heading

While deputy chief minister G Parameshwara is thinking of suspending the registration of new vehicles in Bengaluru due to rapid deterioration in air quality, the State Environment Impact Assessment Authority has initiated environmental clearance for the controversial 92-km elevated corridor project that will only add more vehicles and pollution to the City. ET nails the contradiction and wonder why — as when the government promoted the steel flyover project between Basaveshwara Circle and Hebbal — sustainable mobility, public consultation and socio-environmental impact assessment are being disregarded yet again:

Techie Vishal R thinks that the proposed elevated corridor project is a good idea. The 26-year-old navigates peak traffic to travel from his BTM Layout home to his workplace in Bellandur every day. “How else can so many vehicles ply on the city’s roads, say, 10 years from now? As the number of cars and bikes increase, traffic will only worsen,” he reasons. He quickly adds he is not sure if the project will benefit him directly if implemented.

Many others believe that a six-lane elevated corridor criss-crossing the city is a sure-shot solution to traffic congestion. Chief minister HD Kumaraswamy, who has called the corridor an important part of his “long-term vision” for Bengaluru, has already earmarked Rs 1,000 crore for the project in the current financial year. The detailed feasibility report (DFR) has budgeted it at Rs 19,265 crore, excluding the cost of acquiring nearly 141 acres of prime real estate and 1,130 buildings, most of them commercial structures.

Like Vishal, many Bengalureans are not aware of the likely socio-environmental impact of a project of this scale: for one, it stands to potentially alter the landscape of the city; the 92-km concrete structure would violate the National Green Tribunal (NGT) order on lake buffer zones by running above the Halasuru lake, and close to Kadirenahalli, Benniganahalli, Chelekere, Hebbal and Agara lakes; it requires chopping of over 3,820 trees and pruning another 2,000; its construction stands to impact 1,130 structures and breaches over 60 air and noisesensitive localities like hospitals, libraries, educational institutions and hostels.

An Indian Institute of Science (IISc) report published in August questioned the usefulness of the corridor, since Bengaluru’s vehicle growth is likely to overshoot road capacity as early as 2020. Then, a fortnight ago, the deputy chief minister said that drastic measures — such as suspending registration of new vehicles in Bengaluru — are required to improve air quality and prevent the city from going the Delhi way.

c:\users\admin\desktop\---paste\19-11-2018 16-48-03.txt

heading

 KR Puram, and not Nagawara, could be the hub for Metro connectivity to the Kempegowda International Airport (KIA). This departure from the original alignment, it appears, is due to an expected delay in executing the Metro line from Gottigere to Nagawara.

The new alignment to the airport could start at KR Puram, touch Hebbal via Nagawara, and then run along the Bengaluru-Hyderabad national highway before connecting to the airport. The earlier alignment was an extension of the Gottigere-Nagawara stretch (Reach 6 of Phase II). After Nagawara, it was supposed to pass via RK Hegde Nagar without connecting Hebbal junction.

Of the nine route options prepared by government-owned consultancy firm RITES, the state had chosen the 29.60-km Nagawara-Airport line in February. BMRCL had even prepared a detailed project report. Recently, however, deputy chief minister G Parameshwara hinted at changing the alignment but did not share details. The reasons for the change, according to sources, are: one, the under-construction KR Puram station is expected to have higher footfall as it is designed as an interchange station connecting both the outer ring road Metro corridor up to Central Silk Board and the eastwest Metro corridor from Mysuru Road; second, the BMRCL believes the completion of the 22.43-km Gottigere-Nagawara line, a prerequisite to extending the Metro from Nagawara to the airport, could take longer than scheduled as the stretch has a 14-km underground corridor, for which BMRCL is struggling to strike a deal with construction firms.

It is also learnt that the BMRCL has drawn up a new alignment for a future Phase III, which includes extending the network on the outer ring road from Hebbal to Yeshwanthpur.

Urbanist RK Misra, as did many top officials in the Metro, felt extending Metro to airport from KR Puram was better than Nagawara. “As the new alignment to the airport passes via the outer ring road, it will cater to both the officer-goers and air-passengers. There will be minimal land acquisition as the ring roads have wide median to build Metro pillars,” he said. “The earlier alignment made no sense,” he said.

It is learnt that the BMRCL is disappointed with the Bangalore International Airport Ltd (BIAL) for not extending support to the Metro project. The project, according to the initial plan, was estimated to cost ?5,500 crore, and the BMRCL expected between ?500 crore and ?1,000 crore from the BIAL. With no support, the BMRCL officials say there is no choice but to raise loans from private lenders besides seeking financial aid from the Centre and the state governments.

EARLIER ALIGNMENT

The earlier alignment was extension the Gottigere-Nagawara stretch. After Nagawara, it was supposed to pass via RK Hegde Nagar without touching Hebbal junction

A BETTER OPTION

Many top officials in the Metro feel extending Metro to airport from KR Puram was better than from Nagawara

c:\users\admin\desktop\---paste\19-11-2018 16-51-47.txt

heading

What shocked you today?

Sathish Narayanan Elakshya

Sathish Narayanan Elakshya · Add Credential

Answered 3h ago

I am a staunch Thamizhan, and can give my life for my language. I have been following the “Me-too” issue in TN film industry (Chinmayi vs Vairamuthu etc) (am not getting into who is guilty etc). I just read about Chinmayi being terminated from the dubbing union on flimsy grounds, and this felt revolting by itself. But then I looked at the twitter comments to her post. There are over 400 comments as of now, and most of them are against her (bidding her bye sarcastically, calling her a Telugu/BJP stooge etc etc).

I am simply not able to understand the feelings of my fellow Thamizhans . Vairamuthu has been a greatest source of joy for me all these years, and Chinmayi is someone I have barely heard about till recently, but passing such remarks on her (ostensibly) to show our support to our much-loved Thamizh poet-lyricist, is simply appalling.

I can only offer my sincerest apologies to Chinmayi. I have always been in the forefront of guarding my mother Thamizh and have been extremely proud of my culture. But today, I bow my head low and feel ashamed and shocked.

We Thamizhans need to grow up and get more mature. Our die-hard affinity for our language is blinding us and preventing us from being more balanced and logical.

Please dont do this ; pl come around, my brethren. Vaazhga nam kalaacharam!