B 20, B 26, a(i) 6, a(ii) 17, c 3, d 5-6.]

Allison, June W., “Antithesis and the One/Many in Aeschylus’ Septem,” Mnemosyne, 66, 2013, p. 566-592.

[B 17, B 22, B 27, B 30, B 35.6, B 59, B 96, B 109, B 134, a MP.]

Almqvist, Olaf, Chaos, cosmos and creation in early Greek theogonies: an ontological exploration, London-New York: Bloomsbury Academic 2022, (Classical literature and society).

[B 21, B 28, B 29, B 31, B 35, B 115, B 128, B 130, B 137, B 139.]

Alt, Karin, “Einige Fragen zu den ‘Katharmoi’ des Empedokles,” Hermes, 115, 1987, p. 385-411; and Hermes, 116, 1988, p. 264-271.

[B 115.]

Altheim, Franz - Stiehl, Ruth, Porphyrios und Empedokles, Tübingen: Niemeyer 1954.

– “New fragments of Greek Philosophers I: Empedocles, Democritus, Theophrastus in Arabic Translation,” East and West, 12, 1, 1961, p. 3-18.

Althoff, Jochen, “Presocratic discourse in poetry and prose: The case of Empedocles and Anaxagoras,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 43, 2, 2012, p. 293-299.

[B 6, B  8, B 11.] 

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0039368111001270

Amato, Eugenio, “Un discorso inedito di Procopio di Gaza: In Meletis et Antoninae Nuptias,” Revue des études tardo-antiques, 1, 2011-2012, p. 15-69.

[P. 48-56 - B 17, B 26, B 51, B 154, Papyrus Strasbourg.]

http://www.revue-etudes-tardo-antiques.fr/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/ret1amato.pdf

Ambrosano, Giovanna, “Cosmologia e daimonologia in Empedocle,” Incidenza dell'antico. Dialoghi di storia greca, 9, 2011, p. 101-121.

– “La respirazione empedoclea,” Anais de Filosofia Clássica, 6, 12, 2012, p. 6-38.

[Released in October 2014. B 100.]

http://www.revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/filosofiaclassica/article/view/594/1289

– “La relazione tra sensi e nous in Empedocle,” La parola del passato, 70, 1, 2015, p. 63-90.

Andò, Valeria, “Nestis o l’elemento acqua in Empedocle,” Kokalos, 28-29, 1982-3, p. 31-51.

[B 6, B 96.]

Andolfi, Ilaria, “Empedocles arbiter symposii: luxury, political equality, and bizarre dinner parties in fifth-century Acragas,” Histos, 14, 2020, p. 206-230.

[A 1.]

– “Designing a cosmic architecture: Craftsmanship in Empedocles’ poetry,” in: Teaching through images: Imagery in Greco-Roman didactic poetry, ed. J. Strauss Clay & A. Vergados, Leiden-Boston: Brill 2021, (Mnemosyne, Supplements, 450), p. 63-81.

[B 34, B 71, B 73, B 75, B 86, B 87, B 93, B 95, B 96, B 98.]

– “A grammar of self-referential statements: claims for authority from Hesiod to the Presocratics,” in: Hesiod and the beginnings of Greek philosophy, ed. L. Iribarren & H. Koning, Leiden-Bristol: Brill 2022, (Mnemosyne supplements, 455), p. 117-136.

[B 3, B 21, B 23, B 77, B 112, B 129.]

– “Doric features in Empedocles’ poetry,” Rivista di cultura classica e medioevale, 64, 2, 2022, p. 347-358.

[B 17, B 20, B 22, B 35, B 128, a(ii) 26-27.]

Andreus, H[ans?], Empedocles, de ander, Gravenhage: Stols 1955.

Andriopoulos, Démétrios Z., “Empedocles’ theory of perception,” Platon, 24, 1972, p. 290-298.

Angiò, Francesca., “Review of R. Laurenti, Empedocle (1999) and A. Martin & O. Primavesi, L’Empédocle de Strasbourg (1999),” Göttinger Forum für Altertumswissenschaft, 3, 2000, p. 1039-1041.

– “Review of R. Laurenti, Empedocle (1999),” Quaderni di storia, 52, 2000, p. 301-304.

– “Empedocle, P.Strasb. gr. Inv. 1665-1666, b3: una proposta di integrazione,” in: Πολυμάθεια. Studi Classici offerti a Mario Capasso, ed. P. Davoli & N. Pellé, Lecce - Bescia: Pensa Multimedia 2018, p. 121-123.

Anonymus, “Über die Bergdurchstechung des Empedokles in Akragas,” Beilage zur Augsburger allgemeinen Zeitung, 319 (15. Nov.], 1881, p. 4691-2.

Anonymus, “Empedocles,” The North British Review, 45/6, 1866, p. 420-440. Also “Art.VI.- Empedocles,” The North British Review, American edition, 45, December n° 90, 1866, p. 221-231.

[B 2, B 6, B 27, B 31, B 35, B 38, B 61, B 62, B 96, B 111, B 112, B 115, B 117, B 118, B 119, B 120, B 121, B 122, B 123, B 124, B 128, B 129, B 132, B 133, B 134, B 135, B 136, B 137, B 139, B 141, B 146, B 147. Epithets, metaphors. Apollo.]

Anonymus, I frammenti di Empedocle, Napoli: Stabilimento Industrie Editoriale Meridionali 1935.

Apelt, Ernst Friedrich, Parmenidis et Empedoclis doctrina de mundi structura, diss., Ienae: Sumptibus F. Maukii1857, p. 10-14.

Aquiliani, Scipione, Scipionis Aquiliani Pisani De Placitis Philosophorum, qui ante Aristotelis tempora floruerunt, Ad Principia Rerum Naturalium, & causas motuum assignandas pertinentibus, Venice: Giovanni Guerigli (Ioannem Guerilium) 1620. Reprint in same place: 1621. Reprint: Leipzig 1756.

[Emp. Cap. XXII (p. 102): Quot & quæ fuerint Empedocli principia rerum; Cap. XXIII (p. 111): Quæ Empedocles de ijsdem principijs dixerit; Cap. XXIV (p. 121): Quæ iuxta Empedoclis opinionem de generatione & corruptione alijsque motus speciebus dicenda videantur.]

Arata, Luigi, “Sul frammento 100 D.-K. di Empedocle,” Studi classici e orientali, 45, 1995, p. 65-84.

[B 100.]

Arena, Renato, “Ἀμόρβος, ἀμορβεῖν,” Rendiconti (Lett., Istituto Lombardo), 111, 1977, p. 285-302.

[Useful for B 84.3.]

Arieti, James, A., “Empedocles in Rome: Rape and the Roman ethos,” Clio, 10, 1, 1980, p. 5-20.

Arcellashi, André, “Empedoclea - Terentia ou la ruelle de la rhétorique,” Helmantica, 50, 1999, p. 45-55.

Armstrong, David & Ponczoch Joseph A., “[Philodemus] On Wealth (PHerc. 1570 Cols. VI-XX, Pcc. 4-6a): New fragments of Empedocles, Menander, and Epicurus,” Cronache Ercolanesi. Bollettino del Centro Internazionale per lo Studio dei Papiri Ercolanesi, 2011, 41, p. 97-138.

– “Empedocles and Philodemus in PHerc. 1570, col. VI 9-19,” Cronache Ercolanesi, 43, 2013, p. 113-116.

Arseniev, Arseni, “Empedocles - philosophical and medical views,” Asklepios, II (XXI), 2008, p. 77-82.

Arundel, Maureen Rosemary (= M. R. Wright), “Empedocles fr. 35.12-15,” The Classical Review, 12, 2, 1962, p. 109-111.

[B 35.]

– An Interpretation of Empedocles, diss., University of Oxford 1963.

– “'Principio Caelum' (Aeneid VI. 724-751),” Proceedings of the Virgil Society, 3, 1963-1964, p. 27-34.

[B 38.4., B 134.]

http://virgil.vacau.com/?page_id=260 http://virgil.vacau.com/pvs/1963/full.pdf?

Asheri, David, “Agrigenti libera: Rivolgimenti interni e problemi constituzionali ca. 471 - 446 a. C.,” Athenaeum, 68, 1990, p. 482-501.

Ashton, Susannah, “Chance, relativity, and Empedocles’ cycle(s) of time,” in: Conceptions of time in Greek and Roman Antiquity, ed. R. Faure, S.-P. Valli & A. Zucker, Berlin-Boston: W. de Gruyter 2022, p. 49-77.

[B 30, B 62, scholia Aristotle.]

Asín Palacios, Miguel, The mystical philosophy of Ibn Masarra and his followers, translated by E. H. Douglas and H. W. Yoder, first published as Abenmasarra y su escuela, Orígenes de la filosofía hispaño-musulmana, Madrid, 1914, Leiden: Brill 1978.

[P. 43-72: Pseudo-Empedoclean doctrine of Ibn Masarra, Historical criticism of the Pseudo-Empedoclean system.]

Atanasijevič, Ksenija, “Empedokle iz Agrigenta,” Misao, 7/131-2, 1925, p. 699-702 and 891-905.

– “Empedoklovi religijski fragmenti,” in: Kalendar Vreme (Beograd 1925), p. 64-65.

Athanassakis, Apostolos, N. & Benjamin, M. Wolkow, The Orphic Hymns, translation, introduction, and notes by A. N. A. & B. M. W., Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press 2013.

[Emp. on Ether, Fates, Moon, Hephaistos, Fire, Sun.]

Attilio Piovano, G., “Review of Ettore Bignone. I poeti filosofi della Grecia, Empedocle, 1916,” Athenaeum, 6, 1918, p. 76-82.

Aubin, Nicholas, “Natural teleology versus material determinism and chance: Al-'Āmirī against Empedocles and Galen on nature and soul,” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 59, 3, 2021, p. 429-456.

[Anbāduqlīs. Empedocles arabus. Cf. De Smet.]

Aubry, Gwenaëlle, “Démon et intériorité d’Homère à Plotin : esquisse d’une histoire,” in: Le moi et l’intériorité, G. Aubry & F. Ildefonse, Paris: J. Vrin 2008, p. 255-268.

[Emp.: p. 259-260.]

Avanesov, Sergey, (Аванесов, С. С.), “Эмпедокл: божественность и самоубийство,” ΣΧΟΛΗ, 1, 2, 2007, p. 147-171.

[A 16, B 3, B 114, B 115, B 126, B 127, B 129, B 120, B 146.]

Azevedo, Cristiane A. de, “Uma questão de saber: thymós e nóos em Parmênides e Empédocles,” Anais de Filosofia Clássica, VI, 11, 2012, p. 63-77. 

 http://www.revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/FilosofiaClassica/article/view/353/546

– “Parmênides e Empédocles: entre as sensações e o intelecto,” Anais de Filosofia Clássica, 10, 19, 2016,

 https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/FilosofiaClassica/article/view/5071/4024

BBB

Babut, Daniel, La religion des philosophes grecs : de Thalès aux Stoïciens, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France 1974, (Collection SUP, Littératures anciennes, 4), p. 34-42.

– “Sur l’unité de la pensée d’Empédocle,” Philologus, 120, 1976, p. 139-164. 

[B 21, B 115, B 116, B 118, B 120, B 126, B 128, B 136, B 137, B 139, B 146, B 147, B 148.]

Bacigalupo, Maria Vittoria, “Teriomorfismo e trasmigrazione,” Filosofia, rivista trimestrale (Torino), 16.2, 1965, p. 267-290.

[Emp.: p. 278-280.]

Bachelard, Gaston, La psychanalyse du feu, Paris: Gallimard 1949.

[Emp., p. 31-40, 'Le complexe d’Empédocle'.]

Bader, Françoise, “Autour de Polyphème le Cyclope à l’œil brillant : diathèse et vision,” Die Sprache, 30, 2, 1984, p. 109-137.

[B 84.]

– “Introduction à l’étude des mythes indo-européens de la vision : les Cyclopes,” in : Studi indoeuropei, ed. E. Campanile, Pisa: Giardini 1985, (Testi linguistici, 8), p. 9-50.

[B 84.]

– “De Pollux ä Deukalion: la racine *deu-k- "briller, voir",” in: O-o-pe-ro-si: Festschrift für Ernst Risch zum 75. Geburtstag, ed. A. Etter, Berlin-New York: W. de Gruyter 1986, p. 463-488.

Bader, Nico & Marie-Anne de Roode, Pythagoras Foundation Newsletter. No.28. March 2023. http://www.stichting-pythagoras.nl/

Baeumker, Clemens, Das Problem der Materie in der griechischen Philosophie, Münster: Aschendorff 1890.

[Emp.: p. 67-72.]

Badolati, Giuseppe S., “Empedocle di Agrigento: l’uomo, il medico, l’ambiente,” in: Index Empedocleus, Genova 1991, I.37-48.

Baestlein, Albert, “Quid Lucretius debuerit Empedocli Agrigentino,” in: Jahresbericht des Königlichen Preussischen Hennebergischen Gymnasiums zu Schleusingen, Meiningen: Druck der Keyssner’schen Hofbuchdruckerei 1875, p. 1-21.

[Printed also under the title Quid debeat Lucretius Empedocli Agrigentino.]

Baffioni, Carmela, “Una storia della filosofia greca nell’Islam del XII. secolo (Muhammad ibn ‘Abd al-Karím aš-Šahrastání), II: Anassagora ed Empedocle,” Elenchos, 3, 1982, p. 87-107 (Roma 1983).

Bailey D. M., A catalogue of the lamps in the British Museum, 1, Greek, Hellenistic, and early Roman pottery lamps, London: British Museum Publications 1975.

[Useful for B 84. P. 225-227, 294-299, plate 98, Q 495, Q 496.]

Bakhouche, Béatrice, “Les citations d’Empédocle chez Calcidius,” Ítaca : quaderns catalans de cultura clàssica, 28-29, 2013, p. 45-62. On-line:

http://publicacions.iec.cat/repository/pdf/00000199%5C00000005.pdf

– “Quelques remarques sur les présocratiques à Rome : la figure d’Empédocle de Cicéron à Saint Augustin,” Revue des Études Tardo-antiques, IV, 3, 2014, p. 53-71.

– “Empedocles latinus : citations et traductions latines de fragments empédocléens,” Anais de Filosofia Clássica, 6, 12, 2012, p. 56-67. Released in October 2014.

http://www.revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/FilosofiaClassica/article/view/1453/1294

[B 90, B 105, B 109, B 117, B 121.]

Bakhuizen van den Brink, Regnerus Cornelius (Reinier Cornelis), Disputatio literaria inauguralis continens varias lectiones ex historia philosophiae antiquae etc., H. W. Hazenberg, Lugduni-Batavorum, 1842.

[P. 31-35. B 115.6.]

Bakker, C., “Iets over den invloed van Empedokles en Aristoteles op de geneeskunde en de magie bij de oude Grieken en Romeinen,” Bijdragen tot de Geschiedenis der Geneeskunde = Uitgave van het Nederlandisch Tijdschrift voor Genneskunde, 10, 1930, p. 29-44.

[A 145.]

Balaudé, Jean-François, (1992) Le Démon et la communauté des vivants. Étude de la tradition d’interprétation antique des Catharmes d’Empédocle, de Platon à Porphyre, diss., Lille III 1992.

– (1997) “Parenté du vivant et végétarisme radical : le ‘défi’ d’Empédocle,” in: L’Animal dans l’antiquité, ed. B. Cassin - J.-L. Labarrière, dir. G. Romeyer-Dherbey, Paris: J. Vrin 1997, p. 31-53.

[B 2, B 16, B 22, B 115, B 117, B 124, B 135, B 136.]

– (1999) “[Notes de la Vie d’] Empédocle,” in: Diogène Laërce. Vies et doctrines des philosophes illustres, Paris: Le Livre de Poche 1999, (Classiques modernes. La Pochothèque), p. 980-1002, 1022-1023.

[A 1.]

– (2002) Le Vocabulaire des Présocratiques, Paris: Ellipses 2002.

[B 2, B 3, B 6, B 17, B 23, B 27, B 35, B 89, B 114, B 115, B 134, B 135, B 136, B 139.]

– (2005) “Empédocle d’Agrigente,” in: Le Dictionnaire de l’Antiquité, ed. Jean Leclant, Paris: Les Presses Universitaires de France 2005, p. 785-789.

[A general sketch of Emp. teaching which is based on J. Bollack’s theories from Sixties.]

– (2010) Le Savoir-vivre philosophique : Empédocle, Socrate, Platon, Paris: Grasset et Fasquelle 2010, (Le collège de philosophie).

[Emp.: p. 87-128. Chap. 4. La réflexion éthique avant Socrate : les Catharmes d'Empédocle, (a) les deux poèmes et le papyrus de Strasbourg (p. 87-91), (b) les démons, et leurs significations (p. 92-104). – Chap. 5. Refonder la communauté humaine : le végétarisme radical d’Empédocle (p. 105-128: a reprint of “Parenté du vivant et végétarisme radical: le “défi” d’Empédocle,” with little modifications or improvements). B 2, B 8, B 16, B 17, B 112, B 115, B 117, B 120, B 122, B 123, B 127, B 128, B 136, B 137, B 139, B 151.]

– (2010) France Culture – Les nouveaux chemins de la connaissance : Préhistoires de la pensée 3/5 : Empédocle (10-11-2010).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yPLmHJrymhI

Baloyannis, Stavros, J., “Empedocles: Neurophilosophy and neurosciences- prophecy and reality,” Journal of neurology & Stroke, 1, 6, 2014, 00037. p. 1-5.

http://medcraveonline.com/JNSK/JNSK-01-00037.php

– “Empedocles and Neurosciences,” Encephalos, 51, 2014, p. 66-78.

http://www.encephalos.gr/pdf/51-4-01e.pdf

Ball, Philip, The elements: A very short introduction, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004, (Very short introductions).

– The elements: A visual history of their discovery, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press 2021.

Baltussen, Han, (2006) “An Empedoclean ‘Hearing aid’? Fragment B 99 revisited,” Méthexis, 19, 2006.

[B 99.]

– (2008) Philosophy and exegesis in Simplicius: The methodology of a commentator, London: Duckworth 2008.

[London-New Delhi-New York-Sydney: Bloomsbury 2008. Chap. 2.2.2 Emp.: p. 74-78, 165. B 17, B 21, B 22, B 24, B 109, B 115, B 134.]

– (2015) “Simplicius on elements and causes in Greek philosophy: critical appraisal or philosophical synthesis?,” in: Causation and creation in late Antiquity, ed. A. Marmodoro & B. P. Prince, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2015, p. 111-128.

[B 6.]

– (2019) “Theophrastus’ De sensibus in the A-fragments of Diels-Kranz. Revisiting the Testimonia and their Value,” Rhizomata, 7, 2, 2019, (Special Issue: Topics in Theophrastus’ De sensibus), p. 120-145.

Baltussen, Han, M. Share, M. Atkinson & I. Mueller, Simplicius. On Aristotle, Physics 1.5-9, translated by B. H et al., with an Introduction by R. Sorabji, London-New Delhi - New York - Sydney: Bloomsbury 2012, (Ancient Commentators on Aristotle).

[Simplicius p. 179.20 - 257.30; B 8, B 17.]

Baltzer, Eduard, “Empedokles, eine Studie,” Athenaeum, 2-4, 1876, p. 159-165 and 203-207.

– Empedocles, eine Studie zur Philosophie der Griechen, Leipzig: Oscar Eigendorf 1879.

[More or less the reprint of the previous article plus a translation of the B fragments. [+  +].]

Βαμβακάς, Κ., Οι θεμελιωτές της δυτικής σκέψης : ένας διαχρονικός παραλληλισμός μεταξύ προσωκρατικού στοχασμού, φιλοσοφίας και φυσικής επιστήμης, Ηράκλειο : Πανεπιστημιακές εκδόσεις Κρήτης, 2001.

[P. 341-409 (Εμπεδοκλής).]

Barbanti, Maria, “Empedocle in Plotino e in Porfirio,” Giornale di metafisica, 21, 1999, p. 217-233.

[B 105, B 115, B 120, B 126, B 128, B 129, B 139.]

Barberius, Iosephus, “D. Josephi Barberii De miseria poetarum Graecarum liber,” in: Thesaurus Graecarum antiquitatum, Volumen decimum, Lugduni Batavorum 1701, p. 814-851. (Emp.: p. 822-3: very superficial biography of Emp. plus some enumeration of sources.]

Bargrave-Weaver, D., “The Cosmogony of Anaxagoras,” Phronesis, 4, 2, 1959, p. 77-91.

[B 38, fire, air, ether.]

Barker, Andrew, “Empedocles Mousikos,” in: Musica, culti e riti nell’Occidente greco, ed. A. Bellia, Pisa - Roma: Istituti editoriali e poligrafici internazionali 2014, p. 87-94.

[B 17.]

Barnes, Hazel Estella., “Unity in the thought of Empedocles,” The Classical Journal, 63, 1967, p. 18-23.

Barnes, Jonathan, (1979) The Presocratic philosophers, II, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul 1979, (The arguments of the philosophers).

[Emp.: p. 161-201. – Revised edition in one volume in 1982, Emp.: p. 308-317, p. 418-423, p. 477-504, p. 536-538. An extensive translation of B fragments and their contexts. Reprint in London-New York: Routledge 1999, 2000, 2001. [+  +].]

– (1987) (Early Greek philosophy, London: Penguin Books 1987, (Penguin Classics). Revised edition London: Penguin Books 2001.

[[ + ].]

– (1982) “Review of Wright, Empedocles: The extant fragments, 1981,” The Classical Review, 32.2, 1982, p. 191-196.

[Important.]

– (1983) “Brief review of D. O’Brien, Pour interpréter Empédocle, 1981,” Greece and Rome, 30, 1, 1983, p. 103.

– (1993) “Review of Index Empedocleus, 1991, by Imbraguglia, Badolati, Morchio, Battegazzore, Messina,” The Classical Review, 43.1, 1993, p. 165.

Baron, Christopher A., Timaeus of Tauromenium and hellenistic historiography, Cambridge - New York: Cambridge Univeristy Press 2013.

[Emp.: p. 164-169. B 129.]

Barros, Nayra, Sousa & Rafael, César Pitt, “A presença de elementos míticos na filosofia de Empédocles. Mythic elements in Empedocle’s philosophy,” Investigação Filosófica, 11, 1, 2020, p. 105-114.

https://periodicos.unifap.br/index.php/investigacaofilosofica/article/view/5575/pdf

Barrio Gutiérrez, José, Empédocles: Sobre la naturaleza de los seres. Las purificaciones, Buenos Aires: Aguilar 1964 (19813), (Biblioteca de iniciación filosófica, 90).

Bartolini Niccolini, Olga, “De T. Lucretio Caro,” Latinitas, 3, 1955, p. 280-286.

Bartoš, Hynek, “Nesmrtelná PSYCHÉ a putující DAIMÓN [The immortal Psyché and the wandering Daimón],” Reflexe, 29, 2005, p. 27-57.

https://www.reflexe.cz/Reflexe_29/Nesmrtelna_psyche_a_putujici_daimon.html#84

[Emp.: p. 43-56. A solid analysis of the Empedoclean conception of wandering “daimôn” and reincarnation on basis of the contemporary sources and theories; the text is written in Czech, summaries in English and German. B 59, B 115.]

– Philosophy and Dietetics in the Hippocratic On Regimen: a delicate balance of health, Leiden-Boston: Brill, 2015, (Studies in ancient medicine, 44).

[B 8, B 17, plus p. 197-198, Jouanna.]

Baskevitch, François, La théorie de l'audition chez Empédocle, Academia.edu 2012.

https://www.academia.edu/8108869/La_théorie_de_laudition_chez_Empédocle_et_les_présocratiques

[B 99.]

Battegazzore, Antonio Mario, “Il linguaggio di Empedocle,” in: Index Empedocleus, ed. G. Imbraguglia, Genova 1991, I.69-80.

– “La magia della parola in Empedocle e Gorgia,” Giornale di metafisica, 21, 1-2, 1999, p. 67-99.

Battistini, Yves, “Empédocle,” Revue Empédocle, 1, 1949, p. 55-60.

– “Les Purifications,” Revue Empédocle, 1, 1949, p. 61-66.

– Trois contemporains : Héraclite, Parménide, Empédocle, Paris: Gallimard 1955, p. 115-191; corrected reedition: Trois présocratiques: Héraclite, Parménide, Empédocle, Paris: Gallimard 1965, 19682, 19883. [A free translation of the B fragments. [+  +].]

– Empédocle, Légende et œuvre : Sur la nature, Purifications, Texte intégral, présentation, traduction et notes Y. B., Paris: Imprimerie nationale Éditions 1997, (La Salamandre).

[+  +].

Baumann, Hermann, Das doppelte Geschlecht. Ethnologische Studien zur Bisexualität in Ritus uns Mythos, Berlin: Dietrich Reimer 1955.

[P. 179-180 : influence of Empedoclean conception of bisexuality on Aristophanes’ mythus in Plato’s Symposion. P. 304-307 : Empedoclean theory about influence of left and right sides of body on generation.]

Bauer, Johannes Bapt., “'Μονίη' Empedokles B 27.4 und 28.3,” Hermes, 89, 1961, p. 361-369.

Baxter, Timothy M. S., The Cratylus: Plato’s critique of naming, Leyde: Brill 1992, p. 122-124.

[B 6.]

Beardslee Jr, John Walter, The use of ΦΥΣΙΣ in fifth-century Greek Literature, Diss. University of Chicago, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1918.

[B 8, B 63, B 110.]

Beare, John Isaac, Greek theories of elementary cognition: from Alcmaeon to Aristotle, Oxford 1906, p. 13-21 and 95-99.

[A 86.]

Becker, Otfrid, Das Bild des Weges und verwandte Vorstellungen im frühgriechischen Denken, Berlin: Weidmann 1937, (Hermes Einzelschriften, 4).

[P. 147-150.]

Βέϊκος, Θ. [see also Veikos], Οι προσωκρατικοί, Αθήνα: Ελληνικά γράμματα 1998.

[P. 165-183: Εμπεδοκλής.]

Belloni, Luigi, “Aspetti dell'antica ΣΟΦΙΑ in Apollonio de Tiana,” Aevum, 54, 1, 1980, p. 140-149. (Vita e Pensiero).

Bénatouïl, Thomas, “Mouvements et vie chez Aristote : quelques remarques « autour » des plantes,” Anais de filosofia clássica, 13, 25, 2019, p. 1-20. 

https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/FilosofiaClassica/article/view/26083/15987

Benitez, Rick, “Plato and the secularisation of Greek theology,” in: Theologies of ancient Greek religion, ed. Kindt, J., Eidinow, E. & Osboclaudiarne, R., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2016, p. 301-316.

Benn Alfred, William, Early Greek philosophy, London: Constable 1914.

[Emp.: p. 57-64.]

Bennett, John, Empedocles the poet: His style and metre, diss., Trinity College, Dublin 1940.

Benson, J. L., Greek color theory and the four elements: a cosmological interpretation, Amherst: University of Massachusetts Libraries, 2000.

http://scholarworks.umass.edu/art_jbgc/1/  http://www.library.umass.edu/benson/jbgcimages.html

[Emp.: p. 21-24, A 69a, A 86, A 92, B 21, B 94, B 67, B 71, B 23.]

Benzi, Nicolo, “Chapter 4: Empedocles, the divine poet,” in: Philosophy in verse: Competition and early Greek philosophical thought, Diss., Durham University, 2016, p. 121-154.

http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/11568/

[B 17.]

– “The redefinition of poetic authority in early Greek philosophical poetry,” Dialogues d’histoire ancienne, 44, 2, 2018, p. 15-41.

[Emp.: p. 31-37. Muse. B 3, B 112, B 115, B 131.]

Bercovitch, Sacvan, “Empedocles in the English Renaissance,” Studies in Philology, 65, 1, 1968, p. 67-80.

Bergemann, Lutz, “Transformation und Konstruktion: Empedokles als 'religious atomist' und exemplum eines 'true system' of the universe,” in: Ralph Cudworth - System aus Transformation: zur Naturphilosophie der Cambridge Platonists und ihrer Methode, Berlin-Boston (Mass.): Walter de Gruyter 2012, p. 99-114.

Bergk, Theodor, (1835) “Schedae criticae. Fasciculus II,” Zeitschrift für die Alterthumswissenschaft, 39, 1835, p. 313-320.

[P. 313 = B 17, p. 314 = B 123.]

– (1836) “De scolio Pindari in Xenophontem Corinthium dissertatio et coniecturae in poetas graecos,” in: Acta Societatis Graecae 1, Lipsiae 1836, p. 187-208.

[Emp.: p. 203-207. Reprint in De locis quibusdam Empedocleis, 1886. B 2, B 3, B 17, B 27, B 42, B 82, B 100, B112, B 136.]

– “(1837) Coniectanea non reiectanea,” Zeitschrift für die Alterthumswissenschaft, 54-5, 1837, p. 447-452.

– (1839) “Commentatio de Prooemio Empedoclis,” in: Ankündigungschrift... des Königlichen Joachimsthalschen Gymnasiums, September 28 1839, diss., Berlin: Gedruckt in der Druckerei der Königl. Akademie der Wissenschaften 1839, p. 1-34. (= in: Kleine philologische Schriften, II, zur griechischen Literatur, ed. R. Peppmüller, Halle: Verlag der Buchhandlung des Waisenhauses 1886, p. 8-43. [+  +].]

– (1842) “Review of Karsten’s Empedocles, 1838,” Zeitschrift für die Alterthumswissenschaft, 97, 1842, October, p. 1001-1011. (= Kleine philologische Schriften, II, ed. R. Peppmüller, Halle 1886, p. 45-59.]

– (1843) “Empedocles,” in: Poetae lyrici Graeci, Leipzig: Reichenbach 1843, chap. XVI, p. 431 (1853, Chap. 23, p. 468). (B 156, B 157.]

– (1844) “Commentationum criticarum specimen II,” in: Indices lectionum et publicarum et privatarum, quae in Academia Marburgensi per semestre hibernum anno 1844-5, Marburgi 1844, p. ii-iv (= Kleine philologische Schriften, II, ed. R. Peppmüller, Halle 1886, p. 43-45).

– (1853)“Review of Stein,” Neue Jahrbücher für Philologie und Pädagogik, 68/23, 1853, p. 21-26. (= in: Kleine philologische Schriften, II, zur griechischen Literatur, ed. R. Peppmüller, Halle: Verlag der Buchhandlung des Waisenhauses 1886, p. 59-66.)

[Emp.: p. 203-207. B 2, B 3, B 17, B 27, B 42, B 82, B 100, B112, B 136.]

– (1870) “Philologische Thesen, zweite Centurie, Schluss,” Philologus, 29, 1870, p. 319-330.

[P. 320]. (= Reprint in: Kleine philologische Schriften, II, zur griechischen Literatur, ed. R. Peppmüller, Halle: Verlag der Buchhandlung des Waisenhauses 1886, p. 738-760.]

