// 원서의 참고문헌입니다.
A Framework for K12 Computer Science Education. (2016). A Framework for K12 computer science education. N.p. Web. 13 July 2016. Retrieved from https://k12cs.org/about/
Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2015). Digital technologies: Sequence. Retrieved from www.acara.edu.au/_resources/ Digital_Technologies_-_Sequence_of_content.pdf
Balanskat, A., & Engelhardt, K. (2015). Computing our future. Computer programming and coding. Priorities, school curricula and initiatives across Europe. European Schoolnet, Brussels.
Barron, B., Cayton-Hodges, G., Bofferding, L., Copple, C., Darling- Hammond, L., & Levine, M. (2011). Take a giant step: A blueprint for teaching children in a digital age. New York: The Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop.
Bers, M. U. (2008). Blocks, robots and computers: Learning about technology in early childhood. New York: Teacher’s College Press.
Bers, M. U. (2012). Designing digital experiences for positive youth development: From playpen to playground. Cary, NC: Oxford.
Bers, M. U., Seddighin, S., & Sullivan, A. (2013). Ready for robotics: Bringing together the T and E of STEM in early childhood teacher education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 21(3), 355–377.
Code.org. (2016). Promote computer science. Retrieved from https://code. org/promote
Computer Science Education Week. (2016). Retrieved from https://csed week.org/
Cunha, F., & Heckman, J. (2007). The technology of skill formation. American Economic Review, 97(2), 31–47.
DevTech Research Group. (2016). Retrieved from ase.tufts.edu/devtech/
Digital News Asia. (2015). IDA launches S$1.5m pilot to roll out tech toys for preschoolers.
Elkin, M., Sullivan, A., & Bers, M. U. (2014). Implementing a robotics curriculum in an early childhood Montessori classroom. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 13, 153–169.
European Schoolnet. (2014). Computing our future: Computer programming and coding. Belgium: European Commission.
Heckman, J. J., & Masterov, D. V. (2004). The productivity argument for investing in young children. Technical Report Working Paper No. 5, Committee on Economic Development.
ISTE (International Society for Technology in Education). (2007). NETS for students 2007 profiles. Washington, DC: ISTE. Retrieved from www.iste.org/standards/netsforstudents/netsforstudents2007profiles. aspx#PK2
Kazakoff, E. R., & Bers, M. U. (2014). Put your robot in, Put your robot out: Sequencing through programming robots in early childhood. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 50(4).
Learning First Alliance. (1998). Every child reading: An action plan of the Learning First Alliance. American Educator, 22(1–2), 52–63.
Lifelong Kindergarten Group. (2016). Scratch. Retrieved from https://llk. media.mit.edu/projects/783/
Livingstone, I. (2012). Teach children how to write computer programs. The Guardian. Guardian News and Media. Retrieved from www.the guardian.com/commentisfree/2012/jan/11/teachchildrencomputer programmes
Madill, H., Campbell, R. G., Cullen, D. M., Armour, M. A., Einsiedel, A. A., Ciccocioppo, A. L., & Coffin, W. L. (2007). Developing career commitment in STEM-related fields: Myth versus reality. In R. J. Burke, M. C. Mattis, & E. Elgar (Eds.), Women and minorities in science, technology, engineering and mathematics: Upping the numbers (pp. 210–244). Northhampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Markert, L. R. (1996). Gender related to success in science and technology. The Journal of Technology Studies, 22(2), 21–29.
McIntosh, K., Horner, R. H., Chard, D. J., Boland, J. B., & Good III, R. H. (2006). The use of reading and behavior screening measures to predict non-response to schoolwide positive behavior support: A longitudinal analysis. School Psychology Review, 35(2), 275.
Metz, S. S. (2007). Attracting the engineering of 2020 today. In R. Burke & M. Mattis (Eds.), Women and minorities in science, technology, engineer- ing and mathematics: Upping the numbers (pp. 184–209). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC) & Fred Rogers Center. (2012). Technology and interactive media as tools in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8. Retrieved from www.naeyc.org/files/naeyc/file/positions/PS_technology_WEB2.pdf
Sesame Workshop. (2009). Sesame workshop and the PNC Foundation join White House effort on STEM education. Retrieved from www.sesame workshop.org/newsandevents/pressreleases/stemeducation_11212009
Siu, K., & Lam, M. (2003). Technology education in Hong Kong: Interna- tional implications for implementing the “Eight Cs” in the early childhood curriculum. Early Childhood Education Journal, 31(2), 143–150.
Smith, M. (2016). Computer science for all. The White House blog. Retrieved from www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2016/01/30/computerscienceall
Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613–629.
Sullivan, A., & Bers, M. U. (2015). Robotics in the early childhood class- room: Learning outcomes from an 8-week robotics curriculum in pre-kindergarten through second grade. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. Online First.
Sullivan, A., & Bers, M. U. (2017). Dancing robots Integrating art, music, and robotics in Singapore’s early childhood centers. International Journal of Tech nology & Design Education. Online First. doi:10.1007/s10798-017-9397-0
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2016). Computer and information technology occupations. Retrieved from www.bls.gov/ooh/computerandinfor mationtechnology/home.htm
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology. (2010). Transforming American education: Learning powered by technology. Washington, DC. Retrieved from www.ed.gov/technology/netp2010
White House. (2016). Fact sheet: Advancing active STEM education for our youngest learners. Retrieved from www.whitehouse.gov/thepress office/2016/04/21/factsheetadvancingactivestemeducationouryoungest learners
Ackermann, E. (2001). Piaget’s Constructivism, Papert’s Constructionism: What’s the difference? Future of Learning Group Publication, 5(3), 438.
