Introduction:
It is the responsibility of information professionals to aid users in discovering the needed information, and a frequent approach for doing so is to teach them information retrieval practices. However, unlike in a typical educational setting, there is no obligation to attend or participate, and clients or users often want help to be finished promptly. For this competency, I will discuss how I utilized design learning ideas and theories from specialists during my MLIS journey. The majority of the evidence I present will come from my professional experience, as it was the culmination of my academic studies that enabled me to succeed. My lack of expertise would have been a hurdle if I did not know these notions. MLIS students will benefit greatly from a thorough understanding of theoretical frameworks and models based on group or individual learning experiences.
It is not sufficient to just tell people where to obtain information; it is also necessary to consider learning theories on how to make their process of discovering information more effective and how to enhance their processes based on our knowledge. Several learning hypotheses make an effort to develop a strategy that will create a more comprehensive and memorable learning experience. Furthermore, collaborative or individual learning experiences based on learning principles and theories have the same goal: to improve the user's capacity to find relevant research material and then assess and make educated decisions about its usage. Efforts have been made by academic, public, and other libraries to improve the search techniques of their patrons by encouraging critical thinking and information literacy.
To begin, I would want to elaborate on my conception of what is meant by the phrase "learning theory." In the 1930s and 1940s, when learning theory was at its most formative, the field of psychology was considered by some to be in its "golden era" (Illeris, 2015, 2018). Putnam, Glymour, and Kelly are among the philosophers who have contributed to the development of a formal learning theory. The term "learning theory" comes from the fact that the word "learning" is often used in cognitive science and related fields to describe the process of gaining knowledge through observation. Most cognitive scientists consider "learning theory" to be the behaviorist-inspired empirical study of how humans and animals learn. The term "formal" distinguishes this topic from behaviorist learning theory. The philosophical subjects of learning-theoretic pedagogy include "logical reliability" (Kelly, 1996; Glymour, 1991) and "means-ends epistemology" (Schulte, 1999). Concerning the difficulties in applying learning principles in a contemporary institution or public library, keep in mind that the overall design of a learning environment is to accommodate the particular diversity of curious minds. There are so many instructional design models available today, especially in the twenty-first century, that it might be difficult to choose one. Each has its own set of characteristics and capabilities.
According to Merriam and Caffarella (1999, p. 17), having access to an endless amount of information is not the same as being able to search effectively for the most important information, or even knowing what the most important information is. Much of what I have discovered to be most beneficial for information professionals in our area is derived from the notion of "universal design" (or UD), which the American Library Association (ALA) has long promoted. The Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL) of the ALA (2007) created five Information Literacy Competency Standards that offer a framework for measuring an individual's information literacy:
identifies and articulates the information need
effectively and efficiently gains access to required data
critically analyses information and its sources and integrates it into existing knowledge and values
applies knowledge efficiently, either alone or in collaboration with others, to achieve a goal
knows the economic, legal, and societal ramifications of the many technological tools available
Now I recognize that this may seem familiar to competency J, but in order to grasp complex concepts, it takes underlying vision. In order to create and understand further components of the design process, the information professional has to have keen insight. For example, they need to know what step is finished before they come to us, what they do during, and what we want them to comprehend afterward.
Learning Theories
The theories of learning, such as behaviorism, cognitivism, and constructivism, provide direction and insight into the actions, principles, and conduct of learning. Booth (2011) states that behaviorism is founded on conditioning as opposed to emotion or thinking. This is effective for knowledge retention and memory. Cognitivism is oriented toward learning processes, and cognition is an active component of learning. The learner is an active participant in the cognitivism and constructivism processes, as opposed to behaviorism, in which the learner is reactive. Booth's continuation of constructivism asserts that learners are active participants in their education and that prior experiences influence learning. These ideas have been in use for some time and may be advantageous to information professionals in certain situations. For example, in the evidence piece below, where I helped design the learning strategy for a voting workshop, I heavily relied on the participants' participation and their own realities during the workshop to foster collaborative learning and encourage new knowledge from a variety of perspectives. For cognitivism, it is more advantageous to teach proactive learners with corrective feedback. With a constructivist approach, group engagement and hands-on projects may be utilized most effectively (Booth, 2011). In competency D, I show an example of this where we designed a booklet where students had to write learning strategies for free lunch.
