Eileen Myles

At the Poetry Project of St. Mark's Church, Eileen Myles met Ted Berrigan and Alice Notley, and decided to join the New York School movement of art. Over time, their works became known for their acute representations of a playful outlook on life, their direct tone that imparted information to the audience in a clear and concise fashion, and their striking “hit factor” that was a surefire way to elicit complex emotional reactions from the audience [1]. Characterized as one of the most savviest and most restless intellects among their contemporaries, Myles' personal experience literature revolving around lesbian inclusion paved the way for tangible change in all aspects of the world, including those areas not limited to sexuality, such as homelessness, AIDS, infectious diseases, and political climate [2]. Explore this integration of gender and societal equality themes through our analysis of Myles' prose and poetry.

Cool for You (2000): Carving Out Freedom

One of the reasons why Myles chooses to focus so much of their work on female narratives, apart from the display of their own personal identity, was to bring about equality for women as a whole. In the 20th century, women were generally considered inferior to men and did not get access to the same amenities and life pleasures, were usually confined to a household managerial role, and were not given the opportunity to experiment with the many offerings in the world to pursue their passions and desires. Myles realized that this stigma was especially true when they first moved to New York and began working on the Poetry Project at St. Mark’s Church. So, they made a concerted future effort to shed some more light on this prominent issue, raise greater awareness in their community, and hopefully bring about tangible change to the world in their lifetime. A clear presence of these goals can be seen through the novel Cool for You, published in the last decade of the twentieth century. Note that its content deals with societal events occurring in the early to mid twentieth century, which allows integration with Myles’ other books and poems, as well as those of other New York School poets.

Cool for You is an examination of Myles' working class childhood in Boston, surrounded by women trapped in their pre-existing rigid gender roles during the American 1950s, 1960s, and shockingly continuing until the end of the 1970s. This book focuses in particular on the women in Myles' family, and the ways in which society traps women in small places. [3] In the examination of the feminine stereotype, the novel implements non-quantifiable figurative writing, in terms of the role of Myles' mother in their life and her overall influence on Myles' career trajectory, as well as literal writing, seen through some of the scenes in the nursing home where the main character escapes from confinement to successfully visit their grandmother. In the grand scheme of things, this story revolves around the protagonist's desire to break free out of small spaces and carve out a large self-freedom, in terms of the previously-held restrictions of gender and career. Through this novel, Myles is able to take the conversation regarding feminine equality and societal uplift, and steer it away from themselves to apply it to the large contingent of females that look up to them. They use their primary focus regarding their personal identity to generate a secondary focus based on a clear global identity - an identity of inclusion and acceptance that needs to be firmly imprinted in society.

The narrative present in Cool for You easily resonates with a large number of their audience members, as a majority of the female portion would have likely felt some sort of oppression in their lives, ranging from minute disagreements within their own families to a fundamental disagreement with their position in the defined global hierarchy. As a result, Eileen Myles has galvanized their audience toward a common goal of major societal change, and continued to do so in their future publications in an effort to revamp the underlying structure of male-female relations. Looking at the present day, we can confidently say that Myles was successful in their efforts, as women have rose to new heights never seen before, and have become much more equal with men in terms of available opportunities.

Cover of Eileen Myles' Cool for You. Courtesy of the Soft Skull Press Website.

Chelsea Girls (1994): Queer Identities

Cover of Chelsea Girls. Courtesy of the Paris Review.