Bers, M. U. (2008). Blocks to robots: Learning with technology in the early childhood classroom. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Diffily, D., & Sassman, C. (2002). Project based learning with young children. 88 Post Road West, PO Box 5007, Westport, CT 06881–5007: Heinemann, Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc.
Hafner, K., & Lyon, M. (1996). Where wizards stay up late: The origins of the Internet (1st Touchstone ed.). New York: Simon and Schuster.
Krajcik, J. S., & Blumenfeld, P. (2006). Project based learning. In R. K. Saw- yer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 317–333). New York: Cambridge University Press.
MIT LOGO Memos. (1971–1981). Memo collection. Retrieved from www. sonoma.edu/users/l/luvisi/logo/logo.memos.html
Papert, S., & Harel, I. (1991). Situating constructionism. Constructionism, 36(2), 1–11.
Rinaldi, C. (1998). Projected curriculum constructed through documentation Progettazione: An interview with Lella Gandini. In C. Edwards, L. Gandini, & G. Forman (Eds.), The hundred languages of children: The Reggio Emilia approach Advanced reflections (2nd ed., pp. 113–125). Greenwich, CT: Ablex. Solomon, C. (2010). Logo, Papert and Constructionist learning. Retrieved November 15, 2016, from http://logothings.wikispaces.com/
Stager, G. S. (2016). Seymour Papert (1928–2016). Nature, 537(7620), 308.
Bhola, H. S. (1984). Campaigning for literacy: Eight national experiences of the twentieth century, with a memorandum to decision makers. Paris: UNESCO.
Bhola, H. S. (1997). What happened to the mass campaigns on their way to the twenty-first century? NORRAG, Norrag News, 21, August 1997, 27–29. Retrieved from http://norrag.t3dev1.crossagency.ch/en/ publications/norragnews/onlineversion/thefifthinternationalconference onadulteducation/detail/whathappenedtothemasscampaignsontheirway tothetwentyfirstcentury.html (Accessed 07 March 2014).
Bruner, J. S. (1975). The ontogenesis of speech acts. Journal of Child Language, 2, 1–19.
Bruner, J. S. (1985). Child’s talk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chomsky, N. (1976). On the biological basis of language capacities. In The neuropsychology of language (pp. 1–24). New York: Springer.
DiSessa, A. A. (2001). Changing minds: Computers, learning, and literacy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Dyson, A. H. (1982). Reading, writing, and language: Young children solving the written language puzzle. Language Arts, 59(8), 829–839.
Foucault, M., Martin, L. H., Gutman, H., & Hutton, P. H. (1988). Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.
Graham, S., McKeown, D., Kiuhara, S., & Harris, K. R. (2012). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for students in the elementary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 879.
Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). Writing next: Effective strategies to improve writing of adolescents in middle and high schools. A report to Carnegie Corporation of New York. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
Graves, D. H. (1994). A fresh look at writing. 361 Hanover St., Portsmouth, NH 03801–3912: Heinemann. (ISBN0435088246, $20).
Katz, L. G., & Chard, S. C. (1996). The contribution of documentation to the quality of early childhood education. ERIC Digest. Champaign, IL: ERIC Clearinghouse on Elementary and Early Childhood Education. ED 393 608.
Ong, W. (1982). Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word. London: Methuen.
Ong, W. (1986). Writing is a technology that restructures thought. In G. Baumann (Ed.), The written word: Literacy in transition (pp. 23–50). Oxford: Clarendon Press; New York: Oxford University Press.
Papert, S. (1987). Computer criticism vs. technocentric thinking. Educational Researcher, 16(1), 22–30.
Papert, S. (2005). You can’t think about thinking without thinking about thinking about something. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 5(3–4), 366–367.
Resnick, M., & Siegel, D (2015 Nov 10). A different approach to coding: How kids are making and remaking themselves from Scratch [Web blog post]. Bright: What's new in education. Retrieved June 29, 2017 from https:// brightreads.com/a-different-approach-to-coding-d679b06d83a
Taylor, D. (1983). Family literacy: Young children learning to read and write. 70 Court St., Portsmouth, NH 03801: Heinemann Educational Books Inc.
Tjosvold, D., & Johnson, D. W. (1978). Controversy within a cooperative or competitive context and cognitive perspective taking. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 3(4), 376–386.
Tudge, J., & Rogoff, B. (1999). Peer influences on cognitive development: Piagetian and Vygotskian perspectives. Lev Vygotsky: Critical Assessments, 3, 32–56.
Tudge, J. R., & Winterhoff, P. A. (1993). Vygotsky, Piaget, and Bandura: Perspectives on the relations between the social world and cognitive development. Human Development, 36(2), 61–81.
Turkle, S. (1984). The second self: Computers and the human spirit. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Vee, A. (2013). Understanding computer programming as a literacy. Literacy in Composition Studies, 1(2), 42–64.
Walker, L. J. (1980). Cognitive and perspective taking prerequisites for moral development. Child Development, 131–139.