[Item 60: B 98. Item 61: B 21.3-6.]

– (1886) “De locis quibusdam Empedocleis,” in: Kleine philologische Schriften, II, zur griechischen Literatur, ed. R. Peppmüller, Halle: Verlag der Buchhandlung des Waisenhauses 1886, II, p. 3-7. (Previously published in “De scolio Pindari in Xenophontem Corinthium dissertatio et coniecturae in poetas graecos,” in: Acta Societatis Graecae 1, Lipsiae 1836, p. 187-208).

– (1888) Commentationum de reliquiis comoediae atticae antiquae, Lipsiae 1888.

[B 105, B 137 etc.]

Bernabé Pajares, Alberto, (1979) “Los filósofos presocráticos como autores literarios,” Emerita, 47, 1979, p. 357-394.

– (1997) “Lo uno y lo múltiple en la especulación presocrática: nociones, modelos y relaciones,” Taula, 27-28, 1997, p. 75-99.

– (1998) “Hom. ἀμφίβροτος y mic. a-pi-qo-to, ¿un caso de etimología popular?,” in: Corolla Complutensis. In memoriam J. S. Lasso de la Vega, ed. L. Gil et al., Madrid: Editorial Complutense 1998, p. 39-48.

[B 148.]

– (2000) “La física de Empédocles y Anaxágoras,” in: Ciencia y cultura en la grecia antigua, clásica y helenística,” in: Actas años vi y vii, Fundación Canaria Orotava de Historia de la Ciencia, 2000, p. 71-95.

http://www.gobiernodecanarias.org/educacion/3/Usrn/fundoro/archivos%20adjuntos/publicaciones/actas/actas_6_7_pdf/Act.VI-VII_C004_txi_w.pdf

– (2001) De Tales a Demócrito. Fragmentos presocráticos. Introducción, traducción y notas de A.B., Madrid: Alianza Editorial 2001², (Biblioteca temática, 8241).

[Emp.:.p. 181-242, 327-340. First edition 1988. 3rd edition: 2008. [+  +].]

– (2002) “Orphisme et Présocratiques : bilan et perspectives d’un dialogue complexe,” in: Qu’est-ce que la philosophie présocratique ? What is presocratic philosophy?, ed. A. Laks & C. Louguet, Villeneuve d’Ascq: Presses universitaires du Septentrion 2002, p. 205-247.

[B 6.]

– (2004) Textos órficos y filosofía presocrática: Materiales para una comparación. Madrid: Editorial Trotta 2004, (Estructuras y procesos, Filosofia).

– (2004) Poeta Epici Graeci, Testimonia et fragmenta, Pars II, Orphicorum et Ophicis Similium. Testimonia et Fragmenta, Fasc. I, Munich-Leipzig: Saur 2004.

[B 112, B 146-147, B 115, B 126, B 117, B 118, B 148.]

– (2013) “Eἶδος en los filósofos presocráticos,” in: Τη γλωσσα μου εδωσαν ελληνικη. Homenaje a la profesora Penélope Stavrianopulu, ed. F. García Romero et al., Berlin: Logos 2013, p. 91-104.

– (2013) Los filósofos presocráticos: literatura, lengua y visión del mundo, Madrid: Ediciones Evohé 2013.

[B 22, B 23, B 27, B 71, B 73, B 98, B 115, B 125.]

– (2019) “Vegetarianismo en la Grecia antigua,” Mare nostrum, 10, 1, 2019, p. 31-53.

http://www.revistas.usp.br/marenostrum

[B 115, B 117, B 136, B 137, B 139.]

– (2019) Fragmentos presocráticos. Edición bilingüe de los textos, selección de testimonios, introducciones y notas de A. B. Madrid: Abada Editores 2019.

[Emp.: p. 293-374. Based on Graham 2010 and Diels-Kranz. Published in 2019, but does not take into account new things after 2008. [+  +].]

– (2020) “¿A quiénes se refiere Heródoto 2.123?,” in: Deisidaimonía. Religiosidad y superstición en la Grecia Antigua. Homenaje al profesor Emilio Suárez de la Torre, ed. J.-M Nieto Ibáñez & Á. Ruiz Pérez, Bern: Peter Lang Publishing 2020, p. 309-331.

[B 115, B 117.]

Bernabé, Alberto & Jiménez San Cristóbal, Ana Isabel, Instrucciones para el más allá: las laminillas órficas de oro, Madrid: Ediciones Clásicas 2001.

[P. 193-194: B6; p. 195: B25.]

– Instructions for the netherworld: the orphic gold tablets, translated by Michael Chase, Leiden-Boston: Brill 2008, (Religions in the Graeco-Roman World, 162).

[P. 16: B 129; p. 39: B 114, B 121; p. 65: B 115, B 132; p. 44, 84: B 119; p. 109: B 115; p. 118: B 17, B 26, B 35, B 38; p. 119: B 115; p. 145, 148, 149, 192, 193: B6; p. 146: B 22; p. 173: B 112.]

Bernays, Jacob, Theophrastos' Schrift über Frömmigkeit. Ein Beitrag zur Religionsgeschichte, Berlin, Wilhelm Hertz 1866.

[B 128: p. 79-81, 95-96, 117-179.]

Bersano, Arturo, “Review of E. Bignone, I poeti della Grecia - Empedocle, 1916,” Rivista di filologia e di istruzione classica, 44, 1916, p. 569-574,

Berti, Enrico, “Conclusioni,” Giornale di Metafisica, Nuova Serie, XXI, 1999, p. 243-250.

Bertini, Giovanni Maria, “Dottrine religiose di Empedocle,” Atti della reale Accademia delle scienze di Torino, 4, 1868-1869, p. 675-682.

[Superficial study dealing [a] on Love, B 132 - B 134, B 31: she should be the highest god of Empedocles’ system; [b] on transmigration, B 115, B 117, B 146: some unoriginal theses; [c] on the theory of cognition, B 2 - B 4: the senses are untrustworthy, the only one criterion of cognition is a reason; [d] Alleged eclecticism of Empedocles.]

– La filosofia greca prima di Socrate, esposizione storico-critica, Torino: Stamperia Reale 1869.

[Emp.: p. 233-256.]

Berve, Helmut & Gottfried Gruben, I templi greci, Florence: G. C. Sansoni 1962.

[B 6, Nestis, p. 248.]

Berz, Peter, “Respondenz zu Oliver Primavesi 'Tetraktys und Göttereid',” in: Götter und Schriften rund ums Mittelmeer, ed. Friedrich Kittler, Peter Berz, Joulia Strauss, Peter Weibel, zusammen mit Gerhard Scharbert, Parderborn: Wilhelm Fink 2017, p. 317-410.

Betegh, Gábor, (1999) “A strasbourgi Empedoklész-papirusz,” Magyar Tudományos Akadémia Filozófiai Bizottságának folyóirata, 6, 1999.

http://epa.oszk.hu/00100/00186/00005/996_betegh.html

– (2001) “Empédocle, Orphée et le papyrus de Derveni,” in: Les anciens savants: études sur les philosophies préplatoniciennes, réunies par Pierre-Marie Morel et Jean-François Pradeau, Strasbourg: Université Marc Bloch 2001, (Les Cahiers philosophiques de Strasbourg, 12), p. 47-70.

[B 17, B 26, B 27, B 111, B 112, B 115, B 117, B 127, B 140, B 136, B 137, B 139, d MP.]

– (2004) The Derveni Papyrus: Cosmology, Theology and Interpretation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2004.

[P. 370-372: Empedocles and Orpheus; B 21, B 111, B 112, B 115.]

– (2006) “Eschatology and cosmology: models and problems,” in: La costruzione del discorso filosofico nell’età dei Presocratici / The Construction of Philosophical Discourse in the Age of the Presocratics, ed. M. M. Sassi, Pisa: Edizioni della Normale 2006, p. 27-50.

[P. 45-46: B 105, B 115.]

– (2020) “Fire, heat, and motive force in early Greek philosophy and medicine,” in: Heat, pneuma, and soul in ancient philosophy and science, ed. Hynek Bartoš & Colin Guthrie King, Cambridge-New York: Cambridge University Press 2020, p. 35-60.

[Emp.: p. 41-43; A 37, A 70, B 62.]

– (2021) “Thinking with Empedocles: Aristotle on the soul as harmonia,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 59, 2021, p. 1-44.

[B 96.]

Betegh, Gábor & Pavel Gregorić, “God’s relation to the cosmos (Chapter 6),” in: Pseudo-Aristotle: De Mundo (On the Cosmos). A commentary, ed. Pavel G. & G. Karamanolis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2020, p. 176-212.

[B 21.]

Bett, Richard, Arnot, (trans.), Sextus Empiricus. Against the Logicians. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2005, (Cambridge texts in the history of philosophy).

[A 1, B 109, B 110.10.]

– (trans.), Sextus Empiricus. Against the Physicists. Translated and edited by R. B., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2012.

[B 6, B 17.18-20, B 136, B 137. Conflates roots and elements.]

– (trans.), Sextus Empiricus. Against those in the disciplines, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2018.

[B 109, B 112.4-5, B 113.]

Bianchi, Emanuela (ed.), Sara Brill (ed.) & Brooke Holmes (ed.), Antiquities beyond humanism, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2019, (Classics in Theory).

[B 6, B 115, B 117.]

Bianchi, Ugo, “Péché originel et péché « antécédent »,” Revue de l’histoire des religions, 170, 2, 1966, p. 17-126.

– Selected essays on gnosticism, dualism and mysteriosophy, Leiden: E. J. Brill 1978, (Studies in the history of religions; 38).

[B 109, B 115, B 126.]

– “L’anima in Origene e la questione della metensomatosi,” Augustinianum, 26, 1/2, 1986, p. 33-50.

Bicknell, Peter James., “The Shape of the cosmos in Empedocles,” La Parola del Passato, 23, 1968, p. 118-119.

[A 501, A 47.]

Bidez, Joseph, La Biographie d’Empédocle, Gand: Clemm 1894. Reprint: Hildesheim - New York: Olms 1973.

– “Observations sur quelques fragments d’Empédocle et de Parménide,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 9, 1896, p. 190-207 (§ XIII), p. 298-309 (§ XVII).

[B 2, B 3, B 4, B 21, B 23, B 71, B 110, B 111.]

Bidez, Joseph & Cumont, Franz, Les Mages hellénisés. Zoroastre, Ostanès et Hystaspe d’après la tradition grecque, Tome I- Introduction, Tome II- Les Textes, Paris: Les Belles Lettres 1938. Reprint in a single volume in 2007, by Les Belles Lettres, (Collection d’études anciennes, 134, série grecque).

[A 145, 7-8. P. 238-240.]

Biedrzyński, Dawid, “Pojęcie harmonii w filozofii empedoklesa,” IDEA – Studia nad strukturą i rozwojem pojęć filozoficznych, 26, 2014, p. 5-18,

https://www.infona.pl/resource/bwmeta1.element.desklight-53681f6b-b3b6-449f-8aea-195bff1b9552

Bierl, Anton, “'Riddles over riddles', 'mysterious' and 'symbolic' (inter)textual strategies, the problem of language in the Derveni Papyrus,” in: Poetry as initiation - The Center for Hellenic studies symposium on the Derveni Papyrus, ed. I. Papadopoulou & L. Muellner, Cambridge (Ma)-London: Harvard University Press, 2014, p. 187-210.

Biès, Jean, “Empédocle et l’Orient,” Bulletin de l’Association G. Budé, 27, 4, 1968, p. 365-403.

[Disputable comparison between Emp. and Indian sources plus a very free translation of some fragments.]

– (1969) Empédocle d’Agrigente, Paris, Éditions Traditionnelles 1969 (19772, 20033).

[“Frère des chamanes, devins, voyants, bardes errants, Empédocle est le plus “hindou” des présocratiques. L’auteur découvre dans l’œuvre d’étranges rapprochements avec la cosmologie, la métaphysique et les ascèses des Orients traditionnels. L’ouvrage s’achève sur une traduction inédite et annotée des fragments.” http://www.cgjung.net/jbies/index.htm. [+  +].]

– (2010) Empédocle. Philosophie présocratique et spiritualité orientale, Paris: Éditions Almora 2010, (Chemins de flammes).

[[+  +].]

Bignone, Ettore, (1906) “Review of Emilio Bodrero. Il principio fondamentale del sistema di Empedocle, 1905,” Rivista di filologia e di istruzione classica, 34, 1906, p. 613-616.

– (1915) “Empedocle ed Epicuro,” Bolletino di filologia classica, 21, 1915, p. 156-161.

– (1916) “Due versi di Arato attribuiti erroneamente ad Empedocle,” Bolletino di filologia classica, 22, 1916, p. 151-152.

[B 154b.]

– (1916) Empedocle: Studio critico, traduzione e commento delle testimonianze e dei frammenti, Torino: Fratelli Bocca 1916, (Il pensiero greco, 11). (Roma: "L’Erma" di Bretschneider 19632).

[[+  +].]

– (1918) “La teoria del peso in Empedocle ed Anassagora,” Bolletino di filologia classica, 24, 1918, p. 97-100.

– (1929) “Ennio ed Empedocle,” Rivista di filologia e di istruzione classica, 57, 1929, p. 10-30; reprinted in Studi sul pensiero antico, Napoli: L. Loffredo 1938, chap. 7, p. 327-355, Roma: L’Erma di Bretschneider 19652).

[On alleged Empedoclean content of Ennius’verses, cf. B 17.18 and frg. 357, Valmaggi.]

– (1941) “Note di critica del testo a Epicuro, a Seneca, alla vita di Empedocle di Diogeni Laerzio, a Polistrato epicureo,” Bolletino del comitato per la preparazione dell’edizione nazionale dei classici greci e latini, 2, 1941, p. 103-109.

[P. 106: A 1.]

Bilić, Tomislav, “Early identifications of Apollo with the physical sun in Ancient Greece,” Mnemosyne, 2020, p. 1-28, (ahead of print, online), 74, 5, 2021, p. 709-736 (printed version).

[A 23, B 134.]

Bing, Peter, “The Voice of those who live in the Sea: Empedocles and Callimachus,” Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 41, 1981, p. 33-36.

[B 74, B 71.]

Blanc Alain. - De Lamberterie Charles, “Chronique d'étymologie grecque n° 14 (CEG 2015),” Revue de philologie, de littérature et d'histoire anciennes, 87, 2, 2013, p. 157-202.

[B 110.10.]

Blass, Friedrich, “Zu Empedokles,” Jahrbücher für classische Philologie, 1883, p. 19-20.

[B 23.9, B 84, B 85, B 121.1.]

Blavatsky, H.P, Isis unveiled. Collected writings, vol 1-2, New York-London 1877, Theosophical Pub. House 1972.

Bluck, Richard Stanley Harold, “On ΤΡΑΓΙΚΗ: Plato, Meno 76 E,” Mnemosyne, 4, 14, 1961, p. 289-295.

[A 921.]

– Plato’s Meno, Cambridge 1964, p. 61-75.

[“Transmigration and recollection before Plato”: B 115, B 146, B 117, B 64 and 250-3 A 921.]

Blumenthal, Henry Jacob, “Empedocles frg. 17.19-20,” Grazer Beiträge, 3, 1975, p. 21-29.

[B 17.]

Bocayuva, Izabela Aquino, “Filosofia como tradição e a "presença" de Empédocles no Banquete,” Anais de Filosofia Clássica, 6, 12, 2012, p. 68-73.

[Released in October 2014. A 86, B 107.]

http://www.revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/FilosofiaClassica/article/view/1451/1292

Bock, Martin, “Aischylos und Akragas,” Gymnasium, 65, 1958, p. 402-450.

Bodei Giglioni, Gabriella, “Come gli uomini divennero malvagi: sviluppo della civiltà, alimentazione e sacrificio in Teofrasto,” Rivista storica italiana, 103, 1991, p. 5-32.

[B 128, B 154.]

Bodéüs, R., “De la poésie à la métaphysique. Regards sur un terme d’Empédocle,” Revue Belge de philologie et d´histoire, 52, 1974, p. 36-58.

Bodnár, István & Michael Chase & Michael Share (transl.), Simplicius. On Aristotle Physics 8.1-5, London: Bristol Classical Press 2012. Paperback in 2014 by Bloomsbury.

Bodrero, Emilio, Il principio fondamentale del sistema di Empedocle. Studio preceduto da un saggio bibliografico e dalla traduzione dei frammenti Empedoclei, Roma: Ermanno Loescher & Co.1904.

[Roma: Giorgio Bretschneider 19752, (Philologica, 2). [+  +].]

Böhme, Angelika, Die Lehre von der Seelenwanderung in der antiken griechischen und indischen Philosophie: ein Vergleich der philosophischen Grundlegung bei den Orphikern, bei Pythagoras, Empedocles und Platon mit dem Upanischaden, dem Urbuddhismus und dem Jainismus, diss., Jüchen, Düsseldorf 1989, p. 29-41. (On Emp. daimonology: B 115, B 141, B 117, B 140, B 146 etc.]

Böhme, Hartmut, “Die vier Elemente: Feuer Wasser Erde Luft,” in: Vom Menschen. Handbuch der historischen Anthropologie, ed. Ch. Wulf, Munich: Beltz 1997, p. 17-46.

[B 6, B 86, B 89.]

Böhme, Gernot & Böhme, Hartmut, Feuer, Wasser, Erde, Luft: Eine Kulturgeschichte der Elemente, Munich: C.H. Beck, 1996. (2004, 2010, 2014).

[P. 48-49, 93-100. B 6, B 8. B 17, B 26, B 27, B 28.]

Boissonade, Jean-François (ed.), Tzetzae Allegoriae Iliadis accedunt Pselli Allegoriae quarum una inedita, Paris: Dumont1851.

[P. 18-19, v. 288-309: storm of the elements.]

Bollack, Jean, (1957) “Die Metaphysik des Empedokles als Entfaltung des Seins,” Philologus, 101, 1957, p. 30-54.

– (1958) “Styx et serments,” Revue des études grecques, 71, 334-338, 1958, p. 1-35.

[B 30, B 115. Reprint in La Grèce de personne, 1997, with little modifications, p. 265-287, 435-443.]

– (1959) “Lukrez und Empedokles fr. 110,” Die Neue Rundschau, 70, 1959, p. 656-689.

[B 110.]

– (1959) “Le Proème du Περὶ φύσεως d’Empédocle,” Revue des études grecques, 72, 1959, p. 15-16.

– (1960) “Lukrez I. 1114-1117 und Empedokles fr. 110,” Philologus, 104, 1960, p. 295-298.

– (1961) “Eros und die Liebe. Der Mythos des Aristophanes im Gastmahl des Plato,” Die Neue Rundschau, 72, 1961, p. 781-793.

– (1965) “Empédocle ou l’ancienne physique,” L’information littéraire [historique ?], 17, 1965, p. 203-207.

– (1965-1969) Empédocle, I-III, Paris : Éditions de Minuit 1965-1969, (Le sens commun). I: Introduction à l’ancienne physique, 1965; II: Les Origines, édition et traduction des fragments et des témoignages, 1969; III: Les Origines, commentaire 1, 1969; III: Les Origines, commentaire 2, 1969. Reprint Paris: Gallimard 1992, (Tel, 201, 202, 203).

[Reprint "commentaire 1" and "commentaire 2" are in one book (Gallimard, [Tel, 203]) instead of two books in 1969. [+  +].]

– (1966) “Review of G. Nélod, Empédocle d’Agrigente, 1959,” Gnomon, 38.7, 1966, p. 725-727.

– (1968) “Les zones de la cosmogonie d’Empédocle,” Hermes, 96, 2, 1968, p. 239-240.

– (1968) “Une histoire de σοφίη,” Revue des Études Grecques, 81, 386-388, 1968, p. 550-554.

[Discussion of B. Gladigow, Sophia und Kosmos, Hildesheim 1965. B 129.]

– (1970) “Empédocle,” in: Encyclopædia Universalis, 6, Paris: 1970, p. 146-147.

[The text has been modified later, probably for the 5th edition in 2002, just before Empédocle: Les Purifications was out, after publication of L’Empédocle de Strasbourg, 1999, in order to include the edition of the Papyprus. The bibliography following the text helps to precise the date of publication.]

– (1971) “Review of D. O’Brien, Empedocles’ cosmic cycle. A reconstruction from the fragments and secondary sources,” Cambridge, 1969,” Gnomon, 43.5, 1971, p. 433-439.

– (1982) “Empedocle e la fisica antica,” in: I Presocratici, ed. W. Lezsle, Bologna: Società ed. il Mulino, 1982, p. 353-362.

[Italian translation of Empédocle ou l’ancienne physique appeared in L’information littéraire, 17, 1965, p. 203-207.]

– (1985) “Le modèle scientiste : Empédocle chez Freud,” Littoral, 15-16 (L’hainamoration de transfert), 1985, p. 21-27.

[Revue de psychanalyse, Actes du colloque organisé par Littoral les 24 et 25 novembre 1984 à Paris.]

– (1987)“Empedokles von Agrigent,” in: Der Neue Pauly, herausgegeben von H. Cancik und H. Schneider, Stuttgart-Weimar: 1997, Band III, p. 1011-5.

– (1997) La Grèce de personne, Paris: Éditions du Seuil 1997.

[P. 107-114, 396-397 (notes): “Le modèle scientiste : Empédocle chez Freud.” P. 265-287, 435-443(notes): “Styx et serments.”.]

– (1998) “Empédocle. L’atelier d’Agrigente,” Interview France Culture in "Une vie, une Œuvre", 3 mars 1998.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kui9VwgjA54

– (2000) “Oliver Primavesi the Empedocles of Strasbourg,” Quinzaine littéraire, 784, May 1, 2000, p. 19.

– (2001) “'Voir la Haine' : Sur les nouveaux fragments d’Empédocle,” Methodos, 1, 2001, p. 173-185.

– (2001) “Remarques générales et particulières,” Aevum antiquum, N.S. 1, 2001, p. 69-77.

– (2003) Empédocle : Les Purifications. Un projet de paix universelle, édité, traduit du grec et commenté par Jean Bollack, Paris: Éditions du Seuil 2003. Spanish translation by José M. Zamora: Bollack J., Empédocles: Las purificaciones, Madrid: Arena Libros 2007.

[ [+  +].]

– (2005) “Empedocles: two theologies, two Projects,” in: The Empedoclean Κόσμος: S[t]ructure, process and the question of cyclicity. Proceedings of the Symposium Philosophiae Antiquae Tertium Myconense, July 6th - July 13th, 2003, Patras, ed. A. L. Pierris, Patras: Institute for Philosophical Research, 2005, p. 45-72.

– (2006) Parménide. De l’Étant au Monde, Lagrasse: éditions Verdier 2006, (Poche).

[Emp.: several pages;. B 8.]

– (2006) “13 - Empedokles,” in: Dichtung wider Dichtung. Paul Celan und die Literatur, Wallstein Verlag 2006, p. 301-314.

[Translation of “chap. 13, Lecture de l’antique,” p. 196 in: Poésie contre poésie : Celan et la littérature, Paris: PUF 2011.]

– (2007) “Arcimboldo rencontre Empédocle,” Philosophie magazine, 10, septembre, 2007.

– (2013) “Empédocle,” in: J. Bollack, Au Jour le jour, Paris: PUF 2013, p. 203-214.

[A1.72, B 6, B 143.]

– (2016) The art of reading: from Homer to Paul Celan, translated by C. Porter and S. Tarrow with B. King, ed. C. Koenig, L. Muellner, G. Nagy & S. Pollock, Cambridge (Ma)-London: Center for Hellenic Studies 2016, (Hellenic Studies, 73).

[Chap. 6: Purifications, p. 65-88; Chap 13: Reading the cosmogonies; p. 165-166; Chap 14: Empedocles: a single project, two theologies, p. 167-180; The scientist model: Freud and Empedocles: p. 249-256. In short: several texts written by Bollack and translated into English. Useful on-line, the book: 

https://chs.harvard.edu/CHS/article/display/6650.jean-bollack-the-art-of-reading-from-homer-to-paul-celan

Bollack, Jean & Balaudé, Jean-François, “Empédocle d’Agrigente,” in: Encyclopédie philosophique universelle III/1: Les Œuvres, ed. J.-F. Mattéi, Paris: P.U.F. 1992, p. 124-127.

Bollack, Mayotte, “La chaîne aimantine, Lucrèce et ses modèles grecs,” Revue des études latines, 41, 1963, p. 165-185.

[A 89.]

Bonamy, Pierre-Nicolas, “Recherches sur la vie d’Empédocle,” in Mémoires de littérature tirés de l’Académie royale des inscriptions et belles lettres, 10, 1736, p. 54-75 (transl. by Michael Hissmann into Deutsch under title “Ueber das Leben des Empedokles,” Magazin für die Philosophie und ihre Geschichte, 2, 1779, p. 183-222.

Bonnard, Jean-Baptiste, Le Complexe de Zeus : Représentations de la paternité en Grèce ancienne, Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne 2004.

[B 63, B 66, A 81.]

Bonnechere, Pierre & Cursaru Gabriela, “᾿Aρχή and δῖνος: vortices as cosmogonic powers and cosmic regulators. Study case: the whirling lightning bolt of Zeus,” Archiv für Religionsgeschichte, 21-22, 1, 2020, p. 449-478.

[B 35.]

Booth, Nathaniel B., “Empedocles’ account of breathing,” Journal of Hellenic Studies, 80, 1960, p. 10-15.

– “Aristotle on Empedocles B 100,” Hermes, 103, 1975, p. 373-375.

[B 100.]

– “A Mistake to be avoided in the Interpretation of Empedocles fr. 100,” Journal of Hellenic Studies, 96, 1976, p. 147-148.

[B 100.]

Bordigoni, Carlitria, “Empedocle e la dizione omerica,” in: Studi sul pensiero e sulla lingua di Empedocle, ed. L. Rossetti & C. Santaniello, Bari: Levante editori 2004, (‘Le Rane’, Collana di studi e testi, 37), p. 199-289.

[B 2, B 3, B 6, B 8, B 15, B 17, B 20, B 21, B 27, B 29, B 33, B 35, B 38, B 39, B 40, B 42, B 45, B 51, B 61, B 62, B 70, B 73, B 74, B 83, B 84, B 85, B 86, B 96, B 98, B 100, B 101, B 108, B 109, B 110, B 111.]

Borkowski, Zbigniew, “Local Cults and Resistance to Christianity,” The Journal of Juristic Papyrology, 20, 1990, p. 25-30.

[About non-Christian cults in Achmim where the Pap. Strasb. was written.]

Borman, Karl, Parmenides. Untersuchungen zu den Fragmenten, Hamburg 1971.

Bornheim Gerd A.(ed.], Os filósofos Pré–socráticos. São Paulo: Cultrix 1967.

Börtzler, Friedrich, “Zu den antiken Chaoskosmogonien,” Archiv für Religionswissenschaft, 28, 1930, p. 253-268.

[p. 262-267: on influence of Empedoclean roots in the form of the primordial disordered mixture on the Roman interpretation of Hesiodic Chaos; brief notices of B 8, B 16, B 17, B 28.]

Bos, Abraham P. & Rein Ferwerda, Aristotle, On the life-bearing spirit (De Spiritu): a discussion with Plato and his predecessors on pneuma as the instrumental body of the soul. Introduction, translation, and commentary by A. P. B. & R. F., Leiden-Boston: Brill 2008.

[A 78, B 8, B 96, B 100.]

Botteri, Gerardo & Roberto Casazza, El sistema astronómico de Aristótele: Una interpretación, Buenos Aires: Biblioteca Nacional 2015.

[Emp. in chapter II, La esfericidad del Todo en la filosofía presocrática, p. 35-54, sp. p. 46-51.]

Bouché-Leclerc, Auguste, Histoire de la divination dans l’Antiquité, I, Paris: E. Leroux 1879.

– Histoire de la divination dans l’Antiquité, II, III, Paris: E. Leroux 1880.

Boulogne, Jacques, “Plutarque exégète d’Empédocle. Une leçon de lecture,” Revue de philosophie ancienne, 22, 2, 2004, p. 97-110.

[B 8, B 9, B 11, B 15.]

Boussoulas, Nicolas-Isidore, “Essai sur la structure du mélange dans la pensée présocratique. Empédocle,” Revue de métaphysique et de morale, 63, 1958, p. 135-148. (B 2, B 3, B 4, B 6, B 8, B 9, B 16, B 17, B 21, B 22, B 23, B 24, B 27, B 26, B 35, B 62, B 71, B 89, B 90, B 96, B 98, B 107, B 109, B 110, B 111, B 132, B 134, B 135, B 146, B 147. Sphairos as total fusion of the elements. Heraclitus, Anaxagoras.)

Boyancé, Pierre, “Sur quelques vers de Virgile (Géorgiques, II, v. 490-492),” Revue archéologique, 25/5, 1927, p. 361-379.

[B 129.]

– “Les deux démons personnels dans l’antiquité grecque et latine,” Revue de philologie, de littérature et d'histoire anciennes, 61, 1935, p. 189-202.

[P. 199-200 : B 122.]

– Le culte des Muses chez les philosophes grecs : études d’histoire et de psychologie religieuses, Paris: De Boccard 1936, (Bibliothèque des écoles françaises d’Athènes et de Rome, 141). (Reprint with addenda: 1972².)

[Chap. VI – A 15.]

– “L’Apollon solaire,” in: Mélanges d’archéologie, d’épigraphie et d’histoire offerts à Jérôme Carcopino, ed. J. Heurgon, W. Seston & G. Charles-Picard, Paris, Hachette 1966.

Brague, Rémi, “The Body of Speech: A new Hypothesis in the Compositional Structure of Timaeus’ Monologue,” in: Platonic Investigations, ed. Dominic J. O’Meara, Washington D.C.: Catholic University of America Press 1985, p.53-83, (Studies in Philosophy and the History of Philosophy, 13).

[Pages 57-58: B 29, B 134.]

Brague Rémi, Freudenthal Gad, “Ni Empédocle, ni Plotin : pour le dossier du pseudo-Empédocle arabe,” in: Agonistes - Essays in honour of Denis O'Brien, ed. J. Dillon, M. Dixsaut, Aldershot: Ashgate 2005, p. 267-283. Reprint London-New York: Routledge 2017.

Brandis, Christian August, Handbuch der Geschichte der griechisch-römischen Philosophie, I, Berlin: G. Reimer 1835.

[Emp.: p. 188-232.]

– Geschichte der Entwicklungen der griechischen Philosophie und ihrer Nachwirkungen im römischen Reiche, I, Berlin: G. Reimer 1862.

[Emp.: 103-119.]

– “Empedocles,” in: Dictionary of Greek and Roman biography and mythology, ed. W. Smith, 1870, volume 2, Boston: Little, Brown, and company, p. 12-14.

Brás dos Santos, Evaniel, “Vestígios da cosmologia de Empédocles em fontes latinas dos séculos XII-XIII,” Dissertatio, [44] 131, 2016, p. 131-150.