Within Chelsea Girls, Myles repeatedly shows that they has no reservation in conveying their direct thoughts to the reader, irrespective of their level of personal disclosure or explicit depth. This distancing from traditional expectation from allows Myles to truly showcase their homosexual and feminine attributes in the most striking way possible. They believed that it was not necessarily the complexity of a piece’s interpretation, but rather the piece’s emotional impact that would be the most meaningful to a reader and leave a profound impression on her audience. An example of this is found in the chapter Bread and Water. Myles narrates, "Chris goes out and comes in with some campbell's tomato soup and marlboros. You can do both at the same time. I keep thinking in my mind for about a half hour Merchard, Merchard. Finally I call her that. We lick each other's navels, I smell her crotch and smell blood. She tells me she's got a crammer in herself" [4]. Just from these few short lines, the reader is able to gather a plethora of contextual and stylistic information: the specific food items bought at the grocery store, the sexually suggestive indication evidenced through the double entendre of the verb "do", Myles' soft inner self calling Chris by their pet name "Merchard", and the extreme ferocity of the sexual actions between Myles and their girlfriend. After reading this section, there is absolutely no doubt in the reader's mind that Myles is a wholehearted proponent of espousing female “lesbianity” and fully immersing themselves in a variety of sexual activities. By breaking boundaries and showcasing to their audience, from top to bottom, an event that is normally confined to the bedroom, Myles adds to their distinct personality, completely eradicates the societal expectations placed on them to be prim and proper, and even manages to distinctly separate themselves from their fellow New York School poets; while they may also be quite bold and brash, none of them has the sheer audacity as Myles to transform an event from private seclusion to public exposition. Their homosexual being reigns supreme.

Cover of Evolution by Eileen Myles. Represents their foray into raising awareness of pressing societal issues.

For instance, the chapter February 18, 1982 represents a major awakening for Myles in terms of her career trajectory. Here, Myles has fully embraced her identity as a lesbian poet and is working steadfastly to get their creations out into the real world. In fact, they have just finished composing a volume of poetry, and is about to hold a book signing to commemorate the release of the first edition. As they recount, “My book was called A Fresh Young Voice from the Plains”. [4] This is a real memoir of Myles with a litany of evocative anecdotal poems, which we are able to analyze in this website! (See the poetry section below). However, when celebrity poets such as Allen Ginsburg, Ted Berrigan, and Alice Notley come to the signing, Myles completely clams up, and is unable to communicate to their peers in words the same revolutionary sentiments she expressed in their writing. The reversal of their personality was so prominent that Ted Berrigan found amusement in their discomfort, and sarcastically questioned, “How’re you doing Eileen?” [4] to point to their seemingly fake persona. Fortunately, after an intimate conversation with their partner, Myles is able to get their bravado back for the remaining of the signing, and establish a sense of self-belief that carried over into their 100 future book parties. The establishment of this connection by Myles provides the audience with a sense of thematic continuity in sexual reveal that is consistent from work to work. Moreover, it exposes an added layer of vulnerability to Myles’ life previously unseen - maintaining a personality completely opposite to the norm was not always easy, and there were tribulations and periods of self-doubt that they had to frequently go through. The reader is thus better able to appreciate the comprehensiveness of Myles’ lesbian societal upheaval.

Quote representing Myles' affair with Bernadette Mayer and her husband. Courtesy of the Emory Woodruff Library.

Chelsea Girls, published in 1994, is a first hand collection of short stories in Eileen Myles’ life that is an account of life in the East Village Side in the late 1970s and the early 1980s. The author and curator Raymond Foye famously categorized it “The quintessential memoir of the Lower East Side”. In this breathtaking autobiographical novel, Eileen Myles transforms their life into a work of art. With their audacious voice, made immediate through their lyrical language, Myles’ Chelsea Girls cobbles together memories of Myles’ 1960s Catholic upbringing with an alcoholic father, their volatile adolescence, their unabashed “lesbianity”, and their riotous pursuit of survival as a poet in the New York Climate of the 1970s. Overall, this narrative is infused with alcohol, drugs, and sex, and is a poignant reflection of the hardships and vivid experiences of Myles’ young artist life. With love, humor, and discovery, it chronicles how they shrugged off the constraints of a societal cultural identity meant to define them, and produced a personality that was completely unique to them.

Quote about Myles' sexual adventures. Courtesy of the Emory Woodruff Library.

Myles also uses the content within Chelsea Girls as a whole to connect the experiences regarding their sexual endeavors and recognition of their identity to not only their other publications, but also to other poets within our group in the New York School. The effect of these linkages is that Myles is able to portray the collectivist nature of the New York School and visibly demonstrate that their desire to use Gender and Sexuality to combat societal oppression for both males and females was not a belief isolated to them, but rather a joining goal that unified their poetic works and their poetic community in a very grandiose fashion. There are two examples of this technique that are the most prominent in the novel.