BeeBot Home Page. (n.d). Retrieved November 17, 2016, from www.beebot.us/
Biggs, J. (2013). LightBot teaches computer science with a cute little robot and some symbol based programming. Tech Crunch. Retrieved from https://techcrunch.com/2013/06/26/lightbotteachescomputerscience withacutelittlerobotandsomesymbolbasedprogramming/
Daisy the Dinosaur on the App Store. (n.d). Retrieved November 17, 2016, from www.daisythedinosaur.com/
Eaton, K. (2014). Programming apps teach the basics of code. The New York Times. Retrieved from www.nytimes.com/2014/08/28/technology/ personaltech/getcrackingonlearningcomputercode.html
Lightbot. (n.d). Retrieved November 17, 2016, from http://lightbot.com/
Maney, K. (2014). Computer programming is a dying art. Newsweek. Retrieved from www.newsweek.com/2014/06/06/computerprogramming dyingart252618.html
Shapiro, D. (2015). Hot seat: The startup CEO guidebook. New York: O’Reilly Media, Inc.
Vee, A. (2013). Understanding computer programming as a literacy. Literacy in Composition Studies, 1(2), 42–64.
American Academy of Pediatrics. (2016). Media and young minds. Pediatrics, 138(5). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-2591, 1–8.
Berk, L. E., & Meyers, A. B. (2013). The role of make-believe play in the development of executive function: Status of research and future directions. American Journal of Play, 6(1), 98.
Byers, J. A., & Walker, C. (1995). Refining the motor training hypothesis for the evolution of play. American Naturalist, 146(1), 25–40.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1981). Some paradoxes in the definition of play. In A. T. Cheska (Ed.), Play as context (pp. 14–26). West Point, NY: Leisure Press.
Dennison, P. E., & Dennison, G. (1986). Brain gym: Simple activities for whole brain learning. Glendale, CA: EduKinesthetics, Inc.
Erickson, R. J. (1985). Play contributes to the full emotional development of the child. Education, 105, 261–263.
Fromberg, D. P. (1990). Play issues in early childhood education. In C. Seedfeldt (Ed.), Continuing issues in early childhood education (pp. 223–243). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
Fromberg, D. P., & Gullo, D. F. (1992). Perspectives on children. In L. R. Williams & D. P. Fromberg (Eds.), Encyclopedia of early childhood education (pp. 191–194). New York: Garland Publishing, Inc.
Frost, J. L. (1992). Play and playscapes. Albany, NY: Delmar, G.
Garvey, C. (1977). Play. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Johnsen, E. P., & Christie, J. F. (1986). Pretend play and logical operations. In K. Blanchard (Ed.), The many faces of play (pp. 50–58). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by Chicago. Chicago University.
McElwain, E. L., & Volling, B. L. (2005). Preschool children’s interactions with friends and older siblings: Relationship specificity and joint contributions to problem behaviors. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 486–496.
Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books, Inc.
Pellegrini, A., & Smith, P. (1998). Physical activity play: The nature and function of a neglected aspect of play. Child Development, 69(3), 577–598. Piaget, J. (1962). Play, dreams, and imitation in childhood. New York: W. W.Norton & Co.
Russ, S. W. (2004). Play in child development and psychotherapy. Mah-wah, NJ: Earlbaum.
Scarlett, W. G., Naudeau, S., Ponte, I., & Salonius-Pasternak, D. (2005). Children’s play. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Shaheen, S. (2014). How child’s play impacts executive function—Related behaviors. Applied Neuropsychology: Child, 3(3), 182–187.
Singer, D. G., & Singer, J. L. (2005). Imagination and play in the electronic age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Strawhacker, A. L., & Bers, M. U. (2015). “I want my robot to look for food”: Comparing children’s programming comprehension using tangible, graphical, and hybrid user interfaces. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 25(3), 293–319.
Strawhacker, A. L., Lee, M.S.C., & Bers, M. (2017). Teaching tools, teacher’s rules: Exploring the impact of teaching styles on young children’s programming knowledge in ScratchJr. The International Journal of Technology and Design Education. doi: 10.1007/s10798-017-9400-9
SuttonSmith, B. (2009). The ambiguity of play. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. (1966). Play and its role in the mental development of the child. Soviet Psychology, 5(3), 6–18.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psycho- logical processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wittemyer, R., McAllister, B., Faulkner, S., McClard, A., & Gill, K.(2014).
MakeHers: Engaging girls and women in technology through making, creating, and inventing. (Report No. 1). Retrieved from Intel Corporation, https://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/ reports/makers-report-girls-women.pdf
A Framework for K-12 Computer Science Education. (2016). A framework for K12 computer science education. N.p. Web. 13 July 2016. Retrieved from https://k12cs.org/about/
Allan, W., Coulter, B., Denner, J., Erickson, J., Lee, I., Malyn-Smith, J., & Martin, F. (2010). Computational thinking for youth. White Paper for the NSF(National Science Foundation)'s Innovative Technology Experiences for Students and Teachers (ITEST) Small Working Group on Computational Thinking (CT). Retrieved from: http://stelar.edc.org/sites/stelar.edc.org/ files/Computational_Thinking_paper.pdf
Barr, V., & Stephenson, C. (2011). Bringing computational thinking to K-12: What is involved and what is the role of the computer science education community? ACM Inroads, 2(1), 48–54.
Bell, T. C., Witten, I. H., & Fellows, M. R. (1998). Computer science unplugged: Off-line activities and games for all ages. Computer Science Unplugged
Bers, M. (2008). Blocks to robots: Learning with technology in the early childhood classroom. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Bers, M. U. (2010). The tangible K robotics program: Applied computational thinking for young children. Early Childhood Research and Practice, 12(2).
Bers, M. U., & Fedorenko. (2016). The cognitive and neural mechanisms of computer programming in young children: Storytelling or solving puzzles?, NSP Proposal.
Bers, M. U., Ponte, I., Juelich, K., Viera, A., & Schenker, J. (2002). Teachers as designers: Integrating robotics in early childhood education information technology in childhood education. In AACE (123–145).
Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012). New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. Proceedings of the 2012 annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, Canada.
Cejka, E., Rogers, C., & Portsmore, M. (2006). Kindergarten robotics: Using robotics to motivate math, science, and engineering literacy in elementary school. International Journal of Engineering Education, 22(4), 711–722.
Clements, D. H., & Gullo, D. F. (1984). Effects of computer programming on young children’s cognition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(6), 1051–1058. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.76.6.1051
Clements, D. H., & Meredith, J. S. (1992). Research on logo: Effects and efficacy. Retrieved from http://el.media.mit.edu/logo-foundation/pubs/ papers/research_logo.html
Flannery, L. P., & Bers, M. U. (2013). Let’s dance the “robot hokey-pokey!”: Children’s programming approaches and achievement throughout early cognitive development. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(1), 81–101.
Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). Computational thinking in K–12: a review of the state of the field. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 38–43.
Guzdial, M. (2008). Paving the way for computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 51(8), 25–27.
International Society for Technology Education and The Computer Science Teachers Association 2011.
ISTE & Computer Science Teachers Association. (2011). Operational definition of computational thinking for K–12 education.
Kamenetz, A. (2015). Engage kids with coding by letting them design, create, and tell stories. Retrieved from https://ww2.kqed.org/mindshift/2015/12/15/ engage-kids-with-coding-by-letting-them-design-create-and-tell-stories/
Kazakoff, E. R., & Bers, M.U. (2011). The Impact of Computer Programming on Sequencing Ability in Early Childhood. Paper presented at American Educational Research Association Conference(AERA), 8–12 April, 2011, Louisiana: New Orleans.
Kazakoff, E. R., & Bers, M. U. (2014). Put your robot in, put your robot out: Sequencing through programming robots in early childhood. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 50(4), 553–573.
Kazakoff, E., Sullivan, A., & Bers, M. U. (2013). The effect of a classroom- based intensive robotics and programming workshop on sequencing ability in early childhood. Early Childhood Education Journal, 41(4), 245–255. doi: 10.1007/s10643-012-0554-5
Lee, I., Martin, F., Denner, J., Coulter, B., Allan, W., Erickson, J., . . . Werner, L. (2011). Computational thinking for youth in practice. ACM Inroads, 2, 32–37.
Maguth, B. (2012). In defense of the social studies: Social studies programs in STEM education. Social Studies Research and Practice, 7(2), 84.
National Academies of Science. (2010). Report of a workshop on the scope and nature of computational thinking. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
National Research Council (US). (2010). Report of a workshop on the scope and nature of computational thinking. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books.
Perlis, A. (1962). The computer in the university. In M. Greenberger (Ed.), Computers and the world of the future (pp. 180–219). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Perlis, A. J. (1982). Epigrams on programming. Sig Plan Notices, 17(9), 7–13.
Perlman, R. (1976). Using Computer Technology to Provide a Creative Learning Environment for Preschool Children. MIT Logo Memo #24, Cambridge, MA.
Portelance, D. J., & Bers, M. U. (2015). Code and Tell: Assessing young children’s learning of computational thinking using peer video interviews with ScratchJr. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC ’15). ACM, Boston, MA, USA.
Resnick, M., & Siegel, D. (2015). A different approach to coding. Bright/Medium.
Robelen, E. W. (2011). STEAM: Experts make case for adding arts to STEM. Education Week, 31(13), 8.
Solomon, J. (2005). Programming as a second language. Learning & Leading with Technology, 32(4), 34–39.
STEM to STEAM. (2016). Retrieved July 27, 2016, from http://stemtosteam.org/
Sullivan, A., & Bers, M.U. (2015). Robotics in the early childhood class- room: Learning outcomes from an 8-week robotics curriculum in prekindergarten through second grade. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. Online First.
Wilson, C., Sudol, L. A., Stephenson, C., & Stehlik, M. (2010). Running on empty: The failure to teach K-12 computer science in the digital age. New York, NY: The Association for Computing Machinery and the Computer Science Teachers Association.
Wing, J. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–36.
Wing, J. (2008). Computational Thinking and Thinking About Computing [Powerpoint Slides]. Retrieved from: https://www.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs/usr/ wing/www/talks/ct-and-tc-long.pdf
Wing, J. (2011). Research notebook: Computational thinking—What and why? The Link Magazine, Spring. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh. Retrieved from http://link.cs.cmu.edu/article.php?a=600
Wyeth, P. (2008). How young children learn to program with sensor, action, and logic blocks. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17(4), 517–550.
Yadav, A. (2011). Computational thinking and 21st century problem solving [Powerpoint Slides]. Retrieved from: http://cs4edu.cs.purdue.edu/_ media/what-is-ct_edps235.pdf
Yakman, G. (2008). STEAM education: An overview of creating a model of integrative education. In Pupils’ Attitudes Towards Technology (PATT-19) Conference: Research on Technology, Innovation, Design & Engineering Teaching, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Bers, M. (2008). Blocks to robots: Learning with technology in the early childhood classroom. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012). New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. In Proceedings of the 2012 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April, Vancouver, Canada (pp. 1–25).
