This page of my electronic portfolio showcases the different Professional readings I ventured as I continue with the teaching internship journey. These readings helped me realize and expound my vocabulary on different topics relevant to my profession. I will also be attaching my Classroom Based Action Research proposal, which is a collaborative work made by me and my groupmates, who are also venturing into the teaching profession.
Abstract
The influence is analyzed of a program of professional development of the science teaching staff in a secondary school on the evolution of the students' alternative conceptions on energy. The constructivist-based program consisted of cycles of action-research. We describe the evolution of the students of two teachers with the same educational background but different levels of teaching experience.
Reference
Ruiz, C., Mellado, V., & Bañas, C. The effect of secondary education teachers' involvement in an action-research
program on their students' alternative ideas on energy. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269401357_The_Effect_of_Secondary_Education_Teachers'_Involvement_in_an_Action-Research_Program_on_their_Students'_Alternative_Ideas_on_Energy.
Abstract
Kingston and Nash (2011) recently presented a meta-analysis of studies showing that the effect of formative assessment on K-12 student achievement may not be as robust as widely believed. This investigation analyzes the methodology used in the Kingston and Nash meta-analysis and provides further analyses of the studies included in the study. These analyses suggest, consistent with other reviews, that some of the conclusions reached by Kingston and Nash may not be credible. The studies used in the Kingston and Nash meta-analysis were limited by the nature of the selection process, the questionable quality of their methodologies, and the multiple ways formative assessment was defined and operationalized, often without inclusion of recognized formative assessment characteristics that are needed for successful practice. These limitations mitigate Kingston and Nash's conclusion that the median effect size of experimental studies reviewed suggests a much smaller overall impact than reported by others. Recommendations for further research in this area are summarized to establish an improved body of literature on the effects of formative assessment on student achievement.
Reference
McMillan, J. H., Venable, J. C., & Varier, D. (2013). Studies of the Effect of Formative Assessment on Student
Achievement: So Much More Is Needed. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 18(2), n2. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1005135.
Abstract
A random sample of 22 Year 4 teachers in mathematics from a middle-sized Swedish municipality participated in a teacher professional development programme in formative assessment. The content of the programme was formative assessment conceptualised as a unity of different, integrated strategies. The study examines the effects on student achievement of the changes in the teachers’ formative classroom practice that followed the professional development input. Results show that, after controlling for pretest scores, the classes in the intervention group significantly outperformed the classes in the control group in a posttest administered one school year after the end of the programme (p = 0.036, d = 0.66). The study contributes to the understanding of under-studied areas of the impact of professional development in formative assessment, and the impact of teacher practice based on formative assessment conceptualised as a unity of different formative assessment strategies.
Reference
Andersson, C., & Palm, T. (2017). The impact of formative assessment on student achievement: A study of the effects
of changes to classroom practice after a comprehensive professional development programme. Learning and instruction, 49, 92-102. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0959475216302900.
Abstract
The purpose of this research was to investigate the effects of formative assessment and learning style on student achievement in a Web-based learning environment. A quasi-experimental research design was used. Participants were 455 seventh grade students from 12 classes of six junior high schools. A Web-based course, named BioCAL, combining three different formative assessment strategies was developed. The formative assessment strategies included Formative Assessment Module of the Web-Based Assessment and Test Analysis system (FAM-WATA) (with six Web-based formative assessment strategies), Normal Module of Web-Based Assessment and Test Analysis system (N-WATA) (only with partial Web-based formative assessment strategy) and Paper and Pencil Test (PPT) (without Web-based formative assessment strategy). Subjects were tested using Kolb's Learning Style Inventory, and assigned randomly by class into three groups. Each group took Web-based courses using one of the formative assessment strategies. Pre- and post-achievement testing was carried out. A one-way ANCOVA analysis showed that both learning style and formative assessment strategy are significant factors affecting student achievement in a Web-based learning environment. However, there is no interaction between these two factors. A post hoc comparison showed that performances of the FAM-WATA group are higher than the N-WATA and PPT groups. Learners with a ‘Diverger’ learning style performed best followed by, ‘Assimilator’, ‘Accommodator’, and ‘Converger’, respectively. Finally, FAM-WATA group students are satisfied with six strategies of the FAM-WATA.
