For the first seven week, I need to improve from the group work with my teammate.I agreed that everyone is different, so there will be have different opinion in the group, this is the part that was hard.For seven week, I'm a little bit lack of communicate with my teammate, and also we need to unify and collaborate to one final opinion that will make our group better.There have many different feedback for our project pitch version one, for example our ppt is lack of Amis culture, we're not prepare enough, we make up what indigenous people was like.In pitch 2 we have changed a lot, from we put more Amis pattern and cultural picture in it. And we get more research on the real history and the real culture of Amis tribeThis PBL project have a lot of connection with PBL B, both of them is social justice. In PBL B, we have learned a lot about indigenous people's culture, we even go to the museum to see their traditional object and their culture.In PBL b, there are group that have choose indigenous people for their final exhibition project.It dip down the base of the project for this semester.I also have grown a lot, I have learned about many rules, and leazned to use different type of ways to learn, and also the way of what are think is improved.

For our group, we are focused on the injustice and misunderstanding of indigenous people (especially the Amis tribe). We choose Amis tribe to make it more detail and more focus on one tribe to write.

In modern times there have been many stereotypes about it; all of this is because people now don't know all the sources/knowledge about indigenous culture. They think indigenous people are like this in general, so indigenous people should be like this. Or there are also people from different tribes messed together; one of the tribes is different from the other tribe. It is also caused by a lack of knowledge of indigenous people.

This semester’s PBL magazine project helped me grow a lot as a writer and team member. I was responsible for the magazine’s written content. At first, I thought writing just meant recording facts clearly. But my teammates told me my first draft was too vague. I revised it overnight, adding specific examples, splitting long paragraphs, and adding subheadings. This reminded me of my science lab report, where I also failed to explain the meaning of my results. I now know good writing requires revision and thinking from readers’ perspectives. The biggest change is I now listen carefully to feedback instead of being defensive. My main weakness is slow writing speed. I plan to practice making quick 10-minute outlines before writing to improve efficiency.

I used to think design was just about looking good. Over the semester I learned planning, drafting and feedback are critical. Principles like contrast and emphasis helped our logo: two overlapping heads show bias vs. understanding. I am most proud of our final logo, which clearly communicates our "perception ≠ reality" message while honoring Amis heritage.

Our group studied injustice and misunderstanding faced by Taiwan’s marginalized groups. I was most surprised that everyday stereotypes harm more than historical wrongs. I once thought these issues were mostly in the past and that marginalized communities were homogeneous. Today people still lump diverse groups together and reduce them to narrow stereotypes. This taught me social justice starts with listening to individual stories and challenging our own biases.