Bruner, J. (1960). The Process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bruner, J. S. (1975). Entry into early language: A spiral curriculum: The Charles Gittins memorial lecture delivered at the University College of Swansea on March 13, 1975. University College of Swansea.
Eggert, R. (2010). Engineering design (2nd ed.). Meridian, Idaho: High Peak Press.
Ertas, A., & Jones, J. (1996). The engineering design process (2nd ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Fisher, A., & Margolis, J. (2002). Unlocking the clubhouse: The Carnegie Mellon experience. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 34(2), 79–83.
Google for Education. (2010). Exploring computational thinking. Retrieved from www.google.com/edu/resources/programs/exploring-computational- thinking/index.html#!home
International Technology and Engineering Education Association. (2007). Standards for technological literacy. Retrieved from www.iteea.org/ 67767.aspx
Mangold, J., & Robinson, S. (2013). The engineering design process as a problem solving and learning tool in K-12 classrooms. Published in the proceedings of the 120th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. Georgia World Congress Center, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Massachusetts Department of Education. (2001). Massachusetts science and technology/engineering curriculum framework. Malden, MA: Massachusetts Department of Education.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards. Washington DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers.
O’Conner, B. (2000). Using the design process to enable primary aged children with severe emotional and behavioural difficulties (EBD) to communicate more effectively. The Journal of Design and Technology Education, 5(3), 197–201.
Papert, S. (2000). What's the big idea? Toward a pedagogy of idea power. IBM Systems Journal, 39(3.4), 720–729.
Portelance, D. J., Strawhacker, A. L., & Bers, M. U. (2015). Constructing the ScratchJr programming language in the early childhood classroom. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 29(4), 1–16.
Richmond, G. (2000). Exploring the complexities of group work in science class: A cautionary tale of voice and equitable access to resources for learning. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 6(4), 295–311.
Rosser, S. V. (1990). Female-friendly science: Applying women’s studies methods and theories to attract students. London: Pergamon.
Sadler, P. M., Coyle, H. P., & Schwartz, M. (2000). Engineering competitions in the middle school classroom: Key elements in developing effective design challenges. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(3), 299–327.
Sullivan, A., & Bers, M. U. (2015). Robotics in the early childhood class- room: Learning outcomes from an 8-week robotics curriculum in pre-kindergarten through second grade. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. Online First.
Tobin, K., Roth, W. M., & Zimmermann, A. (2001). Learning to teach science in urban schools. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(8), 941–964.
Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35.
Bers, M. (2008). Blocks to robots: Learning with technology in the early childhood classroom. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). (2016). Standards for students. Retrieved from www.iste.org/standards/standards/ for-students-2016
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. (2016). 2016 Massachusetts science and technology/engineering curriculum framework. Retrieved from www.doe.mass.edu/frameworks/scitech/2016-04.pdf
Resnick, M. (2001). Lifelong Kindergarten. In Presentation delivered at the Annual Symposium of the Forum for the Future of Higher Education, Aspen, Colorado.
Resnick, M. (2007). All I really need to know (about creative thinking) I learned (by studying how children learn) in kindergarten. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity & Cognition, June (pp. 1–6). ACM.
Resnick, M. (2008). Sowing the seeds for a more creative society. Learning & Leading with Technology, 35(4), 18–22.
Turkle, S., & Papert, S. (1992). Epistemological pluralism and the revaluation of the concrete. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 11(1), 3–33.
Abraham Joshua Heschel. (n.d.). BrainyQuote.com. Retrieved May 10, 2017, from BrainyQuote.com Web site www.brainyquote.com/quotes/ quotes/a/abrahamjos106291.html
Baltes, P. B. (1997). On the incomplete architecture of human ontogeny: Selection, optimization, and compensation as foundation of develop- mental theory. American psychologist, 52(4), 366–380.
Bamford, J. (2014). Edward Snowden: The untold story. WIRED Magazine, August.
Beals, L., & Bers, M. U. (2009). A developmental lens for designing virtual worlds for children and youth. The International Journal of Learning and Media, 1(1), 51–65.
Bers, M. (2001). Identity construction environments: Developing personal and moral values through the design of a virtual city. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10(4), 365–415. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Bers, M. U. (2010a). Beyond computer literacy: Supporting youth’s positive development through technology. New Directions for Youth Development, 128, 13–23.
Bers, M. U. (2010b). The tangible K robotics program: Applied computational thinking for young children. Early Childhood Research and Practice, 12(2).
Bers, M. U. (2012). Designing digital experiences for positive youth development: From playpen to playground. Cary, NC: Oxford.
Bers, M. U., Matas, J., & Libman, N. (2013). Livnot u’lehibanot, to build and to be built: Making robots in kindergarten to explore Jewish identity. Diaspora, Indigenous, and Minority Education: Studies of Migration, Integration, Equity, and Cultural Survival, 7(3), 164–179.
Bers, M. U., & Urrea, C. (2000). Technological prayers: Parents and children exploring robotics and values. In A. Druin & J. Hendler (Eds.), Robots for kids: Exploring new technologies for learning experiences (pp. 194–217). New York: Morgan Kaufman.