Quote regarding Myles' anxiety at her first book signing. Courtesy of the Emory Woodruff Library.

In addition, the segment My Couple indirectly reveals the intimate personal relationship between Eileen Myles and Bernadette Mayer, two of the very foundational poets for female equality in the New York School. While Myles does not mention either themself or Mayer, they use an allegorical narrative that symbolizes the thick and thin of this explicit physical relationship. In this chapter, Myles did not have any sustainable option to accommodate for their extravagant way of living, and was encouraged by Ted Berrigan to go to his friends’ house, “Keith” and “Grace”, to plead for the chance to eat a dinner meal. In fact, “Grace” represented Bernadette Mayer in the real world, and “Keith” represented Mayer’s husband, the American poet Lewis Walsh. As the story unfolds, Myles thoroughly enjoys the polyamorous relationship, and makes no attempt to shy away from their heightened sexual desires. They passionately recall, “They were both getting to be unfaithful at the same time and I was getting to be fucked in a new bed in a house with kids which seemed sleazy and sweet at the same time” [4]. Eventually, Myles’ lesbian prominence kicks in, and they desperately tries to separate Mayer from her husband in an attempt to wholeheartedly engage in one-on-one action. Mayer does not budge in her “fidelity” outlook, however, and when Myles has to resort to becoming sexually active with Walsh alone, feelings of jealousy emerge, and this period of attraction grinds to a screeching halt. Here, the reader obtains an in-depth look at one of Myles’ sexual experiences. Yet, this localized narrative also paves the way to a global conversation, as it shows that both Myles and Mayer, among numerous other feminine poets, strove to achieve a similar goal of freedom in feminine identity. Overarching connections have been firmly established.


Dodgems (1977-1979): New York School Literary Punk

In 1977 and 1979, Eileen Myles published issues of Dodgems, a literary magazine whose title, in the vernacular of Great Britain, referenced the particular bumper cars of Revere Beach, Massachusetts. The meaning of this title, the disorderly and unorganized chaos of a bumper car ride, serves to represent the collisions of aesthetic differences that characterized the poetry scene of the time period. [5]. These collisions emanated from the integration of different poetic movements such as New York School work, Language Poetry, Performance Texts, and unconventional prose. Specifically, Dodgems published radical poetry from notable celebrity artists of the time period, such as John Ashberry, Barbara Guest, and Charles Bernstein. It also shed light on the more modern, evolving, and casual part of society with its contribution of a letter from the celebrity Lily Tomlin, as well as an angry note from a random neighbor!

When Myles landed into the New York poetry scene in the early 1920s, they were placed right into the center of the avant-garde movement, where everyone they met took it upon themselves to flaunt their expressive personalities and unconventional ideals to them. There were so many approaches that seemed socially acceptable for the time period, and because Myles came from a doctrinaire Catholic background, they were accustomed to following only a single defined ideal as correct, and rejecting all other concepts that were either unfamiliar or vague [5]. They had little experience, and weren't open to learning from some man or woman of their age or older the “truth.” As such, when they started out, their “avant-garde” was a shakily defined grid that attempted to combine many of the illusionist approaches they had been exposed to, and they weren’t able to decide on being a steadfast lesbian proponent. This initial uncertainty is exemplified in their two year publication of Dodgems. By exposing not only the world but also themselves to the works of Bernstein, Notley, and Tomlin, Myles was able to examine the avant-garde aspect of the works of each of these poets and dissect the minute particularities of their creativity in editing. Their thorough editing process gave them a sense of feeling, and allowed them to consider their goals from the mindset of an external reader. As a result of this experience with Dodgems, they were able to identify their true calling as a lesbian and structure their future artistic works accordingly. Dodgems was critical to the development of Myles’ personality.


Click the list of authors on the right to learn more about the specific details of the magazine and the technological mimeograph involved in its production.

Note from Lily Tomlin in the foreword of the Dodgems Magazine (1977). Courtesy of the Emory Rose Library Archive.
List of authors whose works are accumulated in Eileen Myles' Dodgems Magazine (1977). Courtesy of the Emory Rose Library Archive.

