The method to my madness is as follows: the teams are ranked based on their expected win percentages, and broken down into three categories: buyers, holders and sellers. These categories are determined by the projected win totals that are suggested by the expected win percentage in keeping with the ranking method. So, for example, a team with an EXP WIN% of 0.500 would project to 81 wins which falls into the "holder" category. Ties in expected win percentage are broken by actual win percentage and any two (or more) teams that end up tied in both are left as a tie in the rankings.
Although it is not considered when compiling the rankings, a brief Minimum Wins Requirement update will also be provided at the end of each set of rankings so that anyone on the hot seat knows where they stand.