Bremer, Dieter, “Aristoteles, Empedokles und die Erkenntnisleistung der Metapher,” Poetica, 12, 1980, p. 350-376.

– “Hölderlin, Homer und Empedokles: Der Dichter-Philosoph als Seher und seine griechischen Vorbilder,” in: Begegnung mit dem “Fremden”. Akten des internationalen Germanisten-Kongresses, ed. E. Iwasaki & Sch. Yoshinori, Tokyo-Munich 1991, p. 349-361.

[Probably an art-historical article.]

Bremmer, Jan N., The early Greek concept of the soul, Princeton University Press 19934 (19831).

– The rise and fall of the afterlife, London-New York: Routledge 2002.

[B 112, B 115, B 117, B 128, B 139, B 147, Pap. Strasb. aii7, d5-6.]

– “Balaam, Mopsus and Melampous: Tales of Traveling Seers,” in: The prestige of the pagan prophet Ballam in Judaism, early Christianity and Islam, ed. van Kooten, Geurt Hendrik – van Ruiten, Jacques, Leiden: Brill, 2008, p. 49–67.

[P. 65-66: Emp. as a seer and purifier. Printed also in: J. Bremmer, Greek religion and culture, the Bible, and the ancient Near East, Leiden: Brill 2008, p. 133-151.]

– “The place of performance of Orphic poetry (OF 1),” in: Tracing Orpheus. Studies of Orphic fragments in honour of Alberto Bernabé, ed. Miguel Herrero de Jáurequi et alii, Berlin-Boston: De Gruyter 2011, p. 1-6.

[P. 2, n. 7: Empedocles, heavily influenced by the Orphics, borrowed from them the verses B 3.3-5 DK; a short mention without argumentation.]

Brémond, Mathilde, Empédocle chez Hippolyte de Rome, mémoire de Master II, Lettres Classiques et Philosophie, Université Paris IV Sorbonne, 2011-2012.

– “Le logos d’Empédocle : reconstruction d'une lecture stoïcienne,” Elenchos, 38, 1-2, 2017, p. 127-149.

[B 2, B 3, B 109, B 110, B 131.]

– “Les Présocratiques (A),” in: L’Encyclopédie philosophique, ed. M. Kristanek, 2019, On-line:

https://encyclo-philo.fr/les-presocratiques-a

[A 30, B 6, B 17, B 20, B 30, B 57, B 61, B 84, B 100, B 109, B 111, B 112, B 115, B 137.]

– “Éléments et zones du monde d’Homère à Empédocle,” Philosophie antique, 21 (Les éléments), 2021, p. 7-29.

[A 30, B 17, B 21, B 38, B 52.]

Bréton, Guillaume, Essai sur la poésie philosophique en Grèce, Xénophane, Parménide, Empédocle, Paris: Hachette 1882, p. 177-257.

Brieger, Adolf, “Das atomistische System durch Correctur des anaxagoreischen Entstanden,” Hermes, 36, 1901, p. 161-181, p. 170-172.

[Emp. was not any atomist.]

Brink, C. O., “Horace and Empedocles´ temperature. A rejected fragment of Empedocles,” Phoenix, 23, 1969, p. 138-142.

[A 162.]

Brisson, Luc, “Le corps ‘dionysiaque’ : L'anthropogonie décrite dans le Commentaire sur le Phédon de Platon (1, par. 3-6) attribué à Olympiodore est-elle orphique ?,” in: ΣΟΦΙΗΣ ΜΑΙΗΤΟΡΕΣ Chercheurs de sagesse. Hommage à Jean Pépin, (Collection des Études Augustiniennes, Série Antiquité-131), Paris: 1992, p. 481-499.

[B 115 related to De esu carnium I, 996 b-c.]

Broadie, Sarah, “Rational theology,” in: The Cambridge Companion to ancient Greek philosophy, ed. A. A. Long, Cambridge University Press 1999, p. 225-249. (Emp.: p. 216-220, B 17, B 29, B 134.]

Bröcker, Walter, Die Geschichte der Philosophie vor Sokrates, Frankfurt am Main: V. Klostermann 1965.

Brown, Geoffrey, “The Cosmological theory of Empedocles,” Apeiron, 18, 1984, p. 97-101.

Brown, Robert D., “Lucretian Ridicule of Anaxagoras,” The Classical Quarterly, 33, 1983, p. 146-160. (Emp., p. 148-149; B 6.]

Brown, T. S., “The Greek Exiles: Herodotus’ Contemporaries,” Ancient World, 17, 1988, p. 17-28. [Anaxagoras, Empedocles.]

Broze Michèle, “Les sept propos de Méthyer. Structure narrative et théorie du savoir dans la cosmogonie de Neith à Esna”, Bulletin de l’Institut français d’Archéologie orientale, 99, 1999, p. 63-72.

[B 6.]

Brucker, Jacob, Historia critica philosophiae, I, Leipzig: Ch. Breitkopf 1742, p. 1106-1120.

Brun, Jean, Empédocle ou le Philosophe de l’amour et de la haine : présentation, choix de textes, traduction et bibliographie, Paris: Seghers 1966, (Philosophes de tous les temps, 27).

[A study plus the translation of the fragments and some testimonies. [+  +].]

– “Chapitre V Empédocle,” in: Les Présocratiques, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France 1968, ("Que sais-je ?", 1319), p. 85-104. New edition in 2003, p. 81-99.

Brunck, Richard Franz Philipp, Analecta veterum poetarum graecorum I-III, Argentorati : I. H. Heitz 1772 (I), 1773 (II), 1776 (III), I.163.

[B 156, B 157.]

Brunschwig, Jacques, “Review of Empédocle, I : Introduction à l’ancienne physique, 1965, by Jean Bollack”, Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger, 157, 1967, p. 128-133.

– “On Generation and Corruption I. 1: a false start?,” in: Aristotle: On Generation and Corruption, Book 1, Symposium Aristotelicum, ed. F. de Haas & J. Mansfeld, Oxford: Clarendon Press 2004, p. 25-63.

[§9 - The trouble with Empedocles, p. 48-50; §10 - 314b7–8: the quotation of Empedocles fr. B8. 1 and 3 DK, p. 51-55; §11 - 314b15–26: Empedocles makes alloiôsis impossible, p. 55-58; §12 - 12. 315a3–25: the last salvo of criticisms against Empedocles, p. 58-60 – B 8, B 21.]

Brunschwig, Jacques & Geoffrey E. R. Lloyd (eds.), Greek thought: a guide to classical knowledge, Cambridge (Mass.)-London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press 2000, (Harvard University Press reference library). English version of Le savoir grec (1996), without the chapter about Empedocles.

Büchel, Carl, Die Lehre von der elementaren Zusammensetzung der Körper in ihrer Entwicklung von Empedokles bis Lavoisier, Druck von M. Becker, Düren 1876.

Buchheim, Thomas, “Maler, Sprachbildner: Zur Verwandtschaft des Gorgias mit Empedokles,” Hermes, 113.4, 1985, p. 417-429.

– Die Vorsokratiker: ein philosophisches Porträt, Munich: C.H. Beck 1994.

[Chap. V: Die Wurzeln des Wachstums: Empedokles von Akragas, p. 145-182; p. 37, 239-241. B 6.]

Bucur Bogdan G., Bucur Cristina, “The place of splendor and light: Observations on the paraphrasing of Enn 4.8.1 in the Theology of Aristotle,” Le Muséon, 119, 2006, p. 271-292.

http://www.bgbucur.com/PDFuri/Museonart.pdf

[Arabic Plotinus - B 115.]

Bueno, Gustavo, “Empédocles y Anaxágoras,” in: La metafísica presocrática, Oviedo: Pentalfa 1974, p. 281-326. (Historia de la Filosofía, 1).

http://www.fgbueno.es/med/dig/gb74mp4.pdf http://www.fgbueno.es/gbm/gb74mp.htm

Bufalini, M. et al., “Geo-environmental changes and historical events in the area of the Greek archaeological site of Selinunte,” Caminhos da História, 27, 1, 2022, p. 70-90.

https://www.periodicos.unimontes.br/index.php/caminhosdahistoria/article/view/4845/4933 (pdf)

[A 1.70.]

Buffière, Félix, Les Mythes d’Homère et la pensée grecque, Paris: Les Belles Lettres 1956. Reprint Les Belles Lettres: 1973.

[B 6, B 120, B 126, B 127, B 137, B 139.]

Buhl, Maria Sophia, Untersuchungen zu Sprache und Stil des Empedokles, diss., Heidelberg 1956.

Bulcão, Marly, “En retrouvant Empédocle : un prétexte pour philosopher,” Diotima, 43, p. 121-130, 2015. [Empedocles and Bachelard.]

Burkert, Walter, (1962) “ΓΟΗΣ. Zur griechischen ‘Schamanismus’,” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie, 105, 1, 1962, p. 36-55.

–– (1969) (ed.), Hermann Diels. Kleine Schriften zur Geschichte der antiken Philosophie, Darmstadt-Hildesheim: Georg Olms 1969.

– (1972) Lore and Science in Ancient Pythagoreanism, tr. by. E. L. Minar, Jr, Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press 1972. (Weisheit und Wissenschaft, Nüremberg: H. Carl 1962).

[A 30, A 50, A 56, A 62, A 75, A 83, B 27, B 44, B 48, B 96, B 111, B 115, B 117, B 120, B 129, B 141, B 153a.]

– (1972) “Review of J. Bollack, Empédocle II-III, 1969,” Gnomon, 44, 5, 1972, p. 433-442.

[Important.]

– (1974) “Review of G. Zuntz, Persephone,” Gnomon, 46, 4, 1974, p. 321-328.

[P. 324-325. B 137.2, B 121.3.]

– (1975) “Plotin, Plutarch und die platonisierende Interpretation von Heraklit und Empedokles,” in: Kephalaion. Studies in Greek philosophy and its continuation offered to C.J. de Vogel, ed. J. Mansfeld - L. M. de Rijk, Assen: Van Gorcum 1975, (Wijsgerige texten en studies, 23), p. 137-146.

– (1984) “Brief review of D. O’Brien, Pour interpréter Empédocle, 1981,” Museum Helveticum, 41, 4, 1984, p. 246.

– (1999) “Diels Vorsokratiker: Rückschau und Ausblick,” in: Hermann Diels (1848-1922) et la science de l’Antiquité, Vandoeuvres-Genève 1999, (Entretiens sur l’Antiquité classique, 45), p. 169-206.

– (2004) Die Griechen und der Orient. Von Homer bis zu den Magiern, Munich: C. H. Beck 2003.

[Emp.: p. 125-126. Emp. and the Orient; the possible knowledge of the Eastern texts is undetectable in Empedocles and only tiny useful for interpretation of his philosophy.]

Burnet, John, Greek philosophy: Thales to Plato, London: Macmillan 1914.

[Several reprints. Empedocles: p. 71-75. B 100.]

– Early Greek philosophy, London: Macmillan 19304, reprint New York: Meridian books library edition, 1957, 1958 (London-Edinburgh: Adam and Charles Black 18921, p. 207-271; London: Adam and Charles Black 19082, p. 227-289; London: Adam and Charles Black 19203, p. 197-250).

[Emp.: p. 197-250. [+  +].]

Burstyn, Harold L., “The empirical basis of the four elements,” in: XIIe congrès international d’histoire des sciences, Paris 1968, Actes Tome IIIa, Science et Philosophie, Paris: A. Blanchard 1971, p. 19-24.

[A 28, A 30, A 49, B 115.]

Burnyeat, Miles F., “Empedocles Scholarship (Author’s Response to Letter of Catherine Osborne),” The Times Literary Supplement June 11, 1999, p. 17.

Bussanich, John, “Review of P. Kingsley, Ancient Philosophy,” Bryn Mawr Classical Review, 97.10.19.

http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/1997/97.10.19

– “Reincarnation and salvation in Magna Graecia and Plato,” in: Philosopher kings and tragic heroes: Essays on images and ideas from Western Greece, ed. Reid H.L.& Tanasi D., Sioux City: Parnassos Press 2016, p. 79-92.

[Empedocles’s eschatology at pages 81-84.]

Butler, Edward, P., “Perceiving Aphrodite: Empedoclean Metaphysics,” Walking the Worlds, 4, 2, 2018, p. 40-53.

[B 2, B 20, B 6, B 84, B 109, B 110, B 128.]

Butler, James Eric, “Effluvia: Empedocles studies,” Epoché, 9/2, 2005, p. 215-231.

[B 3, B 6, B 17.3-5, B 21-5, B 35, B 84, B 89, B 100.]

Buttmann, Philippus, “Observationes in Cl. Sturzii Empedoclea,” Commentarii societatis philologicae Lipsiensis 4/1, 1804, p. 31-43.

[B 28, B 59, B 63, B 65, B 71, B 73, B 75, B 101.]

Byk, Samuel Alexander, Die vorsokratische Philosophie der Griechen in ihrer organischen Gliederung dargestellt. Erster Theil, Die Dualisten, Leipzig: Moritz Schaefer 1876.

[Emp. : p. 147-190.]

Byl, Simon, “Le vocabulaire de l’intelligence dans le chapitre 35 du livre I du traité du ‘Régime’,” Revue de philologie, de littérature et d'histoire anciennes, 76/2, 2002, p. 217-24. 

[The chapter in question of the Hippocratic treatise sets out to classify men according to different categories of intelligence; its precedents are to be found in Empedocles, and it was read by Plato and by the author of Alcibiades II, which follows it very closely. The psychological vocabulary of the chapter is particularly rich, with six hapax legomena and six words that occur nowhere else in the Hippocratic corpus.]

CCC

Cabral, Izabela, Silva, “Aphrodite zeídōros: a study of Philotes functions and expressions, according to Empedocles,” Revista Est. Fil. e Hist. da Antiguidade, Campinas, 39, 2, 2022, p. 51-83.

– Afrodite zeidoros, Dissertação de Mestrado, Brasilia-Manaus 2022.

Caetano-Anollés, Gustavo & Richard Janko, “Foresight: Empedocles’ On Nature, P. Strasb. Gr. Inv. 1665–6, a theory of networks and evolutionary growth ~2,400 years before Darwin,” in: Untangling Molecular Biodiversity, World Scientific 2020, p. 599-648.

– “The rise of hierarchy and modularity in biological networks explained by Empedocles’ double tale ~2,400 years before Darwin and systems biology, Frontiers in Genetics 13:973233, 2022, p. 1-6. On-line.

Cairns, David, “The Imagery of Erôs in Plato’s Phaedrus,” in: Erôs in Ancient Greece, ed. Sanders - C. Thumiger - C. Carey & N. Lowe, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013.

Calame, Claude, “Procédures hymniques dans les vers des sages cosmologues : pragmatique de la poésie didactique (d’Hésiode et Théognis à Empédocle et Parménide),” in: Hymnes de la Grèce antique : Approches littéraires et historiques – Actes du colloque international de Lyon, 19-21 juin 2008, ed. R. Bouchon, P. Brillet-Dubois, N. Le Meur-Weissman, Lyon: Maison de l’Orient et de la Méditerranée 2012, p. 59-77.

[See Emp.: voix d’autorité divine et publique, p.  67-74; B 1, B 3, B 112, B 131.]

– “Procedure inniche nei versi dei sophoi cosmologi. Pragmatica della poesia didascalica (da Esiodo e Teognide a Empedocle e Parmenide),”,” in: Mythologeîn: mito e forme di discorso nel mondo antico, studi in onore di Giovanni Cerri, ed. A. Gostoli - R. Velardi, Pisa: Fabrizio Serra editore 2014, (AION. Quaderni, 18), p. 151-159.

– Pratiques poétiques de la mémoire. Représentations de l'espace-temps en Grèce ancienne, Paris: éditions La Découverte 2006, (Textes à l'appui, histoire classique).

[B 6, B 115.]

Calderini, Aristide, “Ancora di un epigramma attribuito ad Empedocle e tradotto da Francesco Filelfo,” Athenaeum (Pavia), 3, 1915, p. 41-46.

[B 161.]

Calenda, Guido, Un universo aperto: la cosmologia di Parmenide e la struttura della terra, Bologna: Diogene Multimedia 2017, (Storia della filosofia antica).

[A 67, B 17, B 45, B 52, B 108, a(ii)13-14.]

Calogero, Guido, “L’eleatismo di Empedocle,” in: Studi in onore di Luigi Castiglioni, I, Firenze: G. C. Sansoni 1960, p. 127-167.

– Storia della Logica Antica I, L’età arcaica, Bari: Laterza 1967.

[Chap. V: Empedocle, p. 209-249. Il vario eleatismo dei pluralisti, Nascita come coesione, morte come scissione, Empedocle tra Parmenide e Melisso, Il vuoto e il pieno, L'eterno e il transeunte, Realtà dell’immortale e realtà del mortale, L’ideale dell’identità, Filosofia e poesia in Empedocle, Visione delle cose e visione dell'assoluto, Lo splendore del transeunte e la monotonia dell'eterno, Lo Sfero e la totalità delle cose, L’immortale Afrodite, La metempsicosi, Gusto della vita e timore della morte, La scoperta del molteplice immortale.]

Calzolari, Alessandro, “Empedocle, Frr. 2 e 3 Diels-Kranz,” Studi classici e orientali, 34, 1984, p. 71-81.

[B 2, B 3.]

Cameron, Alister, The Pythagorean background of the theory of recollection, Menasha (Wisconsin) 1938.

[B 129: p. 20-21.]

Cambiano, Giuseppe, Filosofia e scienza nel mondo antico, Torino: Loescher 1976.

Campailla, Sergio, “La leggenda di Empedocle,” in: Studia Phoenicia and East Mediterranean in the First Millenium B. C., ed. E. Lipinski, Leuven 1987, p. 659-670.

Campbell, Gordon, Lindsay, (2000) “Zoogony and evolution in Plato’s Timaeus: The Presocratics, Lucretius and Darwin,” in: Reason and necessity. Essays on Plato’s Timaeus, ed. M. R. Wright, London: Duckworth, The Classical Press of Wales, 2000, p. 145-180.

[Emp.: p. 149-152: fr. 57, 59, 61, 71, a(ii) 23-30.]

– (2003) fragments and “The Ruin of Time”, 2003.

http://eprints.nuim.ie/97/1/The_ruin_of_time.pdf

[This paper examines the way in which poets, historians and philosophers use the topos of eternal flux, and seeks to apply some lessons learned from them to the editing and interpretation of philosophical fragments. B 11, B 15, B 17, B 111.]

– (2005) “Empedocles divided,” The Classical Review, 55, 1, 2005, p. 12-13.

[Review of J. Bollack’s book on Empédocle, les Purifications.]

– (2006) “Empedocles (of Acragas),” in: The Internet Encyclopedia of philosophy.

http://www.iep.utm.edu/e/empedocl.htm, 2006.

– (2006) Strange creatures: anthropology in Antiquity, London: Duckworth 2006.

[P. 6-9, 21-22, 30-32, 42-43. – B 12, B 23, B 26, B 57, B 59, B 61, B 62, B 71, B 96, B 98, B 128, B 130, a(ii) 23-30.]

– (2008) “"And bright was the flame of their friendship" (Empedocles B130): humans, animals, justice, and friendship, in Lucretius and Empedocles,” Leeds International Classical Studies, 7.4,

http://www.leeds.ac.uk/classics/lics/2008/200804.pdf, December 2008, p. 1-23. 

[B 115, d MP, B 117, B 112, B 146, B 147, B 137, B 136, B 128, B 130.]

– (2014) “Lucretius, Empedocles, and Cleanthes,” in: The philosophizing Muse: The influence of Greek philosophy on Roman poetry, (Pierides, 3), ed. M. Garani & D. Konstan, Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing 2014, p. 26-60.

– (2014) (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of animals in classical thought and life, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2014.

Campbell, Malcom, Studies in the third book of Apollonius Rhodius’ Argonautica, Hidelsheim-Zürich-New York: Olms 1983.

[Supplementary notes, III. Apollonius and Empedocles, p. 129.]

Cañas Quirós, Roberto, “La estructura de la materia en los filósofos pluralistas pre-socráticos,” InterSedes, 13, 25, 2012, p. 143-168,  

http://www.redalyc.org/pdf/666/66623936008.pdf 

http://www.intersedes.ucr.ac.cr/ojs/index.php/intersedes/article/viewFile/331/322

[P. 144-154.]

Candido, Maria Regina, “O saber mágico-filosófico de Empédocles de Acragas na Atenas clássica,” Phoinix, 12, 2006, p. 189-198.

https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/phoinix/article/view/33260/18686

Caneva, Stefano, “Raccontare nel tempo: narrazione epica e cronologia nelle Argonautiche di Apollonio Rodio,” in: Caneva, S. & V. Tarenzi, Il lavoro sul mito nell’epica greca. Letture di Omero e Apollonio Rodio, Pisa: ETS 2007, p. 67-135.

[Emp.: p. 77-82.]

Canterus, Th., Suffridi Petri de scriptoribus et illustribus Frisiae viris, Colog. Agr. 1593, Decad. 15,17

[Sturz, 1805, p. ii, informs on Canterus’ prepared, but probably never realized edition of Emp. verses; non vidi.]

Čanyšev, A. N., “Materializm Empedokla,” Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta, serija filosofija, 1, 1976, p. 81-90.

– Kurs lekcij po drevnej filosofiji [Course of lessons in ancient philosophy], Moskva, Vysšaja škola 1981, p. 166-170.

[General and ideologically biased outline of Empedocles’ teaching without knowledge of the basic literature.]

Capelle, Wilhelm, “Zur Geschichte der griechischen Botanik,” Philologus, 69/4, 1910, p. 264-291.

[B 77, B 78.]

– Die Vorsokratiker, die Fragmente und Quellenberichte übersetzt und eingeleitet, A. Kröner, Leipzig 1935 (Stuttgart 19382), p. 181-249.

– Empedokles von Agrigent. Über die Natur der Seelen. Empedokles-Zitate und Kommentar in der Übersetzung von W. Capelle, Methusalem 1988.

Capizzi, Antonio, Several comments in: Zeller, E. - Mondolfo, R. La filosofia dei Greci nel suo sviluppo storico. Parte I : I Presocratici. Volume V : Empedocle, Atomisti, Anassagora. Ed. Antonio Capizzi, Firenze: La nuova Italia 1969.

[See review by Brunschwig J. in: Revue des Études Grecques, 83, 394, 1970, p. 252-253.]

– “Trasposizioni del lessico omerico in Parmenide ed Empedocle. Osservazioni su un problema di metodo,” Quaderni urbinati di cultura classica, 25, 1, 1987, p. 107-118.

[B. 17, B 20, B 21, B 22, B 27, B 35, B 42.3, B 43, B 44, B 47, B 55, B 57.3, B 100, B 110.]

Cappelletti, Angel, Mitología y filosofía: los presocráticos, Editorial Cincel Kapelusz 1987², (Historia de la Filosofía, 3).

[Emp.: p. 142-165.]

Caprini, Rita & Rosa Ronzitt, “Studio iconomastico dei nomi della ‘pupilla’ nelle lingue indoeuropee e nei dialetti romanzi,” Quaderni di semantica, 28, 2, 2007, p. 287-325.

[B 84.]

Caramico, Anna, “L’aggettivo ὠγύγιος in Eschilo, Pers. 38,” Ítaca. Quaderns Catalans de Cultura Clàssica, 27, 2011, p. 25-34.

http://publicacions.iec.cat/repository/pdf/00000186/00000003.pdf

[B 84.]

Caramuel y Lobkowitz, Juan, Critica Philosophica. Artium Scholasticorum cursum exhibens, Vigevano, 1681.

[‘Critica philosoph. diss. V. metaph. nr. 815, p. 353’, adopted from Sturz, 1805, p. I. Could be find on-line. Just a few lines on p. 353.]

– Empedoclis Philosophiam, Lovanii

[Adopted from Mongitore, 1707, I, 174-179, precisely on p. 179; study noted by Caramuel in the previous title, p. 353.]

Cardoso, Diego Soffritti, “A física das percepções em Empédocles e Demócrito,” Revista Aproximação, 4, 2013, p. 4-13.

– A teoria dos eflúvios em Empédocles e suas reverberações, Diss. (Mestrado em Filosofia) Faculdade de Filosofia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, 2017.

https://ppglm.files.wordpress.com/2008/12/dissertac3a7c3a3odiegosoffritticardosoppglm.pdf.

Cardullo, R. Loredana, “Empedocle πυθαγορικός. Un’'invenzione' neoplatonica?,” in: λόγον διδόναι. La filosofia come esercizio del render ragione. Studi in onore di Giovanni Casertano, ed. Lidia Palumbo, Napoli: Loffredo 2011, p. 817-839.

Carlini, Francesco, “Lettera al Compilatore dell’estratto della Vita di Empedocle,” Biblioteca Italiana, 3, 1816, p. 73-5 = P. Giordani, Opere, ed. A. Gussalli, Milan 1857, X.38-40.

[A reaction on some theses of Scinà’s book concerning to scientific nature of fr. B 100.]

Carrizosa, Diana, El pensamiento de Empédocles a partir de sus versos, Medellín (Colombia): Universidad EAFIT, 2003, (Bordes de Vida).

Carter, Jason, W., Aristotle on earlier Greek psychology: The science of soul, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2019.

["Empedocles and the harmony theory": p. 134-136; "Empedocles’ psychology": p. 143-167; A 86, A 87, A 92, B 17, B 20, B 21, B 22, B 23, B 103, B 109, B 110.]

Cartlidge, Benjamin J., “Empedocles Physika 1 278 (P. Strasb. gr. Inv.1665–1666, a(ii)8),” Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 203, 2017, p. 53-55.

[a(ii)8.]

– “The author of P.Oxy LXXXIII 5349 as a reader of Empedocles,” Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 213, 2020, p. 11-15.

[B 35.4, B 17.7-8, B 26.5-6, a(ii)19.]

Caruso, Valentina, “Empedocle, ‘figura di frontiera’,” Vichiana. Rassegna di Studi filologici e Storici IV serie, XII 1/2010, p. 99-114.

[Review of Empedocle tra poesia, medicina, filosofia e politica, Napoli, 2007.]

– “Empedocle: una duplice cosmogonia, una duplice etica,” Vichiana. Rassegna di Studi filologici e Storici IV serie, XIV 1/2012, p. 94-105.

[Review of Empedocle d’Agrigento, Napoli 2010, by Federica Montevecchi.]

Casadesús Bordoy, Francesc, “On the origin of the Orphic-Pythagorean notion of the immortality of the soul,” in: On Pythagoreanism, ed. G. Cornelli - R. McKirahan & C. Macris, Berlin-Boston: Walter de Gruyter 2013, (Studia Praesocratica, 5), p. 153-176.

[B 117, B 129.]

Casadio, Giovanni., “La metempsicosi tra Orfeo e Pitagora,” in: Orphisme et Orphée, en l’honneur de Jean Rudhardt, ed. Ph. Borgeaud, Genève: Droz 1991, (Recherches et Rencontres, 3), p. 119-155.

[B 126, Plut. De esu.]

Casanova, Angelo, Alfredo, “La critica di Diogene d’Enoanda alla metempsicosi Empedoclea (NF 2 + fr. 34 Ch.],” in: Studi in onore di Adelmo Barigazzi I-II, Roma: Edizioni dell’Ateneo 1986, I., p. 51-72.

[And in: Sileno, 10, 1, 1984, p. 119-130. A 99.]

Casanova-Robin, Hélène, “Reconstruire une poétique des Présocratiques : le feu dans les Métamorphoses d’Ovide,” in: Les Présocratiques à Rome, ed. S. Franchet d’Espèrey & C. Lévy, Paris: Presses de l’Université Paris-Sorbonne 2018, p. 323-346.

[B 3, B 8, B 17, B 21, B 62, B 73.]

Casella, Federico, “Escatologia e conoscenza salvifica in Empedocle: una rilettura della metempsicosi alla luce delle teorie fisiologiche sulla mente,” Elenchos, 40, 2, 2019, p. 265-296.

[B 6, B 21, B 27, B 28, B 29, B 35, B 98, B 105, B 109, B 111, B 115, B 128, B 132, B 134, B 138, B 146, B 147.]

– “Platone e il vegetarianismo nel Timeo,” Plato Journal, 21, 2021, p. 111-124.

https://doi.org/10.14195/2183-4105_21_8

– “Il cosmo come mezzo, il cosmo come fine: il Timeo di Platone, Empedocle e Aristotele sulla relazione tra macrocosmo e microcosmo, Thaumàzein, 10, 2, 2022, p. 24-45.

Casertano, Giovanni, “Amore e morte in Empedocle,” Giornale di metafisica, 21, 1999, p. 51-65.

– “Orfismo e pitagorismo in Empedocle?,” in: Tra Orfeo e Pitagora, ed. Marisa Tortorelli Ghidini - Alfredina Storchi Marino - Amedeo Visconti, Napoli: Bibliopolis 2000, p. 195-236.

– (ed.), Empedocle: tra poesia, medicina, filosofia e politica, Napoli: Loffredo 2007.

– “Une volta fui arbusto e muto pesce del mare,” in: G. Casertano (ed.), Empedocle: tra poesia, medicina, filosofia e politica, Napoli: Loffredo 2007, p. 331-337.

[B 117.]

– I presocratici, Roma: Edizioni Carocci, 2009, (Pensatori. 4).

[Chap. 6. Empedocle - Pluralisti contro monisti? La vista e gli scritti. Le radici, il cosmo e il mondo. Sensazione, pensiero e conoscenza. Il dio, l'anima e la reincarnazione.]

– “Logistikon, thymos and epithymia before Plato,” Archai, 32, 2022, p. 1-13.

[B 6, B 128, B 136, B 137, B 145.]

Casini, Paolo, “Zoogonia e transformismo nella fisica epicurea,” Giornale critico della filosofia italiana, 42, 1963, p. 178-207.

[Emp.: p. 186-197.]

Castelletti, Cristiano, Porfirio. Sullo Stige, Testo greco a fronte. Introduzione, traduzione, note e apparati di C. C, Milan: Bompiani 2006, (Testi a Fronte, 99).

[A 84, B 105.]

Castner, Catherine J., “De Rerum Natura 5.101 - 3: Lucretius’ application of Empedoclean language to Epicurean doctrine,” Phoenix, 41, 1987, p. 40-49.

– The ‘Fulmen’ and Sicily: imagery in Lucretius’ sixth book,” in: Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History 11, ed. C. Deroux, Bruxelles, Latomus, 2003, p. 157-176.

Caston, Victor, “Empedocles’ theory of vision,”, MA thesis, University of Texas, Austin 1986.

– “The spirit and the letter: Aristotle on perception,” in: Metaphysics, soul, and ethics in ancient thought: themes from the work of Richard Sorabji, ed. R. Salles, Oxford: Clarendon Press 2005, p. 245-320. (3.1 Aristotle vs. Empedocles: p. 293-295.]