Biermann, F., & Pattberg, P. (2008). Global environmental governance: Taking stock, moving forward. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 33, 277–294.
Blair, C. (2002). School readiness: Integrating cognition and emotion in a neurobiological conceptualization of children’s functioning at school entry. American Psychologist, 57(2), 111.
Blum-Kulka, S., & Snow, C. E. (Eds.). (2002). Talking to adults: The contribution of multiparty discourse to language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cassidy, S., & Eachus, P. (2002). Developing the computer user self-efficacy (CUSE) scale: Investigating the relationship between computer self- efficacy, gender and experience with computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 26(2), 133–153.
Clements, D., & Sarama, J. (2003). Young children and technology: What does the research say? Young Children, 58(6), 34–40.
Coffin, R. J., & MacIntyre, P. D. (1999). Motivational influences on computer related affective states. Computers in Human Behavior, 15(5), 549–569.
Colby, A., & Damon, W. (1992). Some do care: Contemporary lives of moral commitment. New York: Free press.
Cordes, C., & E. Miller, eds. (2000). Fool’s Gold: A Critical Look at Computers in Childhood. College Park, MD: Alliance for Childhood. Retrieved from: http://drupal6.allianceforchildhood.org/fools_gold
Cunha, F., & Heckman, J. (2007). The technology of skill formation. American Economic Review, 97(2), 31–47.
Damon, W. (1990). Moral child: Nurturing children’s natural moral growth. New York: Free Press.
Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Random House.
Freund, A. M., & Baltes, P. B. (2002). Life-management strategies of selection, optimization and compensation: Measurement by self-report and construct validity. Journal of personality and social psychology, 82(4), 642–662.
Gellman, B., Blake, A., & Miller, G. (2013). Edward Snowden comes forward as source of NSA leaks. The Washington Post, 6(9), 13.
Heckman, J. J., & Masterov, D. V. (2007). The productivity argument for investing in young children. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 29(3), 446–493.
Kato, H., & Ide, A. (1995, October). Using a game for social setting in a learning environment: AlgoArena—a tool for learning software design. Published in the proccedings of the first international conference on Computer support for collaborative learning (pp. 195–199). Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.
Kohlberg, L. (1973). Continuities in childhood and adult moral development revisited. Moral Education Research Foundation.
Lee, K., Sullivan, A., & Bers, M. U. (2013). Collaboration by design: Using robotics to foster social interaction in kindergarten. Computers in the Schools, 30(3), 271–281.
Lerner, R. M. (2007). The Good Teen: Rescuing adolescence from the myths of the storm and stress years. New York, NY: Three Rivers Press.
Lerner, R. M., Almerigi, J., Theokas, C., & Lerner, J. (2005). Positive youth development: A view of the issues. Journal of Early Adolescence, 25(1), 10–16.
Monroy-Hernández, A., & Resnick, M. (2008). Empowering kids to create and share programmable media. Interactions, 15, 50–53. ACM ID, 1340974.
Muller, A. A., & Perlmutter, M. (1985). Preschool children’s problem-solving interactions at computers and jigsaw puzzles. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 6, 173–186.
New, R., & Cochran, M. (2007). Early childhood education: An international encyclopedia (Vols. 1–4). Westport, CT: Praeger.
Oppenheimer, T. (2003). The flickering mind: Saving education from the false promise of technology. New York: Random House.
Piaget, J. (1965). The child’s conception of number. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.
Piaget, J. (1977). Les operations logiques et la vie sociale. In Etude sociologique. Geneva: Libraire Droz.
Portelance, D. J., & Bers, M. U. (2015). Code and tell: Assessing young children’s learning of computational thinking using peer video interviews with ScratchJr. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC ’15). ACM, Boston, MA, USA.
Resnick, M. (2006). Computer as paintbrush: Technology, play, and the creative society. In Play = Learning: How Play Motivates and Enhances Children’s Cognitive and Social-Emotional Growth (192–208).
Resnick, M. (2008). Sowing the seeds for a more creative society. Learning & Leading with Technology, 35(4), 18–22.
Resnick, M., & Siegel, D (2015 Nov 10). A different approach to coding: How kids are making and remaking themselves from Scratch [Web blog post]. Bright: What's new in education. Retrieved June 29, 2017 from https://brightreads.com/a-different-approach-to-coding-d679b06d83a
Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., & Pianta, R. C. (2000). An ecological perspective on the transition to kindergarten: A theoretical framework to guide empirical research. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 21(5), 491–511.
Rinaldi, C. (1998). Projected curriculum constructed through documentation—Progettazione: An interview with Lella Gandini. In C. Edwards, L. Gandini, & G. Forman (Eds.), The hundred languages of children: The Reggio Emilia approach—Advanced reflections (2nd ed., pp. 113–126). Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprentices in thinking: Cognitive development in a social context. New York: Oxford.
Roque, R., Kafai, Y., & Fields, D. (2012). From tools to communities: Designs to support online creative collaboration in Scratch. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (pp. 220–223). ACM.
Subrahmanyam, K., & Greenfield, P. (2008). Online communication and adolescent relationships. The Future of Children, 18(1), 119–146.
Sullivan, A. (2016). Breaking the STEM stereotype: Investigating the use of robotics to change young children’s gender stereotypes about technology & engineering (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Tufts University, Medford, MA.