Irony of the Leash (1978): A Newer New York School

Cover of The Irony of the Leash by Eileen Myles. Courtesy of the Fennick Books Catalog.
Signed Copy of The Irony of the Leash. Courtesy of the Mark Brodey Bookstore.

Through Irony of the Leash, Myles is able to accomplish the second out of their two goals - use gender and sexuality as a conduit to expose some of society’s major problems that do not relate to their personally. They set the stage for this objective when they subtly describe, "As a child I was very in love with the stars. As a human, a victim of my perceptions, it is natural that I should love light and it is natural that I should be attracted to the most distant inaccessible light" [6]. Myles is alluding to the fact that, even as a child, we are conditioned in society to believe things that aren’t necessarily logical. We are taught to look up to the guiding light to the stars as motivation for perseverance toward our goals, but what does that really mean? A star is just an intangible blob of light, that is located more than a million miles away from us. Why should these stars provide us any motivation at all, more than our immediate friends and family? Why are stars even important at all for those not interested in astronomy? While this is not necessarily a pressing concern of many, Myles is setting the stage for their future and more hard-hitting points by showing to their audience that even beliefs that we think of as second nature, such as being motivated by the stars, are the result of us confining to societal expectations and not our own innate desires [7]. A seed of doubt is planted in the reader’s mind, as he or she begins to imagine the plethora of other problems present in society that they might not be immediately aware of, but are extremely strong in magnitude and potential impact. It is important that this train of thought is developed, as it sets a sound stage for Myles’ future claims.

Later on in the poem, Myles uses the foundational knowledge derived above to provide insightful commentary on the economic situation of the United States. They ponder, “I guess I simply believe that life is not enough. I spin dreams about the quotidian of words I couldn't help but choose. They reflect my economic background, the economic situation of my parents and the countries their parents came from" [6]. Myles reveals that they were somewhat economically disadvantaged in their childhood, as their family was struggling to make ends meet. Despite this, their situation was overlooked by the government in terms of providing relief, as they met the poverty threshold and were thus considered “rich”. This financial disparity plagued Myles throughout their life, and they were never able to truly escape it, even after they obtained celebrity status as a poet. Through their personal experience, Myles gathers that a majority of the population would likely be facing similar economic constraints, exacerbated to various degrees of intensity depending on the particulars of each individual issue. By explicitly bringing this issue to light, Myles unifies the community as a whole in terms of bringing this often ignored issue to prominence for the entire world to see [7]. Due to the seeds to stimulation planted in the readers’ minds, as detailed in the paragraph above, the audience is more receptive to this message than they would have been without the presence of the conditioned stimulus of thought. While the information shared does not directly relate to their sexuality, the connection to their female self and the resulting stereotypical bias of lower pay vividly connects this concept to their gender. Their female audience is galvanized to push for financial equality across the sexes, and manifest this theme as a tangible change in real life.


"Along the Strand" from A Fresh Young Voice from the Plains (1981): Lesbian Poetics

Referenced in Chelsea Girls as the memoir published at the book signing that initially questioned but later cemented Myles’ realization of their lesbian sexuality, A Fresh Young Voice From the Plains contains numerous poems that are enriched by their litany of sexual undertones and societal connections. Here, the specific poem in consideration is Myles’ work Along the Strand. This work is a clear reflection of how the combination of sex and drugs was a paramount feature of Myles’ existence, dating back all the way to their years as a blooming adult. In the very first stanza, Myles proclaims, “Or like that time I fell in love with Morning, it was something that I could stay with. I would stick around but it slipped into Noon and again I fell in love; at twilight I was meditative and prayerful and at night I was in love with someone I could not see" [8]. Myles clearly displays to engage in acts of sexual activity at any point in the twenty-four hour cycle, from the earliness of sunrise all the way to the dimness of sunset, along with the period of pitch-black dark in between. They do not require any period of resolution, and can continue to engage in sexual activity for however long she wants to. In addition, the fact that Myles is personifying the different phases of the day such as ‘Morning’ and ‘Noon’, evidenced by the capitalization, shows that they do not even need a partner alongside their to obtain sexual arousal; rather, Myles’ joy and passion, arising from the tenacity in their belief of being a loud and proud lesbian, allows them to be pleasured simply by themselves at any point in time [9]. Clearly, the reader will develop a firm impression surrounding Eileen Myles that is underlined by their gender and sexuality, which is what they desire in this work and the rest of their literature.

