Words of Advice from Experienced Proofreaders and Editors
Proofreading and editing support, particularly in the guise of paraphrasing services, is a labour-intensive occupation that requires concentration and focus. Each editor has their own approach to their work, such as where and when they review content, but there are a few common approaches irrespective of who is doing the checking.
These aspects are extremely common in the world of proofreading and editing and paraphrasing services, and if asked, editors would certainly recommend employing them. Thus, this article will focus on such areas:
● Reading out loud
● Using a second reader
● Don’t expect immediate results
Reading out loud
Proofreading and editing involve reviewing content and removing or fixing any issues that may appear during said review. As you might expect, these errors take many forms, from minor spelling errors to unclear arguments and repeated points.
A key aspect of editorial support is how the content reads, and sometimes, reading the content out loud is the only way to ensure that the text flows well and has the subtlety and nuances that make the work distinct. In other words, if something sounds good, it’ll read well too. And if something doesn’t sound right, the editor knows what they need to fix.
This is particularly true of paraphrasing services, which can often involve completely rewriting text while retaining the author’s intended message and tone. It can be difficult to get paraphrased material just right, and reading it aloud can determine how legitimate and authoritative the rewritten material sounds.
Of course, the author then has to determine whether or not the new material aligns with their set goals, but however they decide to proceed, they can rest assured that the text has a strong composition.
Using a second reader
When proofreading and editing, a second reader will pick up on any errors the author misses during reviews of their own work. This is inevitable because the authors are so attuned to what they’re working on. Thus, when checking over their work, they may not find any issues, be they spelling mistakes, doubles, missed punctuation and so on, because they have a set idea of how the work should appear. In other words, an author rarely notices their own mistakes.
A second reader is impartial, meaning they have no connection to the content. They can identify the errors or mistakes missed by the author and, through a simple review, can streamline the text exponentially, which gives the author more credibility. Second readers are especially helpful for text rewritten by paraphrasing services because it is vital to be sure that integral points from the original text have not been discarded.
Don’t expect immediate results
Proofreading and editing take time, as does work provided by paraphrasing services. The key here is to set aside enough time for editorial reviews. Rushed editing helps no one because it is inevitable that mistakes will be missed and the work will not be improved. Instead, recognise that the more time spent editing one’s work will reflect in the final product’s quality.
Read More: