Incompleteness is unavoidable. But it can be determined with a diligent application of causations that the number and significance of the unknowns is small enough even before the infinite series of incremental improvements are formulized.
At costs exceeding an hour per word, this report has not been cost efficient. No gain has been realized during the 9 years invested. Nothing except thoughts have changed. But, from the perspective of people as a whole the effort was unavoidable. The only unknowns were who, how and when.
Lasting change is only possible when the people as a body are ready to make it change. They cannot be ready until the people as a body know what to change. We ought to hire some representatives who know how to reason out what the change ought to be.
Voting is a government's best form of guessing. Unfortunately, the results are random when all of the proposed actions are not sufficiently good. The results are predictably bad when officials with shallow reasoning skills are presented with attractive but poorly reasoned choices. While incompleteness is unavoidable, reliably good choices are possible even for governments.
For the purposes of this website, The America Problem is the erratic behavior of its governments (federal, state and local). If the problem was defined as the adverse symptoms of this behavior, it would be too large for a single book and intractably controversial. Fortunately, the unreliable behavior can be mitigated by addressing foundational flaws in decision making using well established quality assurance strategies. But the true root causes are human imperfections and limitations of physics which also are barriers to effecting the needed changes. To apply quality practices a measurement of erratic behavior is needed which is not judgmental concerning correctness. There is strong historic evidence that change is sometimes required, and the best policy is not simply avoiding change. The actual quality requirement is the changes must be intentional including the side effects.
A significant percentage of Americans (~20%) have reached their physical limit of perceived complexity that they can tolerate. This physical limit can be improved with improved understandings of the real world. Approximately 20% of that 20% (4%) won't sit idle while the nation goes the wrong way. They "know" only authoritarian edicts can save us from imminent destruction. That 4% has divided themselves into two opposing political groups. The verbal battles between these 2% garners most of the media coverage enabling everyone to have at least one good reason to be angry along with a larger number of irrational reasons. Because "our" side will lose if we are not united in opposition and additional complexity exacerbates the perceived problem, the political solutions to complex problems have become binary questions. While binary thinking does simplify isolated actions, in large organizations the actions are not isolated. Even being 90% correct creates chaos as the 10% errors have systematically accumulated over time.
Reducing perceived complexity without destructive simplifications requires a theory of everything inclusive of evolution, thought, ethical governance and the foundations of American constitutional law to use as a guide for consistency measurements. Flawed models of physics are the focus of part 1 (Quanti Theory) and part 2 (Physics of Thought) in the investigation results report Backtracking Decision Trees PDF . The effort of identifying the statistics and word definitions required for understanding begin with part 3 (Communications). The brief overview below on this website includes some elaborations to make the findings easier to understand. The website, Simplexity Guide has the same purpose of increasing understanding and could serve as the first draft of the guideline needed for consistency measurements for the sciences. However, many people will object to this choice as a guide.
Part 4 (Government) of the pdf are specifically American flaws. The government problem can be traced back to civil war reconstruction when the moral imperative of equal treatment of freed slaves broke state governments and at the same time discarded important precepts at the federal level. It's been xx years since the 14th amendment due process clause became the law of the land. We still don't meet its intent because we only take the time to fix symptoms. Repairing this system of government requires political changes that is the focus of the website Preamble Politics. Many people will object to using the term, "repair".
Humans do not believe anything new that does not synchronize with their current understanding
Our foundational understandings are flawed
We reflexively protect our flaws by misconstruing words.
Changing our minds is a physical process which takes time
The volume of humans and volume of knowledge is immense
Perceived complexity is being actively reduced by destructive authoritarian edicts which increases the volume of change required.
Any change, including the proposed remedy, will initially be perceived as adding to complexity for a significant percentage of people which in turn may cause destructive backlash.
Conquering each barrier requires an enormous number of steps where each step must be small enough for each individual to understand. Everyone knows that:
disinformation is rampant
all humans make mistakes
that they themselves do not make big mistakes in their own area of expertise
unless ...