– “Perception in ancient Greek philosophy,” in: The Oxford Handbook of philosophy of perception, ed. M. Matthen, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2015, p. 29-50.

– “Theophrastus on perceiving,” Rhizomata, 7, 2, 2019, (Special issue: Topics in Theophrastus’ De sensibus), p. 188-225.

Catarzi, Marcello, “La seconda "volta". Note al frammento di Empedocle DK 31 B25,” Incidenza dell'antico, 5, 2007, p. 145-173.

http://www.incidenzadellantico.it/2007_IncidAntico_%205_Abstracts.pdf 

[B 25.]

Cataudella, Quintino, “Empedoclea,” Rivista di filologia e di istruzione classica, 88, 1960, p. 124-132.

[B 137.]

Cavalcante de Souza, José (ed.], Os Pré-socráticos. Vida e obra, fragmentos, doxografia e comentarios seleção de textos, São Paulo: Nova Cultural 19894, (Col. Os Pensadores).

Cavalcante de Souza, José & Remberto, Francisco Kuhnen (éd. and transl.], “Empédocles de Agrigento,” in: Os Pré-Socráticos, fragmentos, doxografia e comentários, ed. Cavalcante de Souza, J. et al., São Paulo: Editora Nova Cultural 1996.

Cazzaniga, Ignazio., “Le metafore enniane relative a cielo e stelle ed alcuni placita di tradizione Anassimeno-Empedoclea,” La Parola del Passato, 26, 1971, p. 102-119.

Centrone, Bruno, “Sopravvivenza dell’anima e luoghi dell’aldilà nella filosofia greca tra vi e v sec. a.c.: Eraclito ed Empedocle,” in: La tomba del tuffatore: rito, arte e poesia a Paestum e nel mediterraneo d’epoca tardo-arcaica, atti del convegno internazionale, Paestum, 4-6 ottobre 2018, ed. A. Meriani & G. Zuchtriegel, Pisa: Edizioni ETS 2020, (Argonautica, 3), p. 335-346.

[B 6, B 15, B 17, B 111, B 112, B 115, B 117, B 120, B 121, B 147.]

Cerasuolo, Salvatore, “Empedocles frigidus,” Vichiana, 8, 1979, p. 252-279.

[A 162.]

Cerri, Giovanni, (1998) “L’ideologia dei quattro elementi da Omero ai Presocratici,” Annali dell’Istituto Universitario Orientale di Napoli, 20, 1998, p. 5-58.

[p. 26-32: B 6.]

– (2000) “Il poema di Empedocle ‘Sulla natura’ ed un rituale siceliota,” in: Poesia e religione in Grecia: Studi in onore di G. Aurelio Privitera, ed. M. Cannatà Fera & S. Grandolini, Napoli: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane 2000, p. 205-212.

[B 6.3.]

– (2000) “Poemi greci arcaici sulla natura e rituali misterici: Senofane, Parmenide, Empedocle,” Mediterraneo Antico, 3/2, 2000, p. 603-619.

[P. 604-613: on the mysteries celebrated in Acragas and Thurioi in honour of Nestis.]

– (2001) “'Physica' e 'Katharmoi' di Empedocle,” Aevum antiquum, N.S. 1, 2001, p. 181-196.

[There were three Emp. poems; B 3.1-8.]

– (2004) “Empedocle, fr. 3 D.-K: saggio di esegesi letterale,” in: Studi sul pensiero e sulla lingua di Empedocle, ed. L. Rossetti & C. Santaniello, Bari: Levante editori 2004, (‘Le Rane’, Collana di studi e testi, 37), p. 83-94.

[B 3.]

– (2006) “Empedocle narratore di miti: la vicenda cosmica,” A I O N, xxviii, 2006, p. 49-63.

[B 3, B 11, B 12, B 17, B 27, B 28, B 29, B 31, B 131.]

– (2007) “Livello scientifico e livello mitico nei poemi di Empedocle,” in: Empedocle: tra poesia, medicina, filosofia e politica, ed. G. Casertano, Napoli: Loffredo 2007, p. 122-142.

Chaignet, Antelme-Édouard, Histoire de la psychologie des Grecs, Tome I: avant et après Aristote, Paris: Hachette et Cie 1887.

[Chapitre douzième: Empédocle, p. 82-96.]

Chang, Lian, Articulation and the origins of proportion in archaic and classical Greece, diss., McGill University, Montreal, 2009.

[The cosmogonic theories of Empedocles and Plato: Chapter Six.]

Chapouthier, Georges, “Le courant zoophile dans la pensée antique,” Revue des questions scientifiques, 161/3, 1990, p. 261-287, p. 266-267

[Superficial, unprecise, without direct evidence, and dependent on invalid literature.]

Cherniss, Harold, Aristotle’s criticism of Presocratic philosophy, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press 1935.

[A 32, B 8, B 9, B 11, B 12, B 13, B 14, B 17, B 20, B 21, B 23, B 26, B 30, B 31, B 35, B 36, B 37, B 38, B 39, B 53, B 54, B 57, B 59, B 61, B 62, B 63, B 64, B 65, B 67, B 71, B 79, B 81, B 84, B 89, B 90, B 96, B 100, B 103, B 105, B 106, B 108, B 107, B 109, B 110, B 115, B 126, B 135.]

Chitwood, Ava, The deaths of the Greek philosophers, Diss., Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, Md. 1993

[Heraclitus, Empedocles, Democritus.]

– “The death of Empedocles,” The American Journal of Philology, 107, 2, 1986, p. 175-191.

– Death by philosophy: the biographical tradition in the life and death of the archaic philosophers Empedocles, Heraclitus, and Democritus, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press 2004.

Χονδροκούκης, Μιχαήλ Θεόδωρος, Δαίμων και κόσμος: η ενότητα εσχατολογίας και κοσμολογίας στο έργο του Εμπεδοκλή, Diss. Αριστοτέλειο Πανεπιστήμιο Θεσσαλονίκης (ΑΠΘ), 2020.

Christianus [Chrestien], Quintus Septimus Florens, I. 'Empedoklέouj Sfaῖra, ἢ Dhmhtrίou toῦ Triklinίou. Empedoclis sphaera, vel Demetrii Triclinii senariis versibus, ab eruditiss. viris castigatis, descripta. Vetus est, et nunc primum in lucem edita, E Bibliotheca ornatissimi ac prudentiss. viri Io. à S. Andrea... II. Sphaera vetus Graeca [Empedocli tributa]: quam Latinis senariis recentavit et recensuit Q. Sept. Fl. Christianus, Lutetiae 1586-1587.

[B 161.]

Christianus, Quintus Septimus Florens, Sphaera vetus Graeca [Empedocli tributa]: quam Latinis senariis recentavit et recensuit Q. Sept. Fl. Christianus, Lutetiae 1587

[non vidi.]

Chrysakopoulou, Vasiliki, (Sylvana), Théologie versus physique dans la poésie présocratique de Xénophane à Empédocle, Thèse de doctorat, Paris, Sorbonne (Paris IV), 2003, sous la Direction de G. Romeyer Dherbey. ––

[Empédocle et Xénophane: p. 219-316; Introduction à Empédocle: p.221-235; La physique d'Empédocle à la lumière de la physique xénophanienne: p. 236-258;  Démonologie et cosmologie chez Empédocle: p. 259-267; Démonologie et anthropologie chez Empédocle: p. 268-271; L'épopée d'Empédocle à l'encontre d’Hésiode: p. 272-300; La notion de bonheur divin chez Empédocle: p. 301-316.]

– “The beauty and the beast: Aphrodite and Teratogenesis in Empedocles’ Cosmogony,” in: Hybrids and extraordinary beings: Deviations from ''Normality'' in ancient Greek mythology and modern medicine, ed. P. N. Soukakos, A. Gartziou Tatti & M. Paschopoulos, Athens: Kōnstantaras Iatrikes Ekdoseis 2017.

Ciampa, Chiara Raffaella, “Eschatological visions in Pindar and Empedocles,” in: Eschatology in Antiquity: forms and functions, ed. H. F. Marlow, K. Pollmann & H. Van Noorden, London: Routledge 2021, (Rewriting Antiquity), p. 131-143.

– “The Presocratics and the gods - Review of Saetta-Cottone R. (ed.), Penser-les-dieux avec les Présocratiques,” The Classical Review, first view, 2022 (on-line), p. 1-4.

Ciglenečki, Jan, Empedoklova kozmološka misel v luči strasburških fragmentov: diplomska naloga, Ljubljana 2005. 

[Short degree essay.]

– “Empedoklov nauk o posmrtnem preseljevanju v luči hermetičnega traktata Korē Kosmou,” Anthropos, 1-2, 2007, p. 1-24.

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:http://www.anthropos.si/anthropos/2007/1_2/ciglenecki.pdf

– Empedokles. Fragmenti, Dopolnjena in razširjena izdaja, Ljubljana 2016. 

http://www.kud-logos.si/e-knjige/

Ćirković, Milan M., “Ancient origins of a modern anthropic cosmological argument,” Astronomical and astrophysical transactions, 22, 6, dec. 2003, p. 879–886.

[B 21.]

Clark, Gillian, Porphyry. On abstinence from killing animals, London-New Delhi-New York-Sidney: Bloomsbury 2000.

[B 124, B 128, B 139 - Reincarnation p. 125-126.]

Clark, Gordon Haddon, Empedocles and Anaxagoras in Aristotle’s De anima, diss., Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania 1929.

Clarke, Michael, “The wisdom of Thales and the problem of the word ΙΕΡΟΣ,” The Classical Quarterly, 45.2, 1995, p. 296-317.

[Homeric background, B 134.] 

– Flesh and spirit in the songs of Homer: a study of words and myths, Oxford: Clarendon Press 1999. [Useful for Homeric background.]

Classen, Carl Joachim, “Empedokles,” in: Pauly-Wissowa Real-Encyclopädie der klassischen Altertumswissenschaft, Suppl. Band XII, Stuttgart 1970, p. 241-247.

Claus, David B., Toward the soul: An inquiry into the meaning of ψυχή before Plato, New Haven-London: Yale University Press 1981.

[Chapter III.2: “Eschatological uses of ψυχή: Pythagoras, Orphism, Empedocles, p. 111-123. B 112, B 115, B 117, B 134.]

Clay, Diskin, “Lucretius contra Empedoclen: a textual note,” Classical Journal, 73, 1, 1977, p. 27-29.

[A 21, B 6, B 37.]

– Paradosis and survival: Three chapters in the history of Epicurean philosophy, The University of Michigan Press 1998.

[P. 126-127 (B 71, B 21), p. 154-155 (B 3, B 131).]

– “Recovering originals: Peri Physeos and De Rerum Natura,” Apeiron, 33/3, 2000, p. 259-271.

– “Empedocles at Panopolis and Delphi,” in: Presocratics and Plato: Festschrift at Delphi in honor of Charles Kahn, ed. R. Patterson, V. Karasmanis and A. Hermann, Las Vegas - Zurich - Athens: Parmenides Publishing 2012. p. 59-78.

[Papyrus a, b, c, d Martin-Primavesi, B 3, B 17, B 20, B 76, B 111, B 112, B 115, B 117, B 127, B 131, B 133, B 139, B 140.]

Clayman, Dee, L., “Philosophers and philosophy in Greek epigram,” in: Brill's Companion to Hellenistic Epigram down to Philip, ed. P. Bing & J. S. Bruss, Leiden-Boston: Brill 2007, p. 497-517.

[Empedocles: p. 503, A1.67.]

Clermont - Ganneau, C., “Empédocle, Les Manichéens et les Cathares,” Journal asiatique, 9, 15, 1900, p. 179-186.

[A Syrian work of the ninth century, which depends on Epiphanius and Scithinus, asserts the predecessors of Manicheans were Pythagoras and Empedocles.]

Cleve, Felix Merori, The giants of pre-Sophistic Greek philosophy: an attempt to reconstruct their thoughts, II, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff 19733 (19651, 19692), p. 329-395.

– “Review of H. Lambridis, Empedocles,” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 17, 1979, p. 455-457.

Coates, Cameron, F., “Cosmic democracy or cosmic monarchy? Empedocles in Plato’s Statesman,” Polis: The Journal for Ancient Greek Political Thought, 35, 2, 2018, p. 418-446.

[B 17, B 26, B 30, B 115, B 130.]

Coda, Elisa, “Empedocle nel medioevo arabo attraverso la testimonianza di Temistio,” Philologia Philosophica, 1, 2022, p. 167-180.

Cohen, S. Marc, Curd Patricia & Reeve, C.D.C. (ed.), Readings in ancient Greek philosophy: from Thales to Aristotle, Indianapolis: Hackett 20114.

[P. 52-74. Translation of the fragments by R. McKirahan, 2010. [ + ].]

Cohoe, Caleb, M. (ed.), Aristotle’s On the soul: a critical guide, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2022.

[A 86, A 92, B 6, B 23, B 84, B 96, B 105, B 107, B 109, B 110.]

– “Review of A. G. Long, Death and immortality in ancient philosophy, 2019 and A. G. Long (ed.), Immortality in ancient philosophy, 2021,” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 61, 3, 2023, p. 515-518.

Colangelo, Eleonora, Prolegomena a una nuova edizione dell’Hymn. Hom. Ap. (III), Master (Laurea Magistrale) Università di Pisa, 2015.

[B 6, B 29, B 134.]

– “Neoanalisi e intertestualità dell’Inno omerico ad Apollo: modelli, immagini, stemma,” Greaco-Latina Brunensia, 22, 2, 2017, p. 77-118.

[P. 94-97: B 6, B 134.]

Cole, F.J., “Aristotle’s lantern,” Centaurus, 1, 4, 1951, p. 377 (in Varia).

[B 84.]

Colli, Giorgio, Lezioni di storia della filosofia antica: Empedocle, Parte prima, Anno accademico 1948-49, Università degli studi di Pisa, Facultà di lettere, Pisa: Libreria 1949.

– Empedocle, A cura di Federica Montevecchi, Milan: Adelphi 2019, (Piccola Biblioteca Adelphi, 746).

Colombani, Maria Cecilia, “As relações entre poesia didática e filosofia. Hesíodo, Parmênides e Empédocles,” Revista Heródoto, 2, 1, 2017, p. 147-164.

https://periodicos.unifesp.br/index.php/herodoto/article/view/1014/pdf_77

Conger, George Perrigo, Theories of macrocosms and microcosms in the history of philosophy, New York: Columbia University Press 1922.

[Empedocles: p. 4-5. B 84, B 100.]

Conte, Gian Biagio, Generi e lettori, Milan 1991, p. 17-26.

Cook, Arthur Bernard, Zeus: A study in ancient religion, I, Zeus god of the bright sky, Cambridge: University Press 1914.

[P. 31-32 : B 6. B 62.]

Cordero, Nestor-Luis, “Platon, Empédocle, et l’origine de l’être humain,” in: Platon, source des Présocratiques: exploration, ed. M. Dixsaut - A. Brancacci, Paris, J. Vrin 2002, p. 93-106.

[A 49, A 66, A 68, A 72, B 6, B 57, B 60, B 61, B 62, B 67, B 96, B 98.]

Cornavaca, Ramón, (ed.), Filósofos presocráticos. Fragmentos II, Buenos Aires: Losada 2011.

Cornelli, Gabriele, In search of Pythagoreanism: Pythagoreanism as an historiographical category, Berlin-Boston: De Gruyter 2013.

[Chap. 3.3, 'Ten or twenty human generations' (Empedocles), p. 97-99: B 129.]

– “Aristotle and the Pythagorean myths of metempsychosis,” Méthexis, 28, 2016, p. 1-13.

[B 126, B 129.]

– “Bearing with dignity your load of inalienable responsibility: The movements of the Pythagoreans’ soul between metempsychosis, palingenesis, anamnesis and koinonia,” in: Seelenreise und Katabasis: Einblicke ins Jenseits in antiker philosophischer Literatur, Akten der 21. Tagung der Karl und Gertrud Abel-Stiftung vom 30. Juli bis 1. August 2018 in Tübingen, ed. I. Männlein-Robert, Berlin - Boston: W. de Gruyter 2021, p. 107-138.

[B 112, B 129.]

Cornelli, Gabriele, McKirahan Richard, Macris Constantinos (ed.), On Pythagoreanism, Berlin-Boston: De Gruyter 2013, (Studia praesocratica, 5).

Cornford, Francis Macdonald, (1912) From religion to philosophy. A study in the origins of Western speculation, New York-London: Longmans, Green and Co E. Arnold 1912. Reprint in Princeton: Princeton University Press 1991.

[Emp.: p. 63, 150-152, 224-242. A 30, B 2,  B 3, B 17, B 19, B 26, B 27, B 28, B 30, B 31, B 35, B 96, B 112,  B 113, B 114, B 115, B 117, B 119, B 120, B 121, B 122, B 128, B 130, B 134, B 135, B 146, B 147.]

– (1922) “Mysticism and science in the Pythagorean tradition,” The Classical Quarterly, 16, 3/4, 1922, p. 137-150.

– (1926) “Mystery religions and pre-socratic philosophy,” in: The Cambridge ancient history, IV, The Persian empire and the West, chapter XV, ed. J. B. Bury, S. A. Cook & F. E. Adcock, Cambridge 1926, p. 522-578, 650-653. Reprint with slight corrections in 1930.

["Empedocles", p. 563-569, section X, plus bibliography p. 652. Reprint in F. M. Cornford. selected papers of F. M. Cornford, edited with an Introduction by A. Bowen, New York-London: Garland Publishing 1987, p. 36-98. Emp.: p. 77-83.]

– (1952) Principium sapientiae: the origins of Greek philosophical thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1952.

[P. 5-7, 34, 56-57, 64, 121-124, 151-152, 167-168, 177. B 3, B 17, B 28, B 100, B 115, B 129, B 134.]

Corradi, Michele, “La préhistoire de l’humanité dans le mythe d’Aristophane du Banquet de Platon, entre poésie, sophistique et philosophie” in: Miti e mitologie tra creazione e interpretazione, ed. R. Ruggiero & O. Vox, Lecce: Pensa Multimedia 2021, p. 97-136.

[B 20, B 61, B 62, B 79.]

Corrado, Alberto, “Life, death, and lightning: an alternative edition of Empedocles B 9 DK with commentary,” Classical Philology, 118, 3, 2023, p. 374-386.

[A 85, B 9.]

Costa, Alexandre da Silva, (1999) “Review of Martin & Primavesi, L’Empédocle de Strasbourg,” Letras Clássicas, 3, 1999, p. 319-325.

https://www.academia.edu/50475453/L_Emp%C3%A9docle_de_Strasbourg_Resenha1999

https://www.revistas.usp.br/letrasclassicas/article/view/73773/77439

– (1999) “Um novo Empédocles?,” Philosophica, 13, 1999, p. 125-130.

https://repositorio.ul.pt/bitstream/10451/28567/1/philosophica13.pdf

– (2002) “Como e por que sobrevivem os pré-socráticos: os exemplos de Empédocles e Heraclito,” Revista filosófica de Coimbra, 11, 21, 2002, p. 163-178.

[Emp. Strasbourg.]

– (2009) Die Unterscheidung der parmenideischen Vernunft in den Werken des Zenons und des Empedokles. Diss., Universität Osnabrück, Osnabrück, 2009.

http://elib.ub.uni-osnabrueck.de/publications/diss/E-Diss929_thesis.pdf

[B 6, B 7, B 8, B 9, B 12, B 16, B 17, B 20, B 21, B 23, B 27, B 28, B 29, B 33, B 34, B 35, B 89, B 105, B 109, B 115, B 127, B 128, B 136, B 146.]

– (2012) “Mito e filosofia em Empédocles. A redenção pelo saber,” Anais de Filosofia Clássica, VI, 11, 2012, p. 99-110.

http://www.ifcs.ufrj.br/~afc/2012/Costa.pdf

[B 6, B 17, B 115, B 128, B 136, B 137.]

Costello, Sean M., “Aristotle on light and vision: an ‘ecological’ interpretation,” Apeiron, 55, 2, 2022, p. 247-279.

[A 57, B 84.]

Couloubaritsis, Lambros, “The Strasbourg Empedocles (P. Strasb. gr. Inv. 1665-1666),” Diogenes, 1999, p. 96-99.

– Aux origines de la philosophie européenne. De la pensée archaïque au néoplatonisme, Paris-Brussels: De Boeck 20034, (Le point philosophique).

[Emp. : p. 132-138.]

– “Émergence de l’individualité dans la pratique archaïche du mythe d’Homère à Empédocle,” Hypnos, 24, 2010 (1), p. 1-23.

http://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/hypnos/article/download/4243/2853z

– “Les transfigurations de la notion de Physis entre Homère et Aristote,” Kriterion, 122, Dec./2010, p. 349-375.

http://www.scielo.br/pdf/kr/v51n122/02.pdf

[B 8, B 110.]

Couprie, Dirk, L. Heaven and Earth in Ancient Greek Cosmology, From Thales to Heraclides Ponticus, New York-Dordrecht-Heidelberg-London: Springer 2011.

[A 30, A 51, A 56, A 58, B 42.]

– “The spiral Movement of the Sun on an imaginary cylinder according to Empedocles and Anaximander,” Philosophia Classica, 15, 1, 2020, p. 4-24.

[A 1.77, A 50, A 51, A 54, A 56, A 58, A 60, A 61, B 44, B 45, B 46, B 48.]

Courtney, Edward, “The Proem of Lucretius,” Museum Helveticum, 58, 2001, p. 201-211.

[B 17.]

Covotti, Aurelio, “La filosofia nella Magna Grecia e in Sicilia fino a Socrate,” Annali delle Università Toscane, XXIII, Pisa: Vannucchi 1901.

[Empedocles: p. 137-169.]

– “Il mondo ‘non ingannevole’ di Empedocle e le sue ‘quattro radici’,” Atti dell’Accademia Pontaniana di scienze morali e politiche, 47, 1921, p. 63-84.

– “Le "Purificazioni" e la leggenda di Empedocle,” in: Atti della reale... Napoli, 1923, p. 17 ff..

– I presocratici, sagi, Napoli: Rondinella 1934, (Collezione di studi filosofici, serie storica, monografie no. 3), p. 159-187.

Cowan, Robert, “Of gods, men and stout fellows: Cicero on Sallustius’ Empedoclea (Q. FR. 2.10[9].3),” The Classical Quarterly, 63, 2, 2013, p. 764-771.

Crasso, Lorenzo, Istoria de poeti greci e di que che’n Greca lingua han poetato, Napoli, Bulifon 1678, p. 182-183.

Crispus, Joannes Baptista (Crispo, Giov. Battista), De ethnicis philosophis caute legendis disputationum .... Rome 1594.

[See L. Paquet, Y. Lafrance, Les Présocratiques [1450-1879] III, Québec: Bellarmin 1995, p. 88.]

Crowley, Timothy, J., “On the use of stoicheion in the sense of ‘element’,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 29, 2005, p. 367-394.

[B 6, B 17.]

– Aristotle on the matter of the elements, Diss., University of Oxford, 2009.

[P. 19-20: B 6; p. 77, 98: B 21.]

– “De generatione et corruptione 2.3: does Aristotle identify the contraries as elements?,” The Classical Quarterly, 63.1, 2013, p. 161-182.

[P. 176: B 21.]

– “Aristotle, Empedocles, and the reception of the four elements hypothesis,” in: Brill’s Companion to the reception of Presocratic natural philosophy in later classical thought, ed. C. H Harry & J. Habash, Leiden: Brill 2021, (Brill’s Companions to Philosophy, 6), p. 352-376.

[B 6, B 17, B 21, B 35.]

Crusius, Otto, “Lobon und seine Verwandten,” Philologus, 30, 1925, p. 176-191.

Cruz, Sebastiana Ferreira da, Cosmologia em Empédocles de Agrigento, Universidade Federal do Tocantins - UFT, TCC Monografia, Palmas, TO, 2019.

Cubells, Fernando, Los filósofos presocráticos. Estudios inéditos de filosofia antigua (Empedocles: orígenes históricos de la ciencia ética), Valencia: Facultad de Teología San Vicente Ferrer 1956 (1979).

Cucinotta, Emilia, “Empedocle e le guerre persiane,” in: Cucinotta, E., Produzione poetica e storia nella prassi e nella teoria greca di età classica, Firenze: Firenze University Press 2014, (Premio Tesi di Dottorato; 40), p. 37-43.

See: https://unipi.academia.edu/EmiliaCucinotta

[A 23, B 34, B 115, B 131, B 132, B 133, B 134.]

Cudworth, Radulphus, Radulphi Cudworthi systema intellectuale hujus universi seu de veris naturae rerum originibus commentarii ... accedunt reliqua ejus opuscula, [ed. and comm. by] Joannes Laurentius Mosheimus, Lugduni Batavorum 1773, Tomus I-II, I.22-7 et passim.

[Birch, Th. (ed.), The works of Ralph Cudworth, D.D., containing the true intellectual system of the universe, Sermons, &c., a new edition, with references to the several quotations in the intellectual system, and a life of the author, by Thomas Birch M.A.  F.R.S., in four volumes, Vol. I, Oxford: D. A. Talboys 1829. Empedocles: p. 93-98, 111-118, 325-327.]

Culianu, Ioan P., “Iatroi kai manteis: sulle strutture dell’estatismo greco,” Studi Storico-religiosi, 4/2, 1980, p. 287-303.

[P. 290-294. E. as a shaman; the miraculous elements in his biography.]

Cumont, Franz, Recherches sur le symbolisme funéraire romain, Paris: Librairie orientaliste P. Geuthner 1942.

[P. 132-140: the later parallels of B 115.8-12 and a background of the idea; very informative text.]

Curd, Patricia, (1998) The legacy of Parmenides. Eleatic monism and later Presocratic thought, Princeton:  Princeton University Press 1998. (Reprint in Las Vegas:  Parmenides Publishing 2004).

[Chapter IV 3.1 Empedocles and the roots of all things, 3.2 Particles and pores, p. 155-171, plus p. 128 n.3. A 34, A 43, A 44, A 86, A 87, B 8, B 9, B 11, B 12, B 17, B 21, B 26, B 27, B 71, B 91, B 96, B 98, B 100, B 107.] 

– (2002) “A New Empedocles? Implications of the Strasburg fragments for Presocratic philosophy,” in: Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy, November 2000, ed. J. J. Cleary & G. M. Gurtler, vol. 17, 1, Leiden-Boston-Köln: Brill 2002, p. 27-49 and 57-59 (bibliography).

– (2002) “The metaphysics of physics: mixture and separation in Empedocles and Anaxagoras,” in: Presocratic philosophy, essays in honour of Alexander Mourelatos, ed. V. Caston & D. W. Graham, Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Company 2002, p. 139-158.

[B 8, B 9, B 17, B 21, B 23, B 96, B 98, B 112, B 146.]

– (2005) “On the question of religion and natural philosophy in Empedocles,” in: The Empedoclean Κόσμος: S[t]ructure, process and the question of cyclicity. Proceedings of the Symposium Philosophiae Antiquae Tertium Myconense, July 6th - July 13th, 2003, Patras, ed. A. L. Pierris, Patras: Institute for Philosophical Research 2005, p. 137-162.

– (2006) “Parmenides and after: Unity and plurality,” in: A Companion to ancient philosophy, ed. M. L. Gill & P. Pellegrin, Malden-Oxford-Victoria: Blackwell Publishing 2006, (Blackwell Companions to Philosophy), p. 34-55.

[Emp.: p. 42-44.]

– (2011) A Presocratics reader: selected fragments and testimonia, edited, with introduction, by Patricia Curd; translations by Richard D. McKirahan and Patricia Curd, Indianapolis: Hackett 2011².

[Emp.: p. 73-100. [ + ].]

– (2011) “New Work on the Presocratics,” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 49, 1, 2011, p. 1-37.

[Emp.: p. 2-3, 26-27.]

– (2013) “Where are Love and Strife? Incorporeality in Empedocles,” in: Early Greek philosophy: The Presocratics and the emergence of reason, ed. J. McCoy, Washington, D.C.: CUA Press 2013, (Studies in Philosophy and the History of Philosophy, 57), p. 113-138.

[B 2, B 17, B 20, B 21, B 23, B 26, B 30, B 33, B 35, B 36, B 71, B 73, B 96, B 98, B 109, [B 115], papyrus.]

– (2016) “Powers, structure, and thought in Empedocles,” Rhizomata, 4, 1, 2016, p. 55-79.

– (2016) “Empedocles on sensation, perception, and thought,” Ancient epistemology, 19, 2016, p. 38-57.

[B 17, B 21, B 23, B 101a, B 105, B 106, B 107, B 108, B 109, B 110, B 132, B 133, B 134, B 143.]

Curletto, Silvio, “L’immaginazione e il concepimento: fortuna di una teoria embriogenetica e di un mito letterario,” Maia, 52/3, 2000, p. 533-564.

Cursaru, Gabriela, “Δίνη et στροφάλιγξ. La « théomachie » d’Empédocle et son modèle poétique homérique dans le chant XXI de l’Iliade,” Gaia, 26, 2023, p. 1-21.

[B 17, B 22, B 30, B 31, B 35, B 37, B 38, B 41, B 115, D73.]

Cusset, Christophe, ‘Aratos de Soles est-il « naturaliste » plutôt que poète ?,’L’homme et la science, ed. J. Jouanna, M. Fartzoff & B. Bakhouche, Paris: Les Belles Lettres 2011, (Association Guillaume Budé), p. 257-266.

[A 22.]

DDD

Daiber, Hans, Aetius arabus. Die Vorsokratiker in arabischer Überlieferung, Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner 1980, (Veröffentlichungen der Orientalischen Kommission, 33).

D’Alfonso, Francesca, “La terra desolata. Osservazioni sul destino di Bellerofonte (Il. 6, 200-202),” Museum Helveticum, 65, 2008, p.  1-21.

[B 115. See Abstract page Abstracts and summaries.]

Darcus, Shirley Muriel Louise, The notion of self in Xenophanes and Heraclitus, Diss., University of Toronto, 1973.

[B 17 p. 354. B 29: p. 320-322, 341-342. B 110: p. 354. B 115, p. 319-320, 340-341, 361, 383, 471. B 129: p. 469. B 134: p. 320-322, 341-344. B 146: p. 472-473.]

– “Daimon parallels the holy phrèn in Empedocles,” Phronesis, 22, 3, 1977, p. 175-190.

[B 134.]

Darcus Sullivan, Shirley Muriel Louise, “The nature of Phren in Empedocles,” in: Studi di filosofia preplatonica, ed. M. Capasso - F. De Martino - P. Rosati, Napoli: Bibliopolis 1985, p. 119-136.

[B 5, B 15, B 17, B 23, B 110, B 114, B 133, B 134, B 138.]

Davies, C., “Empedocles of Acragas,” History To-day, 21, 1971, p. 708-714.

[Very sketchy and too general study on Emp. life and teaching.]

