External Providers are periodically reviewed during contractual or subscription, or on a need basis based on their performance
Quality
Service level, Product reliability, No damages
Time
Availability, Lead time, Delivery on time
Price
Value for money, Competitive price
Competence
Technical expertise, Knowledge, Reputation, Market position, Documented information/records
Cooperation
External communication (reply to queries), Flexibility, Claims resolution
Finance
Invoicing, Credit terms, Cash Only
Criteria Ratings:
Scores 5 - Very Satisfied with External Provider. No action required
Scores 4 - Satisfied with External Provider. No action required
Scores 3 - Adequate performance with External Provider. Internal Communication to review the performance of the External Provider in more detail. Possible communication with the External Provider to possibly rectify any issues encountered.
Scores 2 - Poor Performance with External Provider. Internal Communication to discuss the termination of the current External Provider. Discussions with replacement External Providers begin.
Scores 1 - Very Poor Performance with External Provider. Immediate termination (where possible) with the External Provider. Immediate discussions commence to finding a replacement External Provider
Scores N/A - Criteria do not apply to the External Provider