Item 3.1 is a work in progress that requires feedback from critics. But at this time, the smallest step is Bayesian logic showing that an error in their area of expertise exists. And the first step is showing people how to easily update the odds of information being true for situations where the truth does not depend on free will modifying the future. For the sciences, the universe changes slowly enough that experiments can be used to validate.
For the US government, we can't explicitly test the past intent of the written words. We can still calculate the odds of having the correct interpretation beyond a reasonable doubt by assuming overall consistency between words and actions. Counter intuitively if there are no inconsistencies between individual actions and intent the information used is incomplete and may be intentionally deceitful. Humans use their free will to make things better as soon as possible without being aware of the future damage. The process for restoring any interpretation requires election politics. Attempts to correct the flaws in the correct interpretation prior to acknowledgement embeds inconsistencies that can be abused later.
The Preamble Politics and Simplexity Guide were created in January of 2026 for projects that promote corrections of the America problem.
Things changed in the first weeks of January:
ICE agent actions lead to the administration's support of homicidal tactics,
An improved understanding of the Lorentz local field corrections enabled a pdf document to be created that is urgently needed.
As a result,
menus have been rearranged
science/education (Simplexity)
governance/politics (Preamble)
(2025 Changes) saved but not well organized
It is now as certain as civilization surviving three more years that the changes we want will occur. But only time can answer, questions about cost and the dates.
The more urgent questions:
What side do the elected officials want to be on?
Did the Supreme Court Justices ever dream of setting things right?
Do they still want to be on the right side of history?
Can they admit to being deceived like the rest of the planet has been for 100 years?
Is there time to ...
Executive Summary 1
Precepts and Directional Goals 2
Introduction 3
Director Mindset 4
Figure 1 - Windowed View 5
Placing the Blame 5
Included in this website are:
Criteria for Acceptance of this new paradigm.
Future Enhancements (concepts)
Natural Law (Physics) and Civil Law References
Error tracking in Errata
Testing versions using thought experiment interviews
Voters, as a body, are the authority for each jurisdiction of government. The constituents of each body ought to adopt the mindset of a director on the hiring board for their representatives. This requires training which is not occurring for the vast majority of people.
Figure 2 - Overview of Every Theory 6
Summary For Popular Science 7
Figure 3 - Normal and Distorted Density Distributions 9
Boosting Confidence with Math 10
Applying the Model 11
Figure 4 - Phase Changes 12
Utility of the Model 13
Notes on Free Will and Religion 14
Quanti Theory is the simplest theory of everything which has strong overlaps with validated physics. It has no singularities within the observable universe. While very similar to Motion theory, the quanti model has boundary conditions which are explicitly unknowable and includes irreproducibility (entropy) as an evolutionary cause of standard model particles and forces.
Some quanta of momentum are individually undetectable and are aggregates of quanti. (a new term to avoid ambiguity with standard model quantum) The undetectable is an impenetrable barrier for the unknowable. Theology and free will have a jurisdiction alongside deterministic physics.
Figure 5 - Overview of Thought 17
Instant Choice Best Guess 17
Thought Construction 18
Parallax to Words 20
Figures 6-9
Figure 10- Parallax Repurposed 22
Figure - C for Consciousness 23
Summary for Directors 23
Because physical thought has evolved the methods are limited. Quanti Theory in conjunction with validated physics of chemistry, neural networks, mechano-neurobiology and transitive storage for knowledgebase mathematics paints a picture for how thought works.
The brain works mechanically by cells twitching when shocked. Unlearning anything is a physical dendrite manipulation. Modifications occur in thick films.
Embedded self-deceptions are primarily benevolent and most of the uses are correct. However, there are always hard to self-detect. It's easier to recognize the situation assessment reflex triggers as incorrect best guesses causing mansplaining or other flawed choices.
When an individual or groups of individuals are of two minds on a topic the graph might look something like the below. This curve is conceptual for communicating what would be expected if meaning could be explicitly measured.