Suzuki, H., & Hiroshi, K. (1997). Identity formation/transformation as the process of collaborative learning through AlgoArena. In R. Hall, N. Miyake, & N. Enyedy (Ed.), Computer Support for Collaborative Learning ́97. Proceedings of The Second International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning. December 10–14, 1997. Toronto, Ontario, Canada (280–288).
Suzuki, H., & Kato, H. (1997). Identity formation/transformation as the process of collaborative learning through AlgoArena. Paper presented at the CSCL ’97.
Topping, K. (1992). Cooperative learning and peer tutoring: An overview. The Psychologist, 5(4), 151–157.
Wartella, E. A., & Jennings, N. (2000). Children and computers: New technology—Old concerns. The Future of Children: Children and Computer Technology, 10(2), 31–43.
Wood, D., & O’Malley, C. (1996). Collaborative learning between peers: An overview. Educational Psychology in Practice, 11(4), 4–9.
Bers, M. U. (2010). The tangible K robotics program: Applied computational thinking for young children. Early Childhood Research and Practice, 12(2), 1–20.
Bers, M. U. (2012). Designing digital experiences for positive youth development: From playpen to playground. Cary, NC: Oxford.
Bers, M. U., & Resnick, M. (2015). The official ScratchJr book. San Francisco, CA: No Starch Press.
Flannery, L. P., Kazakoff, E. R., Bontá, P., Silverman, B., Bers, M. U., & Resnick, M. (2013). Designing ScratchJr: Support for early childhood learning through computer programming. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC ’13). ACM, New York, NY, USA (1–10). doi: 10.1145/2485760.2485785
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). The metaphorical structure of the human conceptual system. Cognitive science, 4(2), 195–208.
Lee, M.S.C. (2014). Teaching tools, teacher’s rules: ScratchJr in the classroom (Master’s Thesis). Retrieved from http://ase.tufts.edu/devtech/ Theses/Melissa%20SC%20Lee%20Thesis.pdf
Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books.
Portelance, D. J. (2015). Code and tell: An exploration of peer interviews and computational thinking with ScratchJr in the early childhood classroom (Master’s Thesis). Retrieved from http://ase.tufts.edu/devtech/ Theses/DPortelance_2015.pdf
Portelance, D. J., & Bers, M. U. (2015). Code and tell: Assessing young children’s learning of computational thinking using peer video interviews with ScratchJr. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC ’15). ACM, Boston, MA, USA.
Notes
1. Steve Leonard was the executive deputy chairman of IDA Singapore from June 2013 to June 2016.
2. IMDA was restructured from IDA in September 2016.
American Academy of Pediatrics Council on Communications and Media. (2016). Media and young minds. Pediatrics, 138(5).
Bers, M. (2008). Blocks to robots: Learning with technology in the early childhood classroom. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Bers, M. U. (2010). The tangible K robotics program: Applied computational thinking for young children. Early Childhood Research and Practice, 12(2).
Bers, M. U. (2012). Designing digital experiences for positive youth development: From playpen to playground. Cary, NC: Oxford.
Bers, M. U., Seddighin, S., & Sullivan, A. (2013). Ready for robotics: Bringing together the T and E of STEM in early childhood teacher education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 21(3), 355–377.
Bredekamp, S. (1987). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8. National Association for the Education of Young Children.
Chambers, J. (2015). Inside Singapore’s plans for robots in pre-schools. GovInsider.
Copple, C., & Bredekamp, S. (2009). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8. 1313 L Street NW Suite 500, Washington, DC 22205–4101: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
DevTech Research Group. (2015). Dances from around the world robotics curriculum. Retrieved from http://tkroboticsnetwork.ning.com/page/ robotics-curriculum
Digital News Asia. (2015). IDA launches $1.5m pilot to roll out tech toys for preschoolers. Retrieved from: https://www.digitalnewsasia.com/ digital-economy/ida-launches-pilot-to-roll-out-tech-toys-for-preschoolers Froebel, F. (1826). On the education of man (Die Menschenerziehung). Keilhau/Leipzig: Wienbrach.
Google, Research. (2016, June). Project Bloks: Designing a development platform for tangible programming for children [Position paper]. Retrieved from https://projectbloks.withgoogle.com/static/Project_ Bloks_position_paper_June_2016.pdf
Horn, M. S., Crouser, R. J., & Bers, M. U. (2012). Tangible interaction and learning: The case for a hybrid approach. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 16(4), 379–389.
Horn, M. S., & Jacob, R. J. (2007). Tangible programming in the classroom with tern. In CHI’07 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1965–1970). ACM.
IDA Singapore. (2015). IDA supports preschool centres with technology enabled toys to build creativity and confidence in learning. Retrieved from www.ida.gov.sg/About-Us/Newsroom/Media-Releases/2015/IDA- supports-preschool-centres-with-technology-enabled-toys-to-build- creativity-and-confidence-in-learning
Manches, A., & Price, S. (2011). Designing learning representations around physical manipulation: Hands and objects. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (pp. 81–89). ACM.
McNerney, T. S. (2004). From turtles to tangible programming bricks: Explorations in physical language design. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 8(5), 326–337.
Montessori, M., & Gutek, G. L. (2004). The Montessori method: The origins of an educational innovation: Including an abridged and annotated edition of Maria Montessori’s the Montessori method. Lanham, MD: Row-man & Littlefield Publishers.
Perlman, R. (1976). Using Computer Technology to Provide a Creative Learning Environment for Preschool Children. MIT Logo Memo #24, Cambridge, MA.
