Is it okay to accept a new paradigm?
Are the ones we are using flawed?
Is there a better alternative?
Can we know this new paradigm is a best fit for reality?
Can we know what is best?
Technique: Using Odds
Is there anything wrong with the precepts?
Is the flaw critical?
Is there anything wrong with the theories?
These will always be incomplete.
Are they close enough to make consistent decisions?
Tentative acceptance is required for objective investigation.
Experimental acceptance should follow to enable validation.
Acceptance for purposes of implementation should follow validation.
Reviews of implementations should be followed by incremental improvements
Improvements will always be incomplete
Are they close enough to make consistent high-quality decisions?
Who will use the new paradigm?
Let's talk about who steps in when the government can't.... - just do what you can
A message from the fifth column 4 years ago
Where will always be incomplete.
Note: YouTube video views will be stored in your YouTube History, and your data will be stored and used by YouTube according to its Terms of Service