Practicality and Application of Learning Theories
These methods of applying the above learning theories have been proven effective. They are, however, not all-inclusive. Theories like UD give chances for training to a varied student population, lowering the barriers that other techniques may mistakenly create, which may exclude students with varying skills and capabilities. As noted by Burgstahler (2021), UD views the incidence of a disability not as a shortfall associated with the individual but more as a social construct, such as gender, race, or ethnicity, that should be taken into consideration. A pedagogical approach to instruction that is accessible, intersectional, and inclusive means that all users are seen and steps can be taken to make the accommodations they need.
Theoretical knowledge is meaningless without application. In the National Education Technology Plan (NETP) Update (2017), there is a national vision and plan for all people in the role of instruction to involve the implementation of learning-enhancing strategies and the dedication to maintain students' attention. Teachers' credentials are not always required of librarians and information specialists. However, the professional identity of librarians contains characteristics connected to librarianship and teaching, both of which may stand alone as distinct professional identities. As teaching became a larger part of the responsibilities of many librarians, researchers began to investigate various aspects of the librarian's potential teacher identity, noting that functioning as a teacher does not necessarily imply that an individual identifies as a teacher or fully embraces the role. In interviews with six librarians, Scott Walter discovered that teaching was fundamental to the jobs of these librarians, but that numerous time constraints prevented them from devoting as much time to teaching as they desired. In addition, many said that they did not get enough pedagogical instruction while attending library school. The MLIS competencies take challenges of this kind into account and make certain that classes covering these subjects are easily accessible. Even when I was not enrolled in a course with an instructional focus, the prerequisite courses ensured that LIS students understood that each organization's learners may have distinct requirements, intended results, backgrounds, and familiarity, among other things.
How should MLIS students figure out what to follow when there are so many different explanations? The goal of learning theories is to give guidance to professionals in the development of learning-promoting activities and environments by providing a framework for analyzing the processes and variables that enhance learning. The reality is that the brain and its cognitive capabilities are very complex, and we are still discovering new facts every day. Even though learning theorists put forth a lot of effort to describe how people learn based on formal observation and testing, there is no learning theory that is completely free of errors. Programs and services are based on the idea that each user has a unique learning style, which is backed by several learning theories. Faculty and instructors may get useful knowledge from librarians, and collaboration between the two professions can only be beneficial for students. Learning theories provide the foundation for the creation and delivery of educational services and products. Individual and group learning philosophies would tremendously help librarians and libraries if they were well-versed in and committed to them.
Programs and services are built on the premise that each user learns in their own unique way, and this is supported by a variety of learning theories. Faculty and instructors may get valuable insight from librarians, and the two professions working together can only benefit students. The guiding concepts for the development and delivery of educational services and products are derived from learning theories. Librarians and libraries would greatly benefit from a thorough understanding of and commitment to various learning philosophies for both individuals and groups. Nevertheless, librarianship and teaching are related, since a librarian's duty to instruct is similar to that of a teacher. Something I wanted to explore in this section are the benefits of creating learning strategies for both individual and collaborative learning.
Benefits of collaborative learning (Laal & Ghodsi, 2012)
1. Develops self-management and leadership skills
2. Increases employee skills and knowledge
3. Improves relationships across teams and departments.
4. Improves knowledge acquisition and retention
5. Improves engagement and collaboration
Benefits of Individual learning (Collins, 2004)
Learning is the key to developing a person’s potential
Learning to learn is the key to effective learning
Learning enables the individuals to meet the demands of change
The capacity to learn is an asset that never becomes obsolete
Embracing learning helps the individual to acknowledge that learning is more than formal education and training
Understanding various ideas enables immediate implementation when something is not working effectively. Understanding that instead of developing your infrastructure and services for the typical user, you create them for persons with a wide variety of talents, impairments, and other characteristics—such as age, reading ability, learning style, language, culture, and others—which is a component of UD. Consequently, this competence will assist designers and developers in comprehending these distinctions so that universal access can be realized through the incorporation of customization into learning environments. This implies that, in modern digital age, learning settings may be made more equitable and adaptable for individuals with diverse characteristics and learning styles.
Teaching moments with an MLIS range from finding a credible article for an inquiring user to leading learning sessions. A graduate student such as myself will provide educational, recreational, and informational experiences for the community. Storytime librarians teach children social skills. Community and institutional archivists educate on finding aids, policies, and processes. Academic and public librarians help users use the online catalog and reference searches. Most libraries provide free computer and information literacy workshops. Libraries adapt their educational offerings to user demands. As Connaway and Powell (2010) stated, information workers must be devoted to studying and using research for their field to advance and improve. More so, in order for our field to develop and improve, it is crucial that information professionals make an effort to learn from and use the findings of research. Even though there is no "correct" way to design a learning strategy, there are a few things to keep in mind throughout this iterative process. My knowledge of research methodologies and the steps involved in developing a research topic has been expanded via the program's required courses, particularly INFO 200. In addition to learning how to analyze and synthesize research material, the literature reviews I've been able to undertake in this and other classes have helped me much. In my role as a library service desk member and library technician, I want to make sure the community I am addressing feels their information process has been considered and respected. This will set users up favorably if they decide to pursue further research on their topic.