Dean, Stuart, Empedocles: The Greek text of all of the fragments (With Hyperlinks to annotations on each fragment), https://independent.academia.edu/StuartDean

https://www.academia.edu/41105256/Empedocles_The_Greek_Text_Of_All_Of_The_fragments_With_Hyperlinks_To_Annotations_On_Each_Fragment, 2021.

[[+  +].]

De Azevedo Vianna, S. B., “Empédocles e o pluralismo grego,” Kriterion, 25/72, 1984, p. 125-143.

De Cecco, Daniela, “Guerra e giustizia nella filosofia greca della natura: da Eraclito a Empedocle,” in: La guerra : una riflessione interdisciplinare, ed. Gilda Manganaro Favaretto, Trieste : Edizioni Università di Trieste 2003, p. 55-82.

Decharme, Paul, La Critique des traditions religieuses chez les Grecs, Paris: A. Picard et fils 1904.

[P. 58-63. The author denies the existence of all traditional gods in Emp. including of those in B 6 and B 134, there are only long-lived daimones.]

Decleva Caizzi, Fernanda, “The Strasbourg Text of the Works of Empedocles,” Rivista di storia della filosofia, 55, 2000, p. 691-694.

[Review of Martin - Primavesi, 1999.]

De Crescenzo, Luciano, “Empedocle,” in: Storia della Filosofia Greca 1 - I presocratici, Milan: Arnoldo Mandadori 1983, p. 142-155.

Defradas, Jean, “Un nouvel Empédocle,” Revue des études grecques, 86, 1973, p. 212-223.

Degani, Enzo, ΑΙΩΝ da Omero ad Aristotele, Padua: CEDAM 1961, (Pubblicazioni della Facoltà di lettere e filosofia. Università di Padova, 37).

[Emp. p. 71-73.]

– “Empedocle B 16.2 D.- Kr.,” Quaderni dell’istituto di filologia greca, 2, 1967, p. 6-7.

[B 16.]

De Grandi, Nicola, “Riferimenti Empedoclei nelle Baccanti di Euripide,” Dioniso, 65, 1995, p. 55-59. [Bacch. 1-9 = par. B 6; Bacch. 4 = B 112.4, Bacch. 917-1170 = B 137, Bacch. 1141-2 = B 127.1.]

Deichgräber, Karl, “Review of Ernst Wenkebach,” Beiträge zur Textgeschichte der Epidemienkommentare Galens,” Gnomon, 6, 1930, p. 375-376.

[B 67.]

– “Xenophanes Περι φύσεως,” Rheinisches Museum, 87, 1938, p. 1-31, p. 22-23.

[B 2.9, B 5, B 15.3.]

Delatte, Armand, Études sur la littérature pythagoricienne, Paris: Édouard Champion 1915, p. 39-40.

[(B 136), 41-2, n. 62 (B 2.9, B 3), 63 (B 2.6), 72 (B 152), 77 (B 112.4), 78 (B 146-B 147) and 252 (B 6 and tetraktys, B 129).]

– “Les conceptions de l’enthousiasme chez les philosophes présocratiques,” L’Antiquité Classique, 3, 1, 1934, p. 5-79.

[Emp.: p. 21-27. Printed separately with the same pagination in Collection d’Études Anciennes, Les Belles Lettres, Paris 1934; A 98, B 110, B 112, B 115, B 129, B 134.]

– “Les harmonies dans l’embryologie hippocratique,” in: Mélanges P. Thomas, Bruges 1930, p. 160-171.

Delattre Biencourt, Joëlle, Théon de Smyrne. Lire Platon. Le recours au savoir scientifique : arithmétique, musique, astronomie. Présentation, traduction et annotations par J. D. B., Toulouse: Anarchasis 2010, (Essais, série philologie).

[B 121.2: p. 271 ; B 143 : p. 39-40, 120.]

Delcourt, Marie, (1938) “Chapitre V. Les Fléaux en Sicile au temps d’Empédocle,” in: Stérilités mystérieuses et naissances maléfiques dans l’Antiquité classique, Liège: Librairie E. Droz 1938, (Bibliothèque de la faculté de philosophie et lettres, fasc. 83). Reprint Paris: Les Belles Lettres 1986, p. 83-88, Liége: Presses universitaires de Liège 1986, & OpenEdition Books 2013.

http://books.openedition.org/pulg/658

[Chap. V “Les fléaux en Sicile au temps d’Empédocle”; Emp. as a tamer of winds, a healer of plague and a baren woman: A 2, A 14; these stories are derived from B 111.2-3.]

– (1957) Héphaistos ou la légende du magicien, Paris: Les Belles Lettres 1957, (Bibliothèque de la Faculté de Philosophie et Lettres de l’Université de Liège, 146).

[B 111.]

– (1958) Hermaphrodite. Mythes et rites de la bisexualité dans l’Antiquité classique, Paris: PUF 1958.

[P. 115. On possible influence of Empedoclean zoogony - A 72, B 57 - B 63 - on Aristophanes’ speech in Plato’s Symposion with an general analysis of the background of the whole myth.]

– (1965) Pyrrhos et Pyrrha, Paris: Les Belles Lettres 1965.

[P. 69-70. A 1, par. 68-69: immortalization of Emp. by help of fire.]

de Leo, Daniela, “Empedocle,” in: Michelstaedter filosofo del Frammento: con Appunti di filosofia di Carlo Michelstaedter, Lecce: Milella 2004, (Pubblicazioni del Dipartimento di filosofia e scienze sociali. Nuova serie. Saggi / Università degli studi di Lecce, 13), p. 52-63.

de Ley, Herman, “Empedocles’ sexual theory: a note on fragment B 63,” L’Antiquité Classique, 47, 1, 1978, p. 153-162.

[A 72, A 81, B 61, B 62, B 63.]

– “Brief review of D. O’Brien, Pour interpréter Empédocle, 1981,” L’Antiquité Classique, 54, 1985, p. 343-344.

della Corte, Francesco, “Gli Empedoclea e Ovidio,” Maia, 37, 1985, p. 3-12.

del Lucchese, Filippo, Monstrosity and philosophy: radical otherness in Greek and Latin culture, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press 2019.

[B 17, B 21, B 35, B 57, B 61, B 62, B 73, B 75, B 87, B 97, B 115.]

del Pino, Matilde, La realidad en la sabiduría presocrática. Empédocles - Heráclito - Parménides, Barcelona: Vision Libros 1981.

Demand, Nancy, “Pindar’s Olympian 2, Theon’s Faith and Empedocles’ Katharmoi,” Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies, 16, 1975, p. 347-357.

de Miro, Ernesto, “Società e arte nell'età di Empedocle,” Elenchos, 19/2, 1998, p. 325-344. (Elenchos 19/2 = Empedocle e la cultura della Sicilia antica: Illustrazione di un frammento inedito della sua opera. Atti del Convegno tenuto ad Agrigento dal 4 al 6 settembre 1997.]

Derenne, J-Ph., Debru, A., Grassino,A.E., Whitelaw, W.A., “The earliest History of diaphragm physiology,” European Respiratory Journal, 7, 1994, p. 2234-2240.

http://www.yogagardensf.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/diaphragm-1.pdf

http://erj.ersjournals.com/content/7/12/2234.long

http://erj.ersjournals.com/content/7/12/2234.full.pdf

[B 100.]

– “History of diaphragm physiology: the achievements of Galen,” European Respiratory Journal, 8, 1995, p. 154-160.

http://www.ersj.org.uk/content/8/1/154.full.pdf

de Rhoer, Jacobus, Porphyrii philosophi De abstinentia ab esu animalium libri quatuor cum notis ingeris Petri Victorii et Ioannis Valentini ... notas adiecit Iacobus de Rhoer, Trajecti ad Rhenum 1767.

[P. 139-140 et 152 (edition, translation and commentary of B 128), p. 161 (B 139) et p. 288 (B 124.2)].

de Romilly, Jacqueline, “Gorgias et le pouvoir de la poésie,” Journal of Hellenic Studies, 93, 1973, p. 155-162.

de Rubeis, Maria Grazia, “Ripetizioni nel ΠΕΡΙ ΦΥΣΕΩΣ di Empedocle,” Studi Classici e Orientali, 41, 1991, p. 87-93.

[B 17, B 20, B 26, B 71.]

de Sanctis, Dino, “La Musa πολυμνηστη: Penelope nella poetica di Empedocle (fr. 3 DK),” Studi Classici e Orientali, LIII, 2007 (published in 2010), p. 11-30.

[B 3.]

de Santoro Moreira, Fernando, José, “Αllégories et rondeaux philosophiques dans le Poème de la Nature d’Empédocle,” χώρα REAM, 11, 2013, p. 183‑200.

– “Empédocles, Aristóteles e os elementos,” Anais de Filosofia Clássica, 6,12, 2012, p. 39-55. Released in October 2014. 

[A 37, B 6, B 8, B 17, B 22, B 71, B 82, B 90, B 111, B 117.]

http://www.revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/FilosofiaClassica/article/view/1452/1293

Deschamps, Lucienne, “'Victrix Venus'. Varron et la cosmologie empédocléenne,” in: Beiträge zur altitalischen Geistesgeschichte: Festschrift für Gerhard Radke zum 18. Februar 1984, ed. R. Altheim-Stiehl & M. Rosenbach, Münster-Westfalen: Aschendorffsche Verlagsbuchhandlung 1986, p. 51-72.

– “Le chant V du De rerum natura de Lucrèce et Varron de Reate,” in: Vita Latina, 151, 1998, p. 6-18.

Desclos, Marie-Laurence, ‘Les Nuées : l'autre apologie de Socrate,’ in: Filosofia, storia, immaginario mitologico. Nuovi approcci, ed. E. Berardi, M.P. Catiglioni, M.-L. Desclos & P. Dolcetti, Alessandria (It.): Edizioni dell’Orso2022, (Sophia, 3), p. 3-34.

[B 112.]

de Smet, Daniel, “The Influence of the Arabic Pseudo-Empedocles on medieval Latin philosophy: Myth or Reality?,” in: Across the Mediterranean frontiers: Trade, politics and religion 650-1450, ed. D. Agius & I. Netton, Turnhout 1997, p. 225-234.

– Empedocles Arabus. Une lecture néoplatonicienne tardive, (Koninklijke academie voor wetenschappen, letteren en schone kunsten van België, Klasse der Letteren, 165) Brussel: Paleis der Academiën 1998.

[Cf. the reviews of S. I. Stroumsa,” Journal of the American Oriental Society 122, January 2002, p. 94-97; and J. Janssens,” Tijdschrift voor filosofie 63, 2001, p. 405-406.]

des Places, Edouard, La religion grecque, Paris: A et J. Picard 1969, p. 187-191.

[B 29, B 17, B 21, B 109, B 115, B 117, B 128, B 134.]

Despotopoulos [Δεσποτόπουλος], Konstantinos I., “Θέματα φιλοσοφίας του Εμπεδοκλέους,” Πρακτικα της Ακαδημίας Αθηνων, 67, 1992, p. 192-202.

[B 3.9-13, B 110 etc.]

– Φιλοσοφικά και διαλεκτικά: Μελετήματα, Θεσσαλονίκη 1990.

[Emp.: p. 80-87.]

Detienne, Marcel, “La ‘Démonologie’ d’Empédocle,” Revue des études grecques, 72, 1959, p. 1-17.

[B 115, B 21, B 146, B 112, B 117, B 118, B 119, B 120, B 122, B 123, B 124, B 126.]

– La notion de daïmôn dans le pythagorisme ancien, Paris: Les Belles Lettres 1963, p. 79-85. Reprint 2021, (Anagôgê, 14).

[B 129.]

– Les maîtres de vérité dans la Grèce archaïque, Paris: F. Maspero 1967, (Textes à l'appui).

[B 4, B 23, B 110, B 121, B 122, B 123, B 132.]

Deussen, Paul, Die Philosophie der Griechen, Leipzig 1921, p. 106-124.

De Waele, Jozef Arthur, Acragas Graeca: Die historische Topographie des griechischen Akragas auf Sizielen, I. Historischer Teil, ’s-Gravenhage: 1971.

[P. 33, 204-205, p. 289: Taffel V. B 123.2.]

Dezeimeris, Jean-Eugène, “De quelques ouvrages retrouvés d’Empédocle, de Démocrite et de Diogène d’Apollonie,” Le Moniteur Universel, Paris 1846, coll. 1647c - 1648a, 1702b - 1703a, 1717c - 1718b

[The third part which concentrates only on Empedocles was published also in Séances et travaux de l’académie des sciences morales et politiques, 9, 1846, p. 199-224.]

Diano, Carlo, “Empedocle. L’eredità di Parmenide e dei Pitagorici, - Mitizzazione del principio del movimento - L’escatologia di Empedocle,” in: Il pensiero greco da Anassimandro agli stoici, Torino: Bollati Boringhieri 2007, (Series 1: Nuova cultura; 156), p. 72-76.

Diels, Hermann, (1873) “Critica,” in: Commentationes in honorem Francisci Buecheleri Hermanni Useneri editae a Societate Philologa Bonnensi, Bonnae 1873, p. 61-7, p. 65-66.

[B 42.]

– (1879) Doxographi Graeci, Collegit, recensuit, Prolegomenis Indicibusque instruxit Hermannus Diels, Berlin:  G. Reimer 1879.

– (1880) “Studia Empedoclea,” Hermes, 15, 1880, p. 161-179. 

[B 12, B 21.13-14, B 26.3-7, B 52, B 54, B 22, B 37, B 96, B 76, B 20, B 61, B 67, B 84, B 133, B 137, B 143.]

– 1884) “Gorgias und Empedokles,” Sitzungsberichte der königlich preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 1884, 1, 19, p. 343-368.

[= in: Sophistik, ed. C. J. Classen, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft 1976, p. 351-383; B 21, B 84.]

– (1890) Sibyllinische Blätter, Berlin: G. Reimer 1890.

[B 112, B 143.]

– (1894) “Pseudonaevianum,” Rheinisches Museum, 49, 1894, p. 478.

[B 121.2.]

– (1897) “Über ein Fragment des Empedokles,” Sitzungsberichte der königlich preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 49, 2, 1897, p. 1062-1073.

[B 142; published also separately as a Sonderabdruck of SPAW, 12 p. – Reprint in W. Burkert (ed.), Hermann Diels. Kleine Schriften zur Geschichte der antiken Philosophie, Darmstadt 1969, p. 147-158.]

– (1898) “Über die Gedichte des Empedokles,” Sitzungsberichte der königlich preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 31, 1898, p. 396-415.

[Published also separately as a Sonderabdruck of SPAW, 20 p. – Reprint in W. Burkert (ed.), Hermann Diels. Kleine Schriften zur Geschichte der antiken Philosophie, Darmstadt 1969, p. 127-146.]

– (1898) “Symbola Empedoclea,” in: Mélanges Henri Weil, Paris: A. Fontemoing 1898, p. 125-130.

[B 115.1, 4 et 5-7, B 143, B 61.]

– (1899) Elementum: Eine Vorarbeit zum griechischen und lateinischen Thesaurus, Leipzig: B. G. Teubner 1899.

– (1901) Poetarum philosophorum fragmenta, Berlin: Weidmann 1901, (Poetarum graecorum fragmenta, III, 1, ed. U. von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff).

[Emp.: p. 74-168; Reprint in Hildesheim: Weidmann 20002. [ + ].]

– (1922) Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, Berlin: Weidmann 19224 (19031; 19062; 19123).

[Band I, p. 193-283, and appendix p. XXX-XXXIII. [ + ].]

Diels, Hermann & Kranz, Walther, Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, Band I, Berlin: Weidmann 19345.

[Emp.: p. 276-375, without "Nachtrag" (however see in Band II, p. 419-424). = DK5.]

– Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, Band I, Berlin: Weidmann 19516.

[Reprint of 19345 with a "Nachtrag". Published by Weidmann in Berlin (Grunewald, and printing in Berlin-West SO 36 by Lindemann und Lüdecke) = DK6 or simply DK. Many reprints. Berlin: Weidmann 19547 [...] Zürich-Hildesheim: Weidmann 198918, 199219 etc. Emp.: p. 276-375 and 498-501. [ + ].]

– Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, Band III (Wortindex von W. Kranz. Namen- und Stellenregister von H. Diels ergänzt von W. Kranz), Berlin: Weidmann 19375.

– Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, Band III (Wortindex von Walther Kranz. Namen- und Stellenregister von H. Diels ergänzt von W. Kranz), Zürich-Hildesheim: Weidmann 19526.

[Many reprints. Band II is dated also 1952.]

Diès, Auguste, “L’évolution de la théologie dans les philosophes grecs III. D’Empédocle à Socrate,” Revue d’histoire et de littérature religieuses, 11, 1906, p. 320-352.

[Emp.: p. 325-335. General sketch of Emp. teaching which was heavily influenced by H. Diels. B 31, B 28, B 29, B 115, B 133, B 134, B 146, B 147.]

– Le cycle mystique : la divinité, origine et fin des existences individuelles dans la philosophie antésocratique, Paris: F. Alcan 1909, (Collection historique des grands philosophes).

[Emp.: p. 83-99. B 6, B 11, B 15, B 16, B 17, B 21, B 23, B 27, B 28, B 29, B 30, B 31  B 35, B 110, B 112, B 115, B 116, B 117, B 121, B 127, B 128, B 130, B 132, B 133, B 134, B 136, B 144, B 146, B 147.]

Dieterich, Albrecht, Nekyia: Beiträge zur Erklärung der neuentdeckten Petrusapokalypse, Leipzig: B. G. Teubner 1893.

[P. 119: B 115.6.]

Dietrich, Ernst Ludwig, “Der Urmensch als Androgyn,” Zeitschrift für Kirchengeschichte, 58, dritte Folge IX, 3-4, 1939, p. 297-345.

[P. 299-301: Sphairos as an androgynous god: B 27, B 28, B 30, B 134; influence of Empedocles on Aristophanes’s speech in Plato’s Symposion.]

Di Giovanni, Piero, “L’Empedocle di Freud,” in: Un secolo di ricerche in Magna Grecia, Atti del ventottesimo Convegno di studi sulla Magna Grecia, Taranto, 7-12 ottobre 1988, Taranto 1989, p. 173-184.

[Edizioni G.B.M., Messina.]

– “Empedocle e le quattro radici del mondo,” in: P. Di Giovanni, La storia della filosofia nell’età classica : dal VII secolo a.C. al II secolo d.C., Milan: FrancoAngeli 2013, p. 125-134.

[B 6.]

Diller, Hans, “ΟΨΙΣ ΑΔΗΛΩΝ TA ΦΑΙΝΟΜΕΝΑ,” Hermes, 67, 1, 1932, p. 14-42.

– “Προθέλυμνος,” Philologus, 97, 1948, p. 361-363.

[B 21.]

Dillon, John, “Review of Ancient philosophy, mystery and magic: Empedocles and the Pythagorean tradition by Peter Kingsley,” Hermathena, 164, 1998, p. 122-124.

– “Empedocles’ cosmic cycle in the later platonist tradition,” in: Agonistes: Essays in honour of Denis O’Brien, ed. J. Dillon & M. Dixsaut, Aldershot: Ashgate 2005, p. 227-234. Reprint London-New York: Routledge 2017.

Di Marco, Massimo, “La metensomatosi in Empedocle,” Filosofia e società, 4, 1995, p. 31-58. Reimpr. in: M. Di Marco, Sapienza italica: studi su Senofane, Empedocle, Ippone, Roma: Edizioni Studium 1998, (Quaderni della Libera Università "Maria SS. Assunta" Lumsa - Roma, 13), p. 33-68.

Di Pasquale Barbanti, Maria, “Empedocle in Plotino e in Porfirio,” Invigilata Lucernis, 22, 2000, p. 31-45.

[A 37, ad B 1154, ad B 1202, B 120, ad B 1172, B 126, B 129.]

Disandro, Carlos Alberto, Filosofía y poesía en el pensar griego. Anaxágoras, Empédocles, Demócrito, La Plata: Hosteria Volante 1974.

[B2, B 3, B 35, B 112, B 114, B 115, B 131, B 132, B 134.]

Ditadi, Gino, “Orfeo, Pitagora, Empedocle,” in: Teofrasto, Della Pietà, ed. Gino Ditadi, Este (Padua): Isonomia 2005, p. 61-91, (Bibliophilia).

Dixsaut, Monique, “L’Empedocle di Nietzsche,” in: Empedocle: tra poesia, medicina, filosofia e politica, ed. G. Casertano, Napoli: Loffredo 2007, p. 310-330.

Dodds, Eric Robertson, The Greeks and the irrational, Berkeley: The Regents of the University of California 1951, (Sather Classical Lectures, 25).

[Emp.: p. 145-156, plus end notes.]

Dolce, Lodovico, “Empedocle philosopho,” in: Lodovico Dolce, Terzetti per le “Sorti” : poesia oracolare nell’officina di Francesco Marcolini. edition and commentary by Paolo Procaccioli, Treviso: Fondazione Benetton studi ricerche; Roma: Viella 2006, (Ludica; 6), p. 181 (XXIX).

[See also F. Marocolini, Le ingeniose sorti, Venice 1550, p. 52.]

Dombrowski, Daniel A., The philosophy of vegetarianism, Amherst: The University of Massachusetts Press 1984.

[Empedocles, p. 2, 21-22, 25, 32, 53, 55, 86, 90, 96, 99, 146. B 117, B 128, B 139.]

D’Onofrio, Stevo, L’unità del pensiero empedocleo alla luce del Papiro di Strasburgo (P. Strasb. gr. Inv. 1665-1665), Tesi di laurea in Storia della filosofia Antica, Trieste a. a., 1998-99.

Dorandi, Tiziano, “Gli studi Ercolanesi,” in: Hermann Diels (1848-1922) et la science de l’Antiquité, Vandœuvres-Genève: Fondation Hardt 1999, (Entretiens sur l’Antiquité classique, 45), p. 227-260, p. 239-242.

[B 2.1, B 100.1-2, B 142.]

– “Qualche considerazione di metodo,” Aevum antiquum, N.S. 1, 2001, p. 197-203.

[“we” in Pap. Strasb., B 115.3-4, B 134.]

– Diogenes Laertius. Lives of eminent philosophers, edited with introduction by T. D., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2013, (Cambridge Classical Texts and Commentaries, 50).

Döring, August, “Das Weltsystem des Empedokles,” Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, 105, 1895, p. 29-45.

[A 30, A 49, A 50, A 53, A 54, A 561, A 58, A 59 etc.]

– Geschichte der griechischen Philosophie. Gemeinverständlich nach den Quellen, I, Leipzig: O.R. Reisland 1903.

[Emp.: p.197-216.]

Drozdek, Adam, (2003) “Empedocles’ Theology,” Myrtia, 18, 2003, p. 5-20.

http://revistas.um.es/myrtia/article/viewFile/36741/35271

http://interclassica.um.es/var/plain/storage/original/application/641f8149a020b062d41adc23f04044e3.pdf.

[B 134.]

– (2007) Greek philosophers as theologians: the divine arche, Aldershot (UK)-Burlington (VT): Ashgate 2007. [P. 71-83, Chap. 6: Empedocles and the holy phren. Elements and forces, harmony, chance and necessity, god, immortality. B 134.]

– (2008) In the beginning was the apeiron: infinity in Greek philosophy, Stuttgart: F. Steiner 2008, (Palingenesia, 94).

[Chapter 7: p. 57-60. B 17, B 27, B 28, B 29, B 39, B 98, B 112, B 135.]

– (2011) Athanasia: afterlife in Greek philosophy, Hildesheim - Zürich - New York, NY: Olms 2011. (Spudasmata, 137).

[Chapter 8: Empedocles; 8.1 The soul, 8.2 Blood, 8.3 The daimôn, 8.4 The body, 8.5 Immortality, p 125-142. A 78, A 85, A 86, B 2, B 17, B 21, B 59, B 98, B 105, B 109, B 110, B 112, B 113, B 115, B 117, B 128, [B 134], B 138, B 141, B 146, B 147.]

Drvota, Tomáš & Tomáš Vítek, “Parménide DK 28 B 16 : un fragment méconnue [sic] d’Empédocle ? Part I : Parménide,” Eirene, 56, 1-2, 2020, p.179-240.

[B 108, B 106, B 103, B 105, B 107, B 109, B 134, B 8, B 110.]

DuBose, L. Shannon, Aristotle’s doctrine of elements, University of South Carolina, 1974, (The Society for Ancient Greek Philosophy Newsletter, 78).

https://orb.binghamton.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1077&context=sagp

http://orb.binghamton.edu/sagp/78

Duchesne-Guillemin, Jacques, “D’Anaximandre à Empédocle: Contacts gréco-iraniens,” in: Atti del convegno sul tema: La Persia e il mondo greco-romano. Roma 11. - 14. Aprile 1965, ed. A. Pagliano, Roma: Accademia Nazionale di Lincei 1966, p. 423-431.

Duminil, Marie-Paule, Le Sang, les vaisseaux, le cœur, dans la collection hippocratique, anatomie et physiologie, Paris: Les Belles Lettres 1983.

[P. 216 & 247: B 98; p. 23: B 150; p. 270-272: B 100; p. 309: B 105.]

Dümmler, Ferdinand, Akademika, Beiträge zur Litteraturgeschichte der sokratischen Schulen, Giessen: J. Ricker'sche Buchhandlung 1889, p. 216-241.

[There are two worlds and two zoogonies; the zoogony of the Strife is documented with A 30, B 62, A 85 and A 70.]

– “Zur orphischen Kosmologie,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 7, 1894, p. 147-153.

[Emp. and Orphismus; a critical reaction to Kern, AGPh 1, 1888, B 134.]

Dumont, Jean-Paul, “Empédocle,” in: Les Présocratiques, édition établie par Jean-Paul Dumont avec la collaboration de Daniel Delattre et de Jean-Louis Poirier, Paris: Gallimard 1988, (Bibliothèque de la Pléiade), p. 319-439, plus end notes p. 1294-1331.

[[+  +]. Reprint in Collection Folio Essais, Gallimard, 1991, under the title Les Écoles Présocratiques, p. 127-247, plus end notes p. 792-824.]

Dumoulié, Camille, “Empédocle ou le pathos de l’Harmonie (au Ve siècle avant J.-C),” Critique, 49 (Nr. 553-554), 1993 (juin-juillet), p. 357-371.

[Popular, antiquated and literary orientated sketch of Emp. teaching with some superficial parallels with Freud, Hölderlin, Schopenhauer, Nietzsche and Lacan; useless for Empedoclean studies.]

Düntzer, Heinrich, “Schedae criticae,” Archiv für Philologie und Pädagogik, 5, 1837, p. 205-211.

[P. 208. ὑπόξυλον and λιπόξυλον - B 71.1.]

Duprat, Guillaume Léonce, Quomodo apud Aristotelem in ejus. De Anima doctrina. Empedocles et Hippocrates auctoritate contenderint cum Platone, Lutetiae Parisiorum: A. Fontemoing 1898.

Dupuis, Jean (transl.), Théon de Smyrne, philosophe platonicien. Exposition des connaissances mathématiques utiles pour la lecture de Platon, traduite pour la première fois du grec au français par J. D., Paris: Hachette 1892.

[B. 121.1, B 143.]

Durić [Đjurić], Miloš N., “Etička shvatanja u Empedokla i Anaksagore,” Živa antika, 6, 1, 1956, p. 93-118.

[Empedokles und Anaxagoras als Ethiker.]

– “Empedokle i načelo koegzistencije,” Savremenik, 10, Januar, 1964, p. 179-187.

– Istorija helenske etike, Beograd: Zavod za izdavanije udžbenika 1961 (19672, 19973), p. 146-162. (= ŽA 6, 1956, p. 93-118).

Dyer, Robert, “Empedocles fr. 64 (Plut. Quaest. Nat. 21. 917 C),” Mnemosyne, 27, 1974, p. 175-176.

[B 64.]

EEE

Ebbesen, Sten, “Boethius as an Aristotelian scholar,” in: Aristoteles. Werk und Wirkung. Paul Moraux gewidmet, 2, Kommentierung, Überlieferung, Nachleben, Berlin - New York: De Gruyter 1987, p. 286-311.

[P. 309-311: an account of Empedocles found in a scholium in MS Laur. gr. 72,15, folio 22, a 13th-century codex of Aristotle’s Categories. This account is taken up in Primavesi 2008b, Janko 2010, Primavesi 2011 as 65 R, p. 460.]

Ebert, Theodor, “A Presocratic Philosopher behind the ‘Phaedrus’: Empedocles,” Revue de philosophie ancienne, XI(2), 1993, p. 211-227.

Edinger, Edward, F. & Wesley, Deborah A., The psyche in Antiquity. Book one, Early Greek philosophy, From Thales to Plotinus, Toronto: Innercity Books 1999.

[Studies in jungian psychology by jungian analysts. Emp.: p. 46-53.]

Edwards, Mark J., “Lucretius, Empedocles and Epicurean Polemics,” Antike und Abendland, 35, 1989, p. 104-115.

– “A late use of Empedocles: The oracle on Plotinus,” Mnemosyne, 43, 1990, p. 151-155.

– “Being and Seeming: Empedocles’ Reply,” Hermes, 119/3, 1991, p. 282-293.

Egleston Robbins, Frank, “The creation story in Ovid Met. I,” Classical Philology, 8, 4, 1913, p. 401-414. [Four elements, B 38, B 27. The text reads fr. 8 but it is a misprint for fr. 38, and to be precise fr. 38.4 with Titan = sun.]

Egorov (Yegorov), A. S., (2007) “Empedokl i problema gretcheskogo chamanizma,” Voprosy Filosofii., 2007, 8, p 97-105.

See abstract (in French) on page:

https://sites.google.com/site/empedoclesacragas/alexander-egorov

[= Empedocles and a problem of the Greek shamanism. B 111; B 128.]

– (2009) “K voprosou o lokalizatsii potoustoronnego mira ou Empedokla,” in: Opuscula cathedrae linguarum antiquarum. Fasc. II. Moscow, 2009, p. 72-81.

See abstract (in French) on page:

https://sites.google.com/site/empedoclesacragas/alexander-egorov

[= The question of the location of the Other World in Empedocles. B 115; B 118; B 121; B 128.]

– (2010) “Empedokl na Etne,” Aristeas: Philologia classica et historia antiqua, II, 2010, p. 15-25.

See abstract (in French) on page:

https://sites.google.com/site/empedoclesacragas/alexander-egorov

[B 126; B 128; В 151 DK.]

Einarson, Benedict, & Lacy, Philipp H., Plutarch’s Moralia, XIV, 1086 C - 1147 A, London: W. Heinemann 1967, Cambridge (Ma): Harvard University Press 1986, (Loeb, 428). 

[B 8, B 9, B 10, B 11, B 15.]

Eisler, Robert, “Bildopfer bei Empedokles,” Archiv für Religionswissenschaft, 13, 4, 1910, p. 625-626.

[B 128.4-5.]

Eitrem, Samuel, “Die vier Elemente in der Mysterienweihe,” Symbolae osloenses, 4, 1926, p. 39-59, and Symbolae osloenses, 5, 1927, p. 39-59.