This praise of sexual identity continues throughout the rest of the poem, with varying levels of depth and explicitness. Myles credits their mother for fostering within them a sense of boldness when she reminisces, “My mother taught me sex was dirty, which was exciting. She taught me love is romantic. I didn’t start fucking till quite late. Exciting, romantic, I am quite sure it is the one thing I have invented" [7]. Myles shows to their audience that they are not only happy that they continue to engage in multiple sexual endeavors; they also heavily value the thematic factors of intensity and romance that play a major role in defining the quality of the sex. They obtain a great thrill if the deed is done in secret as part of an affair, unbeknownst to everyone involved, or even plainly in the open to intentionally trigger the disapproval of others. In essence, they are proud of the uniqueness of their action in the sexual world, which perfectly corresponds to their identification as a lesbian. In fact, when Myles states that ‘it’ is the one thing that they “invented”, ‘it’ actually refers to the new lesbian gender group in society! Like an engineer, they are methodically constructing a persona and paving the way for their character to be widely implemented throughout the community. Myles is acutely aware of the revolutionary aspect of their lesbian self, and is not afraid to flaunt it. The reader sees this confidence and is inspired by the magnitude of their feat.

Myles finishes up the poem with an especially striking visual picture. They describe, “Black, white, and grey. Even as she lay dying. Even as she first fucked and her lover’s words caressed her like smoke, inventing pools in her gorgeous and tangled black hair” [7]. Myles concludes that, even though their, or any dissenting personality, engaged in a life radically different from the rest of the societal world, their end outcome is exactly the same as that of normal people. You hair will turn from black to white and grey, and you will die, aware of the tangible impact that you have left on the world. Beneath this description is the underlying question being posed: if there is absolutely no difference between the death of a normal person, who didn’t espouse sexuality of any kind, versus the death of a sexuality-proponent person like Myles, then what is stopping you changing the world? Through a clear reminder that the world is what you make of it, Myles creates a call to action among the members of their audience, particularly encouraging the women to be like them and experiment with a lesbian identity as a stepping stone toward identifying their true selves [8]. As we see in our current society, the LGBTQ movement is on the ever-expanding rise, and more and more women are becoming more comfortable in coming out as lesbians. Overall, Myles has not only impacted the immediate readers of their work, but also any future generations - their efforts have changed society as a whole.


Verse from Along the Strand addressing Myles' sexual infatuations. Courtesy of the Emory Woodruff Library.
Cover of A Fresh Young Voice from the Plains by Eileen Myles. Courtesy of WorldCat.org.
Verse from Along the Strand promoting the benefits of a bold personality. Courtesy of the Emory Woodruff Library.

"An American Poem" from Not Me (1991): Appropriating Political Rhetoric

Cover of Not Me by Eileen Myles. Courtesy of the MIT Press.
A cheerful Eileen Myles laughs and gazes into the distance. Courtesy of Publishers Weekly.

Myles uses their narratives of resistance, pain, and joy to shed light on the other major societal problems that were taking place during the 20th century. They use their personal experience as a queer woman in a male-dominated world to provide additional insight on difficulties that they felt applied to a majority of the population, such as homelessness, poverty, AIDS, and the political climate of the United States [9]. The direct nature of their writing adds to the strength of these claims, and essentially forces society to consider the negative impact that these issues could have if potential measures to rectify them are not immediately implemented. We see an example of this specific type of publication in their piece "An American Poem," published by Myles as part of their memoir Not Me in 1991.

On the surface level, this poem is an autobiographical narrative of Myles' life from 1949 to 1991, the time of publication. However, Myles uses the specific details of their story to reveal evocative commentary on the American world's detrimental state. For example, in the introduction, Myles imagines, "Can you imagine having the benefits of being born into such a wealthy and powerful American family?" [10]. Here, Myles is alluding to the fact that, while there may be a minute subsection of the American population that lives a privileged life, the rest of the community is barely able to meet their basic necessities, or even struggling to make ends meet! They continue to hint at this glaring disparity throughout the rest of the piece, and stimulate a call to action from their upper-class audience. This call is to create an economic balance through equal monetary distribution to aid the middle and lower societal classes.