Reference
Wang, K. H., Wang, T. H., Wang, W. L., & Huang, S. C. (2006). Learning styles and formative assessment strategy:
enhancing student achievement in Web‐based learning. Journal of computer assisted learning, 22(3), 207-217. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00166.x.
Context and Rationale
With the results of the Philippines in global assessment such as the OECD's Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) and the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS), it is evident that Filipino students poorly understand science concepts. It is quite ironic since the country values education as one of the most important systems to be improved and developed. According to the report of Rappler last 2020, the Philippines ranked low in science with 357 points, against the 489 OECD average. On the other hand, Filipino students’ performance in TIMSS is ‘significantly lower’ in comparison to other countries which participated in grade 4 math and science assessments. Thus, this data compels science teachers and stakeholders to look after the curriculum and respond to the need of alleviating the status of our science learners.
Science is both a body of knowledge and a process of acquiring new knowledge done through scientific methods such as observing, hypothesizing, testing, and experimenting. This encompasses different fields of studies. Knowledge and process skills lay interdependent with one another as knowledge could be acquired through the questions being asked and how these are answered through the process and methods being used. Teaching science means more than just understanding the concepts but more so, the science processes of doing science which scientists use as what we call the science process skills. It is used by scientists to discover and construct knowledge to solve problems and formulate solutions (Herda, Johari, Maison, et.al 2020). These are skills that are absolutely important for students to learn in order to achieve global competence. When we teach and allow students to use these skills in science, we are actually teaching them the same skills which they can actualize in their everyday lives. Hence, students will be able to utilize their skills and apply their content knowledge to real world situations.
The science process skills lay the foundation of scientific method, which include: observation, communication, classification, measurement, inference, and prediction. Such skills are significant when it comes to carrying out scientific experiments as well as facing daily challenges. These skills are important individually, much as they are integrated together.
The six basic science process skills can be applied in a logical or increasing manner across all grade levels, depending on the formulated lesson objectives of the school curriculum. In the students’ early years in school, they apply science process skills such as observation and communication most of the time. As they progress on their grade levels, they use the skills of inference and prediction which help them develop their higher-order thinking skills. Meanwhile, classification and measurement are applied across all grade levels equally since science experiments tend to require such skills in almost all scientific procedures as well as there are various ways for students to classify, from simple to complex ways, and such that measuring systems and methods should be gradually introduced to the students. After observations have been conducted, there is another skill that needs to be taught, it is the ability of the students to make inferences and predict future events, which will be the focus of this undertaking.
A good prediction is a result of good observation and how students make meaning out of their past experiences. Students need to know how to evaluate and make an educated guess of the future events relative to what is observable in their environment in the present. This involves critical thinking in order to test whether their inferences and hypotheses are correct. It is intended that teachers train the students by doing experiential activities in their teaching and learning process (Herda, Johari, Maison, et.al 2020). Their active involvement will help them implement their scientific knowledge to actual scenarios occurring in their surroundings. The acquisition of science process skills should be one of the major goals of science education.
For students to acquire such science process skill, there is a need to apply new instructional strategies in the classroom. As such, educators should find methods and strategies which would aid the students to obtain clear and complete understanding of new science concepts as well as to help them develop their higher-order thinking skills. Hence, teachers should seek new learning approaches that would ground the students in active learning, such as the 5 E’s Instructional Model, which this study focuses on in testing its effectiveness to develop the students’ predicting skills.
According to Best (2019), the 5 E’s Instructional Model is a constructivist science learning method involving five key phases: engagement, exploration, explanation, elaboration, and evaluation. Lesley University argued that the 5E Model allows educators to create a unique learning experience for students. Teachers who can incorporate instructional models like the 5E Model into their classrooms help students build a strong foundation of knowledge through active participation.