The more orderly and rigid, the structure the more likely it is to shatter. The more internal structure there is the more resistance to the flow of ideas or quantum packets. Limits are easier to experiment with using communications.
Computer guys know the 4-byte IP addresses gave way to 64-bits. The old IP guys remember bytes were not always 8-bits. IP was specified in octets in 1974 by Vinton Cerf and Robert Kahn. The budget for ARPANET led to TCP on a public network over the military's objections based on national security concerns. Today, Multi-Protocol Label Switching, (MPLS) with Wi-Fi -6 mesh keeps TCP around for backwards compatibility.
These changes from IP were required by the density of communication packets which in turn are distributions of Quanti aggregated into electromagnetic quantum frequencies. The people who had no clue about octets or MPLS are doing just fine with supercomputer powered hand-held AI enabled communication devices. But we ought to change the governance hierarchy into a mesh on a timeline where people can understand.
Computer systems do not care if the data is pretty. Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) works great for these systems. But for humans the presentation is awful. Typesetting markups on paper led to markup languages and on to Hyper-Text--Markup-Language (HTML). Now eXtensible Markup Language (XML) has merged data exchange and presentation.
Hopefully it's easier to see where we are going if you know where we have been.
This is conceptual. There is more work involved with creating a standard than there is creating an app. The change management effort for use could be three times that effort per million users to make this real. If tracked, the effort required per person will create a normal distribution assuming people are willing to try. With resistance and backlash, a nonrandom distribution will appear. Communicating with shapes and inflection points bypasses terminology specific to an area of expertise. Discussions about processes changing the shape of the curves is much easier than doing your own research on something only 0.1% of the world really understands. That's 1.5 million experts (who speak English) that know something that is very hard to learn.
Experts know how to be directors
Know their own jurisdictions.
Know who would benefit from their reports
Know who can provide or find the assistance needed
Know where to go for help
Know how to communicate availability to help
Know how to report
What is being done
How do you know this will help
How will we know it's right
What is needed to make progress
Is it a time or event
Is it a resource
What is ready
How do you know this will help
How will we know it's right
Is it working
How do you know
How will we know
The mission is the same
Trying beings climb Maslow's hierarchy of needs
Beings that can imagine, could add the preamble of the US Constitution
The precepts are substantially the same
Do religions conflict with reciprocity, empathy and mitigation?
Is it close enough?
The chain of reasoning is understood
The chain needs to be created first.
Often the obvious needs to be said.
The individual links that are in conflict are broken down into smaller parts
Focusing on reciprocity, empathy and mitigation
When that doesn't work vote on it, because it's a guess.
Reserve the right to be wiser tomorrow than yesterday
Directors only direct and does not include doing everything else needed that is not getting done.
Rational Reciprocity requires understanding Maslow Hierarchy of Needs
And the impacts of larger numbers
And establishing precepts (Backtracking 18Nov25)