[B 115.9-12.]

Elbert Decker, Jessica, & Matthew Mayock, “Parmenides and Empedocles,” in: The Cambridge Handbook of Western Mysticism and Esotericism, ed. G. A. Magee, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2016, p. 26-37.

[Influenced by P. Kingsley.]

Ellis, Robinson, “Some suggestions on Diels’ Poetarum Philosophorum Fragmenta,” The Classical Review, 16, 5, 1902, p. 269-270.

[B 3.9-11, B 17.20-1 and 25, B 64.]

El Murr, Dimitri, “Friendship in early Greek ethics,” in: Early Greek Ethics, ed. D. C. Wolfsdorf, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2020, p. 566-592.

[B 6, B 17, B 20, B 21, B 71, B 96.]

Emlyn-Jones, Chris, “Brief review of M. R. Wright, The extant fragments, 1981, & D. O’Brien, Pour interpréter Empédocle, 1981,” The Journal of Hellenic Studies, 105, 1985, p. 183.

Emminger, Alphons, “Empedokles,” in: Die vorsoktratischen Philosophen nach den Berichten des Aristoteles, Würzburg: A. Stuber 1878, p. 55-66, 148-162.

Emperius, Adolf, Opuscula philologica et historica amicorum studio collecta, ed. F. G. Schneidewin, Gottingae 1847, p. 287.

[B 40.]

English, Robert B., “Empedoclean Psychology,” Transactions and Proceedings of the American philological Association, 45, 1914, p. xvi.

Enos, Richard Leo, “Aristotle, Empedocles, and the notion of Rhetoric,” in: In search of justice. The Indiana tradition in speech communication, ed. Jensen, R.J. & Hammerback J.C., Amsterdam: Rodopi 1987, p. 5-21.

[A 1.]

– Greek rhetoric before Aristotle, Revised and expanded edition, Anderson (South Carolina): Parlor Press 2012, (Lauer series in rhetoric and composition).

[V. Significant Contributors to Sicilian Rhetoric, Empedocles and the emergence of the sicilian sophistic, p. 110-142.]

Erhardt-Siebold, Erika von, “The Anglo-Saxon riddle 74 and Empedokles fragment 117,” in: Medium Aevum, 15, 1946, p. 48-54.

[B 115, B 117.]

Erler, M., “Hermarch,” in: Die Philosophie der Antike, Band I/1: Die hellenistische Philosophie, ed. H. Flashar, Basel: Schwabe 1994, p. 227-234

– ‘Empedokles (31 DK)’, in: B. Zimmermann (ed.), Handbuch der griechischen Literatur der Antike. Erster Band: Die Literatur der archaischen und klassischen Zeit, Munich: C. H. Beck 2011, p. 277-280.

Erro María Guadalupe, Problemas aspectuales del aoristo y su aplicación a la lectura de los filósofos presocráticos, Diss. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, 2013.

Étienne (Estienne or Stephanus), Henri (Henricus), Plutarchi Chaeronensis Quae extant opera, cum latina interpretatione. Ex vetustis codicibus plurima nunc primum emendata sunt, ut ex Henr. Sephani annotationibus intelleges, Tome II, Geneva: 1572.

http://www.e-rara.ch/

[Greek. B 115, Page 1077: Empedocles in De exilio.]

– Poesis philosophica, vel saltem reliquiae poesis philosophicae, Empedoclis, Parmenidis, Xenophanis ..., item Heracliti et Democriti loci quidam et eorum epistolae, Geneva: 1573.

[P. 16-31.]

Evangelisti, Florestano, The concept of matter: a journey from Antiquity to quantum physics, Springer, 2023, (History of Physics).

ΕΥΑΓΓΕΛΙΔΕΣ, Μαργαρίτης, Ἱστορία τῆς θεωρίας τῆς γνώσεως, Athens 1885.

http://invenio.lib.auth.gr/record/122439/files/?ln=fr

http://invenio.lib.auth.gr/record/122439/files/1.pdf?version=1

http://invenio.lib.auth.gr/record/122439/files/5.pdf?version=1

[Empedocles: p. 75-79.]

Eyselein, K., “Symbolgehalt antiker Kosmologien,” Der altsprachliche Unterricht, 27/5, 1984, p. 50-64.

FFF

Fabre-Serris, Jacqueline, “La réception d’Empédocle dans la poésie latine : Virgile (Buc. 6), Lucrèce, Gallus et les poètes élégiaques,” Dictynna, 11, 2014.

http://dictynna.revues.org/1045

– “Enjeux moraux et idéologiques des usages d’Empédocle au livre XV des Métamorphoses : une réponse d’Ovide à Virgile (Énéide VI et VIII),” in: Les Présocratiques à Rome, ed. S. Franchet d’Espèrey & C. Lévy, Paris: Presses de l’université Paris-Sorbonne 2018, p. 303-319.

[B 129, B 132, B 130.]

Fabricius, Joannes Albertus, Empedoclis Sphaera, Hamburgi 1705.

[B 161.]

– Bibliotheca Graeca sive notitia scriptorum veterum Graecorum, Hamburgi 17183 (Sumptu F. Liebezeit 17051)

[P. 473-477: Empedocles’ biography and the list and the content of his supposed treatises.]

– Sexti Empirici opera graece et latine. Pyrrhoniarum institutionum libri iii cum Henr. Setphani versione et notis. Contra mathematicos sive Disciplinarum professores libri vi. Contra prilosophos libri V cum versione Gentiani Hervetii ... Emendavit supplevitque et toti operi notas addidit Jo. Albertus Fabricius, Lipsiae : Sumptu Joh. Friderici Gleditschii B. filii 1718.

Faggi, A[dolfo?], “Empedocle d’Agrigento e l’età dell’odio,” Marzocco, 46, 1919.

Fairbanks, Arthur, “On Plutarch’s quotations from the early Greek philosophers,” Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association, 28, 1897, p. 75-87.

– The First Philosophers of Greece: An edition and translation of the remaining fragments of the pre-Sokratic philosophers, together with a translation of the more important accounts of their opinions contained in the early epitomes of their works, London: Kegan Paul, Trench and Trübner (also: New York:  Charles Scribner’s sons), 1898, p. 157-234.

http://history.hanover.edu/texts/presoc/emp.htm

– “Repetitions in Empedocles,” The Classical Review, 12, 1898, p. 16-17.

Fairweather, Jane A., “Fiction in the Biographies of the Ancient Writers,” Ancient Society, 5, 1974-1975, p. 231-275.

Fallas López, Luis Alberto, “Mejor nosotros que otros. Empédocles en primera plural,” Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad de Costa Rica, 62, 164, 2023, p. 63-79.

[a(i)6, B 17, B 26, B 147.]

Falter, Otto, Der Dichter und sein Gott bei den Griechen und Römern, Diss. Würzburg, Würzburg: K. Triltsch 1934.

[P. 40: B3.]

Faraone, Christopher A., “Gli incantesimi esametrici ed i poemi epici nella Grecia antica,” Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica, New Series, 84, 3, 2006, p. 11-24. 

– “Empedocles the Sorcerer and his hexametrical Pharmaka,” Antichthon, 53, 2019, p. 14-32.

[B 111, B 112.]

Farina, Antonio, Amore e Odio in Empedocle, Caserta 1948.

Farnell, Lewis Richard, The Cults of the Greek states, I, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1896.

[B 6, Hera, earth, and critics, p.181-195.]

Farrell, Joe, “Looking for Empedocles in Latin poetry: A skeptical approach,” Dictynna, 11, 2014.

[http://dictynna.revues.org/1063]

Fausti, D., “Su alcuni problemi empedoclei,” Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa,10, 1980, p. 363-382.

[B 111.]

Fedorova, Olga (Фёдорова, Ольга, Борисовна), “Четыре элемента Эмпедокла: текстологический анализ фрагментов,” in: Вопро́сы исто́рии естествозна́ния и те́хники, 26, 2, 2005, p. 18-65.

https://vietmag.org/s0205-96060000622-1-1-ru-329/

[B 6, B 9, B 17, B 21, B 23, B 26, B 27, B 29, B 38, B 57, B 84, B 96, B 98, B 117.]

– ‘Роль теории смешения в представлениях о цвете у Эмпедокла, Демокрита, Платона,’ in: История науки в философском контексте, СПб., 2007.

– «Играющее дитя», или фрагмент Эмпедокла о дыхании в свете филологического анализа, in: Вестник Московского университете, 7 Философия, 2, 2010, p. 3-34.

[B 100.]

Fefilio, Nicarno (= G. B. Corniani?), Saggio sopra Luciano, osia Quadro d’antichi e di moderni Costumi, Bassani/Venetiis 1789.

[non vidi.]

Fehling, Detlev, Die Wiederholungsfiguren und ihr Gebrauch bei den Griechen vor Gorgias, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter & Co 1969.

Ferella, Chiara, (2011) L’ampia Natura di Empedocle, Diss., Università di Pisa, 2011.

http://etd.adm.unipi.it/theses/available/etd-11052011-145844/unrestricted/Empoedocle_ampiaNatura.pdf

– (2013) “Empedocle, il giorno spietato e l’esilio dagli dei: a proposito di alcuni frammenti ‘demonologici’,” in: Origini e svolgimento del pensiero greco: studi per Jean-Pierre Vernant, ed. R. Di Donato, Pisa: ETS 2013, (Anthropoi. Studi e materiali di antropologia storica del mondo antico, 8), p. 29-47.

[B 112, B 115, B 117, B 119, B. 126, B 127, B 146, B 147.]

– (2018) “'A path for understanding': Journey metaphors in (three) early Greek philosophers,” in: Chiara Ferella & Cilliers Breytenbach (ed.), Paths of knowledge: Interconnection(s) between knowledge and journey in the Greco-Roman world, Berlin: edition Topoi 2018, p. 47-73, (Berlin Studies of the Ancient World, 60).

[Emp.: p. 60-70, B 3, B 110.]

https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/bitstream/handle/fub188/23808/bsa_060_04.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

– (2019) Abstract of « The interaction between mind and soul in Empedocles’ philosophy », Session/Paper number 46.1, The Society for Classical Studies; 149th annual meeting abstracts; January 4-7, 2018, Boston, MA, printed in Pythagoras foundation, newsletter, 24, Mars 2019, p. 16-17.  

https://classicalstudies.org/annual-meeting/149/abstract/interaction-between-mind-and-soulempedocles%E2%80%99-philosophy

https://www.stichting-pythagoras.nl/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/N24-NEWSLETTER-24-2019-voll.pdf

– (2019) “Empedocles and the birth of trees: Reconstructing P.Strasb. Gr. Inv. 1665-6, Ens. d-f 10B-18,” The Classical Quarterly (online 20 August 2019, p. 1-12), 69, 1, 2019, p. 75-86.

[A 70, B 62, B 72, B 79, ensemble d–f.]

– (2020) “Early Greek medical metaphors and the question of deliberateness,” in: Drawing attention to metaphor: Case studies across time periods, cultures and modalities, ed. C. Di Biase-Dyson - M. Egg, Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins 2020, p. 131-161, (Figurative Thought and Language, 5).

https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.5.06fer 

[B 84, B 100.]

– (2020) “War steers the world: the metaphor domain of conflict in Heraclitus’ and Empedocles’ representations of the cosmos,” Antike Naturwissenschaft und ihre Rezeption, 30, 2020, p. 9-34.

[Akan, 30, ed. J. Althoff, S. Föllinger & G. Wöhrle. Emp.: p. 20-29. ‘Empedocles’ Strife as a principle of generation’, ‘Strife and the origin of the world’, ‘Moral and religious implications in Empedocles’ use of the military metaphor’. B 23, B 62, B 115.]

– (2021) “The Byzantine scholia to Aristotle and Empedocles’ cosmic cycle,” Mnemosyne, 2020, p. 1-23, (ahead of print, online), Mnemosyne, 74, 6, 2021, p. 978-1000.

– (2021) “The zoogonies of Empedocles reconsidered,” Rhizomata, 9, 1, 2021, p. 1-26.

https://doi.org/10.1515/rhiz-2021-0001

[A 72, B 17, B 26, B 62, a(ii), c, d-f.]

– “Review of Tom Wellmann, Die Entstehung der Welt. Studien zum Straßburger Empedokles-Papyrus, 2020,” Philosophical Papyri, 1, 2023, p. 185-190.

Ferguson, John, “Two Notes on the Preplatonics,” Phronesis, 9, 2, 1964, p. 98-106.

[Chap. 1, Empedocles DK 31 A 30, p. 98-101; A 30, A 60, A 61, B 45.]

– “ΔΙΝΟΣ,” Phronesis, 16, 1971, p. 97-115.

Fernández Fernández, Alvaro, “Neologismos Caldaicos (I). Notas sobre καναχισμός, ἀείπολος, προπόρευμα, μηναῖος y ἐπιβήτης,” Les Études classiques, 86, 3-4, 2018, p. 311-356.

Fernández Rivero, María Cecilia, “Eros, visión y conocimiento: la concepción empedoclea transpuesta en los diálogos platónicos. Eros, vision and knowledge: Empedocle’s concepts transposed to Plato’s dialogues,” Praesentia, 16, 2015, p. 1-18.

[B 17, B 21, B 110, B 115, B 128, B 136.]

Ferrari, Sante, (1891) Empedocle, Rome: Tipografia delle Terme Diocleziane di Giovanni Balbi 1891.

[This work is a reprinting of the following two items. [+  +].]

– (1891) “Empedocle, i frammenti del poema tradotti,” La Biblioteca delle Scuole Italiana, 13, 1891, p. 199-200, and La Biblioteca delle Scuole Italiana,14, p. 215-220.

– (1891) “Empedocle,” Rivista Italiana di Filosofia, 1/6, 1891, p. 165-190 and “La Filosofia di Empedocle,” Rivista Italiana di Filosofia, 2/6, 1891, p. 52-79 and p. 250-293.

– (1892) “La filosofia nella magna Grecia dopo Empedocle,” Atti e Memorie della R. Accademia di Scienze Lettere ed Arti in Padova, 8/293, 1891-2, p. 113-151.

[This article was published separately under the same title by Randi, Padua 1892.]

Ferwerda, Rein, Empedokles. Aarde, lucht, water en vuur. Vertaald en toegelicht door Rein Ferwerda, Amsterdam: Athenaeum – Polak & Van Gennep 1997, (Baskerville serie). Reprint in 2006 (Budel: Damon Publisher).

[All Greek fragments edited by DK, with translation and a few comments. The order and numbering of the fragments are Ferwerda’s. Translation of some Testimonia. B 6, on 4 elements of Emp., reviewed by: Beullens, P., Tijdschrift voor filosofie.70, 2, 2008, p 408.]

Feshbach, Sidney, “Empedocles: The phenomenology of the four elements in literature,” in: Poetics of the elements in the human condition: part 2. The airy elements in poetic imagination, ed. A. T. Tymieniecka, Dordrecht-Boston-London: Kluwer Academic Publishers 1988, p. 9-63, (Analecta Husserliana, 23).

[B 2, B 6, B 24, B 29, B 35, B 111, B 117, B 126, B 129, B 146.]

Festugière, André Jean, “Le sens philosophique du mot αἰών. À propos d’Aristote, De Caelo I, 9,” La Parola del passato, 4, 1949, p. 172-189. Reprint in Festugière, A. J., Études de philosophie grecque, Paris: Vrin 1971, p. 254-271.

[B 6, B 7, B 8, B 9, B 11, B 12, B 15, B 16, B 17, B 26, Β 27, Β 30, Β 31, B 110, B 129.]

Fialho, Maria do Céu, “Review of Rossetti L & Santaniello C., Studi sul pensiero e sulla lingua di Empedocle, 2004,” Humanitas, 57, 2005, p. 468-470.

Filée, John, “The Strasbourg Collection of Empedocles,” Études classiques, 67, 1999, p. 273-274;

[Review of Martin - Primavesi, 1999.]

Finkelberg, Aryeh, “Xenophanes’ physics, Parmenides’ doxa and Empedocles’ theory of cosmogonical mixture,” Hermes, 125.1, 1997, p. 1-16.

– “On the History of the Greek ΚΟΣΜΟΣ,” Harvard Studies in classical Philology, 98, 1998, p. 103-136. [B 26.5, B 134.]

– Heraclitus and Thales’ conceptual scheme: A historical study, Leiden-Boston: Brill 2017, (Jerusalem Studies in Religion and Culture, 23).

[Plut. De esu carn. i, 996C1, Censorin. DN iv 7 [28 A 51], B 31, B 44, B 26.5, B 52, B 110, B 112.4, B 115, B 117, B 118, B 120, B 121, B 126, B 134.5, B 148.]

Fino, Antonello, “La fontana arcaica di San Biagio ad Agrigento,” in: Il restauro dei monumenti antichi. Problemi strutturali: esperienze e prospettive, Atti delle Giornate di Studio, Agrigento, 23-24 novembre, 2012, ed. M. Livadiotti & M.C. Parello, Thiasos, 3, 2, 2014, p. 67-91.

[Nestis?]

Flashar, Hellmut, “Empedokles, frgm. B 111 und seine Stellung im Lehrgedicht über die Natur,” in: Actes de la XIIe conférence internationale d’études classiques, 1975, p. 547-551.

Fleet, Barrie, Simplicius. On Aristotle, Physics 2, translated by B. F., London-New Delhi - New York - Sydney: Bloomsbury 2014, (Ancient Commentators on Aristotle). 

[First published in 1997 by Gerald Duckworth. Simplicius p. 259.1 - 393.1; B 50, B 53, B 61, B 62, B 75, B 85, B 96, B 98, B 103, B 104.]

Föllinger, Sabine, “Aristoteles’ Auseinandersetzung mit Empedokles in De generatione animalium,” in: Rezeptionen der Vorsokratiker von der Antike bis in die Gegenwart, ed. O. Hellmann, & B. Strobel, Berlin-Boston: W. de Gruyter 2022, (Philosophie der Antike, 42), p. 87-102.

Forcignanò, Filippo, “Empedocle di Agrigento e Filistione di Locri,” in: Storia della filosofia antica, I, Dalle origini a Socrate, ed. M. Bonazzi, Roma: Carocci 2016, (Frecce 209), p. 139-148.

Förster, Aurel, “Empedocleum,” Hermes, 74, 1939, p. 102-104.

[B 84.8.]

Foti, Veronique Marion, “Empedocles’s philosophy of nature as mandating non-violence,” in: Values and Justice in the Global Era, ed. Kostas Boudouris, Athens: Ionia Publications 2007, p. 91-102.

Fraisse, Jean-Claude, Philia: La notion d’amitié dans la philosophie antique, essai sur un problème perdu et retrouvé, J. Vrin: Paris 1974, p. 84-87.

[Emp. philia was allegedly confined to be a cosmological conception and had not any anthropologic and emotional meaning but even in the cosmology Empedocles was not able to contribute essentially to the history of the term.]

Fränkel, Hermann, (1923) “Homerische Wörter,” Ἀντίδωρον.·Festschrift Jacob Wackernagel [...] gewidmet von Schülern, Freunden und Kollegen, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 1923, p. 274-282.

[B. 2.6-9, ad B 3, B 134.]

– (1938) “A thought pattern in Heraclitus,” American Journal of Philology, 59/3, 1938, p. 309-337.

[P. 325, n. 35: B 2.2 and B 110.]

– (1946) “Man’s “ephemeros” nature according to Pindar and Others,” Transactions and Proceedings of the American philological Association, 77, 1946, p. 131-145.

[B 2.2-4, B 131.1.]

– (1948) “Zur ‘Discordia’ des Ennius,” Philologus, 97 (N.S. 51), 1948, p. 354.

[B 17.27; refusal of Norden’s theory on Ennius’ interpretation of Empedocles.]

Franz, Michael, “Das Farbengleichnis des Empedokles,” in: M. Franz, Von Gorgias bis Lukrez: antike Ästhetik und Poetik als vergleichende Zeichentheorie, Berlin: Akademie Verlag 1999, (Literatur Forshung), p. 85-97.

[A 34, A 43, A 44, A 57, A 86, A 87, A 92, B 3, B 6, B 17, B 21, B 23, B 96, B 109.]

Freeman, Edward Augustus, The history of Sicily from the earliest times I-IV, Oxford: Oxford University Press 1891-1894.

[II, p. 342-356. A1, B 111, B 112.]

Freeman, Kathleen, The Pre-Socratic Philosophers. A Companion to Diels, Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, Oxford: Blackwell 1946.

[Second edition: Cambridge [Ma]: Harvard University Press 1959. In fact, what is called “second edition” is a reprint. In 1946 and in 1959 see Emp.: p. 172-204. [+  +].]

– Ancilla to the Pre-Socratic Philosophers: a complete translation of the fragments in Diels, Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, Oxford: Basil Blackwell 1948. Reprint at Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press 199624.

[Emp.: p. 51-69. [.+.].]

Frenkian, Aram M., Études de philosophie présocratique, II : La philosophie comparée, Empédocle d’Agrigente, Parménide d’Élée, Paris: J. Vrin 1937.

[P. 46-61. B 8, B 109, B 96, B 98, B 105, B 134, B 62, B 110, B 100, B 84.]

– “Theophrast De Sensu Kap. 10,” Philologus, 107, 1963, p. 313.

[A 86, par. 10.]

Frère, Jean, “Le cosmos d’Empédocle et le triomphe de la vie autour de l’usage répétitif des formules-images,” ΦΙΛΟΣΟΦΙΑ (Athènes), 30, 2000, p. 231-234.

– “Trois penseurs présocratiques : Héraclite, Parménide, Empédocle,” Les Annales de l’Académie d’Alsace, 68, 2002, p. 76-86.

[B 16, B 17, B 27, B 28, B 29.]

– “Les dieux d’Élée et d’Agrigente,” in: Agonistes: Essays in honour of Denis O’Brien, ed. J. Dillon, M. Dixsaut, Aldershot: Ashgate 2005, p. 3-12. Reprint London-New York: Routledge 2017.

[A 32, B 27, B 28, B 29, B 31, B 134.]

Freudenthal, Gad, Aristotle’s theory of material substance: heat and pneuma, form and soul, Oxford: Clarendon Press 1995.

[A 70, B 34, B 62, B 98.]

Friedlaender, Paul, “Δὶς καὶ τρὶς τὸ καλόν,” Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association, 69, 1938, p. 375-380.

Friedländer, Pablo, “El lenguaje poético de Empédocles,” Synthesis,12, 2005, p. 59-77.

http://www.scielo.org.ar/pdf/synth/v12/v12a05.pdf

Fritsche, Johannes, “The riddle of the Sphinx: Aristotle, Penelope, and Empedocles,” in: Monsters and philosophy, ed. Charles T. Wolfe, London: College Publications 2005, (Texts in Philosophy, 3), p. 1-19.

Fritzsche, R. A., “Der Magnet und die Athmung in antiken Theorien,” Rheinisches Museum, 57, 1902, p. 363-391.

[P. 368-369: Emp. theory of magnetism; p. 378-379: Emp. theory of breathing.]

Frontisi-Ducroux, Françoise, “Avec son diaphragme visionnaire : « ΙΔΥΙΗΣΙ ΠΡΑΠΙΔΕΣΣΙ », Iliade XVIII, 481. À propos du bouclier d’Achille,” Revue des Études Grecques, 115, 2, 2002. p. 463-484.

[Useful for homeric background.]

Fuchs, Werner, “Die Verseuchung des Wassers in Selinus und die Tat des Empedokles,” Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts, Römische Abteilung, 64, 1957, p. 230-231.

[A 1, par. 70.]

Fuller, B.A.G., History of Greek philosophy: Thales to Democritus, New York: Henry Holt and Company 1923.

[Emp.: p. 181-201.]

Furley, David J., (1956) “The early history of the concept of soul,” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, 3, 1, 1956, p. 1-18.

[Pages 14-15; a not very original sketch of the Empedoclean conception of soul and cognition; B 117, B 115, B 3.9-12, B 105.2.]

– (1957) “Empedocles and the clepsydra,” Journal of Hellenic Studies, 77, 1, 1957, p. 31-34.

– (1970) “Variations on Themes from Empedocles in Lucretius’ Proem,” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies of the University of London, 17, 1970, p. 55-64.

– (1987) “Empedocles and the invention of elements,” in: D. Furley, The Greek cosmologists, Vol I, The formation of the atomic theory and its earliest critics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1987, p. 79-104.

[= chap. 7; B 6, B 17, B 21, B 23, B 27, B 28, B 29, B 31, B 35, B 57, B 59, B 61, B 62, B 96, B 98.]

Furley, David J. & Reginald E. Allen (ed.), Studies in Presocratic philosophy, I, The beginnings of philosophy, New York: Humanities Press 1970, (International Library of Philosophy and scientific Method).

[Reprints of Vlastos 1947, Vlastos 1952, McDiarmid 1953, Guthrie 1957, Lloyd 1964.]

– Studies in Presocratic philosophy, II, The Eleatics and Pluralists, Atlantic Highlands (N.J.): Humanities Press 1975, (International Library of Philosophy and scientific Method).

[Repints of Solmsen 1965, Furley 1957.]

Furnari Luvarà, Giusi, “Le origini siceliote della retorica e l’Empedocle di Domenico Scinà,” in: Un secolo di ricerche in Magna Grecia, Atti del ventottesimo Convegno di studi sulla Magna Grecia, Taranto, 7-12 ottobre 1988, Taranto: Istituto per la storia e l’archeologia della Magna Grecia 1989, p. 185-204.

Furness, Raymond, “Nietzsche and Empedocles,” Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 2/2, 1971, p. 91-94.

Furth, Montgomery, “A 'philosophical hero'? Anaxagoras and the Eleatics,” in: Modern thinkers & ancient thinkers, The Stanley Victor Keeling memorial lectures at University College London, 1981-1991, ed. R. W. Sharples, London: UCL Press 1993, p. 27-65.

[Emp.: p. 33-35; four roots and Parmenidean ‘Ones’, bone, blood.]

GGG

Gaertner, Jean Felix (ed.), Writing exile: The discourse of displacement in Greco-Roman Antiquity and beyond, Leiden-Boston: Brill 2007, (Mnemosyne, Supplements, 83).

[B 115.]

Gain, Frédéric, “Le statut du « daimon » chez Empédocle,” Philosophie antique 7, 2007, p. 121-150.

[B 59, B 112, B 115.]

–          Aristote. Métaphysique, (livres Α α Γ Ε Ζ Η Θ Λ). Présentation, traduction et notes de Fr. G., Paris: L’Harmattan 2023, (Ouverture philosophique).

[Empédocle : 984a8, 985a2, 985a8, 985a21, 985a29, 988a16, 988a27, 989a20, 993a17, 1009b15, 1009b17, 1069b21, 1072a6, 1075b2.]

Gagné, Renaud, “L'esthétique de la peur chez Empédocle,” Revue de philosophie ancienne, 24, 1, 2006, p. 83-110.

[B 115.3.]

– Ancestral fault in ancient Greece, Cambridge-New York:  Cambridge University Press 2013.

[P. 461-463: B 115.]

– “Zeus Panomphaios : réécritures et traditions de l’exégèse,” in: Les dieux d’Homère III, attributs onomastiques, ed. C. Bonnet & G. Pironti, Kernos, supplément 38, 2021, p. 55-79.

[B 123.3.]

Gaisford, Thomas, Poetae minores graeci, III, Leipzig: in bibliopolio Kuehniano 1823.

[Emp.: p. 284-286. B 17, B 28, B 35, B 57, B 59, B 71, B 73, B 75, B 86, B 87, B 95.]

Gale, Monica Rachel., Myth and poetry in Lucretius, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1994.

[P. 59-74, p. 219. B 3, B 17, B 21, B 23, B 128, B 130, B 131, B 151.]

– “Etymological wordplay and poetic succession in Lucretius,” Classical Philology, 96, 2, 2001.

– “Avia Pieridum loca: Tradition and innovation in Lucretius,” in: Wissensvermittlung in dichterischer Gestalt, ed. Marietta Horster & Christiane Reitz, Stuttgart: Franz Steiner 2005, (Palingenesia, 85), p. 175-191.

[Several fragments. Mainly: B128.]

Gallavotti, Carlo, (1973) “Alcune frasi di Empedocle interpretate con i criteri di Aristotele,” Rendiconti delle sedute dell’Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei [RAL], classe di scienze morali, storiche e filologiche, 8, 28, 7-12, 1973, p. 773-792.

[B 17, B 35.17, B 13-14, B 115.7.]

– (1974) “Il proemio di Empedocle,” Helicon,13-4, 1973-1974, p. 7-34.

[B 4, B 131; a trial to reconstruct original filiation of fragments: B 131-B 7-B 19, B 16-B 3-B 1-B 2-B 110-B 12-B 4, B 6, B 109-B 107.]

– (1974) “Il punto geometrico e l’uno di Empedocle nel trattato peripatetico della linea indivisible,” Rendiconti dell’academia dell scienze dell’istituto di Bologna, 29, 1974, p. 381-394.

[The text of B 32 is δύο δεῖ; in the context of B 33 it is necessary to read ἡ δὲ στιγμὴ καὶ τὸ <ἓν> ἐν τοῖς ἀκινήτοις.]

– (1975) “Empedocle nei papiri ercolanesi,” in: Le monde grec, hommages à Claire Préaux, ed. J. Bingen, G. Cambier & G. Nachtergael, Brussels: éditions de l’Université de Bruxelles 1975, p. 153-161.

[B 2, A 33, B 6. The mss. of Philodemus cannot be used for an interpretation of B6. B 100, B 112, B 134, B 142.]

– (1975) Empedocle: Poema fisico e lustrale, Milan: Arnoldo Mondadori 19751 (19914, 19935).

[+  +]

– (1977) “La critica di Empedocle in Diogene di Enoanda,” Museum Criticum (Bologna), 22, 1975-1977, p. 243-249.

[A 99, B 78.]

– (1976) “Qualche frammento di Empedocle,” in: Scritti in onore di Cleto Carbonara, Napoli 1976, p. 355-366.

[B 9.5.]

– (1981) “Da Stesicoro ad Empedocle,” Kokalos, 26-7, 1980-1981, p. 413-433.

– “Nuovi appunti sul testo di Empedocle,” Bollettino dei classici, 6, 1985, p. 3-27.

[B 2, B 6, 17.18-20, B 110, B 115 13-14, B 121, B 125, B 126, B 131.]

Gallo, Italo, “Ermarco e la polemica Epicura contro Empedocle,” in: Esistenza e destino nel pensiero greco arcaico, ed. P. Cosenza, Napoli: Ed. Scientifiche Italiane 1985, p. 33-50.

[A 99.]

Galsworthy, Carrie, Language and Intent in Empedocles’ cosmic cycle, diss., University of Cincinnati, 2010.

Garani, Myrto, (2005) Poetry and analogy in Empedocles and Lucretius, diss., University of London, 2005.