Shonkoff, J. P., Duncan, G. J., Fisher, P. A., Magnuson, K., & Raver, C. (2011). Building the brain’s “air traffic control” system: How early experiences shape the development of executive function. Working Paper No. 11.
Smith, A. C. (2007). Using magnets in physical blocks that behave as programming objects. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction (pp. 147–150). ACM.
Sullivan, A., & Bers, M. U. (2015). Robotics in the early childhood classroom: Learning outcomes from an 8-week robotics curriculum in prekindergarten through second grade. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. Online First.
Sullivan, A., & Bers, M. U. (2017). Dancing robots: Integrating art, music, and robotics in Singapore’s early childhood centers. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. Online First. doi:10.1007/ s10798-017-9397-0
Sullivan, A., Elkin, M., & Bers, M. U. (2015). KIBO robot demo: Engaging young children in programming and engineering. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC ’15). ACM, Boston, MA, USA.
Suzuki, H., & Kato, H. (1995). Interaction-level support for collaborative learning: Algoblockan open programming language. In J. L Schnase & E. L. Cunnius (Eds.), Proceedings on CSCL ’95: The first international conference on computer support for collaborative learning (pp. 349–355). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Wyeth, P., & Purchase, H. C. (2002). Tangible programming elements for young children. In CHI’02 extended abstracts on Human factors in com- puting systems (pp. 774–775). ACM.
Bers, M. U. (2012). Designing digital experiences for positive youth development: From playpen to playground. Cary, NC: Oxford.
Bers, M.U. & Resnick, M. (2015). The Official ScratchJr Book. San Francisco, CA: No Starch Press.
Brown, T. (2009). Change by design: How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. New York: Harper Collins.
Case, R. (1984). The process of stage transition: A neo-Piagetian view. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), Mechanisms of cognitive development (pp. 19–44). San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
Erikson, E. H. (1950). Childhood and society. New York: Norton.
Feldman, D. H. (2004). Piaget’s stages: The unfinished symphony of cognitive development. New Ideas in Psychology, 22, 175–231. doi: 10.1016/ j.newideapsych.2004.11.005
Fischer, K. W. (1980). A theory of cognitive development: The control and construction of hierarchies of skills. Psychological review, 87(6), 477–531.
Gmitrova, V., & Gmitrova, J. (2004). The primacy of child-directed pretend play on cognitive competence in a mixed-age environment: Possible interpretations. Early Child Development and Care, 174(3), 267–279.
Leseman, P. P., Rollenberg, L., & Rispens, J. (2001). Playing and working in kindergarten: Cognitive co-construction in two educational situations. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 16(3), 363–384.
Piaget, J. (1951). Egocentric thought and sociocentric thought. J. Piaget, Sociological Studies, 270–286.
Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children (Vol. 8, No. 5, pp. 18–1952). New York: International Universities Press.
Scarlett, W. G., Naudeau, S., Ponte, I., & Salonius-Pasternak, D. (2005). Children’s play. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Vygotsky, L. (1976). Play and its role in the mental development of the child. In J. Bruner, A. Jolly, & K. Sylva (Eds.), Play: Its role in development and evolution. New York: Basic Books.
Bers, M. (2008). Blocks to robots: Learning with technology in the early childhood classroom. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Bers, M. U. (2012). Designing digital experiences for positive youth development: From playpen to playground. Cary, NC: Oxford.
Bredekamp, S., & Rosegrant, T., eds. (1995). Reaching potentials: Transforming early childhood curriculum and assessment (Vol. 2). Washington, DC: NAEYC.
Code.org, Computing Leaders ACM, and CSTA. (2016). Announcing a new framework to define K-12 computer science education [Press release]. Code.org. Retrieved from https://code.org/framework-announcement
Darragh, J. C. (2006). The environment as the third teacher. Retrieved from www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED493517.pdf
DevTech Research Group. (2015). Sample engineer’s license. Retrieved from http://api.ning.com/files/HFuYSlzj6Lmy18EzB9-sGv4ftGAZpfkGS fCe6lHFFQmv8PaeIQB-4PB8kS6BunpzNhbtYhqnlmEWpFBwQJdfH7y FrJrgUUrI/BlankEngineerLicense.jpg
Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kiefer, M., & Trumpp, N. M. (2012). Embodiment theory and education: The foundations of cognition in perception and action. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 1(1), 15–20.
Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books, Inc.
Papert, S. (2000). What’s the big idea? Toward a pedagogy of idea power. IBM Systems Journal, 39(3–4), 720–729.
Papert, S., & Resnick, M. (1996). Paper presented at Rescuing the Powerful Ideas, an NSF-sponsored symposium at MIT, Cambridge, MA.
Rinaldi, C. (1998). Projected curriculum constructed through documentation Progettazione: An interview with Lella Gandini. In C. Edwards, L. Gandini, & G. Forman (Eds.), The hundred languages of children: The Reggio Emilia approach Advanced reflections (2nd ed., pp. 113–125). Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
Strawhacker, A. L., & Bers, M. U. (2015). “I want my robot to look for food”: Comparing children’s programming comprehension using tangible, graphical, and hybrid user interfaces. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 25(3), 293–319.
U.S. Department of Education, & Office of Innovation and Improvement. (2016). STEM 2026: A vision for innovation in STEM education. Washington, DC: Author.
Wilson, R. A., & Foglia, L. (2011). Embodied cognition. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.