Introducing AWHIP 4/17/23
Introducing AWHIP
by Drew Duffy 4/17/23
I have begun an early stage creation of a new way to interpret WHIP. While WHIP is an imperfect stat (just like all other ones), I think that there is an ability to enhance the metric to be more indicative of overall performance. Some shy away from WHIP, including Tim Dierkes of MLBTradeRumors. He makes the case that WHIP is almost too simplified, which creates a skewed view of overall evaluation. His argument is that the two factors that come into the equation, Walks and Hits, are better off being treated separately, since they are indicative of vastly different skills. As he notes in his article, Dierkes states how simple the calculation of the stat is. To calculate WHIP, all you have to do is sum the walks and hits that a pitcher gives up and then divide them by the total innings pitched.
This is the equation for WHIP:
WHIP = (Walks + Hits) / Innings Pitched
Now, I have seen other people note the oversimplification of the statistic, but the alternative methods are not great in my eyes. I have seen some people completely get rid of WHIP as a useful statistic, which has some merit though the premise of the idea is a good one. I have seen an alternate method that treats each batted ball outcome similarly to the way that Slugging Percentage is calculated for hitters. This means that singles are the baseline, doubles are worth 2x, triples 3x, and home runs 4x. This is closer to where I see value in adjusting WHIP.
In one of my past projects, I used weighted values based on each outcome of the at bat to show Aaron Judge’s “Offensive Bases Affected”, as I called it. I believe this gives a more appropriate value to each outcome, which can be used here in my AWHIP calculation. FanGraphs publishes the wValue for all different outcomes of an at-bat, which serve as the coefficients in my new model. I also added in HBP as part of my calculations, one thing that WHIP does not currently include. This model gives a more encompassing look at a pitcher’s
This is my equation for AWHIP:
AWHIP = (SUM of (# of occurrences X wVal of event)) / Innings Pitched
For the 2022 Season, here are the FanGraphs wValues:
wBB wHBP w1B w2B w3B wHR
0.689 0.72 0.884 1.261 1.601 2.072
For each event, there is a number of times that a pitcher surrenders that result. I summate all of the occurrences then divide them by the total innings that a pitcher pitched. This gives me a number that is an adjusted WHIP, or AWHIP.
First, I looked at two pitchers who had identical WHIP from last season. Corey Kluber and Jose Quintana both pitched to a 1.213 WHIP in 2022. Here are their numbers:
We can see how certain plate events affected each pitcher. Kluber was a victim of the long ball, while Quintana gave up a lot more walks. This is obviously the biggest factor in the change and it affected their rankings nearly 50 spots (48 to be exact).
AWHIP gives us much better insight into how we are able to view players by going a step further in WHIP.
Obviously, the AWHIP is different for different types of pitchers and their role in the rotation. I tried to take into account the difference between pitchers by setting certain ranges of innings to create a more fair and appropriate view of their effectiveness. I used 100 innings as the threshold for one half and 10 - 100 for the other. I looked at the top 10 pitchers in the league for 2022 in terms of WHIP (min 100 IP) and compared my list for AWHIP. Verlander maintains the top spot in both, but the change in 2-10 is pretty interesting to see.
WHIP TOP 10 AWHIP TOP 10
1 Justin Verlander 1 Justin Verlander
2 Zac Gallen 2 Spencer Strider
3 Shane McClanahan 3 Tony Gonsolin
4 Yu Darvish 4 Clayton Kershaw
5 Triston McKenzie 5 Shane McClanahan
6 Julio Urías 6 Nestor Cortes
7 Aaron Nola 7 Max Scherzer
8 Corbin Burnes 8 Zac Gallen
9 Sandy Alcantara 9 Cristian Javier
10 Alek Manoah 10 Max Fried
While the actual mechanics of this statistic are not perfect, they are an improvement from the existing statistic. AWHIP provides a little bit more context to WHIP, while valuing those pitchers who are surrendering fewer bases. The classification of a “hit” in the current model values singles and home runs the same, which is clearly not the case. Everyone will have their own preferences on which stats are indicative of certain performances, I am just trying to add another tool to the toolbox. I hope you enjoyed and will take this into account whenever you see WHIP going forward.
Sources referenced:
https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2021/01/why-i-dont-use-whip.html
https://www.fangraphs.com/guts.aspx?type=cn
Thanks for reading! As always, feel free to leave any thoughts you may have with me on Twitter @DuffyDigest or duffydigest@gmail.com