This piece of evidence has three parts that show how the needs and actions of the information community, which I chose to study, changed my approach to learning theories and principles for future programs or workshops. The literature review matrix summed up and rated the current research, as well as any major findings that put learning theories together in a creative light. I selected papers that provide practical research on gamification. Another goal was to look at how libraries and information centers could use elements, features, and resources from escape rooms to create a workshop that bring people together and also meet information needs. Numerous scholarly publications, for instance, originated from colleges that taught via escape room workshops. Because I utilized this project in my final research report, it demonstrates how effectively I can assess and synthesize various forms of information to use in the future.
To prove my proficiency in this area, I decided which learning theories to include in my study of the information community in order to provide an analysis that can fill in the details on how I can use this educationally, address engagement concerns, and meet the requirements for designing a more interesting workshop. The lesson I learned from this task was to base my pedagogical tenets and beliefs on game design and library resources. I want to utilize this as a tool to assist me in creating my own research methodologies and to support my suggestions for creating new collaboration tactics and procedures.
Intentionally designing the library and learning resources for outreach events helps paint a picture of how it will support the needs of the El Camino College campus community and library. This design clarifies the desired impact that LLR wishes to have with incoming students. This flyer was created using visual learning principles and theories with prospective students in mind during our College Night event. Even though I understand an outreach campaign that pushes the usual limits of library service, I think of it as a shorter version of instructional design. In an effort to pare down and streamline the information presented at this event, Camila the outreach librarian and I wanted to first answer questions students may have, so we answered questions about goals and needs, learning questions, resources, activities, and short-term and long-term outcomes. We wanted to use our 2- to 3-minute conversation to educate students about our services and resources. You need a firm grounding in the fundamentals if you want to integrate intriguing and practical cognitive ideas with effective social abilities. I do believe that we can educate others in a short amount of time, and in the future, I would like to take the time to research outreach learning experiences based on learning principles and theories.
The primary objective of the workshop was to provide both incoming and existing students with information on resources and methods for acquiring knowledge of sociopolitical problems in preparation for voting or other forms of participation in civic debate. Camila Jenkin and Gary Greco, both librarians at El Camino College in Torrance, California, spoke during this session that lasted for a total of two hours. I was able to contribute to the organization of this workshop by helping to provide ideas for group or individual learning experiences that were informed by various learning principles and theories, such as the following:
How to register to vote and where
Evaluating CA Ballot Propositions
Locating database articles related to ballot topics
Locating eBooks on ballot topics
Sources and credibility
Good research habits include identifying sources, assessing their expertise and verifying information found.
Social impacts on elections
And advance strategy searching on advanced google
Although I did not give a presentation, I did participate in their brainstorming meetings on what should be presented to the students and created slides. We had two meetings to narrow down important and interesting topics and how to hold their attention throughout the session. I utilized Robert Gagné's (1985) suggested nine circumstances for learning, known as the external conditions of learning or the nine events of teaching during our meetings before this workshop:
Gain attention. Engage students' attention by connecting learning to relevant events in their life and asking engaging questions. Before the presenters started a new subject, I compiled student-responseable questions for the presenters to ask.
Inform the learner of the objective. Share the learning objectives with the students to establish expectations and provide a learning map. I urged Camila and Gary to remind students of her purpose and the takeaway she desired.
Stimulate recall of prior learning. Before providing new material, encourage students to recall previously acquired skills and knowledge. Due to the fact that this workshop included both students and non-students (it was open to the public), I urged Gary and Camila, before beginning their presentation to connect to their audience in terms of common knowledge.
Present the stimulus. Share the latest information. This stage is dependent on the lesson's topic. In this case, Camila was trying to explain media bias to me, but it was hard to understand, so I asked if there was a picture I could look at instead. Then, to make her point clearer, she ended up adding the following "Media Bias Chart."
Provide learner guidance. Help others learn by demonstrating things to them and explaining how to get there. The El Camino College LibGuides are hard to discover for non-students. I instructed them to demonstrate step-by-step how to locate this information. Originally, they wanted the tabs to be ready, but I believed it would be more beneficial to begin from the viewpoint of a person unfamiliar with our website.
Elicit performance. Allow learners time to practice their skills and show their competence. Ideally, learners would be provided with low-stakes chances for practice, allowing them to feel at ease if they did not instantly succeed. Even though we did not provide computers for practice, we did provide time for questions. I will include trivia questions for learners to answer in the future.
Provide feedback. Provide students with feedback on their strengths and areas for development. I will design a brief question sheet for them to answer. After the session, I will instruct them to review the questions to see whether they can answer them more easily.
Assess performance. To determine if learning has occurred, use metrics such as assignments, activities, and projects. This is presently being worked on.
Enhance retention and transfer. Give students chances to practice their skills in new situations. This helps them remember the skills and see how they can be used in different situations. After the evaluation, we'll share the feedback with people who run similar workshops so they can find better ways to keep people coming back.
Most LIS students will be required to conduct training at some point in their careers, whether it is basic one-on-one advice in the use of online catalogs or advanced information literacy instruction presented to a class over a series of sessions. Even before I began my MLIS program, I had trained teen volunteers at public libraries to shelve books using the Dewey Decimal system and I had developed educational workshops on various topics (including the fourth piece of evidence I listed above) with a strong focus on collaborative learning in academic libraries. In graduate programs, theoretical knowledge is very important for students to develop their identities and skills as researchers and practitioners. Graduate program success necessitates that students become well-versed in theory (Silber, 1982) and research (Merrill, 2006).
People often wonder about the need for learning theories, assuming that these theories would not be usable in the actual world. However, studying theories is very applicable. With a fundamental grasp of learning theories, it is possible to design courses that facilitate the learning process. This knowledge allows us to explain our instructional decisions, or the "why," behind what and how we teach to certain groups. As we find our own connection to certain theories of learning and proactively design lessons around those ideas, we begin to form a pedagogical ethos that will inform our future lesson planning.
This competency bridges the gap between theory and practice by demonstrating how theoretical concepts may be used in the library classroom. I wish to develop successful training sessions with clear and quantifiable learning goals and to apply universal design elements in order to suit the greatest variety of learning styles. My evidence demonstrates that I understand and can use the necessary learning theories and concepts for effective instructional design.
Burgstahler, S. (2021). What Higher Education Learned About the Accessibility of Online Opportunities During a Pandemic. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 21(7), 160–170. https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v21i7.449
Booth. (2011). Reflective teaching, effective learning : instructional literacy for library educators. American Library Association.
Chen, & Wang, J.-H. (2021). Individual differences and personalized learning: a review and appraisal. Universal Access in the Information Society, 20(4), 833–849. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-020-00753-4
Collins, J. (2004). Education techniques for lifelong learning: principles of adult learning. Radiographics, 24(5), 1483-1489.
Connaway, & Powell, R. R. (2010). Basic research methods for librarians (5th ed.). Libraries Unlimited.
Gagné, R. M. (1985). The conditions of learning and theory of instruction. Wadsworth Publishing.
Gullikson, S. (2006). Faculty Perceptions of ACRL’s Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 32(6), 583–592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2006.06.001
Illeris, K. (2018). An overview of the history of learning theory. European Journal of Education, 53(1), 86–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12265
Illeris. (2015). The Development of a Comprehensive and Coherent Theory of Learning. European Journal of Education, 50(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12103
Laal, & Ghodsi, S. M. (2012). Benefits of collaborative learning. Procedia, Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 486–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.091
Merriam S. B. & Caffarella R. S. (1999). Learning in adulthood : a comprehensive guide (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Merrill, M. D. (2006). Hypothesized performance on complex tasks as a function of scaled instructional strategies. (pp. 265–281) In J. Elen, J., & Clark, R. E. (Eds). Handling Complexity in Learning Environments: Theory and Research. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Reimagining the Role of Technology in Education: 2017 National Education Technology Plan Update. (2017). In Office of Educational Technology, US Department of Education. Office of Educational Technology, US Department of Education.
Silber, K. H. (1982). An Analysis of University Training Programs for Instructional Developers. Journal of Instructional Development, 6(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02905112
Walter, S. (2008). Librarians as Teachers : A Qualitative Inquiry into Professional Identity. College & Research Libraries, 69(1), 51–71. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.69.1.51
Ward, D. (2006). Revisioning Information Literacy for Lifelong Meaning. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 32(4), 396–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2006.03.006