Meaning distributions 25
Neural storage retrieval 27
Word stability 30
Binary Thinking 30
Responses are not always Answers 30
Subtle Inflection Point 31
Phase Change Inflection Points 32
Controls Inflection Point 32
Missed Inflection Point Example 33
Repair Process 34
Greater authority makes greater deception 35
Changing Word Definitions 35
Part 4 - Governing our Free Will 36
Estimates and Cause 37
Methodology 38
(see also Methodology Adjustment)
Abductive reasoning provides a method for testing the options that fit the facts.
The most fruitful natural law (physics) questions have answers that were unthinkable at the time. New facts make it time to reconsider.
The most fruitful questions about human creations (like of laws of government) are about avoiding leaders avoiding public embarrassment i.e. visible damage of identity. In situations when an agreement was reached (like a ratification) simple testable logic statements are easily found. The agreement could not include X (or conversely must have included Z) because group Y would not have ratified. Even when the X's and Y's are narrow, they accumulate.
To understand the founding documents its critical to understanding the definitions of the terms used 200 years ago.
Step 1: Read Pre-Civil War Word definitions to get into the correct mindset
Step 2: Read Madison - the people to understand how important the concept of "the people" was at the time.
Step 3: Read Virginia Proposed Amendments to see it wasn't just Madison
Citizens 43
Corporations 45
Ratification 47
Republican form 48
Presider Commander Reporter 50
Reference Addendum
The people must have a head and a body of constituents to be a level of governance.
The people as a group have the civil rights which they delegate or franchise to individuals. Groups as small a carpool can be formed by social contract. Misunderstanding this layer of governance creates extreme positions which cannot be rectified. This is the biggest problem America has. This is not the only term that is misunderstood in the founding documents.
It can't be rectified in another way because the numbers are too big for any other type of situation assessment, flaw detection and correction. However, this broadly distributed Self-Governance model requires a mission statement, some precepts and some goals to be achieved.
The US Constitution can satisfy these requirements if it is read for establishing direction instead of looking for confines (or outer boundaries) to be fought over like adversaries.
Government History
Methodology
Communications
Physical Thought
Physics
Guidelines
Backtracking Analysis
Section 4 of the US Constitution guarantees a republican form of government to each state. The current standard practices for political campaigning violate section 4 crossings state borders.
An Executive Orders or Legislation could use a restraint of trade justification. Valuable solutions, not aligned with nationalistic control cannot survive being primaried. Breakup these two monopolies. Urgently, demote the unitary Emperor to the first President in decades who set things right.
Some projects are just too big for a hierarchical structure. This one needs Mesh Self-Governance and a group to watch for coordination.
"No plan survives contact" and "planning is everything", each is paraphrasing Eisenhower.
The question ought to be: "Is this better than the viable alternatives?"
1795 Amendment 11 is an admission that many ratifiers did not understand the constitution. James Wilson, James Madison and like-minded philosophers knew that only a bottom-up delegation of authority could avoid the "imperium in imperio" where jurisdictions overlap in delegated authority. Yet some states thought their governments were sovereign by common law. The King (or other sovereign) was not a subject nor bound by common law. So common law could not apply. A civil servant document like a constitution can't give natural rights of sovereignty.
The Federal government got supremacy over what was left when the state's got their rights to self-govern their citizens and by extension their chattel. The states did need help with the rabble, disorderly armed non-citizen natives and members of rebellions.
Writing a conclusion is no longer a priority. It may never be a priority.
It won't stop the violence
Individual humans are flawed and made both better and worse with emotions. Groups of humans change behavior with effective density of communications. Effective governance of behavior needs to be aware of phase changes caused by density changes. Phase changes in populations are analogous to phase changes in water.
In theory empires may collapse when butting head frequency self optimizes into more rigid and larger groups of more powerful butthead behavior while surrounded by more fluid groups. Or the reverse where the more rigid phase condenses and is swirled around like raindrops in a hurricane. A combination appears to be the root of the America problem.
[Note: In January of 2026, the concept of the refractive properties of materials applying to rigid and non-rigid, low-density and high-density populations resulting in 9 phases was first conceived. Effective density refers to the combination of passive and active communications]
The mitigation strategy is twofold. Reduce science induced head butting. (Simplexity) And second, to reduce government induced head butting. (Preamble Politics)