– (2007) “Cosmological oaths in Empedocles and Lucretius,” in: Horkos: the oath in Greek society, ed. A.H. Sommerstein - J. Fletcher, Exeter: Bristol Phoenix Press 2007, p. 189-202, and 264-267.

– (2007) Empedocles Redivivus: Poetry and analogy in Lucretius, New York-Abingdon: Routledge 2007.

[See review by Bill Gladhill at BMCR: http://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2009/2009-05-24.html. A lot of fragments are mentioned in this book. The main ones are: B 2, B 3, B 4, B 6, B 8, B 9, B 11, B 13,  B 145, B 17, B 20, B 21, B 22, B 23, B 26, B 27, B 28, B 29, B 30, B 31, B 33, B 35, B 38, B 55, B 57, B 59, B 61, B 62, B 71, B 75, B 84, B 86, B 87, B 89B 91, B 92, B 93, B 95, B 96, B 98, B 100, B 109, B 110, B 115, B 128, B 129, B 131, a(ii).] 

– (2008) “The palingenesis of Empedocles’ Calliope in Lucretius,” in: Essays on ancient literatures: Greece, Rome and the near East, Proceedings of the Venice International University "Advanced seminar in the humanities" 2004-2005, ed. E. Cingano & L. Milano, Padua: S.A.R.G.O.N 2008. (Quaderni del Dipartimento di Scienze dell'Antichità e del Vicino Oriente / Università Ca' Foscari Venezia, 4), p. 231-265.

– (2013) “Lucretius and Ovid on Empedoclean Cows and Sheep,” in: Lucretius: Poetry, philosophy, science, ed. D. Lehoux, A. D. Morrison & A. Sharrock, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013, p. 233-259.

[B 17, B 57, B 61, B 62, B 128, B 136, B 137, a(ii).]

– (2014) “The figure of Numa in Ovid’s Fasti,” in: The philosophizing Muse: The influence of Greek philosophy on Roman poetry, ed. M. Garani & D. Konstan, Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge scholars Publishing 2014.

Garbarino, Giovanna, “Poetica esplicita e implicita nel De rerum natura di Lucrezio,” Bollettino di studi latini, 37, 2, 2007, p. 504-516.

García-Bacca, Juan, David, Los Presocráticos. Traducción y notas, Mexico: Fondo de Cultura Económica 19441; 1979², (Col. popular, 177). 2007: 10th reprint.

[Emp. : p. 55-100, 173-224. [+  +].]

García Díaz, Adolfo, “La metafísica de Empédocles,” Diánoia, 2, 1956, p. 167-180.

http://dianoia.filosoficas.unam.mx/files/2213/7021/0854/DIA56_Garcia_Diaz.pdf

García Escrivá, Vicente, “Los nombres divinos de los cuatro elementos,” Trama & Fondo - Revista de Cultura, 41, 2016 p. 79-86.  

http://www.tramayfondo.com/revista/libros/182/07_Garcia-Escriva.pdf 

[B 6.]

García Gual, Carlos, “Empédocles de Agrigento,” Universitas Philosophica, 13, 25-26, 1996, p. 11-26.

https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/2400802.pdf

García López, Yolanda, “The subordination of the epic to mystic poetics: the example of Polyphemus in love,” in: Ancient Epic: Linguistic and Literary Essays, ed. M. Díaz de Cerio Díez, C. Cabrillana & C. Criado, Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing 2015, p. 101-136.

[P. 107- 110: Ovid's Galatea and Empedocles' Muse, B 3, B 128, B 17; p. 112: B 17, B 61; p. 119: B 110; p. 121: B 115.]

Garin, Marianne, “Le Sage en homme de peu. Remarques sur la construction ancienne d’une “iconographie”,” Dialogues d'histoire ancienne, 47, 2, 2021, p. 15 à 38.

[A 1.73, B 112.]

Garland, Robert, The Greek way of death, London: Duckworth 1985.

[Page 63: a short survey of E. Katharmoi; E. was influenced with Orphism; E. did not acknowledge any underworld and judgment after death; B 144.]

– The eye of the beholder. Deformity and disability in the Graeco-Roman world, London: Duckworth, 1995, p. 174-176.

[A rather traditional overview of Empedoclean ‘evolutionary’ zoology from untraditional teratological perspective; A 72, B 57, B 61, B 62.]

Garrido Clemente, Maria, Pilar, “El debate acerca del presunto influjo del Pseudo-Empédocles en el pensamiento de Ibn Massarra de Córdoba,” Revista española de filosofía medieval, 16, 2009, p. 23-34.

https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/3144517.pdf

Gatz, Bodo, Weltalter, goldene Zeit und sinnverwandte Vorstellungen, Hildesheim: Georg Olms 1967.

[B 128, B 130.]

Gatzemeier, Matthias, “Empedokles,” in: Enzyklopädie Philosophie und Wissenschaftstheorie, ed. von J. Mittelstraass, Mannheim-Wien-Zürich: Metzler 1980, I.540-541.

Gaudentius, Paganinus, (Gaudenzio, Paganino), De pythagoroea animarum transmigratione..., Pisis 1641.

[See L. Paquet, Y. Lafrance, Les Présocratiques [1450-1879] III, Québec: Bellarmin 1995, p. 89.]

Gee, Emma, Aratus and the astronomical tradition, Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press, 2013, (Classical culture and society).

[1.2 Aratus and Empedocles, p. 29-33, B 8, B 17, B 128.]

– “Dogs, snakes and heroes: hybridism and polemic in Lucretius’ De rerum natura,” in: Latin literature and its transmission. Papers in honour of Michael Reeve, ed. R. Hunter & S. P. Oakley, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2016, p. 108-141.

[B 61. Emp.: p. 127-129.]

– Mapping the afterlife: from Homer to Dante, New York: Oxford University Press 2020.

[B 23, B 100, B 115.]

Geizie W. = Veazie, W. B. = error in L’année philologique 1926.

Gemelli Marciano, M. Laura, (1990) Le metamorfosi della tradizione: mutamenti di significato e neologismi nel Peri physeos di Empedocle, Bari: Levante editori 1990.

– (1991) “L’atomismo e il corpuscolarismo empedocleo: frammenti di interpretazioni nel mondo antico,” Elenchos, 12, 1991, p. 5-37. (A 43, A 44, A 86, A 87, A 89, A 92, B 23, B 26, B 89, B 98, B 105.)

– (1994) “Der Tod des Empedokles,” in: Kleos: Estemporaneo di studi e testi sulla fortuna dell’antico, ed. F. De Martino, Bari: Levante 1994, p. 71-74.

– (2000) “Alain Martin, Oliver Primavesi: L’Empédocle de Strasbourg Empedocles (P. Strasb. gr. Inv. 1665-1666),” Gnomon, 72, 2000, p. 389-400.

– (2001) “Le ‘demonologie’ Empedoclee,” Aevum antiquum, N.S. 1, 2001, p. 205-235.

[A 25, ambiguities in Emp., B 24, B 26, B 20, B 115, B 59, “we” in Pap. Strasb.]

– (2002) “Le contexte culturel des Présocratiques : adversaires et destinataires,” in: Qu’est-ce que la philosophie présocratique ? What is Presocratic philosophy?, ed. A. Laks & C. Louguet, Lille : Presses universitaires du Septentrion 2002, p. 83-114.

[Emp.: p. 106-111.]

– (2005) “Empedocles’ zoogony and embryology,” in: The Empedoclean Κόσμος: S[t]ructure, process and the question of cyclicity. Proceedings of the Symposium Philosophiae Antiquae Tertium Myconense, July 6th - July 13th, 2003, Patras, ed. A. L. Pierris, Patras: Institute for Philosophical Research 2005, p. 373-404. 

http://www.klphs.uzh.ch/aboutus/personen/gemelli/gemelli_empedokles_2005.pdf

[A 72, B 20, B 27, B 62, B 126, d 14, reincarnation, P. Derveni, and P. Kingsley’s leitmotiv: Philia binds (imprisonment of the four divine roots) Neikos releases (freedom of the four divine roots); Pausanias must learn how to bind and release. Empedocles is a purifier, iatromantis, seerhealer.]

– (2007) “Lire du début : Quelques observations sur les incipit des présocratiques,” Philosophie antique, 7, 2007, p. 7-37.

[P. 9-13: B 2.]

– (2009) Die Vorsokratiker, II, Parmenides, Zenon, Empedokles: griechisch-lateinisch-deutsch - Auswahl der Fragmente und Zeugnisse, Übersetzung und Erläuterungen von M. L. G. M., Düsseldorf: Patmos, Artemis & Winkler 2009, (Sammlung Tusculum); 2, überarbeitete Auflage, Berlin: Akademie Verlag 2011; 3, überarbeitete Auflage, Berlin: Akademie Verlag 2013.

[2013 vs 2009: the difference from the previous edition resides in the updated bibliography at the end of the volume. [+  +].]

– (2012) “Die empedokleische 'Vierelementenlehre'. Überlegungen über die Anfänge einer 'naturwissenschaftlichen' Theorie,” in: ELEMENTE – ΣΤΟΙΧΕΙΑ – ELEMENTA: Antike und moderne Naturwissenschaft zum Ursprung der Dinge, Schweizerischer Altphilologenverband, Luzern, 2012, p. 25-36. (In this article, the author signes under the name Laura Gemelli.)

[B 2, B 6, B 38, B 62, B 96.]

– (2013) “Feuer bei Heraklit und Empedokles: Aspekte und Funktionen einer göttlichen Kraft,” in: Feuer und Wasser, Beiträge der Eranos Tagungen 2011 und 2012, ed. E. Hornung-A. Schweizer, Basel: Schwabe 2013, p. 133-157.

– (2017) “Catarsi, misteri, magia. Empedocle e la Sicilia nel V secolo a. C.,” in: Lezioni bellinzonesi vol. 10: Presenza del classico, ed. F. Beltraminelli, Bellinzona: Edizioni Casagrande 2017, p. 100-121.

[This article is signed: Laura Gemelli.]

Gencarella, Stephen Olbrys, “Purifying rhetoric: Empedocles and the myth of rhetorical theory,” The quarterly journal of speech, 96, 3, 2010, p. 231-256.

Genovese, Cristina, “The ‘upper sanctuary of Demeter’ at S. Biagio in Akragas: a review,” in: The Akragas dialogue. New investigations on sanctuaries in Sicily, ed. M. de Cesare, E. C. Portale & N. Sojc, Berlin-Boston: W. de Gruyter 2020, p. 169-200.

[Nestis?]

Georgakellos, Nicos, I., Empedocles of Acragas: his theory and the exact sciences, Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2019.

[See below Γεωργακέλλος, Νίκος.]

George, Sarah, Human conception and fetal growth: a study in the development of Greek thought from the Presocratics through Aristotle, Diss. University of Pennsylvania, 1982.

[Emp.: Empedocles and the Hot/Cold Theory, p. 55-68. A 74, A 77, A 81, A 84, B 67, B 100.]

Gerke, Hans, Sprache und Stil des Empedokles, diss., Göttingen 1953.

Gernet, Louis, Recherches sur le développement de la pensée juridique et morale en Grèce : étude sémantique, Paris: Ernest Leroux 19171 (2nd edition, Paris: Albin Michel 2001², with new pagination).

[B 115: p. 39 [p. 55], 47 [63], 312 [313], 316 [317], B 121: 242 [246], B 144: 242 [246].]

Γεωργακέλλος, Νίκος Ι, Εμπεδοκλής - υπό το πρίσμα των φυσικών επιστημών, Αθήνα, Ευρασία, 2008.

Gheerbrant, Xavier, (2012) “Qui sont les destinataires du fragment 3 d’Empédocle ?,” in: Anais de Filosofia Clássica, 6, 11, 2012, p. 78-98.

http://www.revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/FilosofiaClassica/article/view/334/547

[B 3.]

– (2014) Poésie et argumentation dans les fragments des deux poèmes d'Empédocle, Diss. Langue et Littérature grecques, Université de Lille 3, Oct. 2014.

[B 1, B 2, B 3, B 4, B 17 + ensemble a, B 20 + ensemble c, B 21, B 23, B 24, B 25, B 26, B 35, B 84, B 86, B 100, B 112 (vv. 1-4), B 114, B 121, B 122, B 123, B 131, fr. 509 Bollack.]

– (2017) Empédocle, une poétique philosophique, Paris: Classiques Garnier 2017, (Kaïnon, anthropologie de la pensée ancienne, 6).

https://sites.google.com/site/empedoclesacragas/xavier-gheerbrant

[Useful. An in-depth study of several fragments. B 1, B 2, B 3, B 4, B 17, B 20, B 21, B 23, B 24, B 25, B 26, B 35, B 84, B 86, B 100, B 112, B 114, B 115, B 121, B 122, B 123, B 131.]

– (2018) “Ritornell and episodic composition in Empedocles,” Yearbook of Ancient Greek Epic, 2, 1, 2018, p. 40-77.

– (2018) “Théorie poétique, vérité et représentation du divin chez Empédocle et Pindare,” Pallas, 108, 2018, p. 211-224.

http://journals.openedition.org/pallas/10342.

[B 3.]

– (2018) “Poetry and philosophy in Empedocles: two poems, one project,” Museum Sinicum (Fudan University, Shangai), 1, 2018, p. 169-214.

[B 1, B 2, B 3, B 4, B 17, B 21, B 23, B 26, B 71, B 107,  B 112,  B 115, B 121, B 122, B 123, B 131, B 133, B 134, a MP.]

– (2019) “Prose, poésie, modes de signification et modes de rationalité aux origines de la philosophie. À propos de : Sassi (M. M.), The beginnings of philosophy in Greece,” Revue des études anciennes, 121, 2, 2019, p. 467-484.

– (2020) “Traduire Empédocle, entre poésie et philosophie : comparaison de dix traductions en cinq langues (1838-2016),” in: La traduction épistémique : entre poésie et prose, ed. Tatiana Milliaressi, Villeneuve d’Ascq: Presses universitaires du Septentrion 2020, (Traductologie), p. 87-141.

[B 2, B 3, B 6, B 17, B 20, B 61, φρήν, φρονεῖν, φρόνημα, φροντίς, etc. νοῦς, νοεῖν, νόημα, μέριμνα, πραπίδες.]

– (2022) “Addressees, knowledge, and action in Hesiod and Empedocles,” in: Hesiod and the beginnings of Greek philosophy, ed. L. Iribarren & H. Koning, Leiden-Bristol: Brill 2022, (Mnemosyne supplements, 455), p. 263-293.

[B 1, B 2, B 15, B 17, B 20, B 22, B 24, B 110, B111, B 112, B 115, B 129, B 132, B 137, B 146.]

Ghidini - Tortorelli, Marisa, “Instanze utopiche nel mito dell’età dell’oro. Ricerca su alcuni frammenti di Empedocle,” Atti dell’Accademia Pontaniana, 20, 1970-1971, p. 155-172 (N.S. XX, 1971, p. 1-18).

Ghira, Danilo, “Empedocle, fr. 20 e 115 DK: ‘l'intuizione del singolo’,” Maia, 67, 1, 2015, p. 25-35.

[B 6, B 17, B 20, B 115, B 188, B 124, B 134, B 135.]

Giannantoni, Gabriele, (1967) “Review of Jean Bollack, Empédocle, I Introduction à l’ancienne physique, 1965,” Rivista di filologia e di istruzione classica, 95, 1967, p. 331-335.

– (1969) “31. Empedocle,” in: I presocratici: testimonianze e frammenti, Bari: Laterza 1969, (Biblioteca Universale), p. 323-421.

[Translation of Diels-Kranz 1951, with foot notes. [+  +].]

– (1989) “Empedocle: mito e realtà,” in: La cultura filosofica della Magna Grecia, Messina 1989, p. 43-62.

– (1999) “L’originalità del pluralismo empedocleo,” Elenchos, 18, 1997, p. 235-255. Reprint in: Giornale di Metafisica - Nuova Serie, XXI, 1999, p. 31-50.

[Empedocle a Selinunte, Empedocle: religione e filosofia, L’originalità di Empedocle, Empedocle e la filosofia dell’eleatismo, B 2, B 3, B 111, B 112.]

– (1998) “L’interpretazione aristotelica di Empedocle,” Elenchos, 19/2, 1998, p. 361-411.

[Elenchos 19/2 = Empedocle e la cultura della Sicilia antica: Illustrazione di un frammento inedito della sua opera. Atti del Convegno tenuto ad Agrigento dal 4 al 6 settembre 1997.]

Giardina, Giovanna,.R., “Empedocle e gli Empedoclei sui condotti vuoti,” in: La chimica fisica di Aristotele : teoria degli elementi e delle loro proprietà, analisi critica del De generatione et corruptione. Roma: Aracne 2008, (Scienze storiche, filosofiche, pedagogiche e psicologiche, 285), p. 142-144

– “Jean Philopon, commentateur d’Aristote, Physique II 8,” Revue de Philosophie Ancienne, 32, 2, 2014, p. 179-224.

[B 61.]

– “Empedocles and the other physiologists in Aristotle’s Physics II 8,” Peitho, 7, 2016, p. 13-23.

[A 48, B 53-54, B 62.]

Gigandet, Alain, “Plutarque contre Colotès contre Empédocle,” Aitia, 3, 2013, p. 2-10.

http://aitia.revues.org/636

[A 34, A 44, A 48, B 8, B 15, B 16, B 17, B 19, B 21, B 35.]

Gigante, Marcello, “Attendendo Empedocle. Un’insidia al recupero del testo autentico,” Studi Italiani di filologia classica, 15, 1997, p. 131-134.

[Pap. Strasb. aII.26 and 30, c 1-2 = B 20, B 2.1, B 100.1-2.]

Gigon, Olof, “Zum antiken Begriff der Harmonie,” Studium Generale, 19, 1966, p. 539-547.

Gilbert, Otto, Die Meteorologischen Theorien des griechischen Altertums, Leipzig: B. G. Teubner 1907. [Chap. V: Empedokles, p. 105-124; B 6, B 21.]

– “Spekulation und Volksglaube in der ionischen Philosophie,” Archiv für Religionswissenschaft, 13, 1910, p. 306-332. 

– Griechische Religionsphilosophie, Leipzig: W. Engelmann 1911.

[P. 197-225. P. 200-202: B 6; p. 204: B 17, B 35; p. 205: B 115; p. 206: B 17, B 26 ; p. 207-208: Sphairos; p. 211, 215: B 35; p. 221: B 135; p. 222: B 133, B 134.]

Gibertie, Thomas, “Simonide Empédocle et Gorgias : l’héritage poétique dans la formation du vocabulaire en Grèce ancienne,” Mémoire de Maîtrise, Université Michel de Montaigne, Bordeaux, 1999-2000.

[Emp.: p. 34-55. La Muse. B 3, B 4, B 6, B 17, B 112, B 115, B 131.]

Gill, Christopher, “La psychologie présocratique : quelques questions interprétatives,” in: Les anciens savants : études sur les philosophies préplatoniciennes, ed. Pierre-Marie Morel & Jean-François Pradeau, (Les Cahiers philosophiques de Strasbourg, 12), Université Marc Bloch, Strasbourg 2001, p. 169-189.

Giombini Stefania, “Review of Studi sul pensiero e sulla lingua di Empedocle, de Rossetti L., e C. Santaniello,” Nova Tellus, 28.2, 2010.

http://redalyc.org.www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=59120919014

Giordani, Pietro, “Review of Scinà, Memorie (1813),” Biblioteca Italiana, I, 1816, p. 322-333, II, p. 15-21, IV, p. 247-259.

[ = P. Giordani, Opere, ed. A. Gussalli, Milan 1857, X.14-37. P. 25-27: B 100.]

Giornetti, Francesco, El Empédocles inédito de Giorgio Colli, Universidad nacional de educación a distancia, Facultad de Filosofía, Trabajo fin de grado en Filosofía, Directora María Teresa Oñate y Zubia, Seville, June 2017.

Giraldi (Gyraldus), G. G., Historiae poetarum tam Graecorum quam Latinorum dialogi decem, Basileae 1545, Dialogus III, p. 296-299.

[A concise biography of Emp. with quotation of B 112.4 and B 117; the main source is evidently DL.]

Gkarani, Myrto, see Garani, Myrto.

Gladigow, Burkhard, “Zum Makarismos des Weisen,” Hermes, 95, 1967, p. 404-433.

[B 110, B 115, B 129, B 132.]

Gladisch, August, “Empedokles und die alten Aegypter,” Jahrbücher für speculative Philosophie und die philosophische Bearbeitung der empirischen Wissenschaften, 2/4, 1847, p. 681-725 and 5/2, p. 903-944. [This is repeated more fully in 1858.]

– Empedokles und die Aegypter. Eine historische Untersuchung von A. G., mit Erläuterungen aus den Aegyptischen Denkmälern von Dr. Heinrich Brugsch und Joseph Passalacqua, Leipzig: J. C. Hinrichs 1858.

[Fantastic and improbable identification of Empedoclean teaching with Egyptian beliefs; some textual suggestions.]

– “Das mystische vierspeichige Rad bei den alten Aegyptern und Hellenen,” Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft, 15/2, 1861, p. 406-409.

Glénisson, Marine, “Empédocle dans l’Icaroménippe : menteur invétéré ou plaisant démon lunaire ?,” Bulletin de l’Association Guillaume Budé, 2, 2016, p. 64-78.

[Lucian. B 112, daimôn.]

Goebel, Karl, “Empedokles,” in: Die vorsokratische Philosophie, Bonn: Carl Georgi 1910, p. 191-226.

Golitsis, Pantélis, “Un commentaire perpétuel de Georges Pachymère à la Physique d’Aristote, faussement attribué à Michel Psellos,” Byzantinische Zeitschrift, 100, 2, 2008, p. 637-676.

[91b R = Mansfeld-Primavesi.]

Golosovker, J., “Empedokl iz Agrigenta,” in: Gelděrlin, F., Smerť Empedokla, Moskva-Leningrad 1931.

Gomperz, Theodor, Griechische Denker. Eine Geschichte der antiken Philosophie, Leipzig: Veit & Comp., 1896; Band I, 1903.

[Band I: p. 183-204. Engl. transl. Greek thinkers: A history of ancient philosophy, Bristol 1996 (19051), I. p. 227-254.]

– “Herculanische Notizen,” Wiener Studien, 2, 1880, p. 139-142, p. 140.

[B 100.1-2.]

– “Zu Empedokles,” Hermes, 31, 1896, p. 469-471.

– “Beiträge zur Kritik und Erklärung griechischen Schriftsteler,” Sitzungsberichte der philosophisch-historischen Klasse der kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien, 152, 1906, p. 1-31, p. 14-15. [The author attempts to identify the supposed Empedoclean fragment.]

Gonçalves, Isabel, Cristina Rocha Hipólito, “Necessidade e teleologia na teoria da natureza em Empédocles e Aristóteles,” Pensando, Revista de Filosofia, 5, 9, 2014, p. 146-166.

https://revistas.ufpi.br/index.php/pensando/article/view/3036/1766

González Escudero, Santiago, “Raíces y elementos en Empédocles,” El Basilisco, 1st collection, 13, 1981-1982, p. 62-69.

http://www.fgbueno.es/bas/bas11306.htm

http://www.filosofia.org/ave/001/a297.htm

http://www.fgbueno.es/bas/pdf/bas11306.pdf

[B 6.]

González Martínez, Carmen, “Empédocles, Fausto y los "musulmanes" del Lager: la muerte a través del tiempo y la memoria histórica,” in: Miradas a la historia: reflexiones historiográficas en recuerdo de Miguel Rodríguez Llopis, ed. J. A. Gómez Hernández & N. Marín, Murcia:  Universidad de Murcia, 2004, p. 39-56.

Görner, Rüdiger, “Empedokles,” in: Historische Gestalten der Antike: Rezeption in Literatur, Kunst und Musik (= Der Neue Pauly. Supplemente. Band 8), ed. P. von Möllendorff, A. Simonis, L. Simonis, Stuttgart - Weimar: J.B. Metzler 2013, p. 405-412.

Goto (後藤), Jun (淳), “エンペドクレス哲学において思惟性と生命性を担うフレーン,” 東亜大学紀要, 12, 2010, p. 25-39. 

[“Φρήν carrying the thoughtfulness and vitality in Empedocles’ philosophy.” This article can be read on the web with an abstract in English. Link found with the address of the author: jung510@toua-u.ac.jp. - B 134.]

Gottschalk, H. B., Heraclides Pontus, Oxford: Clarendon Press 1980.

[The apotheosis of Empedocles: p. 13-22., A1.]

Goulet, Richard, “Empédocle,” in: Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques, III, ed. R. Goulet, Paris: C.N.R.S.-Éditions 2000, p. 66-88 (except p. 67-70 for ‘Papyrus de Strasbourg’ by A. Martin).

Goytisolo, Juan, “Las chinelas de Empédocles,” in: Obras completas, I. Barcelona: Galaxia Gutenberg : Círculo de Lectores. 2005, (Opera mundi), p 354-391.

Grabowski, Franz, Empedokles und Leukipp-Demokrit, mit besonderer Berücksichtigung des Anaxagoras, diss., Breslau: Hochschulverlag 1923.

Graf, Fritz, Eleusis und die orphische Dichtung Athens in vorhellenistischer Zeit, Berlin-New York 1974.

Graf, Fritz & Sarah Iles Johnston, Ritual Texts for the Afterlife. Orpheus and the Bacchic Gold Tablets, Abingdon - New York: Routledge 2007.

Graham, Daniel Watkins, (1988) “Symmetry in the Empedoclean cycle,” The Classical Quarterly, 38, 2, 1988, p. 297-312.

– (1999) “Empedocles and Anaxagoras: Responses to Parmenides,” in: The Cambridge Companion to ancient Greek philosophy, ed. A. A. Long, Cambridge University Press 1999, p. 159-180.

– (2002) “La lumière de la lune dans la pensée grecque archaïque,” in: Qu’est-ce que la Philosophie Présocratique ? What is Presocratic philosophy?, ed. A. Laks & C. Louguet, Lille, 2002, p. 351-380.

– “The topology and dynamics of Empedocles’ cycle,” in: The Empedoclean Κόσμος: S[t]ructure, process and the question of cyclicity. Proceedings of the Symposium Philosophiae Antiquae Tertium Myconense, July 6th - July 13th, 2003, Patras, ed. A. L. Pierris, Patras: Institute for Philosophical Research 2005, p. 225-244.

– (2006) Explaining the cosmos: the Ionian tradition of scientific philosophy, Princeton-Oxford: Princeton University Press 2006.

[B 8, B 9, B 11, B 12, B 17, B 21, B 22, B 23, B 26, B 27, B 28, B 30, B 31, B 33, B 35, , B 36, B 62, B 96, B 98.]

– The texts of early Greek philosophy: the complete fragments and selected testimonies of the major presocratics, Part I, Cambridge: University Press 2010.

[Emp.: p. 326 - 433 – [+  +]]

Graham, Daniel W., Zachary Herzog & Michael Williams, “Earth, wind, and fire: Aristotle on violent storm events, with reconsideration of the terms ἐκνεφίας, τυφών, κεραυνός, and πρηστήρ,” Apeiron, 2021 (on-line), p. 1-26.

[The four elements.]

Grammatico, Giuseppina, “L'immaginario empedocleo,” in: Empedocle: tra poesia, medicina, filosofia e politica, ed. G. Casertano, Napoli: Loffredo 2007, p. 48-70.

Greco, Giovanna, “La città di Empedocle: le evidenze archeologiche,” in: Empedocle. Tra poesia, medicina, filosofia e política, ed. G. Casertano, Napoli: Loffredo 2007, p. 198-220.

Greene, William, Chase, “Fate, Good, and Evil in Pre-Socratic philosophy,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, 47, 1936, p. 85-129.

[Emp., p. 110-118.]

Gregory, Andrew, “Empedocles,” in: Ancient Greek cosmogony, London: Bloomsbury 2007, p. 78-101.

[Chap. 5. The lava lamp is used as an analogy for what the world under total Strife would be. Interesting focus on chance in cosmogony and zoogony. “The kosmoi generated by the cycle are not identical, and the differences are down to chance”. B 8, B 12, B 13, B 14, 17, B 35, B 57, B 59, B 62, B 84, B 96, B 98, B 103, B 104, B 124, a(i) 6, a(ii) 17.]

– “Empedocles,” in: The Presocratics and the supernatural: magic, philosophy and science in early Greece, London: Bloomsbury 2013. p. 167-184.

[Ch. 9. Empedocles’ ontology, meteorology, cosmogony, zoogony. Love and Strife. Empedocles’ gods. Empedocles’ magic? Empedocles as a shaman? Empedocles’ claims. Metempsychosis. Empedocles and Homer. It is possible to have a view of Empedocles’ cosmic cycle where there are only natural entities and processes. The lava lamp is used as an analogy for what the world under total Strife would be. B 111. B 112.]

– Anaximander: a re-assessment, London-Oxford-New York: Bloomsbury 2016.

Gregory, Joshua, C., Combustion from Heracleitos to Lavoisier, London: Edward Arnold 1934.

[Emp.: p. 11-16. B 6, B 17, B 100.]

Grmek, Mirko D., “La légende et la réalité de la nocivité des fèves,” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 2, 1, 1980, p. 61-121.

[B 140.]

Griffiths, John, Gwyn, Plutarch’s de Iside et Osiride. Edited with an introduction, translation and commentary by J. G. G., University of Wales Press 1970.

Grilli, Alberto, “Lucrezio tra poesia e filosofia,” Annali del liceo G. Garibaldi di Palermo, 14-16, 1977-1979, p. 197-216.

[Lucretius was inspired mainly by Homer, Hesiod, Emp. and Ennius.]

Grimal, Edmonde, A propos d’un passage du Ménon, une définition “tragique” de la couleur,” Revue des études grecques 55, 1942, p. 1-13.

[ 921.]

Grotius, Hugo, Dicta poetarum quae apud Jo. Stobaeum exstant. Emendata et latino carmine reddita ab H. G. Plutarchi et Basilii Magni de usu Graecorum poetarum libelli, Parisiis: N. Buon 1623.

[16252; Bollack, 1969, III, p. 659, mentions this title among “éditions des fragments et commentaires”, p. 152 (B 6), 166 (B 105) and 170 (B 115.1-2).]

– Annotationes in novum testamentum, VI, Groningen: Zuidema 18282.

[Annotationes in epistolam ad Romanos, cap. I, p. 23; B 134.]

Grottanelli, Cristiano., “Healers and saviours of the Eastern Mediterranean in pre-classical times,” in: La soteriologia dei culti orientali nell’Impero Romano, ed. U. Bianchi - M. J. Vermaseren, Leiden 1982, p. 649-670.

Grünwald, Michael, Die Anfänge der abendländischen Philosophie. Fragmente der Vorsokratiker. Mit einer Einführung von M. Laura Gemelli Marciano, Zürich-Münich: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag, Artemis Verlag 1991, (Bibliothek der Antike).

[Emp.: p. 121-144. An extensive translation of B fragments and A testimonies; and p. 225-230: notices. Does not follow Diels’s ordering of the fragments. First edition in Zürich: Artemis 1949.]

Gruppe, Otto, Griechische Mythologie und Religionsgeschichte, Band I-II, Munich 1903-1906.

[I.429 (B 6) and II.1044 (Empedocles as a magician).]

Guglielmino, Francesco, “Empedocle,” in: Tradizione 1939.[???]

Guimarães, Bias Busquet, O poema de Empédocles: três linhas interpretativas em língua portuguesa, Monografia para a obtenção do grau Licenciatura em Filosofia, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, 2019.

– O Poema de Empédocles: Uma renovação da teoria do ciclo cósmico, Dissertação (Mestrado em Filosofia), Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, 2021.

http://www.pgfi.uff.br/index.php/dissertacoes/

http://www.pgfi.uff.br/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/2021_Bias_Busquet.pdf

[Harmony - A 32, A 37, A 38, A 52, A 41, A 42, A 44, A 46, A 47, A 48, A 50, A 56, A 58, A 64, A 67, A 72, A 75, B 6, B 8, B 16, B 17, B 23, B 26, B 27, B 30, B 31, B 35, B 38, B 54, B 57, B 62, B 71, B 73, B 89, B 110, B 114, B 115, B 116, B 117, B 121, B 125, B 146.]

Gulley, Joshua, Mixture, powers, and reality in Empedocles and Aristotle, diss., Purdue University, Department of philosophy, West Lafayette, Indiana, 2017.

[Chapter 3.5 has the title "The Empedoclean Roots as Power-Stuffs". The word "roots" is used many times, but fr. 6 is never quoted. For Gulley, the four roots are fire, air, water and earth. Homer and Hesiod are never quoted for the understanding of Empedocles. B 8, B 9, B 12, B 15, B 16, B 17, B 20, B 21, B 22, B 23, B 26, B 27, B 27a, B 28, B 35, B 38, B 71, B 73, B 84, B 91, B 96, B 115, B 134, B 137.]

Guthrie, William Keith Chambers, (1952) “The presocratic world-picture,” The Harvard Theological Review, 45, 2, 1952, p. 87-104.

[Empedocles: p. 93, 98-102, some remarks on Empedocles´ theory of soul, daimones, cosmos.]

http://www.upf.edu/materials/fhuma/hiid1/mat/txt/guthrie.pdf

– (1954) The Greeks and their Gods, Boston: Beacon Press 1954 (First edition: 1950). 

[P. 309-325: Orphism and Empedocles.]

– (1952) – see 1993.

– (1957) In the Beginning: Some Greek views on the origins of life and the early state of man, London: Methuen & Co 1957. Also: Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press 1957, (The Messenger lectures, 1957).

[P. 42-45, 72-73; B 61, B 62; B 128.]

– (1962) A history of Greek philosophy, I, The earlier Presocratics and the Pythagoreans, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1962.

[A 85, B 26, B 52, B 62, B 96, B 109, B 115: p. 318-319, 482 - two souls, B 127, B 134, B 139, B 140.]

– (1965) A history of Greek philosophy, II, The presocratic tradition from Parmenides to Democritus, Cambridge-London-New York: Cambridge University Press 1965.

[Emp.: p. 122-265. [+  +]]

– (1993) Orpheus and Greek religion: a study of the orphic movement, Princeton (N.J): Princeton University Press 1993 (reprint with foreword of 1952²).

[P. 169: B 115, B 146-147. P.175: B 112, B 117. P.197: B 128, B 136, B 137. P. 231-232.]

Guzzo, Augusto, “Empedocle d’Agrigento,” Atti dell’Accademia di scienze, lettere e arti di Palermo, IV, 23, 2, 1962-1963, p. 121-180.

[Also as an extract with same title and pagination, Palermo, Presso l’Accademia 1964. B 2-3, B 6, B 8, B 16, B 17, B 20, B 21, B 23, B 27-31, B 35, B 38, B 40-42, B 44-45, B 47, B 54, B 57, B 67, B 71-73, B 77-78, B 79, B 82-83, B 84, B 85-89, B 96, B 100, B 102-103, B 105-107, B 109, B 111, B 112, B 113, B 115, B 117, B 120-123, B 128, B 129, B 133, B 134, B 136, B 138, B 139, B 144, B 146, B 147.]

Gysembergh, Victor, “Source et valeur des fragments antiques sans parallèle dans le Livre de l’Amour d’Agostino Nifo,” Revue de Philologie, 90, 2, 2016, p. 29-45.

[A new account of Empedocles, p. 39. Good Love and bad Love.]

HHH

Habash Justin, Early Greek philosophy and the discovery of nature, Diss. McAnulty College, Duquesne University, 2016.

[Emp.: p. 149-165.]

Habermehl, P[eter?], “Empedokles,” in: Metzler Philosophen Lexicon, ed. von B. Luty, Stuttgart: Metzler 1989, p. 217-219.

Hack, Roy Kenneth, God in Greek philosophy to the time of Socrates, Princeton: Princeton University Press 1931.

[Chapter X: Empedocles and Anaxagoras, p. 94-117; Empedocles: 94-102.]

Hadot, Pierre, Qu’est-ce que la philosophie antique ?, Paris: Gallimard 1995.

[P. 276-277: B 129; p. 278: B 132.]

Hahm, David E., The origins of Stoic cosmology, Colombus: Ohio State University Press, 1977.

[B 6, B 8, B 17, B 38, B 62, B 73.]

Halapsis, A. V., “Divine evolution: Empedocles’ anthropology,” Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, 19, 2021, p. 107-116.

[B 8, B 11, B 12, B 23, B 35, B 112, B 117, B 126.]

Halbertsma, Klaas Tjalling Agnus, “Over den wijsgeer Empedokles,” Hermeneus, 21, 1949, p. 3-9, 22-26 and 62-68.

Halbwachs, Maurice, “La représentation de l’âme chez les Grecs : le double corporel et le double spirituel,” Revue de métaphysique et de morale, 37/4, 1930, p. 493-534.

[Emp. p. 518-519.]

Hall, Alexander, E. W., “Dating the Homeric Hymn to Selene: Evidence and Implications,” Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies, 53, 2013, p. 15-30.

[Moon, B 45.]

Hall, Edith, “Political and cosmic turbulence in Euripides’ Orestes,” in: Tragedy, comedy and the polis. Papers from the Greek Drama Conference: Nottingham, 18-20 July 1990, ed. A. H. Sommerstein, St. Halliwell, J. Henderson, B. Zimmermann, Bari: Levante Editori 1993, p. 263-285.

[Strife.]

Hall, Matthew, Plants as Persons: a philosophical botany, Albany (New York): State University of New York Press 2011, (SUNY series on religion and the environment).

[Emp., p. 18-19, in a chapter called 'The roots of disregard'. B 21, B 107, B 136, B 140.]

Halleux, Robert, Le problème des métaux dans la science antique, Paris: Les Belles Lettres 1974, (Bibliothèque de la Faculté de Philosophie et Lettres de l’Université de Liège, fasc. 209), Presses universitaires de Liège & OpenEdition Books 2013.

[Chapitre I. Les présocratiques : http://books.openedition.org/pulg/967 A 34, A 89, B 91, B 92.]

Hallier, Aemilius [Emil], Lucreti carmina e fragmentis Empedoclis adumbrata, diss., Ienae: Typis Maukii 1857.

Ham, Charles Tyler, Empedoclean elegy: love, strife and the four elements in Ovid’s amores, ars amatorial and fasti, Diss., classical studies, University of Pennsylvania, 2013.

– “Venus discors. The Empedocleo-Lucretian background of Venus and Calliope's song, in Metamorphoses 5,” in: Philosophy in Ovid, Ovid as philosopher, ed. K. Volk & G. D. Williams, New York: Oxford University Press 2022 p. 164-183.

[B 6, B 17, B 115, B 128, B 131.]

Hamblenne, P., “Au Salluste inconnu,” Revue belge de philologie et d’histoire, 59, 1981, p. 60-70.

[A 20.]

Hanf, Roland, Begriffliches Denken bei Empedokles, diss., Kiel, 1999-2000.

Hankinson, R. J., Cause and explanation in ancient Greek thought, Oxford: Clarendon Press 1998.

[P. 45-49. Empedocles: structure and emergence; B 12, B 15, B 21, B 23, B 96, B 98.]

– “Reason, cause, and explanation in Presocratic philosophy,” in: The Oxford Handbook of Presocratic philosophy, ed. P. Curd and D. W. Graham, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008.

Hâncu, Mihail-George, The terminology of ancient Greek cosmogonies, Diss. University Bucharest: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti 2019.

[Emp.: p. 275-306. B 6, B 8, B 17, B 20, B 31, B 71, B 129, B 134. Pap. Strasbourg. Eros, ἔρως.]

Hardie, Alex, “Empedocles and the Muse of the agathos logos,” American Journal of Philology, 134, 2, 2013, p. 209-246.

[B 3, B 4, Β 23, B 110, B 131, B 133, B 134.]

– “The formation of an Augustan elegist: Empedocles and Propertius’ ‘Monobiblos’,” in: Word and context in Latin poetry. Studies in memory of David West, ed. A. J. Woodman & J. Wisse, Cambridge: The Cambridge Philological Society 2017, p. 61-87.

[A 98, B 3, B 4, B 17, B 20, B 30, B 98, B 101, B 115, B 122, B 124, B 134.]

Hardie, Philip Russel, Virgil’s Aeneid. Cosmos and imperium, Oxford: Clarendon Press 1986.

– “The speech of Pythagoras in Ovid Metamorphoses 15: Empedoclean epos,” The Classical Quarterly, 45, 1995, p. 204-214.

– Lucretian receptions. History, the sublime, knowledge, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2009. [B 8, B 17, B 30, B 61, B 112, B 115, B 146.]

– “Horace et le sublime empédocléen,” in: Les Présocratiques à Rome, ed. S. Franchet d’Espèrey & C. Lévy, Paris: Presses de l’Université Paris-Sorbonne 2018, p. 263-282.

[B 23, B 61, B 77, B 117, B 129, B 134.]

Hardy, Edmund, Der Begriff der Physis in der griechischen Philosophie, I, Berlin: Weidmann 1884.

[P. 21-22, B 8.]

Harles, G. C. [Harless, Gottlieb Christoph], Programma IV de Empedocle, num ille merito possit magiae accusari, Erlangen 1788-1790

[non vidi.]

Harris, William Vernon., Dreams and Experience in Classical Antiquity, Cambridge (Mass.)-London: Harvard University Press, 2009.

[P. 237-240. Empedocles and his theory of dreams, ad B 108.]

Harrison, Jane Ellen, The prolegomena to the study of Greek religion, Cambridge 1908.

Harvey, Edmund, Newton, A history of luminescence: from the earliest times until 1900, Philadelphie, The American philosophical society, 1957.

Hatem, Jad, Empédocle, Qohélet, Bar Hebraeus, Paris: Orizons 2015, (La main d'Athéna).

Haussleiter, Johannes, Der Vegetarismus in der Antike, Berlin: Alfred Töpelmann 1935.

[P. 157-163 et passim. The passage on Empedocles is strongly dependent on Diels’ translations of fragments and Wilamowitz’s commentaries in SPAW 1929. Not very informative.]

Heath, Thomas L., Aristarchus of Samos: the ancient Copernicus. A history of Greek astronomy to Aristarchus together with Aristarchus’s treatise [...], Oxford: Clarendon Press 1913.

[Empedocles:  p. 86-93, reprint in Greek in 2005 below.]

– Αρίσταρχος ο Σάμιος, ο αρχαίος Κοπέρνικος, μτφρ. Θ. Γραμμένος, Αθήνα: Κέντρο Έρευνας Επιστήμης και Εκπαίδευσης [«Κ.Ε.ΕΠ.ΕΚ.»], 2005.

[P. 82-89 « Εμπεδοκλής ».]

Hedericus, Beniamin, Sphaera Empedoclis, notis, cum suis, tum Q. Septimii Florentis Christiani, illustrata, ad orationes de astronomiae instauribus... invitat B. H., Typ. J. Ridelii, Dresdae 1711.

[B 161.]

Heeren, Arnold, Hermann, Ludwig, Ioannis Stobaei Eclogarum physicarum et ethicarum, libri duo: Partis primae tomus prior, Physica continens, Göttingen: Vandenhoek & Ruprecht 1792.

[P. 286-290: B 6, B 17.7-8, B 20.2-5.]

– Ioannis Stobaei Eclogarum physicarum et ethicarum, libri duo: Partis primae tomus alter, Göttingen: Vandenhoek & Ruprecht 1794.

[P. 895: B 115.]

– Ioannis Stobaei Eclogarum physicarum et ethicarum, libri duo: Partis secundae tomus alter, variantes lectiones, commentationem de fontibus Eclogarum I. S. et indices continens, Göttingen: Vandenhoek & Ruprecht 1801.

Heerkens, Gerardus Nicolai [Gerard Nicolaas], Empedocles sive physicorum epigrammatum libri quinque, Groningae: H. Vechner 1783.

– Empedocles sive physicorum epigrammatum libri septem, Groningae 1788.

Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich, “Vorlesungen über die Geschichte der Philosophie,” in: Hegel’s Werke, ed. von K. L. Michelet et alii, Bände XIII-XV, Berlin 1833-1837, Band XIII, 1833, p. 269-275.

[Hegel’s lectures from 1805 to 1830.]

Heidel, William Arthur, “Qualitative change in Pre-Socratic philosophy,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 19, 1906, p. 353-379.

– “On certain fragments of the Pre-Socratics,” Proceedings of the American Academy Arts and Sciences, 48, 1913, p. 725-729.

[B 109, B 110, B 101.]

– “Περι φύσεως: A study of the conception of nature among the Pre-Socratics,” Proceedings of the American Academy Arts and Sciences, 45, 1910, p. 79-133.

Heinimann, Felix, Nomos und Physis. Herkunft und Bedeutung einer Antithese im Griechischen Denken des 5. Jahrhunderts, Basel: Friedrich Reinhardt AG 1945.

[P. 48-9, 84-5, 89-90, 153 (B 9), 89-90, 153 (B 8), 85 (B 17.22: νομίζεσθαι), 91-2 (B 63.]

Heinze, Richard, Xenokrates: Darstellung der Lehre und Sammlung der Fragmente, Leipzig: B.G. Teubner 1892.

[Emp.: p.86-87. B 21.12 or B 23.8, B 115.]

Heneveld, Amy, “Concordia discors : l’harmonie de récriture médiévale,” Médiévales (Presses Universitaires de Vincennes), 66, (Harmonie Disharmonie), 2014, p. 25-41.

Herington, C. J., “A study in the Prometheia. Part I. The elements in the trilogy,” Phoenix, 17, 3, 1963, p. 180-197.

[B 6, B 17.]

Hermann, Gottfried, Draconis Stratonicensis liber De metris poeticis. Ioannis Tzetzae in Homeri Iliadem, Leipzig: Weigel 1812.

[Exeg. In Iliad. 42.17-26: storm of the elements. A 66.]

Hernández Castro, David, (2018) “El temenos de Apolo y Aristeas en Metaponto. Una aproximación a la influencia de Delfos sobre la Magna Grecia,” Ilu (Madrid), 23, 2018, p. 111-128.

https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/ILUR/article/view/61023/4564456547736

– (2019) “Aphrodite Ζείδωρος: the subversion of the myth of Prometheus and Pandora,” ΣΧΟΛΗ, 13, 2, 2019, p. 430-450.

https://nsu.ru/classics/schole/13/13-2-castro.pdf

[B 128, B 130, B 136, B 151.]

– (2019) “Buscando a Empédocles. Vivir y morir como un cantor de Apolo,” in: Morir antes de morir. Ritos de iniciación y experiencias místicas en la historia de la cultura, ed. Javier Alvarado Planas & David Hernández de la Fuente, Madrid: Dykinson 2019, p. 117-142.

https://www.academia.edu/40470061/Buscando_a_Emp%C3%A9docles._Vivir_y_morir_como_un_cantor_de_Apolo

[B 111, B 112.]

– (2019) “Empedocles without horseshoes. Delphi’s criticism of large sacrifices,” Symposion, 6, 2, 2019, p. 129-146.

http://symposion.acadiasi.ro/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/2019.6.2.2.-Castro-1.pdf

[B 128, B 137, B 139.]

– (2019) “La estructura topográfica del pensamiento presocrático,” Araucaria, 21, 41, 2019, p. 139-159.

https://revistascientificas.us.es/index.php/araucaria/article/download/5246/7697

[A 1, B 17, B 55, B 112.]

– (2020) “Las Purificaciones de Apolo: revolución, ritual y mito en Empédocles de Akragas,” Pensamiento al margen, 12, 2020, p. 135-203. (On-line journal ISSN: 2386-6098. www.pensamientoalmargen.com.)

https://pensamientoalmargen.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/10.-Herna%CC%81ndez-Las-Purificaciones-de-Apolo.pdf

[Stimulating - B 1, B 2, B 3, B 17, B 21, B 29, B 111, B 112, B 117, B 115, B 129, B 131, B 132, B 134, B 137, B 139, B 146, d5-6 MP.]

– (2020) Empédocles, cantor de Apolo. El lugar de la democracia y la estructura topográfica, narrativa y ritual de las Purificaciones, diss., Programa de doctorado en Filosofía, UNED, 2020.

[A learned dissertation, ‘sobresaliente cum laude’.]

http://e-spacio.uned.es/fez/view/tesisuned:ED-Pg-Filosofia-Dhernandez

http://e-spacio.uned.es/fez/eserv/tesisuned:ED-Pg-Filosofia-Dhernandez/HERNANDEZ_CASTRO_DAVID_Tesis.pdf

Herrero de Jáuregui, Miguel, (2005) “Le pluriel de dédain dans la réflexion religieuse des Présocratiques,” Revue de Philosophie ancienne, XXIII, 2, 2005, p. 53-74.

[B 11, B 112, B 124, B 141, B 146, B 147.]

– (2010) Orphism and Christianity in late antiquity, Berlin-New York: De Gruyter 2010, (Sozomena, Studies in the Recovery of Ancient Texts, 7).

[B 6, B 17, B 115, B 117, B 126.]

– (2013) “Salvation for the wanderer: Odysseus, the gold leaves, and Empedocles,” in: Philosophy and salvation in Greek religion, ed. V. Adluri, Berlin-Boston: Walter de Gruyter 2013, (Religionsgeschichtliche Versuche und Vorarbeiten, 60), p. 29-57.

[B 3, B 20, B 23, B 84, B 112, B 115, B 131, B 132, B 146, B 147.]

– (2016) “Trust the god! Tharsein in Greek religion,” Harvard studies in Classical Philology, 108, 2016, p. 1-52.

[The Muse. B 3, B 115, B 131.]

– (2017) “L’hostilité des éléments cosmiques, d’Homère à Empédocle,” Revue des études grecques, 130, 1, 2017, p. 23-42.

[B 115.]

– (2017) “Ipsissima verba de la Musa: Empédocles B 3.6-13 y B 111 DK,” in: Ratna: Homenaje a Julia Mendoza, ed. J. A Álvarez-Pedrosa, A. Bernabé, E. Luján, F. Presa, Madrid: Escolar y Mayo 2017, p. 233-241.

[B 3, B 111, B 131.]

– (2018) “Protreptic and poetry: Hesiod, Parmenides, Empedocles,” in: When wisdom calls. Philosophical protreptic in Antiquity, ed. Olga Alieva, Annemaré Kotzé & Sophie van der Meeren, Turnhout: Brepols 2018, (Monothéismes et philosophie), p. 49-69.

[The Muse. B 3, B 11, B 17, B 111, B 112, B 115, B 117, B 118, B 131, B 146, B 147. a(ii) 21-22.]

– (2020) “Eros en la literatura orfica,” in: Eros en la literatura griega, ed. J. A. López Férez, Madrid: Ediciones Clásicas 2020, p. 1-14.

Hershbell, Jackson P., (1968) “Empedocles’ oral Style,” The Classical Journal, 63, 1968, p. 352-357.

– (1970) “Hesiod and Empedocles,” The Classical Journal, 65, 1970, p. 145-161.

– (1971) “Plutarch as a source for Empedocles re-examined,” American Journal of Philology, 92, 1971, p. 156-184.

[B 5, B 8, B 24, B 25, B 27, B 76, B 115, B 122.]

– (1973) “Hippolytus’ Elenchos as a source for Empedocles re-examined,” Phronesis, 18.2, p. 97-114, and 18.3, p.187-203, 1973.

[B 6, B 109, B 110, B 115, B 131.]

– (1974) “The idea of Strife in early Greek thought,” The Personalist, 55, 1974, p. 205-215.

– (1974) “Empedoclean influences on the Timaeus,” Phoenix, 28, 2, 1974, p. 145-166.

Heyne, Christian Gottlob, “Vorrede,” in: Dieterich Tiedemann, System der stoischen Philosophie, Erster Theil, Leipzig: Bey Weidmanns Erben und Reich 1776, p. III–XVIII.

[Emp.: pages VIII-IX: B6; Nestis: Persephone; Aïdôneus: earth.]

Hicks, R. D., Aristotle: De anima. With translation, introduction and notes, Cambridge: University Press 1907.

[B 96, B 106, B 108, B 109.]

Hild, Joseph-Antoine, Étude sur les démons dans la littérature et la religion des Grecs, Paris: Hachette 1881.

[Emp.: p. 228-234.]

Hillgruber, Michael, Die pseudoplutarchische Schrift De Homero - Teil 2 - Kommentar zu den Kapiteln 74–218, Stuttgart-Leipzig: Teubner 1999, (Beiträge zur Altertumskunde, 58).

[B 6, B 17, B 22, B 42, B 65, B 71, B 128.]

Hladký, Vojtěch, (2002) “Vítkův Empedoklés,” Souvislosti, 3-4, 53-54, 2002, p. 194-202.

[A review of Tomáš Vítek’s Empedocles, I.] 

http://www.souvislosti.cz/3402/hla.html 

– (2006) “Empedokleův Sfairos,” Filosofický časopis, 3/54, 2006, p. 393-410.

[In Czech, English summary.]

– (2008) “Empedokleův Sfairos očima antických interpretů,” Listy filologické (Folia philologica), 2008, 131, 1, p. 379-439.

[See an English abstract: http://lf.clavmon.cz/. A recent English translation of the whole text by Anna Pilátová can be supplied by Vojtěch Hladký on demand - vojtechhladky@gmail.com - or by empedocles.acragas.]

– (2010) “Reinkarnující se duše mezi Presokratiky a Platónem,” Reflexe, 38, 2010, p. 19-34.

[Emp.: p. 22-24.]

– (2014) “Empedocles’ Sphairos and its interpretations in Antiquity, I: Aristotle and the neoplatonists,” Eirene, 50, 1-2, 2014, p. 149-164.

– (2015) “Empedocles’ Sphairos and its interpretations in Antiquity, II: Plato’s Timaeus and Statesman,” Eirene, 51, 2015, p. 71-98.

– (2016) “Empedocles’ Sphairos and its interpretations in Antiquity, III: zoogony and Plato’s Symposium,” Eirene, 52, 1-2, 2016, p. 359-383.

[A 72, B 20, B 27, B 28, B 29, B 42, B 45, B 47, B 61, B 62, B 95, B 96, B 98, B 124.]

– (2017) “Empedocles’ Sphairos,” Rhizomata, 5, 1, 2017, p. 1-24.

[Wrongly given on-line in July 2018 by De Gruyter as Volume 9 – instead of 5. A 47, A 50, A 72, B 6, B 26, B 27, B 27a, B 28, B 29, B 30, B 31, B 62, B 110, B 134.]

– (2018) “Transmigrating soul between the Presocratics and Plato,” Aither, international issue n°5, 2018, p. 20-49.

http://aither.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/A20.pdf

Hladký, Vojtěch et alii, Evoluce před Darwinem, Praha: Pavel Mervart, 2012, p. 71-86.

[Evolution before Darwin. Chap. Empedocles: The cycle of life; a partly popular, partly original interpretation of E. zoology in the context of his cosmology; the text is written in Czech, summary is absent.]

Hoessly, Fortunat, “2.4. Empedokles,” in: Katharsis: Reinigung als Heilverfahren, Studien zum Ritual der archaischen und klassischen Zeit sowie zum Corpus Hippocraticum, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, (Hypomnemata, 135), 2001, p. 188-197.

[B 111, B 112, B 115, B 117, B 128, B 129, B 136, B 137, B 146.]

Höfer, Ferdinand, “Zur Lehre von der sinnlichen Wahrnehmung im 4. Buche des Lukrez,” in: Zu der öffentlichen Prüfung des Gymnasiums zu Seehausen in der Altmark und zur Vorfeier des Geburtsfestes Sr. Majestät des Kaisers und Königs und zur Entlassung der Abiturienten am 20. und 21. März 1872 zu ergebenst einladen Dir. Aug. Dihle, Stendal: Franzen & Große 1872, p. 1-24.

[B 84.]

Hoffmann-Loß, Herbert, Die Wiedergabe der Empedokleischen Physik durch Aristoteles, diss., Göttingen 1966.

[B 6, B 8, B 15, B 17, B 21, B 22, B 23, B 26, B 27, B 29, B 30, B 35, B 36, B 37, B 39, B 59, B 62, B 96, B 109, B 110, B 115, B 133, B 134, B 135.]

Hollenberg, Wilhelm, “Empedoclea,” in: Jahresbericht über das Königliche Joachimsthalsche Gymnasium, Gedruckt in der Druckerei der Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Berlin 1853, p. 1-31.

[De prooemio Empedoclis: p. 1-17, De cognoscendi facultate: p. 17-31.]

Holmes, Brooke, The symptom and the subject: the emergence of the physical body in ancient Greece, Princeton-Oxford: Princeton University Press 2010.

[B 8, B 134.]

Hölscher, Uvo, (1965) “Weltzeiten und Lebenzyklus: eine Nachprüfung der Empedokles-Doxographie,” Hermes, 93, 1965, p. 7-33

[= reprinted in U. Hölscher, Anfängliches Fragen: Studien zur frühen griechischen Philosophie, Göttingen: 1968, p. 173-212.]

– (1965) Empedokles und Hölderlin, Frankfurt am Main: Insel 1965.

[The second actualized edition was published like Schriften der Hölderlin-Gesellschaft 21, Eggingen: Isele 1998.]

– (1968) Anfängliches Fragen. Studien zur frühen griechischen Philosophie, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 1968.

[Emp.: p. 173-212. B 6, B 8, B 12, B 17, B 26, B 27, B 29, B 35, B 110, B 123.]

– (1976) “Der Sinn von Sein in der älteren griechischen Philosophie,” Sitzungsberichte der Heidelberger Akademie der Wissenschaften, 3/1976, Heidelberg 1976.

– (1991) “Heraklit über göttliche und menschliche Weisheit,” in: Weisheit. Archäologie der literarischen Kommunikation III, ed. Aleida Assmann, Munich: Wilhelm Fink Verlag 1991, p. 73-80.

[P. 77-78. B 3.3, B 2.9, B 113, B 112.4-5.]

Holton, Stephanie, Sleep and dreams in early Greek thought: Presocratic and Hippocratic approaches, London-New York: Routledge 2022, (Medicine and the Body in Antiquity).

[3.1.3 Empedocles: p. 80-83. More: p. 92-93, 126. 164-165. – 28 A 46b, 31 A 84, A 8, A 86, B 98, B 100, B 105, B 108, B 115, B 117, B 126. Blood and heat. Life, sleep and death.]

Holwerda, Douwe, Commentatio de vocis quae est φύσις vi atque usu praesertim in Graecitate Aristotele anteriore, Gröningen 1955.

–“Zu Empedokles fr. 20 D-K,” Mnemosyne 4/50, 1997, p. 320-321.

[B 20.]

Hommel, Hildebrecht, “Cetera mitte, zu Archilochus, Horaz, Euripides und Empedokles,” Gymnasium, 58, 1951, p. 218-227.

Hooykaas, Reijer, Het begrip element in zijn historisch-wijsgerige ontwikkeling, Diss. Rijksuniversiteit Utrecht, 1933.

Hopkins, Phil, “"As he says in his poetical Way": Anaximander and Empedocles on the motive forces of Kosmos,” in: A Companion to ancient philosophy, ed. S. D. Kirkland & E. Sanday, Evanston: Northwestern University Press 2018, (Rereading ancient Philosophy), p. 53-66.

[B 17, B 35, B 105, B 110, B 115, B 135.]

Horky, Phillip Sidney, Plato and Pythagoreanism, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013.

[Emp.: p. 179-183, 219-220. A 29, A 86, B 17, B 26, B 115.]

– “Empedocles Democraticus: Hellenistic biography at the intersection of philosophy and politics,” in: Bios philosophos philosophy in ancient Greek biography, Proceedings of the 2013 Diatribai di Gargnano, ed. M. Bonazzi & S. Schorn, Brepols 2016 (Hellenistic and Roman Philosophy Series, 4).

– “When did the kosmos become the kosmos,” in: Cosmos in the ancient world, ed. P. S. Horky, Cambridge University Press 2019, p. 22-41.

[A 47, A 50, A 58, B 26, B 53-54, B 100, B 115, B 134, B 136.]

Horna, Constantinus, “Empedocleum,” Wiener Studien, 48, 1930, p. 3-11.

[B 134, B 29, A 1, par. 77, A 2, B 160.]

Horsfall, Nicholas, Virgil, Aeneid 6, A commentary, volume 1: introduction, text and translation, Berlin-Boston: De Gruyter 2013.

[B 121.]

Huby, Pamela & C.C.W. Taylor, Simplicius. On Aristotle, Physics 1.3-4, translated by P. H & C.C.W. T., London: Bristol Classical Press 2011, (Ancient Commentators on Aristotle).

[Simplicius p. 102.16 - 179.19; B 8, B 17, B 21, B 23, B 26.]

Huffman, Carl A., (1999) “The Pythagorean tradition,” in: The Cambridge Companion to early Greek philosophy, ed. A. A. Long, Cambridge 1999, p. 66-87.

[P. 75-78: Emp. as a Pythagorean; B 137, B 115, B 112.]

– (2006) “Aristoxenus’ Pythagorean Precepts: A rational Pythagorean ethic,” in: La costruzione del discorso filosofico nell’età dei Presocratici, ed. M. M. Sassi, Pisa: Edizione della Normale 2006, p. 103-121.

[P. 108, n. 4 A 95.]

– (2009) “The Pythagorean conception of the soul from Pythagoras to Philolaus,” in: Body and soul in ancient philosophy, ed. D. Frede D. & B. Reis, Berlin-New York: Walter de Gruyter 2009, p. 21-43.

[B 115, B 135, B 138.]

– (2014) (ed.), A history of Pythagoreanism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2014.

Hüffmeier, Friedrich, “Phronesis in den Schriften des Corpus Hippocraticum,” Hermes, 89, 1, 1961, p. 51-84.