The thing that surprised me most about the two game reviews I read were how different their angles were. Gamespot took a deeper look into some specifics. That review talked about the differences between PC and console versions of the game, and even more specifically about the mining method's differences. The IGN review tries to cover as much of the game as possible. It runs through the elements of the game bit by bit. The IGN review also seems to be more linearly told than the Gamestop review, the Gamestop review talking about the general steps of the game until about half-way in.
Reviewing two different game reviews give me the idea of what different people can look for in a game, as well as what different people will focus on in a game. Some people might want more of one thing, or balance of everything. It also can expose some glaring issues: in the terraria review, the Gamespot reviewer compared the superior console version's mining to the PC's mining, and the console's mining was later added to the game as an option. The two opinions can also help you market your game by finding what your game did well and leaning into that. Or they can help you know what you're doing wrong in certain areas in order to widen your audience.