Later on in the text, Myles passionately reveals, "You are the new Americans. The homeless are wandering through the streets of our nation's greatest city. Homeless men with AIDS are among them. Is that right? There are no homes for the homeless, there is no medical care for these men" [10]. They build upon their argument of financial disparity and explicitly lists several unfortunate consequences that result: inability to find room and board, the rapidly-spreading AIDS epidemic, and the plethora of spreading diseases. Moreover, Myles strikes a nerve in the community when she explicitly states that "men" are the ones bearing this catastrophe. If men, typically the dominant and unflappable portion of society, face so much suffering, then the reader can only imagine the additional burden bore by women of a similar economic status simply due to their sex. They thus paints a depressing and resonating picture that motivates Americans to take action to improve societal quality.

Finally, Myles concludes the poem with, "But I am no longer ashamed, no longer alone. I am not alone tonight because we are all Kennedys. And I am your president" [10]. Here, Myles indicates that the political instability of the United States, stemming from John F. Kennedy, is responsible for this mismanagement of resource capital and all of the ensuing problems. They desire a governmental change to a structure that prioritizes the underprivileged over the privileged. In fact, Eileen Myles actually ran as an openly lesbian presidential candidate in the 1992 election, in an attempt to bring about first-hand societal modifications based on their community ideals [11].

Works Cited

[1] Fitzgerald, Helena. “Punk Poet Eileen Myles on Combating Trump, Capitalism With Art.” Rolling Stone, 25 June 2018, https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture- features/punk-poet-eileen-myles-on-combating-capitalism-with-

[2] Wilson, Leila. “On Eileen Myles.” Chicago Review, 53/54, 2008, pp. 324–327. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/25742468/.

[3] Myles, Eileen. “Cool for You: a Novel.” Amazon, Soft Skull Press, 5 Jan. 2000, https://www.amazon.com/Cool-You-Novel-Eileen-Myles/dp/161902917.

[4] Myles, Eileen. “Chelsea Girls.” PublishersWeekly.com, New York Times, 25 Aug. 1994, https://www.publishersweekly.com/978-0-87685-932-2.

[5] Aaberg, Christopher. “Poetry New York: A Journal of Poetry & Translation.” From a Secret Location, 7 July 2017, https://fromasecretlocation.com/poetry-new-york-journal-poetry -translation/.

[6] Myles, Eileen. “The Irony Of The Leash by Eileen Myles.” LesbianFunWorld Books, Poetry Society Incorporated, 6 June 2016, http://lesbianfunworld.com/books/?p=6426/.

[7] Meinen, Abigail. “I Am Legion: An Interview with Eileen Myles.” Sampsonia Way Magazine, Fearless Columnists, 22 June 2018, https://www.sampsoniaway.org/blog/2018/06/22/i-am -legion-an-interview-with-eileen-myles/.

[8] Myles, Eileen. “Eileen Myles: A Fresh Young Voice from the Plains.” EileenMyles.Net, A FreshBack Publishers, 26 Jan. 1981 http://www.eileenmyles.net/afresh.htm.

[9] Myles, Eileen. “Eileen Myles: Being a Poet in New York.” Louisiana Channel, YouTube, 21 Mar. 2018, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNOISkJhaCw .

[10] Myles, Eileen. “Not Me.” The MIT Press, Visual Odyssey Collaborations, 24 Oct. 1991, https://mitpress.edu/books/not-me/.

[11] McCormack, JW. “The Story Behind New York City Poet Eileen Myles's Presidential Bid.” Culture Trip, The Culture Trip, 9 Oct. 2017, https://theculturetrip.com/north-america/usa/ new-york/articles/the-story-behind-new-york-city-poet-eileen-myles-presidential-bid/.

Header image photographed by Helena Fitzgerald. Courtesy of the RollingStone Magazine.

Other Gender and Sexuality Artists: