Progress Review Meeting

Overview

The progression panel will consider your evidence, your supervisor’s report and agreed TAP reports at an integrated TAP and progress review meeting. As a matter of course, you will be in attendance and, based on these elements, the progression panel will decide as to whether you have met, exceeded or not met the relevant University progression criteria as well as a recommendation regarding your progression.

Departmental Procedure for the Progress Review Meeting, including Distance Learners

Timetable and evidence required for Philosophy department progression


Year 1 progression (two stages: PGR Progression Day; panel meeting)

PGR Progression Day

  • When: Week 10 of Summer Term

  • Evidence from PGR: describe the direction their research is taking and the research questions it addresses

  • Attendees: PGR, supervisor(s), TAP and progression panel members; other PGs (PGT and PGR) and staff invited

Progression panel meeting and TAP 2 meeting (integrated)

  • When: Month 9-10, after PGR Progression Day

  • Evidence from supervisor: a written progress report 7 days prior to the meeting and after the Progression Day presentation

  • Evidence from PGR: annotated bibliography; a written plan for Year 2; training record; all submitted 14 calendar days prior to the meeting; copy of final presentation ASAP after Progression Day

  • Attendees: PGR, non-supervisory TAP member(s), department’s Director of PGRs as chair

Year 2 progression panel meeting and TAP 4 meeting (integrated)

  • When: Month 24

  • Evidence from supervisor: a written progress report 7 days prior to the meeting

  • Evidence from PGR: chapter of their thesis; written plan for Year 3 including research questions; draft bibliography for thesis; training record; all submitted 14 calendar days prior to the meeting

  • Attendees: PGR, non-supervisory TAP member(s), department’s Director of PGRs as chair