District: St. Charles - Full Control
Owner: Will Owen Blankenship
HDLC Staff: Krista J. Guzzo
Rating: Contributing
Applicant: Goldfish Construction
Description: Retention of inappropriate, highly visible conduit installed at a Contributing rated, two-story, single-family residential building without a Certificate of Appropriateness.
HDLC Guidelines:
Section 10-9 of the HDLC Guidelines states that exposed wall-mounted electrical conduit and piping should be minimized, and that the visibility of exposed building infrastructure should be minimized.
Retention Items:
Conduit: Deny as installed.
Staff Recommendations:
During a recent renovation, Staff informed the applicant, both within the stamped drawing set and CofA, that any additional changes to the exterior of the building would require HDLC review. After that renovation, very large, visually prominent conduit was installed to service pool equipment as part of an electrical permit, but the conduit was not disclosed within the scope submitted with the application. As the HDLC did not have an opportunity to review, the inappropriate work was done without a CofA. There was previously existing conduit in the same location, beneath the rear overhang of the house, but its gauge was much smaller and it did not extend downward as the current conduit does. As the previous conduit was in the same location, it is appropriate for new conduit to be run under the overhang; but the extension of the new conduit to the ground, the size of the conduit, and the PVC material (which does not hold paint reliably), as well as wires beneath that remain uncontained, contribute to the inappropriateness of the current condition. The house's location on a corner lot make the inappropriate conduit highly visible.
Staff recommends that the Commission deny the retention of the conduit as it currently exists and that the applicant replace it with appropriate metal conduit, in the smallest gauge possible, include the currently exposed wires in the conduit with the other electrical lines, and paint the conduit to match the house.
Case History:
05/12/23: Retention application is submitted
04/26/23: Staff discusses with Applicant how the inappropriate conduit could be corrected, but Applicant does not wish to make these corrections and elects to apply for retention.
04/24/23: A violation is placed on the property for the inappropriate conduit/failed final inspection.
04/24/23: HDLC Inspector finds new conduit during inspection to close out a previous renovation permit
01/2/23: An electrical permit is issued for the work, but the conduit installation was not disclosed, so the change was not reviewed by the HDLC.
11/12/22: A permit is issued for new pool equipment to be installed. After installation, Applicant becomes aware that an upgrade of electrical lines is required for safety.