Slow Pedagogy
NQS 5.1 Relationships between educators and children - Respectful and equitable relationships are maintained with each child.
NQS 5.1 Relationships between educators and children - Respectful and equitable relationships are maintained with each child.
... after our engagement with the Phoenix Cups learning, the Educational Leader (Sinead) and Assistant Manager (Carol) reflected on the feedback and the educator's journey throughout the training. One thing both noticed was that educators all had very similar feedback. They said that they felt they didn't have enough time to connect with the children. This concerned both as we felt the priorities of the centre were becoming skewed. We set to investigate 'time' within our centre - exploring what is taking up time, how time is used and how we feel that time at the centre is best spent.
Through research, Sinead found 'Slow Pedagogy' - a framework we felt could positively reframe and benefit educators.
Notes from discussion
July 2024
Meeting between QIP driver and Assistant Manager, Carol, and Educational Leader, Sinead.
We seek to ensure educators and children have a strong sense of well-being within the service and have the time and space to create strong meaningful connections with each other. We aim to be driven by children's needs and desires rather than by the clock.
This will be a long process of consistent implementation and reflection. We are aiming to achieve intertwining this framework into our service in parts: program, rhythms and routines (meal times and rest times particularly), transitions, educator practice, rostering, and educator tasks,
Educators slow down and are present in the moment with children.
Observe in practice:
Educators are present in the moment, sitting and engaging with children
Educators are not clock-driven and make intentional decisions throughout the day based on children's energies
Children are calm and supported to delve deep into learning
Transitions are slow and foster meaningful connections with children
Sight Documentation:
Educators are planning and using Phoenix Cups linking to demonstrate planning for children's needs.
Educational Leader - Sinead Leong
Room Leaders:
Tessa – Koalas
Esther – Possums
Renee – Wombats
Jess – Emus
Sarah - Kangaroos
31/7/2024
Sinead and Carol met in regards to current QIP goals and where to move from here. We discussed the feedback from the Phoenix Cups training and how many educators felt that they did not have enough time to connect with children. We set out to investigate what is taking up time, how time is being currently used and how we want to spend our time.
We are looking in depth at many areas of our service: program, practice, observations, posts, routines + how rooms and our service operates,
6/8/2024
Sinead(EL) introduced Room Leaders to the concept of 'slow pedagogy ' and explained the reasoning behind adopting this framework. Room Leads were asked to watch a short video on slow pedagogy to reflect on in the next meeting.
We have been embedding and practicing slow pedagogy, finding ways to find time and slow down our practice.
We removed time stamps from routines
we removed any unnecessary transitions
stopped using 'time language'
reflected on our routines from children's perspectives to find areas for improvement
Evidence below
We looked into Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi's flow theory which is a psychological concept that describes a state of intense focus and engagement that people experience when they are completely immersed in an activity known as the 'optimal experience'. We discussed how we can use this theory to reflect on our day and use this concept to program and create quality routines and rituals.
Our rooms engaging with nature and allowing children to determine the pace
We had our last Room Leader meeting for 2024. Our team had nothing but positive feedback on their slow pedagogy journey so far. We reflected on the ease of programming and how the educators better understand the cycle. Educators have noticed a positive change in children's behaviors and the room's energy since removing clocks and intentionally slowing down and being present.
Our QIP journey through 2024 led us to the implementation of slow pedagogy. This goal was originally listed under Quality Area 5, but on further reflection we feel that Quality area 1 element 2, practice, encapsulates this goal more.
Our center’s journey exploring slow pedagogy has been an evolving process aimed at creating a more thoughtful, reflective, and sustainable approach to teaching and learning. Slow pedagogy emphasizes the importance of taking time, fostering deeper engagement, and nurturing meaningful connections between educators, learners, and the content. Initially, the center we focused on experimenting with alternative teaching methods that valued reflection over speed, allowing space for learners to engage more thoroughly with the material. This included adapting our documentation styles and quantity with families to create time and space for educators to purposefully slow down and focus on interactions. As the journey progressed, there was likely a conscious shift towards prioritizing quality interactions over the rapid pace of traditional education models.
Through collaboration, professional development, and inquiry-based practices, our center has embraced practices that support the individual learning process, rather than rushing through a prescribed curriculum. The exploration of slow pedagogy also involved a rethinking of assessment methods, the classroom environment, and community-building, where relationships became as central to learning as the subject matter itself.
Ultimately, this journey has led the center to embrace the core values of mindfulness, intentionality, and respect for the diverse paces at which children learn. By grounding education in these principles, our center has fostered a learning culture that nurtures curiosity, deep thinking, and long-term personal growth rather than focusing solely on outcomes or efficiency.
Our goals for slow pedagogy in 2025:
continue to research and explore current theories
complete Abecedarian training to deepen interactions between educators and children
explore impacts of slow pedagogy on programming (look at programming goals for 2025)
Create centre-wide universal embedded routines and rituals